Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,913
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,913 results for “Morphological characters”
Figure 37 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 37. Distribution of georeferenced specimens of C. rekohuensis in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand (circles). The four largest islands from west to east are Little Mangere, Mangere, Pitt, and Rangatira. The record off the north-west coast of Pitt Island is from the tiny Rabbit Island. This species is also known from Star Keys, 14.5 km east of Pitt Island. For location of Chatham Islands see Figure 34.
Figure 27 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 27. Creophilus imitator, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); C, median lobe apex, ventral; D, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); E, pronotum (female); F, female internal genitalia, ventral – arrow indicates small sclerotic ridges of vaginal fold; G, paramere, dorsal; H, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper). Abbreviations: T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: H = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 25 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 25. Creophilus erythrocephalus, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, pronotum (large male); B, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); C, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); D, paramere, dorsal. Abbreviations: T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 24 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 24. Distribution of all georeferenced Creophilus specimens from South America. C. variegatus (triangles), C. erythrocephalus (squares), C. maxillosus maxillosus (circles).
Figure 21 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 21. Creophilus flavipennis, details of morphology (setae of head, mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, head, dorsal (small male); B, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); C, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); D, paramere, dorsal; E, apical part of median lobe with fully everted internal sac, right lateral; F, aedeagus with details of internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); G, pronotum (small male); H, female internal genitalia, ventral – arrow indicates subsclerotized or pigmented regions; I, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper); J, median lobe apex, ventral – arrow indicates internal tooth flanking the groove of the median orifice. Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: I = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 26 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 26. Distribution of all georeferenced Australian specimens of C. erythrocephalus (circles). See Figure 24 for distribution in South America, and Figure 28 for New Guinea. This species is also known from Lord Howe Island, Fiji, French Polynesia, New Caledonia, Tonga, and Vanuatu.
Figure 32 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 32. Creophilus oculatus, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); C, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, ventral; D, same, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); E, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper); F, pronotum (female); G, female internal genitalia, ventral; H, paramere, dorsal; I, median lobe apex, ventral. Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: E = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 29 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 29. Creophilus lanio, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); C, female internal genitalia, ventral; D, paramere, dorsal; E, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); F, pronotum (female); G, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper); H, basal cap of internal sac; I, median lobe apex, ventral. Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: G and H = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 20 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 20. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. galapagensis on Isla Isabela in the Galapagos Islands (circles). The species is also known from Fernandina, Santiago and San Cristóbal Islands.
Figure 17 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 17. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. incanus in Madagascar and Mayotte (circles). This species is also known from Réunion and Mauritius islands.
Figure 16 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 16. Creophilus incanus, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown; anterior is to the left); C, median lobe apex, ventral; D, paramere, dorsal; E, apical part of median lobe with fully everted internal sac, right lateral; F, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); G, pronotum (small male); H, right elytron (only whitish setae shown); I, female internal genitalia, ventral (surface of vf with minute teeth as shown for vp of C. maxillosus villosus in Fig. 9M); J, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper). Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 15 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 15. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. maxillosus villosus (white circles) and C. m. maxillosus (black circles) in North America. Creophilus m. villosus is also recorded from Guatemala, Panama, and Chile (no locality). The holotype of C. arcticus, a synonym of C. m. villosus, is from Russia: Kamchatka.
Figure 14 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 14. Ventral vestiture patterning of A, C. maxillosus maxillosus and B, C. m. villosus. Scale bar = 10 mm.
Figure 13 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 13. Creophilus maxillosus, details of morphology (setae of mandibles, antenna, and pronotum omitted). C. m. maxillosus (A–G); C. m. villosus (H). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right elytron (only whitish setae shown) C, paramere, dorsal; D, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); E, pronotum (small male); F, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); G, female internal genitalia, ventral H, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper). Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: H = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 35 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 35. Distribution of all georeferenced specimens of C. huttoni in southern New Zealand (circles). For location of map within New Zealand see rectangle in Figure 34.
Figure 12 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 12. Strict consensus of 11 most-parsimonious trees from the combined analysis of 121 adult morphological characters of the Creophilus complex (TL = 297; CI = 0.55; RI = 0.78). A, bars indicate the proportional contribution of each character system to the total synapomorphies supporting each clade. Numbers above branches are partitioned Bremer support values for structure, male genitalia, female genitalia, and chaetotaxy characters, respectively; small numbers below branches are bootstrap proportions. B, filled squares = uniquely optimized character state changes, open squares = homoplasious changes. Character and state numbers are given above and below branches, respectively. * = ACCTRAN; + = DELTRAN. Taxa in bold type are marine littoral species. Large numbers 1–18 indicate nodes referred to in the text.
Figure 36 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 36. Creophilus rekohuensis, details of morphology (A, B, D–H, J, K = holotype; setae of mandibles, antenna, pronotum, and legs omitted). A, mandibles, dorsal (bases omitted); B, right antenna, dorsal (only apical setae shown); C, ventral sclerite of internal sac, ventral (lower) and apical (upper); D, paramere, dorsal; E, aedeagus with details of inverted internal sac, ventral; F, same, right lateral (parameral setae omitted); G, protarsus, dorsal; H, pronotum; I, female internal genitalia, ventral; J, right protibia, anterior; K, median lobe apex, ventral. Abbreviations: T1, T2, T3, mandibular teeth. Additional abbreviations as in Figure 3 (male) and Figure 5 (female). Scale bars: C = 0.1 mm; rest = 1 mm.
Figure 10 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 10. Scanning electron micrographs of copulatory pieces. A, Creophilus flavipennis; B, C. maxillosus villosus; C, C. erythrocephalus. Abbreviations as in Figures 3 and 4. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.
Figure 8 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 8. Details of morphology (vestiture omitted). Platydracus maculosus (A–C); Hadropinus fossor (D, E); Thinopinus pictus (F, G). A, head, dorsal; B, head, ventral; C, abdominal segments II–V, dorsal; D, right protibia, posterior; E, same, dorsal; F, abdominal segments II and III, dorsolateral; G, abdominal segment II, dorsal. Abbreviations: af, anterolateral flange; bgi, basal gular impression; io, infraorbital ridge; mem, medial emargination; nr, nuchal ridge; pg, postgenal ridge; po, postoccipital suture; ps, parasclerite; sbm, sinuate basal abdominal margin; spi, spiracle; vb, ventral basal ridge. Abbreviations of macrosetae as in Figure 6. Scale bars = 1 mm.
Figure 11 in Testing the phylogenetic utility of morphological character systems, with a revision of Creophilus Leach (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
Figure 11. Strict consensus trees from analysis of combined and separate character systems. Grey dots indicate nodes congruent with the analysis of all the data. Numbers above branches indicate Bremer support; numbers below branches are numbered nodes referred to in the text. The taxonomic congruence (Mickevich, 1978) tree represents the strict consensus of trees obtained in the separate analyses. Tree statistics are presented in Table 1.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.