Find research datasets worth reusing

Рис. 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – биотоп, ассоциация Cirsium acanthoides; 2 – Λичинка внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 3 – моΛоÃой жук внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 4 – гоΛова Λичинки; 5 – внешний виÃ Λичинки; 6 – внешний виÃ кукоΛки. Figs 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – biotope, Cirsium acantoides association; 2 – larva within the stalk of the host plant; 3 – young beetle inside the stalk of the host plant; 4 – head of the larva; 5 – habitus of the larva; 6 – habitus of the pupa. in Description of the preimaginal stages and biology of the weevil Lixus (Dilixellus) pulverulentus (Scopoli, 1763) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixini)

Рис. 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – биотоп, ассоциация Cirsium acanthoides; 2 – Λичинка внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 3 – моΛоÃой жук внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 4 – гоΛова Λичинки; 5 – внешний виÃ Λичинки; 6 – внешний виÃ кукоΛки. Figs 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – biotope, Cirsium acantoides association; 2 – larva within the stalk of the host plant; 3 – young beetle inside the stalk of the host plant; 4 – head of the larva; 5 – habitus of the larva; 6 – habitus of the pupa.

Figure. 3 in Niche separation between the cosmopolitan species Drosophila melanogaster and the tropical Asian species Drosophila ananassae based on larval host-plant species

Figure. 3. Statistical interaction between Drosophila species and larval host plant in determining the number of male flies eclosing in the present experiment. Blue circles represent replicates for Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila melanogaster when raised on cucumberfruit (Averrhoa bilimbi). Red circles indicate replicates where D. ananassae or D. melanogaster were raised on banana (Musa sp.). The number of male flies eclosing from each replicate are presented as squareroot transformed data (variable: TFlies), since the transformed data were used in the ANOVA to determine the statistical significance of this statistical interaction. Da. = Drosophila ananassae, Dm.= Drosophila melanogaster.

Figure 2 in Niche separation between the cosmopolitan species Drosophila melanogaster and the tropical Asian species Drosophila ananassae based on larval host-plant species

Figure 2. Number of Drosophila ananassae and Drosophila melanogaster eclosing in the present experiment, pooling across fruit types. Da. = Drosophila ananassae, Dm.= Drosophila melanogaster.

Figure 1 in Niche separation between the cosmopolitan species Drosophila melanogaster and the tropical Asian species Drosophila ananassae based on larval host-plant species

Figure 1. Number of male flies eclosing from cucumberfruit (Averrhoa bilimbi) vs. banana (Musa species), pooled across Drosophila Species.

Fig. 4 in New hosts for a snake's helminth: First report of intermediate and definitive hosts naturally infected by Ophidascaris arndti (Ascarididae) in the wild

Fig. 4. Scanning electron micrographs of Ophidascaris arndti larva from Akodon montensis. (A) Body; (B) Anterior end; (C) Apical view, amphids (am) and double papillae (dp); (D) Posterior end lateral view, anus (A).

Fig. 3 in New hosts for a snake's helminth: First report of intermediate and definitive hosts naturally infected by Ophidascaris arndti (Ascarididae) in the wild

Fig. 3. Scanning electron micrographs of Ophidascaris arndti from Bothrops freitasi: (A) Male ventral view of the posterior end papillae (arrow); (B) Male cloaca (c) and papillae (arrow); (C) Male ventral view of tail, cloaca (c), papillae (arrow), and phasmid (ph, arrowhead); (D) Female ventro-lateral view of tail.

Fig. 2 in New hosts for a snake's helminth: First report of intermediate and definitive hosts naturally infected by Ophidascaris arndti (Ascarididae) in the wild

Fig. 2. Scanning electron micrographs of Ophidascaris arndti from Bothrops freitasi adult female. (A) Anterior end lateral view showing the excretory pore (arrow); (B) Dorsal view of lips, dorsal lip (D), double papillae (dp), lateroventral lips (LV), amphids (am), pointed depression (arrowhead); (C) Detail of denticles; (D) Detailed amphids.

Fig. 1 in New hosts for a snake's helminth: First report of intermediate and definitive hosts naturally infected by Ophidascaris arndti (Ascarididae) in the wild

Fig. 1. Light microscopy drawing of adult Ophidascaris arndti from Bothrops freitasi. (A) Female anterior end lateral view; (B) Female lips apical view; (C) Male posterior end lateral view, spicule, and ejaculatory duct; (D) Female posterior end ventral view; (E) Spicules; (F) Lateral view of the vulva, vagina, and uterine branches.

Fig. 5 in New hosts for a snake's helminth: First report of intermediate and definitive hosts naturally infected by Ophidascaris arndti (Ascarididae) in the wild

Fig. 5. Photomicrography of Ophidascaris arndti larva from Akodon montensis. (A) Anterior end lateral view; (B) Posterior end lateral view.

Fig. 6 in New hosts for a snake's helminth: First report of intermediate and definitive hosts naturally infected by Ophidascaris arndti (Ascarididae) in the wild

Fig. 6. Phylogenetic relationships Bayesian tree based on partial MT-CO1 gene sequences of ascaridoid specimens, including Ophidascaris and outgroup. The numbers at the nodes are BPPs (left) and aLRT (right). The scale bar represents the number of substitutions per site.

Fig. 6 in Role of landscape context in Toxoplasma gondii infection of invasive definitive and intermediate hosts on a World Heritage Island

Fig. 6. Relative density of black rats in different land-use types, as expressed by the capture rate by traps, i.e., number of individuals captured per 100 trapdays. Numerals above the bars indicate total trap-days.

Fig. 5 in Role of landscape context in Toxoplasma gondii infection of invasive definitive and intermediate hosts on a World Heritage Island

Fig. 5. Anti-Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and OD values of black rats as a function of the number of cattle barns within 1 ha or individual body weight. Gray areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Dots represent individuals. The color becomes darker with increasing sample size.

Fig. 4 in Role of landscape context in Toxoplasma gondii infection of invasive definitive and intermediate hosts on a World Heritage Island

Fig. 4. Model averaged coefficients of variables (GLM) explaining seroprevalence and OD values of black rats. Bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Fig. 2 in Role of landscape context in Toxoplasma gondii infection of invasive definitive and intermediate hosts on a World Heritage Island

Fig. 2. Model averaged coefficients of variables (GLM) explaining seroprevalence and OD values of cats. Bars indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Fig. 3 in Role of landscape context in Toxoplasma gondii infection of invasive definitive and intermediate hosts on a World Heritage Island

Fig. 3. Anti-Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence and OD values of cats as a function of the number of cattle barns within 1 ha or individual body weight. Gray areas indicate 95% confidence intervals. Dots represent individuals. The color becomes darker with increasing sample size.

Fig. 1 in Role of landscape context in Toxoplasma gondii infection of invasive definitive and intermediate hosts on a World Heritage Island

Fig. 1. Map showing the study area. Open circles and black triangles in the map indicate, respectively, capture sites of cats and black rats.

Fig. 1 in Are feral goats intermediate hosts for Linguatula (Pentastomida) in Australia?

Fig. 1. Anterior end of infective nymph of Linguatula sp. removed from capsule within mesenteric lymph node of a feral goat examined in this study. Lateral view. Note capsule wall on left side of photograph. ah, anterior hook; as, annular spine; bc, buccal capsule; dap, dorsal accessory piece; ph, posterior hook. Scale bar 50 μm.

Fig. 6 in Interactions of cranial helminths in the European polecat (Mustela putorius): Implications for host body condition

Fig. 6. Marginal effects plot of the gamma generalised linear model of the Zeroaltered gamma model, predicting kidney fat weight as a function of snout-vent length and sex of the host. The colour of the 95% confidence interval corresponds to the sex of the same colour. The plot is based on the most parsimonious model identified after model selection (see Table 3). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 3 in Interactions of cranial helminths in the European polecat (Mustela putorius): Implications for host body condition

Fig. 3. Marginal effects plot of a logistic regression model predicting the presence (a) of T. acutum as a function of sex of the host and the presence/absence of S. nasicola, the other parasite, (b) of S. nasciola as a function of sex of the host and (c) of S. nasciola as a function of age of the host and the presence/absence of T. acutum. The 95% confidence intervals are shown as error bars or in grey. The plots is based on the most parsimonious model identified after model selection (see Table 1).

Fig. 5 in Interactions of cranial helminths in the European polecat (Mustela putorius): Implications for host body condition

Fig. 5. Marginal effects plot of the zero hurdle model of the Zero-altered gamma model, predicting the presence of kidney fat as a function of (a) snout-vent length, (b) abundance of T. acutum, (c) abundance of S. nasicola and (d) sex of the host. The 95% confidence intervals are shown in grey. The plot is based on the most parsimonious model identified after model selection (see Table 3).