Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 2 in A study of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in its native range: further insights into life cycle, larval identification, developmental parameters, natural enemies, and damage to the host plant Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae)

Fig. 2. Description of spots and setae from larval I to VI, shown in the pro- and meso-thoracic segment, and the seventh and anal abdominal segments: D1–2: dorsal setae; SD1–2: subdorsal setae; XD1–2: prothoracic setae; L1–3: lateral setae; SV1–2: subventral setae; PP1: posterior setae; spot "k" in prothorax, "h" in mesothorax, "a" and "c" in the seventh abdominal segment, and anal shield in the tenth and last abdominal segment.

Fig. 5 in A study of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in its native range: further insights into life cycle, larval identification, developmental parameters, natural enemies, and damage to the host plant Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae)

Fig. 5. Number of larvae of Cactoblastis cactorum per mo from all sites of Tucumán and the proportion of those that were parasitized by Apanteles.

Fig. 1 in A study of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in its native range: further insights into life cycle, larval identification, developmental parameters, natural enemies, and damage to the host plant Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae)

Fig. 1. (a) An eggstick oviposited on a pad of Opuntia ficus indica; (b) Anterior part of the larva exhibiting the cephalic capsule and prothorax starting to sclerotize; (c) Larva II has a dark shield on the prothorax and small macula at the base of each setae in the abdomen; (d) Larva III with bigger maculae with alternating color intensity on successive segments; (e) Larva IV with a white line between the head capsule and prothorax shield; (f) Larva V characterized by almost continuous black rings on the abdomen on an orange-brownish back- ground; (g) Typical bright orange larval VI with the prothorax shield fractured in 2 and apparently continuous black rings; (h) pupa within silk cocoon and naked pupa; Cactoblastis cactorum females (lef) and males (right); females have longer palps (i) than males (j). Both genders are characterized by a transverse line in the distal part of the wings (k, l).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 2 in Biology of Spodoptera eridania and Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants

Fig. 2. Number of eggs (mean ± SE) of Spodoptera cosmioides on different sectors of the host canopy (a and c) and host species (b and d) in no-choice (a and b) and free-choice (c and d) tests. Means followed by the same letter did not differ between canopy sectors (bottom, middle, and upper) or different hosts (Tukey's HSD test, p ≤ 0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Biology of Spodoptera eridania and Spodoptera cosmioides (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on different host plants

Fig. 1. Number of eggs (mean ± SE) of Spodoptera eridania on different sectors of the host canopy (a and c) and host species (b and d) in no-choice (a and b) and free-choice (c and d) tests. Means followed by the same letter did not differ between canopy sectors (bottom, middle, and upper) or different hosts (Tukey's HSD test, p ≤ 0.05).

Fig. 2 in Oviposition preference of rugose spiraling whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on five host plant species

Fig. 2. The cumulative number of eggs deposited on different plants during the experiment. The average cumulative number of eggs was always greatest on gumbo limbo.

Fig. 3 in A study of Cactoblastis cactorum (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) in its native range: further insights into life cycle, larval identification, developmental parameters, natural enemies, and damage to the host plant Opuntia ficus-indica (Caryophyllales: Cactaceae)

Fig. 3. Proportion of individuals of different developmental stages of Cactoblastis cactorum in Tucumán throughout the year. Inside the bars: E = eggsticks, L = larvae, P = pupae.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Relationship between host searching and wind direction in Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Fig. 3. Mean numbers (± SE) of Ophraella communa eggs and adults at various cardinal directions from the center of each plot on common ragweed plants in the concentric bands. Data represented by columns bearing the same letters were not significantly different (LSD, a = 0.05). The dominant direction of the wind during the period of the entire experiment was from the south.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Relationship between host searching and wind direction in Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Fig. 1. Plot design to study the location of host plants by Ophraella communa adults in relation to wind direction. This diagram displays the planting pattern for 1 m wide concentric plots of the host, common ragweed, separated by 1 m wide concentric barriers of a non-host, sunflower.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Relationship between host searching and wind direction in Ophraella communa (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae)

Fig. 2. Wind roses at different dates observed by Changsha Meteorological Observatory from 5 Jul to 15 Aug 2010. The letters a, b, c, d, and e in each small figure represented general wind roses on 5–10 Jul, 11–20 Jul, 21–31 Jul, 1–10 Aug, and 11–15 Aug 2010, respectively.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in The effects of non-host plant extracts on the oviposition deterrent and ovicidal activity of Conopomorpha sinensis Bradley (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 1. The effect of 5 plant extracts on oviposition activity index (OAI) values of Conopomorpha sinensis in the choice test. Plant extracts with oviposition activity indexes of ≥ 0.3 are considered as attractants, whereas those of ≤ −0.3 are considered to be deterrents. Negative values indicate that more eggs were deposited in the control group than those in groups receiving treatment with plant extracts.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Fig. 2 in Solanum lycocarpum Saint Hilaire (Solanaceae) is host plant of Leucanella memusae (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Hemileucinae) in Brazilian mountain grasslands

Fig. 2. Adults (lef: female above, male below), cocoon (center, above), egg cluster (center, below), pupa (right, above), and Belvosia sp. (Diptera: Tachinidae) parasitoid of Leucanella memusae (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Hemileucinae). Diamantina, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Solanum lycocarpum Saint Hilaire (Solanaceae) is host plant of Leucanella memusae (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Hemileucinae) in Brazilian mountain grasslands

Fig. 1. Leucanella memusae (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Saturniidae: Hemileucinae) larvae of different ages on leaves of Solanum lycocarpum Saint Hilaire (Solanaceae). Diamantina, Minas Gerais State, Brazil.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2019View details →

Fig. 1 in Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Brazil: recent spread, natural enemies, and new hosts

Fig. 1. Geographic distribution of Maconellicoccus hirsutus (Green) (Hemiptera: Pseudococcidae) in Brazil, and M. hirsutus collection locations in the state of Espírito Santo, Brazil.

Fig. 5 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 5. Fruit infestation and population fluctuation of Anastrepha fraterculus in (A) pears, (B) peaches, and (C) mandarins. Cn = Canelones, Py = Paysandú; FTD = flies per trap per d; Af = Anastrepha fraterculus.

Fig. 6 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 6. Population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata males (M) in Jackson traps (Cc) and females (H) in McPhail traps. A, B, C, D = cultivars where fruit infestation was recorded (A, B = Canelones; C, D = Paysandú); E, F, G, H = cultivars where no fruit infestation was recorded (E, F = Paysandú; G, H = San José).

Fig. 4 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 4. Population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata registered in McPhail traps in mandarins (A) with fruit infestation and (B) without fruit infestation. Py = Paysandú, SJ = San José, W = Washington; FTD: flies per trap per d; Cc = Ceratitis capitata.

Fig. 3 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 3. Fruit infestation and population fluctuation of Ceratitis capitata registered in McPhail traps in (A) pears and (B) peaches. Cn = Canelones, SJ = San José; FTD = flies per trap per d; Cc = Ceratitis capitata.

Fig. 2 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 2. Spatial distribution of accumulated captures and fruit infestation of Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha fraterculus during the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 seasons. Ap = Apple: ERO = Early Red One, RCh = Red Chief, RD = Red Delicious; Pch = Peach: JG = June Gold, EL = Elegant Lady, RM = Rey del Monte, PC = Pavía Canario, F = Forastero; Nc = Nectarine: L = Lara, F = Fantasía; Pr = Pear: W = William's; Mn = Mandarin: E = Elenadalle, O = Ortanique, S = Satsuma; Or = Orange: V = Valencia, WN = Washington Navel; Gf = Grapefruit: SR = Star Rubí. Cc = C. capitata, Af = A. fraterculus. The accumulated captures per season were calculated by adding captures from the date that traps were installed (1 Sep, 30 Oct, and 1 Nov 2014 in San José, Canelones, and Paysandú, respectively) until 30 Jun 2015, and for the same period from spring 2015 until Jun 2016.

Fig. 1 in Spatio-temporal distribution of Anastrepha fraterculus and Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) captures and their relationship with fruit infestation in farms with a diversity of hosts

Fig. 1. Average number of fruit flies per McPhail trap per d (FTD) of Ceratitis capitata (Cc) and Anastrepha fraterculus (Af) in Paysandú (Py) and Canelones (Cn).