Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 4 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 4. MDS on the different sizes, sites and seasonal independent groups. The total length (Lt) categories compared were Juveniles (J = Lt <3 cm), Semi-adults (S = 3 8 cm). The three sites sampled along the catchment were: site 1 (P1), an upstream first order section of the basin near its spring; site 2 (P2), a second order middle section of the basin; and site 3 (P3), a downstream third order section of the basin. Seasons compared were: VER=summer (December, January and February), OUT=Autumn (March, April and May), INV=Winter (June, July andAugust) and Spring=PRI (September, October and November).

Fig. 5 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 5. MDS on the different sizes, sites and seasonal groups. Total length (Lt) categories compared were Juveniles (J = Lt <3 cm), Semi-adults(S = 3 8 cm) and seasons were: VER=summer (December, January and February), OUT=Autumn (March, April and May), INV=Winter (June, July andAugust) and Spring=PRI (September, October and November).

Fig. 2 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 2. Geographical location of the rio Ribeirão basin, with indication of the three sampling sites (P1, P2, and P3).

Fig. 3 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 3. UPGMA cluster analysis using Morisita-Horn similarity coefficient on the different sizes, sites and seasonal groups. Total length (Lt) categories compared were Juveniles (J = Lt <3 cm), Semi-adults (S = 3 8 cm). The three sites sampled along the catchment were: site 1 (P1), an upstream first order section of the basin near its spring; site 2 (P2), a second order middle section of the basin; and site 3 (P3), a downstream third order section of the basin. The seasons are: VER=summer (December, January and February), OUT=Autumn (March, April and May), INV=Winter (June, July and August), and Spring=PRI (September, October, November). A (> 70 % similarity) = with a predominance of Autochthonous Insects, Allochthonous Insects and Non Identifiable Arthropod Parts; B (> 80 % similarity) = with a predominance of Detritus and Allochthonous and Autochthonous Insects; and C (> 80 % similarity)= with a predominance of Allochthonous plants and Detritus.

Fig. 1. Monthly rainfall for 2002 in Ontogenetic, spatial and temporal variations in the feeding ecology of Deuterodon langei Travassos, 1957 (Teleostei: Characidae) in a Neotropical stream from the Atlantic rainforest, southern Brazil

Fig. 1. Monthly rainfall for 2002 (x) and 2003 (filled triangles) in the study region, and average temperature in 2002 (filled squares) and 2003 (open squares). Source: IAPAR.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Fig. 5 in Evidence for cryptic diversity in the Neotropical water snake, Helicops angulatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Dipsadidae, Hydropsini), with comments on its ecology, facultative reproductive mode, and conservation

Fig. 5. Illustration of the holotype of Coluber surinamensis Shaw. From Sebae (1735, Vol. 2, pl. 59, Fig. 2).

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Fig. 3 in Evidence for cryptic diversity in the Neotropical water snake, Helicops angulatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Dipsadidae, Hydropsini), with comments on its ecology, facultative reproductive mode, and conservation

Fig. 3. Best Maximum Likelihood tree based on the data set of concatenated 12S and 16S rDNA, and c-mos sequences. The red clade depicts the Helicops angulatus group. On the left and right sides of a slash (/) are values indicated at nodes for Maximum Likelihood bootstraps (> 75%) and Bayesian Posterior probability values (> 95%), respectively. Green clades represent the paraphyly of Helicops angulatus. The name Helicops pictiventris is currently a junior synonym of H. infrataeniatus, but it appears in the tree exactly as the pertinent sequences appear in the GenBank dataset.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →

Fig. 1 in Evidence for cryptic diversity in the Neotropical water snake, Helicops angulatus (Linnaeus, 1758) (Dipsadidae, Hydropsini), with comments on its ecology, facultative reproductive mode, and conservation

Fig. 1. The distribution of Helicops angulatus in the Neotropics. Locality data is from the VertNet and GBIF databases, as well as the literature. Diamonds (green oviparous, yellow viviparous): specimens reported in Appendix B of Braz et al. (2016); red stars represent localities where Helicops was sampled for DNA; small black markers: localities from Helicops angulatus map in Nogueira et al. (2019). As currently defined Helicops angulatus occurs in Freshwater Ecoregions: 301 North Andean Pacific Slopes, Rio Atrato; 302 Magdalena, Sinu; 304 South America Caribbean Drainages, Trinidad; 307 Orinoco Llanos; 308 Orinoco Guiana Shield; 311 Guianas; 313 Western Amazon Piedmont; 317 Ucayali, Urubamba Piedmont; 318 Mamore, Madre de Dios Piedmont; 319 Guapore, Itenez; 320 Tapajos, Juruena; 321 Madeira Brazilian Shield; 323 Amazonas Estuary and Coastal Drainages; 324 Tocantins, Araguaia; 325 Parnaiba; and 328 Northeastern Mata Atlantica.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2020View details →

Fig. 1. Multilure trap baited with 300 in Myrmecological fauna (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) collected with Multilure-type traps in a Neotropical transitional region from northeastern Mexico

Fig. 1. Multilure trap baited with 300 mL of Strepha Trap® on a tree in the biosphere reserve "El Cielo."

Figs 11- 18 in Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding

Figs 11- 18. Morphological characteres for Tipuloidea genera identification. (11) Gonomyia (Neolipophleps), (12) Gonomyia (Paralipophleps), (13) Molophilus and (14) Ormosia, wings; (15) Rhipidia and (16) Dicranomyia, antennae; (17) Symplecta (Symplecta) and (18) Symplecta (Trimicra), wings. Modified from GELHAUS (2009).

Fig. 2 in Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding

Fig. 2. DNA barcoding gap analysis, with frequency of intra and interspecific distances in COI sequences among Tipuloidea species.

Figs 3-10 in Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding

Figs 3-10. Morphological characteres for Tipuloidea genera identification: (3) Tipulidae*, (4) Limoniidae, head; (5) Ozodicera*, antennae. (6) Nephrotoma* and (7) Zelandotipula, wings; (8) Toxorhina*, (9) Geranomyia* and (10) Teucholabis*, head (Sc, Subcostal vein; Rs, Radial sector vein; bm-cu, Basalmedial cubital vein; dm, Discal-medial cell). *Modified from GELHAUS (2009).

Fig. 1 in Crane flies (Diptera, Tipuloidea) from southern Neotropical salt marshes: survey with DNA barcoding

Fig. 1. Sampling areas at salt marshes of the Patos Lagoon Estuary, Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil.

Fig. 4 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 4. Activity period of (A) two glossophagine species (Anoura caudifer + Glossophaga soricina) and Phyllostomus discolor on Musa paradisiaca inflorescence, and of (B) two approaching strategies (upside landing and hovering) performed by two glossophagine species in an orchard located in the state of São Paulo, Brazil.

Fig. 3 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 3. Phyllostomus discolor (Wagner, 1843) with its wings completely open and its head directed toward the flowers performing the downside landing strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

Fig. 2 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 2. Glossophaga soricina (Pallas, 1766) with its wings folded alongside the body performing the upside landing strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

Fig. 1 in Feeding behavior and activity period of three Neotropical bat species (Chiroptera: Phyllostomidae) on Musa paradisiaca inflorescences (Zingiberales: Musaceae)

Fig. 1. Anoura caudifer (É. Geoffroy, 1818) with its snout partially inserted in floral tube performing the hovering strategy on the banana inflorescence in an orchard located in the state of SÃo Paulo, Brazil. Photo: Wilson Uieda.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Can dams affect the trophic structure of ichthyofauna? A long-term effects in the Neotropical region

Fig. 2. Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) (biplot) considering the fish species of each stretch and the different trophic categories in Jurumirim Reservoir, Upper Paranapanema River, state of São Paulo, Brazil. Acronym of the species in the Table III.

opencc-by-4.0May 2019View details →

Fig. 3 in Zooplankton associated with phytotelms and treefrogs in a neotropical forest

Fig. 3. Non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination of the zooplankton species showing differences in composition between frogs' skin (grey circles) and bromeliad phytotelms (black circles). Dashed lines indicate the range of each community dispersion and solid lines indicate the distance of each sample from centroid.