Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
733
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
733 results for “predatory”
Fig. 9 in A comparison of teeth in Tithonian, Late Jurassic, predatory actinopterygian fishes from Owadów-Brzezinki Lägerstatte and its palaeoecological implications
Fig. 9. Examples of superficial penetrations present in orthodentin of caturoid fish Strobilodus sp. ZPAL P. 16/O-B/2 from Tithonian, Upper Jurassic Kcynia Formation, Corbulomima Limestone (Unit III), Owadów-Brzezinki, Poland. A. Overview of penetrated teeth with exposed dentin (borings marked by arrows). B. Close view of structure with visible bifurcating canals. C. Example of advanced bioerosion, with substantial surface area of orthodentin penetrated.
Figure 2 in Quality control of the predatory mite Euseius scutalis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) againstTetranychus turkestani (Acari: Tetranychidae) over 30 generations of rearing on cattail pollen
Figure 2 The age-specific survivorship (lx), age-stage specific fecundity of femalesf(xj) (eggs) and age-specific fecundity (mx) of Euseius scutalis fedTetranychus turkestani before (G0) and after (G10 –G30) long-term rearing on cattail pollen.
FIGURE 3. Quantitative burrow properties. A in Linking burrow morphology to the behaviors of predatory soil arthropods: Applications to continental ichnofossils
FIGURE 3. Quantitative burrow properties. A) Measurements were taken for number of surface openings (SO), burrow slope (S), maximum depth (D), total length (L), tunnel, shaft, and chamber width (w), height (h), and circumference (c), and branching angles (BA). B) Complexity includes the number of segments (s), chambers (h), and surface openings (e) within a single burrow system. C) Tortuosity of a single burrow segment is found by dividing the total length (u) by the straight-line distance (v) from end to end. Modified from Hembree (2019).
FIGURE 7 in Linking burrow morphology to the behaviors of predatory soil arthropods: Applications to continental ichnofossils
FIGURE 7. Burrow morphology: architecture and bioglyphs. A) Simple subhorizontal burrow of Hadrurus arizonensis with a single entrance. B) Helical subhorizontal burrow of H. arizonensis with a single entrance. C) Simple subhorizontal burrow of Pandinus imperator with a single entrance. D) Branching subhorizontal burrow of P. imperator with a single entrance. E) Branching, helical burrow of P. imperator with a large terminal chamber (at arrow). F) Mazework of H. arizonensis with multiple branches and two entrances (at arrows). G) Multiple, fine striations (at arrows) along, and parallel to, the shaft of a Gorgyrella inermis burrow. H) Pair of protrusions (at arrows) on the roof of a terminal chamber of Mastigoproctus giganteus. I) Large striations (at arrows) along the side of a subhorizontal burrow of Aphonopelma chalcodes. J) Burrow opening of Hogna lenta showing silk and sediment lining (at arrow). K) Compression lining (at arrow) visible in a cross section of a tunnel of Scolopendra polymorpha.
FIGURE 6 in Linking burrow morphology to the behaviors of predatory soil arthropods: Applications to continental ichnofossils
FIGURE 6. Burrow morphology: openings and architecture. A) Elliptical burrow opening of Scolopendra polymorpha. B) Circular burrow opening of Hysterocrates gigas surrounded by a mound of excavated sediment. C) Paired triangular burrow openings of Pandinus imperator. D) Simple vertical burrow of Gorgyrella inermis with a single entrance. E) Vertical branching burrow of Pelinobus muticus with a single entrance. F) Vertical burrow Hysterocrates gigas with large terminal chamber and a single entrance. G) Subvertical helical burrow of Aphopelma chalcodes with a single entrance. H) J-shaped burrow of Mastigoproctus giganteus with a single entrance. I) U-shaped burrow of M. giganteus with two entrances. J) Y-shaped burrow of M. giganteus with two entrances. K) Mazework of M. giganteus with five entrances (at numbers). L) U-shaped burrow of S. polymorpha with two entrances. M) Mazework of S. polymorpha with four entrances (at numbers).
FIGURE 4. Burrowing techniques observed among the studied arthropod predators. A in Linking burrow morphology to the behaviors of predatory soil arthropods: Applications to continental ichnofossils
FIGURE 4. Burrowing techniques observed among the studied arthropod predators. A) Initial burrowing by intrusion by Scolopendra polymorpha (burrow opening at arrow). B) Burrowing by intrusion by Hogna lenta. C) Continued construction of a vertical shaft by compression by Gorgyrella inermis, compressing sediment along burrow boundary (at arrow) to increase the width. D) Subsurface tunnel construction by intrusion by Hemiscolopendra marginata. No sediment is removed as the tunnel is extended but is pressed against the tunnel boundary (at arrow). E) Burrowing by excavation by Mastigoproctus giganteus. Sediment is removed and carried with the pedipalps (at arrow). F) Burrowing by excavation by Pelinobus muticus. Sediment is removed and carried with the pedipalps (at arrow). G) Burrowing by excavation by Hadrurus arizonensis. Sediment is scraped and kicked back out (at arrow) of the developing burrow with the first two pairs of legs. H) Backfilling of a tunnel by S. polymorpha. The centipede removes sediment from the developing tunnel and uses it to fill the old tunnel (at arrow). I) Light silk lining around the opening, shaft, and chamber (at arrows) of Hysterocrates gigas. J) Thick silk lining around the shaft (at arrow) of G. inermis producing a smooth interior surface. K) Six silk runners (example at arrow) connected to the burrow entrance of G. inermis with a closed trap door.
FIGURE 2 in Linking burrow morphology to the behaviors of predatory soil arthropods: Applications to continental ichnofossils
FIGURE 2. Examples of experimental enclosures used in this study. A) Surface view of a 212 L enclosure before the introduction of the study animal. Objects were placed on the surface to encourage burrowing. B) Side view of a 246 L enclosure filled with 60 cm of an organic rich clay loam. C) A 212 L enclosure filled with 55 cm of an organic-rich clay loam. Five specimens of Pandinus imperator produced a branching burrow complex in the subsurface (at arrow). D) Plaster-filled, connected U-shaped burrows produced by Mastigoproctus giganteus in a 38 L enclosure filled with an organic-rick clay loam.
FIGURE 1 in Linking burrow morphology to the behaviors of predatory soil arthropods: Applications to continental ichnofossils
FIGURE 1. Burrowing arthropod predators investigated in this study. A) Scolopendra viridis, B) Scolopendra polymorpha, C) Hemiscolopendra marginata, D) Hadrurus arizonensis, E) Smeringurus mesaensis, F) Uroctonus mordax, G) Heterometrus spinifer, H) Pandinus imperator, I) Mastigoproctus giganteus, J) Hogna lenta, K) Gorgyrella inermis, L) Myrmekiaphilia sp., M) Aphonopelma chalcodes, N) Hysterocrates gigas, and O) Pelinobus muticus.
Figure 1 in First record of the predatory stink bug Podisus sagitta (Hemiptera: Asopinae) in Brazil
Figure 1. Male (A) and female (B) of Podisus sagitta (Hemiptera: Asopinae) collected in the municipality of Itamarandiba, Minas Gerais state, Brazil.
Figure 2 in The predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) does not respond for volatiles of maize infested by Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)
Figure 2. Olfactory response of Neoseiulus californicus in Y-olfactometer. (A) maize plants without infestation vs. maize plants infested by 100 adult females of T. urticae, (B) maize plants without infestation vs. maize plants infested by 200 adult females of T. urticae and (C) maize plants infested by ten vs. 200 adult females of T. urticae. NR represents non-responsive insects (no choice). Chi-square test with 5% significance. Numbers in bars represent individual predator that choose the indicated odor. The number of predatory mite without response to the treatments (NR), after 5 minutes, was eliminated from the statistical analysis.
Figure 1 in The predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) does not respond for volatiles of maize infested by Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae)
Figure 1. Olfactory response of Neoseiulus californicus in Y-olfactometer. (A) air vs. air (white bars), (B) air vs. maize plants without infestation and (C) maize plants without infestation vs. maize plants infested by ten adult females of T. urticae. NR represents nonresponsive insects (no choice). Chi-square test with 5% significance. Numbers in bars represent individual predator that choose the indicated odor. The number of predatory mite without response to the treatments (NR), after 5 minutes, was eliminated from the statistical analysis.
Fig 1. A parasitoid wasp and 1 in Predatory behavior of long-legged flies (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) and their potential negative effects on the parasitoid biological control agent of the Asian citrus psyllid (Hemiptera: Liviidae)
Fig 1. A parasitoid wasp and 1 of 7 species of predaceous long-legged flies collected in this study. The photograph is insufficient for identification. Although predation events could not be duplicated in captivity, the parasitoid wasp ap- pears to be within a size range that the long-legged fly would attack (e.g., Barrentine 2011). Scale bar = 2 mm.
Figure 2. A in Exotic and predatory: a spider (Araneae: Salticidae) that preys on native stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) in Brazil
Figure 2. A. Nest in PVC pipe. B, C, D, E. Menemerus bivitattus (Dufour, 1831) on the move to prey on the sentinels of Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836). / A. Nido en tubo de PVC. B, C, D, E. Menemerus bivitattus (Dufour, 1831) en movimiento para aprovecharse de los centinelas de Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836).
Figure 1 in Exotic and predatory: a spider (Araneae: Salticidae) that preys on native stingless bees (Hymenoptera: Meliponini) in Brazil
Figure 1. Location map of the natural nest of Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836), in the neighborhood of Pituba, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. / Mapa de ubicación del nido natural de Nannotrigona (Nannotrigona) testceicornis (Lepeletier, 1836), en el barrio de Pituba, Salvador,
Figure 4 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions
Figure 4. Functional Response. The predatory capacity of H. albuquerquei larvae (predator) on Musca domestica larvae (prey) at different proportional prey densities to the total number of larvae (200 individuals) of predators and prey in other encounters. The statistical model (Poisson distribution with correction of the distribution for Quasipoisson) of the predatory capacity is in the upper portion of the graph. H1M1, H. albuquerquei first-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H2M1, H. albuquerquei second-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H3M1, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus first-instar larvae of M. domestica. H3M2, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus second-instar larvae of M. domestica.
Figure 3 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions
Figure 3. Survival of predator (%) of Hydrotaea albuquerquei larvae (predator) at different proportional densities of prey with the total number of larvae (200 individuals) of predators and prey in other encounters. The statistical model (Binomial distribution with correction of the distribution for Quasibinomial) of the predator's survival is in the upper portion of the graph to the H1M1, H2M1 and H3M1 encounters. H1M1, H. albuquerquei first-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H2M1, H. albuquerquei second-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H3M1, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus first-instar larvae of M. domestica. H3M2, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus second-instar larvae of M. domestica.
Figure 2 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions
Figure 2. Survival of prey (%) of Musca domestica larvae (prey) at different proportional prey densities to the total number of larvae (200 individuals) of predators and prey in other encounters. The statistical model (Binomial distribution with correction of the distribution for Quasibinomial) of the prey survival is in the upper portion of each graph. H1M1, H. albuquerquei first-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H2M1, H. albuquerquei second-instar larvae versus M. domestica first-instar larvae. H3M1, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus first-instar larvae of M. domestica. H3M2, third-instar larvae of H. albuquerquei versus second-instar larvae of M. domestica.
Figure 1 in The predatory behavior of Hydrotaea albuquerquei (Lopes) larvae on the larvae of Musca domestica Linnaeus under laboratory conditions
Figure 1. Diagram showing the sampling design of the interaction of larvae of different instars (1, 2 and 3) between the predator Hydrotaea albuquerquei (H) and the prey Musca domestica (M). The other encounters (HM) considered the differences in size between the larvae of the species. In each encounter (HM) of the different instars, 200 larvae of the species were placed together in different proportions considering the ratio of M. domestica larvae (M) to eachH.albuquerquei larva (H), establishing proportional densities between predators (H) and preys (M) in agreement with Table 1. For each encounter and density, triplicates were performed.
Figure 1. a–c in Pelvic and sacral size dimorphism and allometry in two predatory carnivores with different life histories and locomotory adaptations
Figure 1. a–c) Pelvic and sacral measures used in the study. All abbreviations and measures [GL (1–1´); GBTc (2–2´); SB (3–3´); GBA (4–4´); SBI (5–5´); GBTi (6–6´); LAR (7–7´); LFo (8–8´); BFo (9–9´); BPuS (10–10´); LPuS (11–11´); PL (12–12´); GB (13–13´); BFcr (14–14´); HFcr (15–15´)] are explained in Section 2.
Fig. 9 in Biological control of the twospotted spider mite (Trombidiformes: Tetranychidae) with the predatory mite Neoseiulus californicus (Mesotigmata: Phytoseiidae) in blackberries
Fig. 9. Population of T. urticae (TU) and N. californicus (NC) eggs in treatments of N. californicus (A), Abamectin, and unsprayed (control) (B), plots on Navaho variety in a field experiment.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.