Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 8 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 8. Distribution of sponge genera from museum collections (data from Frisone et al. 2016) and bulk sampling (this study). Error bars denote binomial standard errors of percentages.

Fig. 7 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 7. Families and relative abundances frequencies from museum collections (data from Frisone et al. 2016) and bulk sampling (this study). Error bars denote binomial standard errors of percentages.

Fig. 6 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 6. Comparison between frequency of museum collections (data from Frisone et al. 2016) and bulk field sampling (this study) at the ordinal level. Error bars denote binomial standard errors of percentages.

Fig. 5 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 5. Distribution of species richness (number of taxa) and species abundance (number of individuals per taxon) among classes.

Fig. 11 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 11. Rank-abundance distribution of bulk samples (A) and museum collection (Whittaker plots) (B). Y axis shows species abundance; X axis ranks each species in order from most to least abundant. Black dots represent species.

Fig. 2 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 2. Location (B) and geological map (A) of the study area (Verona and Vicenza provinces, Northern Italy), modified from http://gisgeologia.regione. veneto.it/, author: Regione Veneto, Sezione Geologia e Georisorse, and released under the Italian Open Data License 2.0 (https://www.dati.gov.it/content/ italian-open-data-license-v20). Outline of the Lessini Shelf during the Eocene modified from Bosellini (1989). The sponge-bearing outcrop is indicated by the white star near Chiampo. Cf, Castelvero fault; SVf, Schio-Vicenza fault; Pf, Pedemontana thrust fault.

Fig. 4 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 4. Rarefaction curve (line in the middle) of the Chiampo sponge fauna at Lovara. Grey area demarcate 95% confidence intervals of diversity estimates.

Fig. 12 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 12. In situ Eocene specimen of Laocoetis patula from Lovara Quarry, Italy; showing its characteristic morphology with canal openings in quadrate arrangement, indicated by the white arrow. Coin for scale is 22 mm in diameter.

Fig. 10 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 10. Percent similarity (A) and Jaccard similarity (B) measurements between bulk and museum collection material at different taxonomic levels.

Fig. 3 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 3. Bulk collection of Eocene sponges at Lovara Quarry. Some of the sponge specimens are indicated by white arrows.

Fig. 1 in Biodiversity of museum and bulk field samples compared: The Chiampo sponge fauna (Eocene, Lessini Mountains, Italy)

Fig. 1. Sponge fossils from the Eocene of Chiampo. A. The lyssacinosid Stauractinella eocenica Frisone, Pisera, and Preto, 2016. B. The lychniscosid Callicylix eocenicus Pisera and Busquets, 2002. C. The lithistid demosponge Platychonia sp. D. The hexactinosid Laocoetis patula Pomel, 1872. Scale bars 10 mm. Photos S. Castelli.

Fig. 2 in A Late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe

Fig. 2. Tridactyl tracks (pes prints) of possibly early ornithischian dinosaurs from the Czerwone Żlebki site, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian–Rhaetian), Poland. A, B. cf. Moyenisauropus isp. C, D. cf. Anomoepus isp. A–C. Specimens left in field. D. Specimen deposited at Tatra Mountains National Park, Zakopane, Poland. Photographs (A1–D1) and drawings (A2–D2). Scale bars 5 cm.

Fig. 7 in A Late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe

Fig. 7. Dinosaur ichnofauna of the Late Triassic of the Tatra Mountains, Poland and Slovakia. A. cf. Anomoepus isp. and cf. Moyenisauropus isp. Trackmakers: possibly early ornithischian dinosaurs. B. cf. Grallator isp. and Anchisauripus isp. Trackmakers: theropod dinosaurs. C. cf. Kayentapus isp. and cf. Eubrontes isp. Trackmakers: theropod dinosaurs. D.?Sauropodomorpha tracks indet. Trackmakers: "prosauropod" or sauropod dinosaurs. Abbreviation: TL, track length.

Fig. 6 in A Late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe

Fig. 6.?Sauropodomorph tracks indet. A. Specimen from the Czerwone Żlebki found in 2004, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian– Rhaetian), Poland. B. Specimen from the Červený Ŭplaz found in 2007, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian–Rhaetian), Slovakia. Both specimens left in field. Photographs (A1, B1) and drawings (A2,B2). Scale bars 5 cm.

Fig. 1. A in A Late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe

Fig. 1. A. The location of this area in Poland. B. Satellite map of the Western Tatra Mountains showing positions of sites at which dinosaur tracks have been recorded. C. Czerwone Żlebki tracksite, Poland. D. Červený Ŭplaz tracksite, Slovakia.

Fig. 4 in A Late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe

Fig. 4. Tridactyl tracks (pes prints) of small to large theropod dinosaurs. cf. Kayentapus isp. A, B. Specimens from Červený Üplaz site, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian–Rhaetian), Slovakia. C, D. Specimens from Czerwone Żlebki site, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian–Rhaetian), Poland. A. Specimen Z 14 296 housed at Slovak National Museum, Bratislava, Slovakia. B, D. Specimens left in field. C. Specimen deposited at Tatra Mountains National Park, Zakopane, Poland. Photographs (A1–D1) and drawings (A2–D2). Scale bars 5 cm.

Fig. 5 in A Late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe

Fig. 5. Tridactyl track (pes print) cf. Eubrontes isp. from Červený Ŭplaz site, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian–Rhaetian), Slovakia. Specimen left in field. Photograph (A) and drawing (B). Scale bars 5 cm.

Fig. 3 in A Late Triassic dinosaur-dominated ichnofauna from the Tomanová Formation of the Tatra Mountains, Central Europe

Fig. 3. Tridactyl tracks (pes prints) of small to medium sized theropod dinosaurs. A. cf. Grallator isp. B–E Anchisauripus isp. A, E. Specimens from Czerwone Żlebki site, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian–Rhaetian), Poland. B–D. Specimens from Červený Ŭplaz site, Tomanová Formation (?late Norian–Rhaetian), Slovakia. A, C, E. Specimens left in field. B. Specimen Z 14 297 housed at Slovak National Museum, Bratislava, Slovakia. D. Specimen deposited at Tatra Mountains National Park, Zakopane, Poland. Photographs (A1–E1) and drawings (A2–E2). Scale bars 5 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2012View details →

Fig. 15 in Biodiversity evolution through the Permian-Triassic boundary event: Ostracods from the Bükk Mountains, Hungary

Fig. 15. Ostracods from Bálvány North section, Bükk Mountains, Hungary. Right lateral views of complete carapaces. A. Bairdiacypris cf. fornicata Shi, 1982, UPMC P6M2863, sample 08BAN47, Upper Permian. B–J. Cytherellina? magyarorszagensis Forel sp. nov., Griesbachian, Lower Triassic. B. Holotype, UPMC P6M2864, sample 08BAN63. C. Paratype, UPMC P6M2865, sample 08BAN61. D. UPMC P6M2866, sample 08BAN61. E. UPMC P6M2867, sample 08BAN63. F. UPMC P6M2868, sample 08BAN63. G. UPMC P6M2869, sample 08BAN62. H. UPMC P6M2870, sample 08BAN61. I. UPMC P6M2871, sample 08BAN62. J. UPMC P6M2872, sample 08BAN62. K, L. Cytherellina? sp. E, Changhsingian, Upper Permian. K. UPMC P6M2873, sample 08BAN47. L. UPMC P6M2874, sample 08BAN47. M–P. Hungarella gerennavarensis Crasquin sp. nov., Griesbachian, Lower Triassic. M. Holotype, UPMC P6M2875, sample 08BAN62. N. Paratype, UPMC P6M2876, sample 08BAN67. O. UPMC P6M2877, sample 08BAN63. P. UPMC P6M2878, sample 08BAN63. Q–X. Microcheilinella egerensis Forel sp. nov., Griesbachian, Lower Triassic. Q. Holotype, UPMC P6M2879, sample 08BAN61. R. UPMC P6M2880, sample 08BAN63. S. Paratype, UPMC P6M2881, sample 08BAN61. T. UPMC P6M2882, sample 08BAN62. U. UPMC P6M2883, sample 08BAN61. V. UPMC P6M2884, sample 08BAN61. W. UPMC P6M2885, sample 08BAN63. X. UPMC P6M2886, sample 08BAN61. Scale bars 100 µm.