Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,617
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,617 results for “user”
A User DNS Fingerprint Dataset
<p><span>Using a user DNS fingerprint allows one to identify a specific network user regardless of the knowledge of his IP address. This method is proper, for example, when examining the behavior of a monitored network user in more depth. In contrast to other studies, this work introduces a dataset for possible user identification based only on the knowledge of its DNS fingerprint created from the previously sent DNS queries.</span></p> <p><span>We created a large dataset from the real network traffic of a metropolitan Internet service provider. The dataset was created from 2.3 billion DNS queries representing 6.2 million different domain names. The data collection took place over three months from 12/2023 to 02/2024.</span></p> <p><span>The dataset contains a detailed user activity description in the sense of overall daily activity statistics and detailed 24-hour activity statistics. Each dataset record contains a list of 1137 classification attributes. The absolutely unique feature of this data set is the classification of user activity based on categories of content accessed by a user.</span></p> <p><span>The new dataset can be used for the creation of machine learning models, allowing the identification of a specific user without direct knowledge of their IP addresses or additional network location information. The dataset can also serve as a reference dataset for the creation of DNS fingerprints of users.</span></p>
User participation in digital accessibility evaluations: reviewing methods and objectives
<p><span>Although laws and standardization bodies promote user participation in digital accessibility evaluations, people with disabilities still consider themselves excluded from this process. One reason could be the lack of systematized knowledge about evaluation methods involving users. This article seeks to understand how and for what purpose digital accessibility evaluations with user participation were conducted in the scientific literature from 2018 to 2021. Three types of user participation emerged: 1) user-based usability testing to evaluate task accomplishment, user reactions and interface qualities; 2) interviewing users to assess the local and social factors impacting digital service accessibility; 3) using questionnaires or crowdsourcing to check the compliance of certain interfaces with accessibility standards. Participants are primarily chosen based on their functional impairments and, to a lesser degree, their project-related skills, biographical information, technology habits, among other criteria. The comprehensive user insights gained with these methods are judged to be positive whereas the lack of representativeness of the selected user samples is found to be regrettable. The article finally discusses the definitions of accessibility and disability that underpin these methodologies.</span></p>
User Guide – Dashboard on Salmonella
<p>The EFSA dashboard on <em>Salmonella</em> is a graphical user interface for searching and querying the large amount of data collected each year by EFSA from EU Member States and other reporting countries based on Zoonoses Directive 2003/99/EC. The <em>Salmonella</em> dashboard shows summary statistics for the monitoring results of the pathogen with regard to major food categories and animal species, <em>Salmonella</em>-positive official samples in the context of food safety criteria and process hygiene criteria, the occurrence of <em>Salmonella</em> in major food categories and the achievement of <em>Salmonella</em> reduction targets in poultry populations. The <em>Salmonella</em> data and related statistics can be displayed interactively using charts, graphs and maps in the online EFSA dashboard. The main statistics can also be viewed and downloaded in tabular format. Detailed information on the use and features of the <em>Salmonella</em> dashboard can be found in the present user guide that can also be downloaded from the online tool.</p>
User Guide – Dashboard on Zoonotic tuberculosis: Mycobacterium
<p>User Guide – Dashboard on Zoonotic tuberculosis focusing on Mycobacterium bovis and M. caprae</p>
User Guide – Dashboard on Listeria monocytogenes
<p>The EFSA dashboard on <em>Listeria</em> <em>monocytogenes</em> is a graphical user interface for searching and querying the large amount of data collected each year by EFSA from EU Member States and other reporting countries based on Zoonoses Directive 2003/99/EC. The <em>Listeria</em> <em>monocytogenes</em> dashboard shows summary statistics for the monitoring results of the pathogen with regard to major ready-to-eat food categories, <em>Listeria</em> <em>monocytogenes</em>-positive official samples in the context of food safety criteria in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 and official samples exceeding the food safety criteria limit of 100 CFU/g for specified food matrices. Other monitoring statistics for <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> in ready-to-eat foods are also displayed. The <em>Listeria</em> <em>monocytogenes</em> data and related statistics can be displayed interactively using charts, graphs and maps in the online EFSA dashboard. The main statistics can also be viewed and downloaded in tabular format. Detailed information on the use and features of the <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em> dashboard can be found in the present user guide that can also be downloaded from the online tool.</p>
User Guide – Dashboard on Campylobacter
<p>The EFSA dashboard on <em>Campylobacter</em> is a graphical user interface for searching and querying the large amount of data collected each year by EFSA from EU Member States and other reporting countries based on Zoonoses Directive 2003/99/EC. The <em>Campylobacter</em> dashboard shows summary statistics for the monitoring results of the pathogen with regard to major food categories, <em>Campylobacter</em>-positive official samples exceeding the Process Hygiene Criterion limit of 1,000 CFU/g for chilled broiler carcases and the occurrence of <em>Campylobacter</em> in major food categories. The <em>Campylobacter</em> data and related statistics can be displayed interactively using charts, graphs and maps in the online EFSA dashboard. The main statistics can also be viewed and downloaded in tabular format. Detailed information on the use and features of the <em>Campylobacter</em> dashboard can be found in the present user guide that can also be downloaded from the online tool.</p>
User Guide – Dashboard on Brucella
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data and results for the paper: "From Bugs to Benefits: Improving User Stories by Leveraging Crowd Knowledge with CrUISE-AC"
<div> <div>We provide the following files used in the study "From Bugs to Benefits: Improving User Stories by Leveraging Crowd Knowledge with CrUISE-AC".</div> <div>The paper has been accepted for presentation in the research track of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE) 2025 and will be included in the conference proceedings.</div> <div>The preprint is available on <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/2501.15181" target="_blank" rel="noopener">arXiv</a>.</div> <br> <div><strong>User stories e-commerce.xlsx</strong></div> <div>307 real-world user stories from 3 different eCommerce projects.</div> <br> <div><em>Project A</em> defines a complete set of requirements for a B2C focused onlineshop of a publishing house who aims do sell his own publications directly.</div> <div><em>Project B</em> contains a partial set of requirements for a B2C focused onlineshop of a bookseller.</div> <div><em>Project C</em> includes a subset of B2C and B2B requirements for an online bookstore, supplemented by an eProcurement module designed to provide information and automation for industrial customers.</div> <div>Most of the user stories come with additional acceptance criteria, written in unstructured natural language.</div> <br> <div>The user stories have been anonymized and the merchant's real names were replaced with neutral terms.</div> <br> <div>Columns</div> <div>- ID: a unique ID we assigned across all projects</div> <div>- Project: user story belongs to project A, B or C</div> <div>- Connextra: user story in connextra pattern</div> <div>- Acceptance Criteria: acceptance criteria that came with the user story</div> <br> <div><strong>User stories CMS.xlsx</strong></div> <div>34 CMS related user stories from a dataset that was originally created by</div> <div>*Lucassen, G., Dalpiaz, F., van der Werf, J.M.E., Brinkkemper, S.: Visualizing user</div> <div>story requirements at multiple granularity levels via semantic relatedness. In: Con-</div> <div>ceptual Modeling: 35th International Conference, ER 2016, Gifu, Japan, November</div> <div>14-17, 2016, Proceedings 35. pp. 463–478. Springer (2016)*</div> <br> <div>Columns</div> <div>- ID: a unique ID we assigned</div> <div>- Connextra: user story in connextra pattern</div> <br> <div><strong>Issues e-commerce.xlsx</strong></div> <div>54,396 issues, we harvested from seven different issue trackers between June 2011 and July 2024</div> <div>- magento2 (https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues)</div> <div>- nopCommerce (https://github.com/nopSolutions/nopCommerce/issues)</div> <div>- OpenCart (https://github.com/opencart/opencart/issues)</div> <div>- PrestaShop (https://github.com/PrestaShop/PrestaShop/issues)</div> <div>- Shopware5 (https://issues.shopware.com/?products=SW-5)</div> <div>- Shopware6 (https://issues.shopware.com/?products=SW-6)</div> <div>- WooCommerce (https://github.com/woocommerce/woocommerce/issues)</div> <br> <div>Columns</div> <div>- id: unique ID we have assigned</div> <div>- Issue Tracker: issue tracker this issue originates from</div> <div>- Title: title of the original issue</div> <div>- Body: body / description of the original issue</div> <div>- Preprocessed: result of preprocessing the issue as described in the paper</div> <div>- Sample: issue was part of our 3,500 sample issues we used to evaluate CrUISE-AC</div> <br> <div><strong>Issues CMS.xlsx</strong></div> <div>64,500 issues, we harvested from two different issue trackers between April 2002 and August 2024</div> <div>- Moodle (https://github.com/magento/magento2/issues)</div> <div>- Umbraco (https://github.com/nopSolutions/nopCommerce/issues)</div> <br> <div>Columns are the the same as for "Issues e-commerce.xlsx"</div> <br> <div><strong>trivia-trainingdata.csv</strong></div> Manually labelled dataset to train the trivia classifier. <div>The dataset contains 1916 phrases with an even distribution of 958 trivia and 958 non-trivia phrases.</div> <br> <div>- Label = 1: this sentence is trivia</div> <div>- Label = 0: this sentence is not considered trivia</div> <br> <div>Any source code was replaced by [CODE] to simplify the classification process. Source code in markdown could be identified easily as it is enclosed by a special character https://docs.github.com/en/get-started/writing-on-github/working-with-advanced-formatting/creating-and-highlighting-code-blocks</div> <br><strong>Prompts</strong><br> <div><em>prompt_match.txt</em>: prompt we used across all LLMs to assess, if an issue potentially might affect a given user story</div> <em>prompt_generate.txt</em>: GPT4-turbo prompt to convert an issue text into gherkin-style acceptance criteria for a given user story<br> <div><em>prompt_evaluate.txt</em>: GPT4-turbo prompt to assess the usefulness of a newly generated acceptance criteria for a given user story</div> <br> <div><strong>Evaluation e-commerce.xlsx</strong></div> issue / user story pairs, generated acceptance criteria and result of manual evaluation.<br> <div> </div> <div>Columns</div> <div>- StoryID: unique ID of the user story (refer to User stories e-commerce.xlsx)</div> <div>- IssueID: unique ID of the issue (refer to Issues e-commerce.xlsx)</div> <div>- Issue: preprocessed issue text used as basis to generate the acceptance criterion</div> <div>- Connextra: user story in connextra pattern</div> <div>- Existing AC: acceptance criteria that originally came with the user story</div> <div>- AC: by CrUISE-AC generated acceptance criterion</div> <div>- AC_Explanation: explanation generated by CrUISE-AC why this AC adds new knowledge to the current user story</div> <div>- E1: evaluation result by expert 1 (1 = AC adds relevant knowledge; 0 = AC is irrelevant)</div> <div>- E2: evaluation result by expert 2 (1 = AC adds relevant knowledge; 0 = AC is irrelevant)</div> <div>- E3: evaluation result by expert 3 (1 = AC adds relevant knowledge; 0 = AC is irrelevant)</div> <div>- E4: evaluation result by expert 4 (1 = AC adds relevant knowledge; 0 = AC is irrelevant)</div> <div>- 3/4 majority: did at least 3 experts assess this AC as relevant (1 = yes; 0 = no)</div> <br> <div><strong>Evaluation CMS.xlsx</strong></div> <div>- StoryID: unique ID of the user story (refer to User stories CMS.xlsx)</div> <div>- IssueID: unique ID of the issue (refer to Issues CMS.xlsx)</div> <div>- Issue: preprocessed issue text used as basis to generate the acceptance criterion</div> <div>- Connextra: user story in connextra pattern</div> <div>- AC: by CrUISE-AC generated acceptance criterion</div> <div>- AC_Explanation: explanation generated by CrUISE-AC why this AC adds new knowledge to the current user story</div> <div>- E1: evaluation result by expert 1 (1 = AC adds relevant knowledge; 0 = AC is irrelevant)</div> <div>- E4: evaluation result by expert 4 (1 = AC adds relevant knowledge; 0 = AC is irrelevant)</div> <div>- E5: evaluation result by expert 5 (1 = AC adds relevant knowledge; 0 = AC is irrelevant)</div> <div>- 2/3 majority: did at least 2 experts assess this AC as relevant (1 = yes; 0 = no)</div> </div>
Distinguishing GUI Component States for Blind Users using Large Language Models
<p><strong># Data Code Repository</strong></p><p> </p><p>This repository contains open-source data code that provides utilities for the paper named "Here comes trouble! Distinguishing GUI Component States for Blind Users using Large Language Models". The code is designed to facilitate data-related tasks and promote reproducibility in research and data analysis projects.</p><p> </p><p><strong>## Features</strong></p><p> </p><p>- Attribute identification and extraction: Including real-time recognition and extraction of GUI components in the view type, resource-id, color, action of four attributes</p><p>- Components State Distinction: Provides the prompt needed for large language models, covering their specific design schemes and chain of thought reasoning processes as well as contextual learning content.</p><p>- Implementation: Offers specific methods to realize the process, including the setting of relevant parameters and the use of functions.</p><p> </p><p><strong>## Installation</strong></p><p> </p><p>To use the data code, you can down or clone the required code.</p><p>Notably, before using the code, make sure the necessary environment configuration is done.</p><p> </p><p><strong>## Dependencies</strong></p><p>The data code has the following dependencies:</p><p> </p><p>Python (version 3.6 or higher)</p><p>NumPy</p><p>Pandas</p><p>Seaborn</p><p>Scikit-learn</p><p>Openai</p><p>Android Studio (version 4.0)</p><p> </p><p>Install the required dependencies using pip:</p><p>pip install numpy..</p><p> </p><p><strong>##License</strong></p><p>This data code is distributed under the MIT License. See LICENSE for more information.</p><p> </p><p><strong>##Copyright</strong></p><p>All copyright of the tool is owned by the author of the paper.</p>
Accessibility Rank: A Machine Learning Approach for Prioritising Accessibility User Feedback
<p>This repository serves as a comprehensive collection of datasets, code scripts, and associated data used in my master's research conducted at the University of Auckland on accessibility-related reviews. The research findings and methodology are described in detail in our paper titled "Accessibility Rank: A Machine Learning Approach for Prioritising Accessibility User Feedback". By making these resources openly available, we aim to foster collaboration, reproducibility, and advancement in the field of accessibility research. Researchers and developers can leverage these datasets, associated data, and code scripts to gain insights, validate findings, and explore novel approaches to addressing accessibility challenges.</p> <p>We encourage users to refer to our paper for a comprehensive understanding of our research methodology, experimental setup, and results. Proper attribution and citation of our paper are appreciated when utilizing any part of this repository in further research or publications.</p>
Influential users_Arqueología_with keyhole.co_Sept.2021
<p>Usuarios influenciadores en varias plataformas sociales para temas de Arqueología en Latinoameríca, relevado entre agosto y septiembre de del 2021, elaborado a partir de keyhole.co</p>
UIS Log: Synthetic User Interface with Screenshots Log
<p>These data correspond to the set of problems for evaluating the proposal detailed in Martínez-Rojas et al. 2022. The evaluation utilizes a set of synthetic problems that simulate realistic administrative use cases. Each problem includes a UI Log with a synthetic screenshot corresponding to each event, capturing 3 distinct processes (<em>P</em>) marked by varying complexity levels. These levels are defined by the number of activities, the process execution variants, and the visual features influencing decisions between these variants.</p> <p>The implementation of this proposal can be found in the tool available at <a href="https://github.com/RPA-US/screenrpa" target="_new">this GitHub repository</a>, which utilizes the logs of these 3 processes for validation. Here they are described:<br><br></p> <ul> <li><em>P1 Client creation</em>. A process with <strong>5 activities and 2 variants</strong>. The single decision in this process is made based on the existence of an attachment in the reception email.</li> <li><em>P2 Client validation</em>. A process with <strong>7 activities and 2 variants</strong>. The decision is made based on the user’s response to a query.</li> <li><em>P3 Client deletion</em>. A process with <strong>7 activities and 4 variants</strong>. The decisions are made based on two conditions: (1) the existence of pending invoices and (2) the existence of an attachment to justify the payment of the invoices.</li> </ul> <p>These processes all contain a single decision point, although the one in P3 is complex. All processes include</p> <ol> <li>synthetic screen captures for their activities and</li> <li>a sample event log with a single instance for each variant.</li> </ol> <p>To generate the objects for the valuation, we generate event logs of different sizes (|<em>L</em>|) for each of these processes by deriving events from the sample event log. We consider log sizes in the range of {10, 25, 50, 100} events. Note that we consider complete instances in the log and thus, we remove the last instance if it goes beyond |<em>L</em>|.<br>Some of these logs are generated with a balanced number of instances, while others are unbalanced (<em>B</em>?) which present more than 20% of different frequency between the most frequent and less frequent variants. To average the result over a collection of problems, 30 instances are randomly generated for each tuple < <em>P</em>, |<em>L</em>|, <em>B</em>? >.<br>In this dataset there are 3 zips, one for each family. Each family corresponds to a process:</p> <ul> <li><em>Basic </em>corresponds to P1</li> <li><em>Intermediate </em>corresponds to P12</li> <li><em>Advanced </em>corresponds to P3</li> </ul> <p>Within these folders, we find 30 different scenarios (folder), in which the look and feel of the applications present in the screenshots have suffered little variations. Within each of these scenarios, variations are carried out respecting to the data entered in the forms and the images or attachments present in the user interface to generate log instances depending on the characteristics of each process.<br>For each scenario, we find 8 folders with the concrete problem which is defined by Log_size (in {10,25,50,100}) and Balanced (in {Balanced, Unbalanced}). The name of these folders have this format<em>: Family_LogSize_Balanced.</em><br>Inside each problem folder the UI Log and the screen captures can be found.<br><br><strong>References</strong><br><br>Martínez-Rojas, A., Jiménez-Ramírez, A., Enríquez, J. G., & Reijers, H. A. (2022, September). Analyzing variable human actions for robotic process automation. In <em>International Conference on Business Process Management</em> (pp. 75-90). Cham: Springer International Publishing.</p>
Citizen science at public libraries: Data on librarians and users perceptions of participating in a citizen science project in Catalunya, Spain
<p>As libraries struggle to keep pace with the changing societal landscape, emerging practices such as citizen science (CS) initiatives are being incorporated to reinforce the idea of public libraries as gathering, meeting, and collaboration spaces within the context of shared community and shared learning resources. However, there is little empirical evidence of whether the most open and participatory ways that CS puts forward can converge with and be nurtured by the essence of public libraries. Also, the roles of librarians and users in the ‘next generation public library’ have been under-developed. As the number of CS initiatives at public libraries grows, so does the need to collect evidence on the impact and the capacity of assimilation of CS practices. The data describes librarians and users' perceptions of participating in a citizen science project. Two hands-on activities for librarians of the Barcelona Network of Public Libraries were implemented. One was a training course for 30 librarians from 24 libraries which allowed them to envisage citizen science implementation in each library. The second activity consisted in the co-creation of a citizen social science project. 40 library users, 7 librarians from 3 different cities, and professional scientists, were involved. The data on librarians and users' perception was collected through participant observation, surveys, and a focus group to identify strengths and challenges of implementing citizen science at public libraries. The data covers librarians and users attitudes towards citizen science, their motivations to participate, their perceived ability to implement a citizen science project (as for librarians) or to contribute to science (as for library users), and the participants intention to keep engaged with citizen science, drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Responses to closed-ended survey questions are analyzed at a descriptive level. The qualitative feedback from the focus group and the open-ended survey question on motivations is subjected to a thematic analysis. The data offers interesting insights to identify opportunities and challenges of implementing citizen science at public libraries, contributing to the debate over the public library's mission as local community hub.</p> <p>The dataset is formed by 5 tables:</p> <ol> <li>Librarians_pre.csv: data on librarians profiles, attitudes towards citizen science, expected impact of the project and self-efficacy collected at the beginning of the Citizen Science Lab.</li> <li>Librarians_post.csv: data on librarians profiles, attitudes towards citizen science, perceived impact of the project and self-efficacy collected at the end of the Citizen Science Lab.</li> <li>Users_first_phase.csv: data on users profiles, motivation, attitudes towards the library, confidence to perform scientific tasks and self-efficacy collected at the beginning of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> <li>Users_second_phase.csv: data on users profiles and motivation collected at the middle of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> <li>Users_last_phase.csv: data on users profiles, attitudes towards the library, confidence to perform scientific tasks and perceived impact of the project collected at the end of the Science and Citizen Action.</li> </ol> <p><strong>Citizen Science Lab Questionnaire (Librarians_pre)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [rol_1] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Director</li> <li>Library technician</li> <li>Support technician</li> <li>Service support</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_1] How long have you been working at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>2 or less</li> <li>3 to 5 years</li> <li>6 to 10 years</li> <li>11 to 20 years</li> <li>more than 20 years</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_1] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [know_1] Have you already heard about citizen science?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [part_1] Have you already participated in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards users engagement</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [att_lib_pre1] Do you believe that library users are able to participate in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [att_lib_pre2] Do you believe that library users will commit to participating in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Expected impacts</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [exp_lib_pre] To what extent do you believe that citizen science may bring positive impacts to your library?</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [se_lib_pre1] Right now, do you feel able to recommend any citizen science project to library users?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [se_lib_pre2] Right now, do you feel able to implement yourself and lead a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Citizen Science Lab Questionnaire (Librarians_post)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [years_2] How long have you been working at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>2 or less</li> <li>3 to 5 years</li> <li>6 to 10 years</li> <li>11 to 20 years</li> <li>more than 20 years</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [back_2] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [sat_1] To what extent does the project meet your initial expectations?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards users engagement</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [att_lib_post1] Do you believe that library users will commit to participating in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [att_lib_post2] What are/could be the potential barriers to users engagement in citizen science?</p> </td> <td> <p>[open]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Perceived impact</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [imp_lib] What do you believe that citizen science may bring to public libraries and users?</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p>a. Knowledge of the scientific process</p> <p>b. New connections among participants </p> <p>c. Fun</p> <p>d. New knowledge of the local environment</p> <p>e. Scientific evidence on a common concern</p> <p>f. Social cohesion</p> <p>g. Positive attitudes towards science</p> <p>h. Willingness to learn</p> <p>i. Critical thinking and self-efficacy</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [se_lib_post1] Right now, do you feel able to recommend any citizen science project to library users?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [se_lib_post2] Right now, do you feel able to implement yourself and lead a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Intention to keep engaged</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [eng_lib] To what extent are you motivated to keep engaged with citizen science?</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Focus group guide (Librarians)</strong></p> <p><strong>Opening questions</strong></p> <p><strong>1.</strong> To start with…. Are you satisfied with the project?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Yes, no, why? Was it fun/interesting/challenging/enriching….</p> <p><strong>2.</strong> Do you feel you have learned something new?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> About your library’s environment, users, science and citizen science... Is there anything special that you will take with you after the project?</p> <p><strong>Reflections on the cocreation process</strong></p> <p><strong>3.</strong> At what time during the project have you felt most comfortable?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> For example, has it been easier to lead the activity and/or involve and retain the community? Did you find it entertaining?</p> <p><strong>4.</strong> At what time during the project have you felt less at ease?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> What was challenging during the cocreation process?</p> <p><strong>5.</strong> To what extent do you feel more capable of implementing and leading a citizen science project in your library right now?</p> <p><strong>Probe: </strong>For example, in the case of both more crowdsourcing and of cocreated projects that actively involve the community</p> <p><strong>Reflections on the perceived impact</strong></p> <p><strong>6. </strong>To what extent does the project meet your initial expectations?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> in line with what you discussed at the beginning of the project, you expected it to promote participation, new connections among participants, improve the library perceptions and stimulate the participants’ critical thinking...Do you think that citizen science may meet these expectations?</p> <p><strong>Reflections on citizen science at public libraries</strong></p> <p><strong>7.</strong> To what extent can citizen science (in its most ‘extreme’ form of participation) be imagined as an activity within the library that promotes more active user participation?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Through for example cocreation, experimentation, and hands-on learning activities...</p> <p><strong>8. </strong>Do you think that the activity has brought new knowledge? What new knowledge has the activity brought from your perspective?</p> <p><strong>Probe</strong><strong>:</strong> Knowledge of the scientific process, knowledge of the community or new users...</p> <p>9. What could be the opportunities and barriers of introducing citizen science at public libraries? And the barriers?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> Like for example improving the perception of the library, actively involving certain users...What could be the ‘return’ for the community? What impact can citizen science projects have on making the environment more dynamic from libraries?</p> <p><strong>10. </strong>More generally, what could be the ‘added value’ of the introduction of citizen science within the library’s range of activities?</p> <p><strong>Probe:</strong> Is it a fun activity that promotes socialization, for example? Or that allows to generate new knowledge? Or that highlights the library’s social value? Or, also, that may offer new uses and new roles to the library? Can it foster a sense of community with the library as a connector? What other impacts can be generated in your environment?</p> <p><strong>Closing</strong></p> <p><strong>11.</strong> Do you see yourselves the next year, implementing a citizen science project as part of the library’s range of activities? And adopting an existing one?</p> <p><strong>Probe: </strong>Are you motivated to get more involved with citizen science projects? What kind of projects? What level of user involvement do you expect? What barriers do you see to users’ involvement? What benefits and opportunities do you think you can bring to the library?</p> <p><strong>12.</strong> We have now reached the end of the discussion. Anyone want to add anything else?</p> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_first_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_1] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_3] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_2] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user not associated with local associations</li> <li>Library technician</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [back_3] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [part_2] Have you already participated in a citizen science project?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Motivations to participate</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [mot_us] What did motivate you to participate in the project?</p> </td> <td> <p>[open]</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards the library</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [att_us_pre1] To what extent do you believe that your library is responsive to the community needs?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [att_us_pre2] To what extent to you believe your library is able to face local challenges based on users' active participation?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Confidence to perform scientific tasks</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>9. [conf_us_pre] To what extent do you feel able to contribute to perform the following scientific tasks:</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 4 [Totally]</p> </td> <td> <p>a. Formulate the research question</p> <p>b. Data collection</p> <p>c. Analysis and interpretation of the results</p> <p>d. Propose concrete actions based on scientific evidence</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Self-efficacy</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>10. [se_us_pre] To what extent do you feel able to positively contribute to the library and your community?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_second_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_3] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_5] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_4] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user or technician not associated with local associations</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_5] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [mot_us2] To what extent are you motivated to carry out the experiment?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p><strong>Science and Citizens Action Questionnaire (Users_last_phase)</strong></p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Personal information</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>1. [gen_2] Are you..?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Woman</li> <li>Man</li> <li>NA</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>2. [years_4] How old are you?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>18-25</li> <li>26-35</li> <li>36-45</li> <li>46-55</li> <li>56-65</li> <li>66+</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [rol_3] What is your role at the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Library user or technician not associated with local associations</li> <li>Member of a local association</li> <li>Representative of public administrations</li> <li>Representative of the private sector</li> <li>Others:</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>3. [back_4] Do you have a scientific background?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>Yes</li> <li>No</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>4. [part_3] To how many cocreation sessions have you participated?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>None</li> <li>1</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>5. [sat_2] To what extent are you satisfied with the experiment?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Attitudes towards the library</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>6. [att_us_post] To what extent do you believe that the project has positively changed your perception of the library?</p> </td> <td> <ul> <li>1 [Not at all]</li> <li>2</li> <li>3</li> <li>4</li> <li>5 [Totally]</li> </ul> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Confidence to perform scientific tasks</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>7. [conf_us_post] To what extent do you feel able to contribute to perform the following scientific tasks:</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> </td> <td> <p>a. Formulate the research question</p> <p>b. Data collection</p> <p>c. Analysis and interpretation of the results</p> <p>d. Propose concrete actions based on scientific evidence</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>Perceived impact</strong></p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>8. [imp_us] What do you believe that citizen science may bring to public libraries and users?</p> <p>1 [Not at all] …… 5 [Totally]</p> <p> </p> </td> <td> <p>a. Knowledge of the scientific process</p> <p>b. New connections among participants </p> <p>c. Fun</p> <p>d. New knowledge of the local environment</p> <p>e. Scientific evidence on a common concern</p> <p>f. Social cohesion</p> <p>g. Positive attitudes towards science</p> <p>h. Willingness to learn</p> <p>i. Critical thinking and self-efficacy</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p>
Supplementary data to the Baseline Methodological User Needs Analysis
<p>Supplementary data to the Baseline Methodological User Needs Analysis</p>
Replication data for: Enhancing user awareness on inferences obtained from fitness trackers data
<p>Survey results and fitness trackers datasets used for the evaluation of PrivacyEnhAction application.</p>
Pharmaceutical advertising and the consumption of over the counter (OTC) medicines in users of the Superfar drugstore in Barrios Altos - Cercado de Lima, 2022.
<p>To determine the relationship between pharmaceutical advertising and the consumption of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines in users of the SUPERFAR drugstore in barrios altos -cercado de lima, 2022.</p>
Online Repository of the Study "I want to RIDE my e-bicycle!": Supporting Developers Categorizing User Issues of a Mobility-as-a-Service Platform
<p><strong>Online Repository of the Study </strong><em>“I want to RIDE my e-bicycle!": Supporting Developers Categorizing User Issues of a Mobility-as-a-Service Platform</em></p> <p><strong>Introduction</strong></p> <p>In the Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) context, e-bikes are important and environmental-friendly transportation resources providing flexibility, time and cost savings, and reducing traffic congestion. Additional to user satisfaction and marketing advantages, the resolution of user-reported issues is regulated in many cities. In order to efficiently solve the issues, it is essential to quickly identify their types (e.g., software- or hardware-related?) to assign them to the responsible team. But for popular e-mobility services, the manual analysis of the reports is inefficient because of its tediousness, high time requirements, and error-proneness. </p> <p>Our empirical study, carried out in the context of a <em>Mobility as a Service </em>start-up company, proposes an approach for the automated identification of relevant concerns reported by users of e-bike services. The company has more than 20,000 private customers across seven different countries and dedicates considerable effort in analyzing user behavior. However, the current manual process of analyzing and triaging user-reported issues hinders MaaS-company’s ability to grow and expand its services. </p> <p>To help MaaS providers identify relevant user-reported issues, In the study, we (i) manually inspect about 3,000 user-reported issues received by the MaaS company; (ii) design a taxonomy modeling the types of relevant issues reported by users; and (iii) propose MaaS-RIDE, an approach to automatically classify the user-reported issues according to the categories of the devised taxonomy. </p> <p>Our results demonstrate that MaaS-RIDE is able to accurately (F-measure ≥ 93%) identify software and hardware user-reported issues. This result is critical for e-bike sharing companies to address such issues in an agile way and achieve the required user satisfaction.</p> <p><strong>Dataset Overview</strong></p> <p>The dataset is composed of the following different sorts of data: </p> <ul> <li> “<em>Data_and_preprocessing</em>” folder <ul> <li>o the user-reported issues data</li> <li>o the user-reported issues data processed as Bag of Words for Machine Learning training. <ul> <li>For this look at the sub-folder “<em>input_data_for_ML</em>” and the following matrices: <ul> <li><em>tf-idf-matrix-of-comment_finals_with_oracle_info_low_level.csv</em></li> <li><em>tf-idf-matrix-of-comment_finals_with_oracle_info.csv</em></li> </ul> </li> <li>Moreover, a sample of selected issues was reported in the replication package: <ul> <li>see file “<em>randomSamples.csv</em>” (due to a non-disclosure agreement with our industrial partner, we are unauthorized to share the whole raw user reports used in our experiments)</li> <li> “RQ1” folder: Types of E-bikes User-reported Issues</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> the resulting taxonomy after the analysis of the issues</li> <li> “RQ2” folder: Classifying E-bikes Issue types</li> <li> the trained models </li> <li> the results of the models</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>The following sections describe more in detail what each of those folders and files contain.</p> <p><strong>“Data_and_preprocessing” folder</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>User-reported issues subset.</strong></li> </ul> <p>In an industrial setting, due to privacy reasons, we disclose only an example subset of the user-reported issues, this information is in the file <em>randomSamples.csv</em>.</p> <p>The <em>randomSamples.csv </em>a subset that was generated randomly adding 20 examples using a stratified sampling from the High-level categories and 20 from the Low-level categories. This subset is not exhaustive but serves the purpose of showing the reviewers the kind of issues that this particular industrial set is confronted with. The file contains:</p> <ul> <li> <ul> <li> the Id of the user report; </li> <li> the column "comment_final"<strong> </strong>contains the issue text after the replacement of information that needed anonymization (e.g., vehicle-plates, personal names, addresses and timestamps); </li> <li> the column "High_level_category" contains the selected category from the 5 first level categories of the presented <em>Three-level taxonomy of e-bike user reported issues</em>; </li> <li>• the columns ‘Low_level_category" and "Fine_grained_topic" contain the assigned, if existing, respective category. </li> </ul> </li> <li><strong>Bag of Words Term by Document matrix.</strong></li> </ul> <p>An important input for training the ML models is the Bag of Words representation generated after processing the 2,989 manually-labeled user issues. The result of this process is a Term-by-Document matrix. We share this matrix in the files in the sub-folder <em>input_data_for_ML </em>where they are labeled for High- and Low-level categories. </p> <p>In the <em>tf-idf-matrix-of-comment_finals_with_oracle_info.csv</em> and <em>tf-idf-matrix-of-comment_finals_with_oracle_info_low_level.csv</em> files, the first column refers to the issue “Id”, the last column “oracle” is the labeled category, the rest of the columns represent the terms contained in the 2,989 user-reported issues and in each row the weight of the i−𝑡ℎ term contained in the j−𝑡ℎ user issue by using the tf-idf score.</p> <p><strong>“RQ1” folder</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>“Three-level taxonomy of e-bike user-reported issues.pdf<em>” file</em></strong></li> </ul> <p>The taxonomy derives from the manual analysis of the 2,989 user issues. We found that a three-level taxonomy provides significant granularity to the MaaS-company. The taxonomy encompasses 5 High-level categories, 16 Low-level categories, and 15 Low-level subcategories of e-bike user-reported issues. The file <em>Three-level taxonomy of e-bike user-reported issues.pdf</em> presents the taxonomy categories and in the columns “Nr.” and “%” it shows the number of occurrences within the analyzed dataset, and the corresponding percentages.</p> <p><strong>“RQ2” folder</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>“Trained Models” folder</strong></li> </ul> <p>We provide the trained machine and deep learning models in the sub-folder <em>ML_DL_models</em>. Our approach experimented with classic machine learning models based on the Bag-of-Words approach using SVM, on Word Embeddings using FastText, and Language models leveraging BERT. The SVM and BERT models were trained using the open source low-code data analytics platform KNIME and were used to classify issues corresponding to the first and second levels of the taxonomy from the “RQ1” folder. A 10-fold cross validation strategy was used to assess the classification performance. </p> <p>The fastText model was trained by using default values of parameters (https://fasttext.cc/docs/en/options.html) and a 10-fold cross-validation strategy. With fastText, we classified issues corresponding only to the first level of the taxonomy from “RQ1” folder, since fastText is more effective when more data points are available in the training set (i.e., lower levels in the taxonomy have fewer well-represented issue types).</p> <ul> <li><strong>“Model results” folder</strong></li> </ul> <p>In the sub-folder model_results we provide the tables summarizing the results of using the proposed MaaS-RIDE approach, with which we automatically identify and categorize user-reported issues according to the High-level and Low-level categories of the taxonomy devised in RQ1, which are relevant for the MaaS-company. </p>
Rather Multifaceted than Disruptors: Exploring Gamification User Types of Crowdworkers
<p>Dataset employed for the statistical analysis presented in the paper "Rather Multifaceted than Disruptors: Exploring Gamification User Types of Crowdworkers." </p> <p>The dataset corresponds to the demographic data, HEXAD user type scores, and performance score (mean_score) for 481 crowdworkers who participated in a user study conducted via Microworkers and Amazon MTurk. The dataset is presented in a CSV file.</p> <p>The dataset only includes the data of crowdworkers who pass all the reliability checks described in the paper.</p> <p><strong>The paper can be cited as:</strong></p> <p>E.Gamboa, M. Bauer, M. Reham Khawaja, and M. Hirth, “Rather Multifaceted than Disruptors: Exploring Gamification User Types of Crowdworkers,” Human Factors in Virtual Environments and Game Design. AHFE International, 2022. DOI: 10.54941/ahfe1002069.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Dataset Practical Performance and User Experience of Novel DUAL-Flush Vacuum Toilets
<p>Dataset for paper "Practical Performance and User Experience of Novel DUAL-Flush Vacuum Toilets" <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162228">https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162228</a> <em>Water</em> <strong>2021</strong>, <em>13</em>(16), 2228</p> <p> </p>
Self-medication for anxiety symptoms in the context of COVID-19, in users who go to a drugstore in Los Olivos, Lima-2021
<p><strong>Background:</strong> To determine the relationship between self-medication and anxiety symptoms in the context of COVID-19, in users who go to a drugstore in Los Olivos, Lima 2021.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> The research method was deductive, basic and with a quantitative approach; the design used was non-experimental, descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional, and prospective. Spearman's Rho analysis was performed to validate the hypothesis.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> 384 users were evaluated, finding 93.5% aged 18-59 years, of whom 53.4% were female, 42.7% had completed high school, 57.8% were single and 51.6% presented physical symptoms, preferably muscular tension accompanied by pain, 60.7% presented behavioral symptoms, highlighting unusual sadness in the face of COVID-19 and 70.1% presented cognitive symptoms with greater frequency of concern about contracting COVID-19. In addition, the greater the symptoms of anxiety, the higher the self-medication increased from 9.0% to 21.1%, a similar case was evidenced in self-medication on their own initiative where the increase was from 7.5% to 33.3%; likewise, self-medication without medical prescription increased from 15.8% to 47.7%, the consumption of anxiolytics or antidepressants increased from 0.8% to 26.3% caused by the symptoms of anxiety.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> It was determined that there is a moderate relationship between self-medication and anxiety symptoms in the context of COVID-19, in users who go to a drugstore in Los Olivos, Lima 2021.</p> <p><strong>Keywords:</strong> Self-medication, prescription, anxiety, depression, COVID-19.</p> <p><strong>Background:</strong> To determine the relationship between self-medication and anxiety symptoms in the context of COVID-19, in users who go to a drugstore in Los Olivos, Lima 2021.</p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> The research method was deductive, basic and with a quantitative approach; the design used was non-experimental, descriptive, correlational, cross-sectional, and prospective. Spearman's Rho analysis was performed to validate the hypothesis.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong> 384 users were evaluated, finding 93.5% aged 18-59 years, of whom 53.4% were female, 42.7% had completed high school, 57.8% were single and 51.6% presented physical symptoms, preferably muscular tension accompanied by pain, 60.7% presented behavioral symptoms, highlighting unusual sadness in the face of COVID-19 and 70.1% presented cognitive symptoms with greater frequency of concern about contracting COVID-19. In addition, the greater the symptoms of anxiety, the higher the self-medication increased from 9.0% to 21.1%, a similar case was evidenced in self-medication on their own initiative where the increase was from 7.5% to 33.3%; likewise, self-medication without medical prescription increased from 15.8% to 47.7%, the consumption of anxiolytics or antidepressants increased from 0.8% to 26.3% caused by the symptoms of anxiety.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> It was determined that there is a moderate relationship between self-medication and anxiety symptoms in the context of COVID-19, in users who go to a drugstore in Los Olivos, Lima 2021</p> <p> </p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.