Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
23,351
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
23,351 results for “Comparative”
Figure 5 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 5. The strict consensus of the two equally parsimonious cladograms shown in Fig. 4. Numbers above the nodes are the Bremer support; numbers below the nodes are bootstrap values (5000 replicates).
Figure 13 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 13. Skull roof of an adult specimen of Heterotis niloticus (MCZ 50959, adult, unknown SL) in dorsal view. A, photograph. B, line drawing. Note that the left opercle was removed, the exoccipitals are missing, and the dermosphenotic and infraorbital 4 of the left side are fused in this specimen. Anterior facing left.
Figure 4 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 4. The two fundamental most parsimonious trees resulting from analysis of the data matrix provided in Appendix 1; characters and character states described in text are listed in Appendix 2. The strict consensus is provided in Fig. 5. These trees both have a length of 171 steps, a consistency index (CI) of 0.6433 (0.6139 excluding uninformative characters, a homoplasy index (HI) of 0.3977 (0.3861 excluding uninformative characters), a retention index (RI) of 0.7782 and a rescaled consistency index (RC) of 0.5006. Letters above the nodes correspond to those listed in the text under the heading Character Optimization and Node Support.
Figure 19 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 19. Photographs of neurocrania in anterolateral view showing aspects of the trigeminofacialis chamber in four osteoglossomorphs. A, Hiodon alosoides (UMA F10581, 315 mm SL). B, Chitala chitala (UMA F10349, 437 mm SL). C, Pantodon buchholzi (UMA F11265, approx. 50 mm SL). D, Gnathonemus petersii (UMA F11267, approx. 140 mm SL). Arrows indicate position of the foramen for the nerve historically called the combined cranial nerves V and VII; this nerve likely contains a portion of the anteroventral lateral line nerve as well. In Gnathonemus, as in some other mormyroids, there are two separate foramina (i.e. one for V and one for VII).
Figure 3 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 3. Hypotheses of osteoglossomorph interrelationships, redrawn from: A, Shen (1996); B, Bonde (1996); C, Taverne (1998). Question marks and dashed lines indicate doubt concerning the placement of a taxon. Note that Shen's (1996) hypothesis places several fossil taxa that are commonly regarded as osteoglossomorphs outside the group (e.g. †Jiaohichthys, †Lycoptera, †Tongxinichthys & †Plesiolycoptera). Taverne's (1998) hypothesis resulted from analysis of 344 characters, although these were presented as a list rather than in the form of a data matrix, and some characters were reversals of others (see Cavin & Forey, 2001). Note that Taverne (1998) considered †Brychaetus to be distantly related to †Phareodus (contrary to Li et al., 1997a), and he considered both genera to be paraphyletic. Contrary to Li & Wilson (1996a), Taverne (1998) considered †Ostariostoma and †Lycoptera to be closely related to the hiodontids, †Singida to be relatively basal, and the monophyly of Scleropages to be uncertain.
Figure 21 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 21. Infraorbital bones of Elops and osteoglossomorphs showing different numbering strategies employed by Nelson (1969), Li & Wilson (1996a), and the present study. Nelson's and Li & Wilson's numbering systems are given anterior to posterior, and distinct elements are separated by commas. All are redrawn from those illustrated by Nelson (1969) except for †Lycoptera, which is from Jin et al. (1995) (Nelson did not illustrate †Lycoptera in his study). Black dots indicate position of the neuromast organ(s) associated with each element.
Figure 26 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 26. Suspensorium and opercular bones of Heterotis niloticus (MCZ 50959, adult, unknown SL) in medial view. A, photograph. B, line drawing. Note the reduced subopercle. The element labelled 'dpl + ecp' has been suggested in the past to be a fusion of the dermopalatine and the ectopterygoid, although no ontogenetic evidence supports this (see Character 30). Anterior facing right.
Figure 34 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 34. Abdominal region of Notopteridae. A, Abdominal region of Chitala sp. (UMA F10341, 75 mm SL), showing several features characteristic of the family Notopteridae. Note particularly the abdominal scutes, abdominal ribs, elongate second and third true ribs (perhaps abdominal ribs and true ribs that have fused), anal scutes and an enlarged proximal radial of the first anal pterygiophore. The abdominal ribs develop like true ribs and may fuse to the true ribs; the autogenous abdominal ribs are marked with arrows. There is a small cartilaginous element that is developed posterior to the last ossified abdominal rib, which likely is the fifth autogenous abdominal rib. B, close-up of pelvic fin region showing details of the pelvic girdle, abdominal scutes and the proximal radial of the first anal pterygiophore. Note that the abdominal and anal scutes are both paired structures.
Figure 33 in Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha)
Figure 33. Some elements of the left branchial arches of A, Heterotis niloticus (UMA F10653, 75 mm SL) and B, Pantodon buchholzi (FMNH 63752, 74 mm SL) in dorsal and medial views showing position of the accessory cartilages associated with the fourth and fifth branchial arches. Gill rakers omitted. Cartilage shown in black. Anterior facing right.
Figure 8 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 8. Rostrum of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in left oblique rostrodorsolateral view. AMNH 5405. Scale bar 70 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 16 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 16. Scanning electron micrograph of tooth of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902). TMP 87.36.99. Scale bar, 10 mm.
Figure 5 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 5. Schematic illustrations of the basicranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in right lateral view. (A) Basicranial components of the occipital/basicranial region. (B) Basicranial foramina. Not to scale. Abbreviations in italics (i.e. the frontal and parietal elements) are not considered components of the occipital/basicranial region. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 1 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 1. Phylogeny of the Ankylosauria, providing the genealogical context for the taxa discussed in the text (after Vickaryous et al., 2001b). Explanation of nodes: node (1) Ankylosauria; node (2) Nodosauridae; node (3) Ankylosauridae; node (4) Ankylosaurinae. All suprageneric taxonomic nomenclature follows the definitions of Sereno (1998).
Figure 12 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 12. Post-palatal area of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) cranium in ventral view, original and interpretive illustration. TMP 97.132.1. Scale bar, 100 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 15 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 15. Mandible of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902). Predentary in oblique rostroventral (A) and ventral (B) views. Right mandible in medial (C) and lateral (D; mirror imaged) views. AMNH 5405. Scale bar, 100 mm (E) Right coronoid bone (indicated by arrow) articulating with the dentary, surangular and splenial in medial view. AMNH 5403. Scale bar, 25 mm. Compare with Fig. 6.
Figure 17 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 17. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in left lateral (A) and ventral (B) views. NMC 8530, holotype of Anodontosaurus lambei, herein considered synonymous with Euoplocephalus tutus. Scale bar, 100 mm. Abbreviations in italics and parentheses reflect the original interpretation by Sternberg (1929). All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 14 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 14. Basicranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in right lateral view, original and interpretive illustration. FPDM-V-35. Scale bar, 50 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 10 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 10. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in left lateral view (A) indicating the relative position of the transverse computer tomographic sections (B–F) through the rostrum. Only the left half of each transverse computer tomographic image is depicted. (A) AMNH 5405. (B–F) TMP 97.132.1. Scale bar, 100 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1. (G) Schematic illustration of a nasal cavity proper undulating through the rostrum based on a reconstruction of the computer tomographic images. Not to scale.
Figure 6 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 6. Schematic illustrations of the mandibular region of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902). (A) Predentary, ventral view. (B) Medial view, right mandible. (C) Lateral view, right mandible. Teeth and alveoli omitted. Not to scale. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1.
Figure 3 in A redescription of the skull of Euoplocephalus tutus (Archosauria: Ornithischia): a foundation for comparative and systematic studies of ankylosaurian dinosaurs
Figure 3. Cranium of Euoplocephalus tutus Lambe (1902) in oblique rostrodorsolateral view demonstrating the unique pattern of cranial ornamentation. AMNH 5405. Scale bar, 100 mm. All abbreviations are listed in Appendix 1. Modified from Vickaryous et al. (2001a).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.