Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURES 38–46 in Tolypella mongolica (Charophyceae, Characeae): A new dioecious charophyte species from the center of Eurasia and implications for charophyte taxonomy, including the validation of T. porteri and the new combination for T. jwalae

FIGURES 38–46. Oospores of Tolypella mongolica sp. nov., Altai Mountains (LE), general appearance and sparsely coarsely tuberculate surface, scanning electron microscopy: 38–42—general appearance: 38, 41 & 42—lateral view of oospores with different degree of prominence of tubercles; 39 & 40—basal view; 43–46—sparsely coarsely tuberculate surface with different prominence of tubercles. Scale: 38–42—100 μm, 43—10 μm, 44–46—20 μm. Photographs by R.E. Romanov.

FIGURES 29–37 in Tolypella mongolica (Charophyceae, Characeae): A new dioecious charophyte species from the center of Eurasia and implications for charophyte taxonomy, including the validation of T. porteri and the new combination for T. jwalae

FIGURES 29–37. Oospores of Tolypella mongolica sp. nov., Mongolia (UBA, LE), different expression of surface sculpture, scanning electron microscopy: 29 & 30—densely coarsely tuberculate surface; 31—different expression of oospore surface at neighboring fossae, from sparsely weakly tuberculate to having complex tubercles at the middle of fossa; 32 & 33—isolated protrusions with acute forked ends; 34—tuberculate surface and tuberculate surface with forked acute protrusions at neighboring fossae; 35–37—surface resembling an aerial view of a mountain landscape. Scale: 29, 31 & 35—40 μm, 30, 32, 33, 34, 36 & 37—20 μm. Photographs by R.E. Romanov.

FIGURE 1 in Tolypella mongolica (Charophyceae, Characeae): A new dioecious charophyte species from the center of Eurasia and implications for charophyte taxonomy, including the validation of T. porteri and the new combination for T. jwalae

FIGURE 1. Holotype and isotypes of Tolypella mongolica sp. nov., Mongolia (UBA-6283). The upper bigger plant is a holotype. Scale: 2 cm. Photograph by R.E. Romanov.

FIGURES 23–28 in Tolypella mongolica (Charophyceae, Characeae): A new dioecious charophyte species from the center of Eurasia and implications for charophyte taxonomy, including the validation of T. porteri and the new combination for T. jwalae

FIGURES 23–28. Oospores of Tolypella mongolica sp. nov., Mongolia (UBA, LE), general appearance with different expression of surface sculpture, scanning electron microscopy: 23–25—lateral view; 26—apical view; 27—basal view; 28—tangential view of basal pole. Scale: 100 μm. Photographs by R.E. Romanov.

FIGURES 2–22 in Tolypella mongolica (Charophyceae, Characeae): A new dioecious charophyte species from the center of Eurasia and implications for charophyte taxonomy, including the validation of T. porteri and the new combination for T. jwalae

FIGURES 2–22. Morphological traits of Tolypella mongolica sp. nov., Mongolia (UBA, LE, NHMM): 2–5—apical parts of plants with different numbers of more or less compacted branchlets; 6—whorl of most compacted branchlets; 7—lateral branch; 8–10—basal parts of whorls with well-developed branchlets, arrowhead indicates lateral ray with fructifying node; 11—first node (arrowhead) of richly branched plant; 12—close view of apical whorls of branchlets, arrowhead indicates richly fertile single node of main axis of branchlet; 13—apical whorl of branchlets having two-celled ends; 14—gradually tapering three-celled end of long branchlets; 15–20—basal parts of branchlet whorls and axial nodes with numerous oogonia, arrowheads indicate single richly fertile nodes of branchlets above basal branchlet internode having variable length; 21 & 22—richly fertile single nodes of main axes of branchlets: 21—arrowheads indicate lateral rays; 22—arrowheads indicate nodes of lateral rays. Scale: 2–11—5 mm, 12–18, 20–22—1 mm, 19—2 mm. Photographs by R.E. Romanov.

FIGURE 6. Ripartitella vinosa. A–B. PDD112507. C–F. PDD112791 in Two new species of Cystodermella and new combinations in Ripartitella (Agaricineae, incertae sedis) and Cystolepiota (Verrucosporaceae)

FIGURE 6. Ripartitella vinosa. A–B. PDD112507. C–F. PDD112791. Bar = 1 cm. Photos by: Jerry A. Cooper.

FIGURE 4 in Two new species of Cystodermella and new combinations in Ripartitella (Agaricineae, incertae sedis) and Cystolepiota (Verrucosporaceae)

FIGURE 4. Microscopic drawings (basidiospores, basidia) of the Cystodermella species described. A. C. canadensis (WTU-F-073309, holotype). B. C. rubrogranulosa (PDD106521, holotype). Bar = 10 µm. Drawings by: Irja Saar.

FIGURE 3 in Two new species of Cystodermella and new combinations in Ripartitella (Agaricineae, incertae sedis) and Cystolepiota (Verrucosporaceae)

FIGURE 3. Species of Cystodermella. A. C. canadensis (WTU-F-073309, holotype). B. C. adnatifolia (TUF118417). C. C. cinnabarina (TUF106009, neotype). D. C. cinnabarina (TUF106012). E. C. granulosa (TUF120293, epitype). F. C. granulosa (TUF101314). Bar = 1 cm. Photos by: Steven A. Trudell (A), Vello Liiv (B–F).

FIGURE 2 in Two new species of Cystodermella and new combinations in Ripartitella (Agaricineae, incertae sedis) and Cystolepiota (Verrucosporaceae)

FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree of ITS data of Cystolepiota and Melanophyllum. Bootstrap values of ML analyses (≥ 70 %) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (≥ 0.95) are above and below branches, respectively.

FIGURE 1 in Two new species of Cystodermella and new combinations in Ripartitella (Agaricineae, incertae sedis) and Cystolepiota (Verrucosporaceae)

FIGURE 1. Phylogenetic tree of ITS data of Cystodermella and Ripartitella. Bootstrap values of ML analyses (≥ 70%) and Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (≥ 0.95) are above and below branches, respectively.

FIGURE 1 in Morphological and phylogenetic evidence for recognition of a new species of Kirschsteiniothelia, K. agumbensis and validation of five new combinations in Kirschsteiniotheliaceae

FIGURE 1. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree obtained from an IQ-TREE analysis of species from Kirschsteiniotheliaceae and closely related taxa based on ITS, LSU and SSU sequences. Strains of the species under study is shown in bold text. Families and orders are indicated on the right side of the tree in blocks, as well as the name of new species in bold text. Branch support values from 1000 non-parametric bootstraps for IQ-TREE (ML-BS) and posterior probability values from the Bayesian analysis (PP) are shown at the nodes (ML-BS>70%/ PP>0.9). The tree is rooted with Stemphylium vesicarium MFLUCC 14-0920 and Stemphylium vesicarium CBS 191.86.

FIGURE 3 in Morphological and phylogenetic evidence for recognition of a new species of Kirschsteiniothelia, K. agumbensis and validation of five new combinations in Kirschsteiniotheliaceae

FIGURE 3. Kirschsteiniothelia agumbensis (AMH 10646). a–c Conidia with attachment. d–i Conidia. Scale bars: a–i = 20 µm.

FIGURE 1 in Myxotrichum persicum sp. nov., and two new combinations in the genus Myxotrichum

FIGURE 1. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree inferred from the combined ITS, LSU, MCM7 and RPB1 sequence alignment of 55 strains of the Myxotrichaceae and Amorphothecaceae. Maximum likelihood bootstrap supports (≥70%) and Bayesian posterior probabilities support (≥0.9) are given above or below the branches, respectively. Dashes replace non-significant values. The branches with full statistical support (ML = 100%; PP = 1.0) are thickened. The scale bar shows the expected number of changes per site. The tree is rooted to Hyphodiscus hyaloscyphoides (NBRC 104869) and Venturiocistella japonica (NBRC 106633).

FIGURE 5 in Morphological and phylogenetic evidence for recognition of a new species of Kirschsteiniothelia, K. agumbensis and validation of five new combinations in Kirschsteiniotheliaceae

FIGURE 5. The results of the pairwise homoplasy index (PHI) test for the closely related species of Kirschsteiniothelia agumbensis using both LogDet transformation and splits decomposition. PHI test results (фw) <0.05 indicate significant recombination within the dataset.

FIGURE 2 in Morphological and phylogenetic evidence for recognition of a new species of Kirschsteiniothelia, K. agumbensis and validation of five new combinations in Kirschsteiniotheliaceae

FIGURE 2. Kirschsteiniothelia agumbensis (AMH 10646). a–c Conidiomata on natural substrate. d Colonies on MEA obverse. e Colonies on MEA reverse. Scale bars: a = 1000 µm. b–c = 100 µm.

FIGURE 2. Myxotrichum persicum. a in Myxotrichum persicum sp. nov., and two new combinations in the genus Myxotrichum

FIGURE 2. Myxotrichum persicum. a. Colonies morphology (surface and reverse) from left to right on PDA, PCA and CMA at 25 °C, after 4 weeks of incubation. b. Ascoma. c. Peridial hyphae. d, e. Appendages. f. Immature asci (arrow) and peridial hyphae. g. Ascospores. Scale bars: b, f=20 μm, c–e, g=10 μm.

FIGURE 4 in Morphological and phylogenetic evidence for recognition of a new species of Kirschsteiniothelia, K. agumbensis and validation of five new combinations in Kirschsteiniotheliaceae

FIGURE 4. Kirschsteiniothelia agumbensis (AMH 10646). a–f SEM of conidia. Scale bars: a–b = 20 µm. c–d = 2 µm. e–f = 20 µm.

opennotspecifiedApr 2024View details →

FIGURE 3. Maximum Likelihood tree generated from the combined ITS and LSU sequences. Bootstrap support values above 50 in A new species of Naematelia (Tremellales, Basidiomycota) from India

FIGURE 3. Maximum Likelihood tree generated from the combined ITS and LSU sequences. Bootstrap support values above 50 are indicated above branches. The new species is indicated in bold. Holotype is represented in red color. Cryptococcus depauperatus was set as the outgroup.

opennotspecifiedApr 2024View details →

FIGURE 5 in "Parting is such sweet sorrow [...]" , or the perils of publishing papers in parts: the case of the nomenclatural novelties published by Raymond Hamet (1890-1972) in his two-part monograph (1907, 1908) of Kalanchoe (Crassulaceae subfam. Kalanchooideae), with special reference to the new names and new combinations treated (but not first published) in part 2

FIGURE 5. The new combination Kalanchoe prolifera (Bowie ex Hooker 1859: t. 5147) Hamet (1907: 881) for the species figured here was first published in 1907, and not in the second part of Hamet's monograph, in 1908, as usually given.