Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 in The type material of the species of Laparocerus Schönherr, 1834 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae)

Figure 4. (A) Lectotype of Laparocerus subopacus Wollaston, 1865; (B) paralectotype of Laparocereus grossepunctatus Wollaston, 1864.

Figure 1 in The type material of the species of Laparocerus Schönherr, 1834 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae)

Figure 1. Holotype of Laparocerus doramasensis Uyttenboogaart, 19295hirtus Wollaston, 1864. (A) Lateral view; (B) dorsal view; (C) frontal view.

Figure 8 in The type material of the species of Laparocerus Schönherr, 1834 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae)

Figure 8. (A) Holotype of Laparocerus morio Boheman, 1834; (B) lectotype of Laparocerus tetricus (Boheman, 1834).

Figure 6 in The type material of the species of Laparocerus Schönherr, 1834 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae)

Figure 6. Type series of Cyclobarus susicus Escalera, 1914. (A) Paralectotype, with labels; (B) excluded paralectotype, with labels. Second label from the top is in Escalera's handwriting.

Figure 2 in The type material of the species of Laparocerus Schönherr, 1834 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae)

Figure 2. (A) Holotype of Laparocerus abditus Roudier, 1963; (B) holotype of Laparocerus lindbergi, Roudier, 1963.

Figure 7 in The type material of the species of Laparocerus Schönherr, 1834 (Coleoptera, Curculionidae, Entiminae)

Figure 7. (A) Paratype of Laparocerus curvipes Lindberg, 1950; (B) paratype of Laparocerus microphthalmus Lindberg, 1950; (C) paratype of Laparocerus transversus Lindberg, 1950.

Figure 7 in New Material of Barawertornis tedfordi, a Dromornithid Bird from the Oligo-Miocene of Australia, and its Phylogenetic Implications

Figure 7. Phylogenetic hypothesis of dromornithid relationships resulting from analysis of femoral characters only. Bootstrap values are indicated above branches; Bremer support values are indicated below branches. Support values to the left are from unordered analysis; values to the right are from ordered analysis.

Figure 4 in New Material of Barawertornis tedfordi, a Dromornithid Bird from the Oligo-Miocene of Australia, and its Phylogenetic Implications

Figure 4. Specimens of Barawertornis tedfordi. (A) QM F45420, shaft of right femur, cranial view; (B–C) QM F45419, right tarsometatarsus; (B) caudal view of proximal end; (C) caudal view of distal third. Scale = 10 mm.

Figure 5 in New Material of Barawertornis tedfordi, a Dromornithid Bird from the Oligo-Miocene of Australia, and its Phylogenetic Implications

Figure 5. Phylogenetic hypotheses of intrafamilial relationships within the Dromornithidae. (A) Single most parsimonious tree resulting from unordered analysis. Bootstrap values are indicated above branches; Bremer support values are indicated below branches. This tree topology was also derived in ordered analysis. (B) One of two equally parsimonious trees resulting from ordered analysis. Bootstrap values are indicated above branches.

Figure 3 in New Material of Barawertornis tedfordi, a Dromornithid Bird from the Oligo-Miocene of Australia, and its Phylogenetic Implications

Figure 3. Tarsometatarsus of Barawertornis tedfordi. (A–D) QM F45419, right tarsometatarsus broken into proximal and distal ends; (A) dorsal view; (B) plantar view; (C) proximal view; (D) distal view. Scale = 20 mm.

Figure 1 in New Material of Barawertornis tedfordi, a Dromornithid Bird from the Oligo-Miocene of Australia, and its Phylogenetic Implications

Figure 1. Specimens of Barawertornis tedfordi. (A–B) QM F45056, right femur missing distal third; (A) cranial view; (B) caudal view; (C–E) QM F39901, proximal end of right femur; (C) cranial view; (D) caudal view; (E) proximal view. Abbreviations: ra ridge A; rb ridge B; obt impressiones obturatoriae. Scale = 20 mm.

Figure 6 in New Material of Barawertornis tedfordi, a Dromornithid Bird from the Oligo-Miocene of Australia, and its Phylogenetic Implications

Figure 6. Strict consensus tree of two equally parsimonious trees resulting from ordered analysis. Bremer support values are indicated below branches.

Figure 2 in New Material of Barawertornis tedfordi, a Dromornithid Bird from the Oligo-Miocene of Australia, and its Phylogenetic Implications

Figure 2. Specimens of Barawertornis tedfordi. (A) QM F45417, proximal end of left tibiotarsus, cranial view; (B) QM F30828, proximal end of left tibiotarsus, proximal view; (C) QM F30802, proximal end of right tibiotarsus, proximal view; (D–H) QM F45416, left tibiotarsus; (D) cranial view; (E) caudal view; (F) lateral view; (G) medial view; (H) distal view. Scale = 20 mm.

Figure 13 in The Nomenclature and Type Material of Crocodylus johnstoni (Krefft, 1873)

Figure 13. Dorsal view of vertebrae and ribs of AM R134548 at midbody, showing damage to the transverse processes

Figure 12 in The Nomenclature and Type Material of Crocodylus johnstoni (Krefft, 1873)

Figure 12. Dorsal view of the mounted skeleton AM R134548, purported to be from the same individual as the

Figure 6 in The Nomenclature and Type Material of Crocodylus johnstoni (Krefft, 1873)

Figure 6. Reproduction of image of the cast of the head of the holotype of Crocodilus johnsonii Krefft, from Gray (1874). Note correspondence of the posterior edge of the cast with the anterior edge of the holotype skin.

Figure 1 in The Nomenclature and Type Material of Crocodylus johnstoni (Krefft, 1873)

Figure 1. Left lateral view of a dried head of Crocodylus johnstoni, possibly the holotype of Crocodilus australis Krefft and Tomistoma krefftii Gray, in Krefft (image created from Negative V343, Australian Museum Archives).

Figure 11. Image from Negative V345 in The Nomenclature and Type Material of Crocodylus johnstoni (Krefft, 1873)

Figure 11. Image from Negative V345 (Australian Museum Archives); dorsal view of the intact holotype skin of Crocodilus johnsonii Krefft. Compare with Fig. 2 (the same skin at the present time), and Figs 7–9, representing closer views of segments of the specimen.

Figure 4 in The Nomenclature and Type Material of Crocodylus johnstoni (Krefft, 1873)

Figure 4. Ventral view of holotype skin of Crocodilus johnsonii Krefft. Note the low number of transverse ventral scale rows on the body, diagnostic of this species.

Figure 7. Image from Negative V341 in The Nomenclature and Type Material of Crocodylus johnstoni (Krefft, 1873)

Figure 7. Image from Negative V341 (Australian Museum Archives); dorsal view of head and neck of holotype of Crocodilus johnsonii Krefft. Image most likely taken in 1873, at time of description. Compare with Figs 6 and 8. The white line between anterior rows of dorsal scutes appears to be a chalk mark that, together with the scute configuration, allows alignment of this image with Fig. 8.