Find research datasets worth reusing

opennotspecifiedDec 2013View details →

FIGURE 10 in Ampharetidae (Annelida: Polychaeta) from Japan. Part II: Genera with elevated and modified notopodia

FIGURE 10. Sosane trigintaduo sp. nov. A: anterior end, dorsal view, 36x, B: anterior end of a paratype, lateral view, 34x, C: prostomium, dorsal view, 36x, D: posterior end, dorsolateral view, 32x, E: thoracic unciniger 10, anterior view, 60x, F: modified notochaeta of thoracic unciniger 10, 1100x, G: posterior end, ventral view, 64x, H: thoracic uncinus, 990x.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →

FIGURE 3 in Phylogenetic position of Electrostrymon picoloro, a new high elevation hairstreak from western Colombia (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae: Eumaeini)

FIGURE 3. One of two most parsimonious trees (cf. the matrix in the supplementary file). The initial "R" and "E" denote Rubroserrata (the outgroup) and Electrostrymon, respectively. The E. guzanta species complex is denoted by a yellow star. The lineage "guzanta*" includes the identically coded E. guzanta and E. perisus. The lineage "hugon***" includes the identically coded E. hugon, E. angerona, E. angelia, and E. dominicana.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →

FIGURES 4–6 in A new genus and two new species of Araecerini from high elevation in the Andes with a synopsis of the tribe in South America (Coleoptera, Anthribidae, Choraginae)

FIGURES 4–6. Neoxenus corrugatus Mermudes sp. nov., holotype male: 4, dorsal habitus; 5, lateral habitus; 6, rostrum frontal and antennae. Scale bars: 4–5 = 1 mm; 6 = 100 µm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2015View details →

FIGURES 1–3 in A new genus and two new species of Araecerini from high elevation in the Andes with a synopsis of the tribe in South America (Coleoptera, Anthribidae, Choraginae)

FIGURES 1–3. Aurigeripilus andinus Mermudes gen. nov. et sp. nov., holotype male: 1, dorsal habitus; 2, lateral habitus; 3, head and rostrum, dorsal. Scale bars: 1–2 = 1 mm; 3 = 200 µm.

FIG. 9 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 9. Ampelisca cavicoxa. Male. (A) head; (B) pereopod 3; (C) basal of the pereopod 6; (D) epimeral plate 1; (E) epimeral plate 2; (F) epimeral plate 3; (G) uropod 1; (H) uropod 2; (I) uropod 3. The scale is the same for A, B, C. For the other drawing the scale is the same than G.

FIG. 8 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 8. Ampelisca cavicoxa. Female: (A) pereopod 5; (B) pereopod 6; (C) pereopod 7; (D) epimeral plate 1; (E) epimeral plate 2; (F) epimeral plate 3; (G) carina; (H) uropod 1; (I) uropod 2; (J) uropod 3; (K) telson. Male: (L) telson.

FIG. 7 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 7. Ampelisca cavicoxa. (A) Male; (B) basal of the pereopod 5 of the male; (C) carina of the male; (D) female. Female articles: (E) head; (F) gnathopod 1; (F1) enlargement of the lower posterior corner of gnathopod 1; (G) gnathopod 2; (G1) enlargement of the lower posterior corner of gnathopod 2; (H) pereopod 3; (I) pereopod 4. The scale is the same for B, C, F, G, H, I.

FIG. 4 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 4. Ampelisca pectenata. Male: (A) pleopod 1; (B) coupling spine of pleopod 1; (C) epimeral plate 1; (D) epimeral plate 2; (E) epimeral plate 3; (F) carina; (G) uropod 1; (H) uropod 2; (I) uropod 3; (J) telson. Female: (K) labrum; (L) maxillae 1; (M) maxillae 2.

FIG. 2 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 2. Ampelisca pectenata: (A) male; (B) female. Male articles: (C) head; (D) labrum; (E) mandible; (F) labium; (G) maxillae 1; (H) maxillae 2; (I) maxilliped.

FIG. 3 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 3. Ampelisca pectenata male. (A) Gnathopod 1; (A1) enlargement of the lower posterior corner of gnathopod 1; (B) gnathopod 2; (B1) enlargement of the lower posterior corner of gnathopod 2; (C) pereopod 3 (D) pereopod 4; (E) pereopod 5; (F) pereopod 6; (G) pereopod 7.

FIG. 5 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 5. Ampelisca pectenata female. (A) Head; (B) labium; (C) mandible; (D) maxilliped; (E) gnathopod 1; (E1) enlargement of the lower posterior corner of gnathopod 1; (F) pereopod 3; (G) pereopod 7; (H) pleopod 1; (I) bi®d ciliated setae of the pleopod rami.

FIG. 1 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 1. Sampling stations: () samples of Y. Monbet; (+) samples of J. P. LagardeÁre; (_) samples of F. LagardeÁre.

FIG. 6 in Elevation of two eastern Atlantic varieties of Ampelisca brevicornis Costa, 1853) (Crustacea, Amphipoda) to full speci®c rank with redescription of the species

FIG. 6. Ampelisca pectenata female. (A) Gnathopod 2; (A2) enlargement of the lower posterior corner of gnathopod 2; (B) pereopod 4; (C) pereopod 5; (D) pereopod 6; (E) epimeral plate 1; (F) epimeral plate 2; (G) epimeral plate 3; (H) carina; (I) uropod 1; (J) uropod 2; (K) uropod 3; (L) telson.

opennotspecifiedSep 2013View details →

Figs. 3–4 in Myriochila (Monelica) Confluentesubtilis (W. Horn, 1914) (Coleoptera: Carabidae: Cicindelinae): Elevation To Species Status And New Record For Guinea-Bissau

Figs. 3–4. Myriochila species, aedeagi, lateral view. 3) Myriochila confluentesubtilis; 4) M. vicina vicina.

Figure 8 in Variation in a Darwin Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Community along an Elevation Gradient in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot: Implications for Ecology and Conservation

Figure 8. Vegetation predictors of the pimpline community across traps (n = 30). (a) Epiphyte density against log richness; (b) herb ground cover against the log of inverse Simpson's Index of Diversity;

Figure 7 in Variation in a Darwin Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Community along an Elevation Gradient in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot: Implications for Ecology and Conservation

Figure 7. Pimplinae community composition, as measured by the first axis of a Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling analysis (NMDS1, see Figure 6) across sampling sites (n = 15), against the first Principal Component (PC1) of the habitat variables at those sites (see Table 4). The line is the linear regression (±95% CI in gray). The figure demonstrates that pimpline community composition is very strongly associated with differences in habitat characteristics across sites.

Figure 6 in Variation in a Darwin Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Community along an Elevation Gradient in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot: Implications for Ecology and Conservation

Figure 6. An ordination using Non-metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) of the pimpline community at the site level. Black numbers and points indicate the 15 sampling sites, going from the bottom of the mountain (1) to the top (15). Species are in gray, small lettering.

Figure 4 in Variation in a Darwin Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Community along an Elevation Gradient in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot: Implications for Ecology and Conservation

Figure 4. Pimplinae wasp community metrics against elevation (altitude) across 30 traps. (a) Abundance; (b) Log10 Species Richness; (c) Log10 Simpson's Index (1/D); and (d) Shannon Index. Lines are the equations of the polynomial linear model in Table 2 with the lowest AICc, ±95%CI; (a,b): cubic models (c,d): quadratic models.

Figure 2 in Variation in a Darwin Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Community along an Elevation Gradient in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot: Implications for Ecology and Conservation

Figure 2. Some of the Pimplinae wasp species sampled (all are females). (a) Dolichomitus megalourus (scale bar 4 mm), 10 individuals sampled; (b) Neotheronia charli (scale bar 1 mm), 24 individuals sampled; (c) Neotheronia sp. 6 (scale bar 1 mm), 26 individuals sampled; (d) Pimpla caerulea (scale bar 1 mm), 447 individuals sampled; (e) Polysphincta organensis (scale bar 2 mm), 19 individuals sampled; and (f) Polysphincta teresa (scale bar 2 mm), 8 individuals sampled.

Figure 3 in Variation in a Darwin Wasp (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Community along an Elevation Gradient in a Tropical Biodiversity Hotspot: Implications for Ecology and Conservation

Figure 3. Species richness of pimplines against sampling intensity. (a) Estimates of total species richness against number of traps sampled (filled circles: observed data; open circles: bootstrap; diamonds: first-order jackknife; triangles: Chao; squares: second-order jackknife); (b) site-level rarefaction (±SD); (c) trap-level rarefaction (±SD); (d) mean individual-level rarefaction for the whole data (top line) and altitudinally-zoned subsets (from top to bottom, 332–549 m, 703–887 m, 952–1071 m, 110–150 m, and 1236–1482 m, which are superimposed, 1649–1812 m and 1935–2169 m), points are literature-based data covering the same span of sampling intensities for comparison from [45]. Note the log scale on the y-axis.