Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,610
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,610 results for “economic”
Platform for Economic Analysis of Climate Hazards (PEACH): Gridded Hazards from 2000-2019
<p>A (quasi) global gridded hazard and socioeconomic exposure database, spanning 2000 to 2019, covering 14 climate impact drivers (CIDs) and 3 geophysical hazards.</p> <p>The Platform for Economic Analysis of Climate Hazards (PEACH) provides monthly data at an approximate 10 × 10 km resolution, with full coverage between 2004 and 2015. Unlike event-based datasets, PEACH avoids rigid inclusion thresholds whenever possible, enabling flexible definition of “extreme events” and analysis across the full hazard intensity spectrum. Six complementary socioeconomic and environmental variables are included: population, nighttime light, relative wealth, critical infrastructure, vegetation indices, and land use.</p> <p><strong>If you use PEACH in your work, please cite the paper:</strong><br>R. Reinhardt (2025) <em>The Platform for Economic Analysis of Climate Hazards (PEACH): Gridded Hazards from 2000-2019, </em> CES Working Paper, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne <a href="https://shs.hal.science/halshs-05314666v1" target="_blank" rel="noopener">⟨halshs-05314666⟩</a></p> <p><strong>Data Description</strong><br>The main dataset is provided in Apache Arrow Feather format, partitioned into world subregions based on the UN M49 classification. Each file contains monthly hazard exposure and socioeconomic variables per 10 km grid cell. Variable definitions, formats, and usage notes are detailed in the accompanying README.</p> <p>For ease of use, see also the <em>ConversionScript.zip</em> files, which include exemplary code for loading the data in R and Python.</p> <p><strong>Overview</strong></p> <ul> <li><strong>Temporal resolution:</strong> Monthly (2000–2019; full coverage 2004–2015)</li> <li><strong>Spatial resolution:</strong> 10 × 10 km grid cells (global coverage, rainfall quasi-global: 50°N–50°S)</li> <li><strong>Projection:</strong> EPSG:4326 (WGS 84, standard Mercator)</li> <li><strong>File format:</strong> Apache Arrow Feather (.feather), partitioned by UN M49 subregions</li> <li><strong>Hazards included:</strong></li> <ul> <li><em>Climate impact drivers (14):</em> mean air temperature, cold spells, extreme heat, mean precipitation, heavy precipitation, floods (river/pluvial), landslides, drought, fire weather & wildfires, severe windstorms, tropical cyclones, sand and dust environments (proxy indicator, not direct dust storm records), hail, air pollution (PM2.5/PM10).</li> <li><em>Geophysical hazards (3):</em> earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, tsunamis</li> </ul> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>Access information:</strong></p> <p><em>Access to the PEACH dataset is granted upon request for non-commercial academic and policy research. Requests will be processed as timely as possible, typically within a few business days.</em></p>
Data for : EU Green Deal improves food system sustainability with unequal economic impacts on consumers and producers of crops and livestock
<p>Data for an article in Communications Earth Environment - soler et al-SM3 file presents the economic model used to simulate the impacts of changes in agricultural practices, food waste and consumers' diets in the framemork of the European Green Deal proposed by the European Commission. It displays the data used to calibrate the economic model, the coefficients used to calculate the non-market environmental and nutritional impacts, and the detailed results of simulated scenarios. It provides the list of variables and parameters used in the model. The data sources used for the calibration process are detailed, as well as the status of each variable (endogenous vs exogenous). The model calibration process aims at determining (reproducing) the baseline scenario that represents the current situation; it checks that production, consumption, and price estimates calculated with the economic model are equal to those currently observed. </p> <p>soler et al-SM4 provides sensibility tests for different parameter sets</p>
An Evaluation of the Economic Impact of the UK City of Culture
<p>Since the perceived successes of Liverpool and Glasgow European Capital of Culture <br>(Garcia, 2005), there has been an emphasis by successive UK governments, and <br>particularly by those within the cultural sector to promote cultural activities as a panacea to <br>place based problems (Lash & Urry, 1994) (Miles & Paddison, 2005) By examining the bids <br>by applicant locations for the UK City of Culture initiative and the published information by <br>the awarding body, it is evident that alongside posited benefits to community cohesion, place <br>identity, raised profile and enrichment of the cultural life of local communities and visitors <br>there have also been assumptions and in many cases promises that The UK City of Culture <br>initiative would bring both immediate and long term economic benefits including: improved <br>footfall, improvements in retail vacancy rates, increased visitor numbers and improved hotel <br>occupancy rates, lowered unemployment rates- including specifically amongst young people, <br>job creation, inward investment and regeneration.<br>The following study contains quantitative analysis of evidence from bidding documents and <br>other sources from applicant cities bidding to become UK City of culture, in order to extract <br>the “hard” economic benefits that organisers often imply are intrinsically linked to becoming a <br>host city/location and aims to show whether the economic promise lives up to the hype of the <br>epistemological meta-narratives assigned to culture led exemplar cities (O'Dowd & <br>Komarova, 2013).<br>A detailed examination has been made of the bid documents and surrounding literature for <br>the 2017 Kingston upon Hull (Hull) and 2013 Derry/Londonderry bids, examining the detail <br>and quantum of economic promises made in these bids and comparing this with the <br>statistical evidence to indicate whether hosting the UK City of Culture had the impact that <br>was promised. Data was drawn from UK Office of National Statistics (ONS) NOMIS national <br>labour statistics, Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency (NISRA) labour and <br>Tourism statistics, Springboard, Centre for Cities, Local Authority and LEP (Local Enterprise <br>Partnership) sources to examine some of the key sustained economic improvements that <br>were claimed would be a result of hosting UK City of Culture in bid documents for Hull and <br>Derry/Londonderry relating to employment and youth employment, visitor numbers, Hotel <br>occupancy rates, capital investment and retail vacancy rates.<br>The results of the data show that in the areas analysed, little to no long term economic <br>benefits could be directly attributed to the hosting of UK City of Culture and that short term <br>benefits were quickly amortised and the analysis casts doubts over whether in fact there are any longer-term economic impact from hosting UK City of Culture and generates caveats as <br>to the validity of places legitimately using assumed long term economic benefits as an <br>argument to support their bids to become UK City of Culture. The results further raise the <br>question as to the opportunity cost of being a host city and whether the significant <br>investment by places in terms of money and other resources would be better spent on <br>directly on regeneration, stimulating job creation and inward investment rather than indirectly <br>with the hope that there will be an economic osmosis.</p>
Decision-making Impairments in OCD: An Integrated Behavioral Economics Model
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03420495. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Appropriateness of Colonoscopy Indication: an Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Impact.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06775951. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Medical and Economic Evaluation for Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02271659. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Economic Assessment of STarting Endoscopic Robotic Groin Hernia Repair
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04431271. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Subcutaneous Interval Lengthening of Vedolizumab for Economic Research
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06584162. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Evaluation of the Clinical and Economic Impact of painPRIMER in the Treatment of Low Back Pain in a Primary Care Setting
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01838057. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Health Status and Its Socio-economic Covariates of the Older Population in Poland - the Nationwide PolSenior2 Survey.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04026815. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
A Prospective and Observational Cohort Study to Evaluate the Treatment Model and Medical Economics of Advanced Gastric Cancer Chemotherapy in Clinical Practice in China
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01472250. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Prolaris Enhanced Risk Stratification - an ecONomic and clinicAL Evaluation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03851211. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Longitudinal Study of Behavioral Changes, Economic and Sociological After CAncer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02893774. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Impact of Oncotype DX® on Treatment Recommendation and Its Economic Evaluation Under the Brazilian Society Perspective
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05100277. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Influence of Socio-Economic Factor on Net Survival in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis in France ( ECOVIMUS).
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04028232. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Clinical and Economic Impact of an Electronic Medical Record Interfaced Decision Support System Reinforced With Patient Specific Pharmacogenetic Data for Minimizing Severe Drug-Drug Interactions
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01765621. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Medico-economic Evaluation of Strategies for the Lead Extraction of Implantable Defibrillator and Pacemakers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03121183. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Medico-economical Impact of the Brindley Neurosurgical Technique in France
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00221767. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Clinical and Economic Impact of Interventions by a Clinical Pharmacist on Antibiotic Use on Surgical Wards
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00431483. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Health Economics of a Novel Portable Non-Pneumatic Active Compression Device (NPCD) for Lymphedema/Phlebolymphedema
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06418282. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.