Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,673
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,673 results for “practices”
Dataset - What are the Machine Learning best practices reported by practitioners on Stack Exchange?
<p>The data correspond to the posts (questions and answers) retrieved by querying for posts related to the tag 'machine learning' and the phrase 'best practice(s).' The data were used as the basis for a study currently under review on discussing machine learning best practices as discussed by practitioners in question-and-answer communities such as Stack Exchange. The information from each type of post (i.e., questions and answers) is presented in multiple formats (i.e., .txt, .csv, and .xlsx).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Answers - Variables</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>AID</strong>:<strong> </strong> Unique identification of the answer in the Q&A website.</li> <li><strong>ParentId</strong>: Unique identification of the question associated with the answer in the Q&A website </li> <li><strong>AcceptedAnswerId</strong> : In the case in which an answer is the most voted question associated with the <em>ParentId</em>, and it is different from the accepted answer, a different identifier from the <em>AID</em> is available. In the case in which the accepted question had a <em>score</em> lower than 1, a -1 is assigned. </li> <li><strong>ABody:</strong> HTML text of the answer.</li> <li><strong>Score:</strong> Upvotes - downvotes of the answer.</li> <li><strong>url_Answer:</strong> URL of the answer. The question URL can be from different websites. </li> <li><strong>type:</strong> best or accepted. Accepted in the case that the information belongs to the accepted answer of the <em>ParentId </em>question and best in the case in which it is the most voted question of the <em>ParentId </em>question.</li> <li><strong>Date: </strong>Creation date of the answer.</li> </ul> <p><strong>Questions - Variables</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>QID</strong>: Unique identification of the question in the Q&A website. </li> <li><strong>AcceptedAnswerId</strong>: Unique identification of the accepted answer for a specific question in the Q&A website. In the case in which a question had a most-voted answer different from the accepted one, and the accepted one had a negative score, a -1 was assigned to the <em>AcceptedAnswerId</em><strong>. </strong></li> <li><strong>BestAnswerId</strong>: Unique identification of the most voted answer for a specific question in the Q&A website. In the case in which the most voted and accepted questions were the same, then a -1 was assigned to the <em>BestAnswerId</em>. </li> <li><strong>Qtitle</strong>: Title of the question.</li> <li><strong>QBody</strong>: HTML text of the question.</li> <li><strong>Score</strong>: Upvotes - downvotes of the questions.</li> <li><strong>QTags</strong>: Tags that are associated with each question.</li> <li><strong>url_question</strong>: URL of the question. The question URL can be from different websites. </li> <li><strong>Date</strong>: Creation date of the question</li> </ul> <p>This dataset is a subset of the Stack Exchange dump of 03.2021 (<a href="https://archive.org/details/stackexchange_20210301">https://archive.org/details/stackexchange_20210301</a>) in which a series of filters were applied to obtain the data used in the study.</p>
Analysis of interventions of practice abstracts and videos
<p>This dataset containts the underlying data that was used to analyse the SmartCulTour identified interventions that were described under the production of abstracts and practice videos of D6.2. The data collection established:</p> <ul> <li>Context & background</li> <li>Reason why of the intervention</li> <li>Resources and tools</li> <li>Expected economic impact</li> <li>Expected social impact</li> <li>Expected cultural impact</li> <li>Expected environmental impact</li> <li>Success conditions</li> </ul> <p>These criteria were analysed by the SmartCulTour local experts and meant to feed into the updated taxonomy on cultural tourism interventions of D3.4. The interventions that are described are linked to the practice videos that can be found under the Living Labs section of the SmartCulTour website (<a href="http://www.smartcultour.eu">www.smartcultour.eu</a>) and pertain to:</p> <ul> <li>Rotterdam Living Lab: Planning for the future of Hoek van Holland & Bospolder-Tussendijken</li> <li>Scheldeland Living Lab: Hof van Coolhem: social employment and care project in tourism</li> <li>Scheldeland Living Lab: Bornem Castle: upgrades historical exhibitions & creates visitor centre</li> <li>Scheldeland Living Lab: Steam train Dendermonde-Puurs: volunteers protecting industrial heritage</li> <li>Utsjoki Living Lab: Traces in Utsjoki: inspiring respectful visitor behaviour in nature areas</li> <li>Utsjoki Living Lab: Placemaking as a technique to support meaningful visitor experiences</li> <li>Huesca Living Lab: The Somontano Wine Route: a resilient strategy for Huesca</li> <li>Huesca Living Lab: The Río Vero Cultural Park. From Palaeolithic human history to the present</li> <li>Split Living Lab: Making traditional Easter bread-Sirnica in Solin</li> <li>Split Living Lab: The cultural heritage of Sinj: the story of Alka</li> <li>Vicenza Living Lab: Vicenza: the city of Palladio</li> <li>Vicenza Living Lab: The international library "La Vigna" becomes an open innovation Living Lab</li> </ul>
Rapid Review Dataset for Seeking Enlightenment: Incorporating Evidence-Based Practice Techniques in a Research Software Engineering Team
<p>A collection of evidence briefings produced through a rapid literature review protocol the Department of Software Engineering and Research at Sandia National Laboratories. These briefings are described in our research paper, "Seeking Enlightenment: Incorporating Evidence-Based Practice Techniques in a Research Software Engineering Team", which was accepted for publication at the 1st Annual Conference of the United States Research Software Engineer Association (US-RSE'23).</p> <p>Sandia National Laboratories is a multimission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology & Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. SAND2023-06549O.</p>
Dataset - Drying out fish ponds, for an entire growth season, as an agroecological practice: maintaining primary producers for fish production and biodiversity conservation
<p>This dataset is based on samples taken from fish ponds in the Dombes region between 2007 and 2014. It includes sediment and water physio-chemistry data, as well as primary producer diversity, benthic invertebrate density and fish yield for 85 different ponds. All these data are linked to the distance to the last dry-out, a major practice in extensive fish farming in this region.</p> <p>There are two .tab and .csv files:<br> One containing the dataset<br> One containing the description of the different variables (Metadata)</p>
agroBRIDGES EIP-AGRI Practice Abstracts - Regional insights and business models for SFSC development
<p>The present dataset completed the collection of the 25 regional practice abstracts developed in the framework of the agroBRIDGES project, using the EIP-AGRI common format. The aim is to share project outputs so other actors of the agri-food sector can leverage on them and to see the main added value and benefits met by the end-users if the generated knowledge is implemented. The Practice Abstracts are also published on the EIP-AGRI website and available at this <strong><a href="https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/find-connect/projects/building-bridges-between-consumers-and-producers">link</a>. </strong></p> <p>The current (second) version of the dataset builds upon the previous set of Practice Abstracts generated in each of the 12 European focal countries of the project to share the project's knowledge and insights gained from co-creation, data collection, communication, toolbox validation and event organisation activities.</p> <p>These activities aim at promoting the development of Short Food Supply Chains, while motivating the local network of agri-food actors in the process (multi-actor approach). At least one Practice Abstract has been generated per Beacon Region (i.e. focal region of the agroBRIDGES project). The Practice Abstracts aim to support proactitioners in replicating our approaches and methodologies.</p> <p>2 Practice Abstracts have been elaborated per country (23 in total):</p> <ul> <li>Ireland</li> <li>Denmark</li> <li>Italy (Lazio & Piemonte regions)</li> <li>Greece (Central Macedonia region)</li> <li>Spain (Andalusia region)</li> <li>France (Pays de Loire, Auvergne and Bretagne regions)</li> <li>Poland</li> <li>Latvia</li> <li>Lithuania</li> <li>Turkey</li> <li>Finland</li> <li>Netherlands</li> </ul> <p>Additionally, 1 Practice Abstract was developed to present 5 business model categories of SFSC analysed in the context of agroBRIDGES. </p>
agroBRIDGES EIP-AGRI Practice Abstracts: A practical toolbox for SFSCs
<p>The present dataset is a collection of the practice abstracts developed in the framework of the agroBRIDGES project, using the EIP-AGRI common format. The aim is to share project outputs so other actors of the agri-food sector can leverage on them and to see the main added value and benefits met by the end-users if the generated knowledge is implemented. agroBRIDGES Practice Abstracts are also published on the EIP-AGRI website and available at this <strong><a href="https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/en/find-connect/projects/building-bridges-between-consumers-and-producers">link</a>. </strong></p> <p>The current (first) version of the present dataset contains 13 Practice Abstracts generated to to present the agroBRIDGES toolbox that encompasses a set of 12 practical tools for producers, farmers to develop and grow their business based on Short Food Supply Chains as well as other agri-food actors (retailers, wholesalers, distributors, public food procurers) to facilitate collaborations and awareness.</p> <p>The <a href="https://agrobridges-toolbox.eu">agroBRIDGES Toolbox</a> contains 4 types of tools fully translated in 12 local languages:</p> <ul> <li><strong>Communication material</strong> <ul> <li>Know your local food</li> <li>Label me </li> <li>#WeNeedLocalFood</li> <li>Why am I special?</li> <li>Yes, you can!</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Digital spaces / tools:</strong> <ul> <li>Decision Support Tool</li> <li>Hear my voice</li> <li>Net</li> <li>Smart Delivery</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Training material:</strong> <ul> <li>Support for food procurement</li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Event organisation material:</strong> <ul> <li>Let's meet!</li> <li>Let' build our SFSC</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>A Practice Abstract has been developed for the agroBRIDGES Toolbox and each of the 12 provided tools, using the standard EIP-AGRI Practice Abstract template. All Practice Abstracts are also supported in video format, also available in the <a href="https://the agroBRIDGES Youtube channel">agroBRIDGES Youtube channel</a>. </p>
Documentary practices and uses in rural context of north-western Iberia
<p>Abstract, slides, datasets, and draft transcript of the presentation given at the XXIIe Colloque de paléographie latine, Prague (14-16 September).</p> <p><strong>Brief abstract: </strong></p> <p>Our proposal intends to examine the documentary practices and uses found in the context of rural, secular communities in the north-western Iberian Peninsula from the late eleventh to the thirteen centuries. These practices will be considered in contrast with those from urban, mostly ecclesiastical, communities. We will assess the form and function of secular diplomas made by rural scribes, before considering the graphic systems and styles used in communities of professional scribes with different levels of literacy. Finally, the mobility of practices and their authors will be evaluated, taking the parish church and the rural monastery as meeting points.</p> <p>Ultimately, this will provide a clearer picture of the connections between rural and urban scribes and their communities, mutual exchanges, reception of new palaeographical and codicological developments and cultural interaction. This innovative assessment of the evolution of documentary practices in north-western Iberia will lead to a better understanding of writing practices across all levels of society.</p> <p><strong>Proposal:</strong></p> <p>Within the context of the transition from Visigothic to Caroline minuscule from the end of the eleventh century until well into the twelfth century in north-western Iberia, and alongside the progressive increase in the use of Romance that will result in the emergence of vernacular languages by the thirteenth century, our proposal intends to address documentary practices and uses in the context of secular rural communities in contrast with those communities culturally located at the centre of change and which are mostly ecclesiastical. With that end in mind, this paper combines three of the perspectives proposed for this congress. We will depart from the analysis of the form and function of secular diplomas made by scribes from rural contexts, before considering the graphic systems and styles used in communities of professional scribes with different levels of literacy. Finally, we will assess the mobility of practices and their authors, taking the parish church and the rural monastery as meeting points.</p> <p>Form and function: We will examine the interaction between the visual and material aspects typical of framed charters, their production and content, in the context of rural secular communities (what distinguishes the secular documentary corpus in terms of its materiality and use?) and in opposition to the charters associated with central ecclesiastical communities. A comparison will be made between the processes of documentary creation in both environments, their raison d’être and usefulness, and the effect on the resulting product as a material object to be read but also seen.</p> <p>The scripts and styles of writing communities: We will study the graphic typologies and documentary practices of professional scribes working for central ecclesiastical institutions (cathedrals and monasteries) in contrast to those in centres of a lower cultural level (rural parishes and minor monasteries), examining their possible interaction with regards to the process of absorption and internalization of new palaeographic and diplomatic developments. In this sense, we propose to delve into the life and development of graphic activity of ecclesiastical and lay agents with limited literacy and to evaluate their role in the configuration of identities.</p> <p>Individual mobility and encounters: The scope of action of the rural scribes will be evaluated alongside their relationship with the secular communities they served. Similarly, we will consider their role as integrating agents as well as their possible itinerancy within (certainly) parochial and, possibly, monastic contexts.</p> <p>As a result of the study of these three perspectives, we will provide a clearer picture of the encounters in the written culture between rural and central scribes and their respective communities, pondering mutual exchanges, reception of new developments and how cultural interaction could affect the evolution of documentary practices in north-western Iberia. This will bring about a better understanding of the practice of writing across all levels of society.</p>
Supplementary data for "Ecological assessment of combined sewer overflow management practices through the analysis of benthic and hyporheic sediment bacterial assemblages of an intermittent stream"
<p><strong>Supplementary data for the Pozzi <em>et al.</em> paper entitled "Ecological assessment of combined sewer overflow management practices through the analysis of benthic and hyporheic microbial assemblages and a tracking of exogenous bacterial taxa in a peri-urban intermittent stream".</strong></p> <p># Created by Dr Adrien C. MEYNIER POZZI on June, 29th, 2023<br> # Part of DOmic research project funded by the Agence de l’Eau - Rhône Méditerranée Corse [AE-RMC, Project 2020 0702 DOmic, 2020-2023], and of the DOmic extension funded by the EUR H2O'Lyon [ANR-17-EURE-0018] of Université de Lyon<br> # Part of the Chaudanne river long-term experiment site belonging to the Observatoire de Terrain en Hydrologie Urbaine (OTHU)<br> # Part of the work conducted in the team on Opportinistic Bacterial Pathogen in the Environment (BPOE) led by Dr. Benoit Cournoyer<br> # Samples were obtained in 2 campaigns, corresponding to periods before (2010-2011) or after (2018) the implementation of the 91/271/EEC European Directive that limited Combined-Sewer Overflow (CSO) discharges to the Chaudanne river<br> # Samples consisted in surface water, benthic and hyporheic sediments taken in run, riffle and pool geomorphologic features, either upstream or downstream the CSO outlet, plus positive and negative controls</p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td><strong>Metadata. Name and description of data tables provided as supplementary information</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td><strong>Data Name</strong></td> <td><strong>Description</strong></td> </tr> <tr> <td>Data S1. River hydrology variables and hydraulic gradients at surveyed transects</td> <td>Array to describe the hydrologic variables and gradients at the studied transects. Top line is header, second line is metadata for each recorded variable, and third line is the unit of the variable, if any.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Data S2. Environmental variables (water physical-chemistry, nutrients, FIBs, MTEs, PAHs) with metadata</td> <td>An array to list environmental variables for all true samples (n=90) included in the study. Sample identifiers and dates are provided. First 8 rows list the CAS number, SANDRE number, unit, method, limit of quantification and norm for each variable, if any.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Data S3. Hydrological indices and synthetic variables computed with ClustOfVar</td> <td>Hydrological indices computed for the river flow, precipitations and CSO overflows computed over a 3-week period preceding each sampling date.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Data S4. Discharge events selected to compute CSO dilution ratios</td> <td>An array to describe CSO events included for the computation of the CSO dilution ratio (SI Data 6A) together with 6 tables and 3 figures (SI Data 6B to 6J) describing the CSO event ratio all year round over the studied period, as well as for events that occurred before or after the CSO was modified and during low flow or high flow season. In SI Data 6A, top line is header and second line is metadata for each recorded variable.</td> </tr> <tr> <td>Data S5. Raw environmental matrix for use in R</td> <td>An array to list experimental design and environmental variables for all true samples and controls. Several environmental variables were synthetized using the ClustOfVar method (Chavent et al (2012) 10.18637/jss.v050.i13). Format is directly usable in R software.</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Neural Differentiation Tracks Improved Recall of Competing Memories Following Interleaved Study and Retrieval Practice
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Insights into European research funders policies and practices - public dataset
<p>This is the dataset arising from a survey of European research funders on Open Access (OA) and Research Data (RD) policies, commissioned by SPARC Europe, in consultation with representatives from the following organisations: <a href="https://www.allea.org/">ALLEA</a>, the <a href="https://www.efc.be/">European Foundation Centre</a> and <a href="http://scienceeurope.org/">Science Europe</a> and a wider advisory group.</p> <p>Launched in the spring of 2019, the survey, which targeted about 400 funders, garnered just over 60 responses from 29 countries. The cohort includes important national funding agencies (almost 50%), pan-European funders, national and regional academies, foundations and philanthropic organisations and research charities. </p>
Fig. 6.1. Shell digitised with different methods. The photogrammetry model was captured with a 100 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 6.1. Shell digitised with different methods. The photogrammetry model was captured with a 100 mm Macro lens and processed with Agisoft Photoscan. The visual comparison of the mollusc shows a similar level of detail between photogrammetry and MechScan for the external surfaces, with still a bit more detail for the MechScan. The HDI Advance has a much lower resolution.
Fig. 5.6 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 5.6. Decimation of a 3D model. The four parts show a 3D model in various degrees of reducing the amount of faces. In the left upper corner is the original and rotating clockwise are the models at 50%, 75% and 90% decimation. Until 75% there is hardly any difference noticeable, while at 90% the cracks become less deep and the faces become more visible.
Fig. 6.2 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 6.2. Texture comparison between photogrammetry and MechScan (above) and an actual picture captured by a Canon 700D with 100 mm macro lens of the shell below.
Fig. 5.3 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 5.3. Micro-contrast enhancement in DxO OpticsPro 11. A crop of the original image is on the left, one of the post-processed pictures on the right.
Fig. 5.4 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 5.4. Micro-contrast enhancement in DxO OpticsPro 11. The original image is on the left, the postprocessed picture on the right. The post-processed picture looks more crisp and shows more details than the original one as the washed-out appearance has gone.
Fig. 6.14. Ishango rod. The left 3D model was acquired with a in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 6.14. Ishango rod. The left 3D model was acquired with a µCT many years ago. The middle one is scanned with the MechScan structured light scanner. The right one is the combination of both the µCT scan, the structured light scan and the texture of the photogrammetry model.
Fig. 5.1 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 5.1. Relighting in DxO OpticsPro 11. The original image is on the left, the post-processed picture on the right. The underexposed image is now corrected without the need to take new images.
Fig. 4.9 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 4.9. Pre-Columbian handle of an incense shovel from the Royal Museum of Art and History collections. UV fluorescence photogrammetry model. In this case, fluorescence enables to enhance the glue (fluorescing in green). https://sketchfab.com/models/2d82a98be64c48b89cada459b81bd0ab
Fig. 4.7 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 4.7. Enhancing the legibility of a specimen. The picture on the left represents the specimen captured under white light, while the picture on the right displays the specimen under UV light. Part of the reflections is reduced under UV light allowing to display more contrasted structures.
Fig. 4.5 in Handbook of best practice and standards for 2D+ and 3D imaging of natural history collections
Fig. 4.5. Detail of the Halszkaraptor fossil from Mongolia. In white light on the left, in UV fluorescence on the right. The UV fluorescence image displays restorations of the fossils and treatment applied to preserve it.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.