Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2022View details →

◂Fig. 6 Gynoecial development, fruit and seedling of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A–F light microscopy, G–K stereo microscopy of endocarp, mesocarp removed; L–O field images; TS in horizontal orientation). A, B TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and strongly stained, peripheral tissue). C, D TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). E Young fruit %note developing endocarp and flashily pink portions of the mesocarp). F TS of postanthetic flower %note three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). G TS of endocarp, with three developed embryos removed %note scanty endosperm). H Endocarp. J TS of endocarp. K Endocarp. L Immature fruits. M Mature fruits. N Seedlings %note short hypocotyl and long petioles of cotyledons). O Seedlings %note long hypocotyl and short petioles of cotyledons; image taken from cultivated plant, accession number 2012–0005, in the Botanical Garden Munich) %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; ao, abortive ovule; cot, cotyledon; db, dorsal bundle; c, calyx; ec, endocarp; ens, endosperm; ex, exocarp; fr, fruit; h, hypocotyl; int, integument; lb, lateral bundle; mc, mesocarp; o, ovule; pet, petiolus; sty, style; ut, peripheral tissue; vs, ventral slit) in Observations on flower and fruit anatomy in dioecious species of Cordia (Cordiaceae, Boraginales) with evolutionary interpretations

◂Fig. 6 Gynoecial development, fruit and seedling of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A–F light microscopy, G–K stereo microscopy of endocarp, mesocarp removed; L–O field images; TS in horizontal orientation). A, B TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and strongly stained, peripheral tissue). C, D TS of anthetic flower %note two to three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). E Young fruit %note developing endocarp and flashily pink portions of the mesocarp). F TS of postanthetic flower %note three abortive ovules and lignifying portions of prospective mesocarp). G TS of endocarp, with three developed embryos removed %note scanty endosperm). H Endocarp. J TS of endocarp. K Endocarp. L Immature fruits. M Mature fruits. N Seedlings %note short hypocotyl and long petioles of cotyledons). O Seedlings %note long hypocotyl and short petioles of cotyledons; image taken from cultivated plant, accession number 2012–0005, in the Botanical Garden Munich) %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; ao, abortive ovule; cot, cotyledon; db, dorsal bundle; c, calyx; ec, endocarp; ens, endosperm; ex, exocarp; fr, fruit; h, hypocotyl; int, integument; lb, lateral bundle; mc, mesocarp; o, ovule; pet, petiolus; sty, style; ut, peripheral tissue; vs, ventral slit)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2022View details →

◂Fig. 4 Gynoecium of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A–R light microscopy; TS in horizontal orientation). A Secantial section. B, C TS %note cellular organisation). D Secantial section. E, F TS %note cellular organisation). G Secantial section of young gynoecium showing cellular organisation. H–J TS %note lacking cellular organisation, localisation in K–M). K–M LS at different levels from outside to inside of the same specimen %note strongly stained peripheral tissue; asterisks indicate tissue illustrated in H–J). N TS %note dehiscence lines of the prospective endocarp). O, P TS showing transmission tissue and dorsal bundles at top of style. Q vascularisation at base of gynoecium %note strongly stained peripheral tissue). R Vascularisation at base of flower %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; db, dorsal bundle; dl, dehiscent line; ep, epidermis; lb, lateral bundle; tt, transmission tissue; ut, peripheral tissue; vb, ventral bundle; vs, ventral slit) in Observations on flower and fruit anatomy in dioecious species of Cordia (Cordiaceae, Boraginales) with evolutionary interpretations

◂Fig. 4 Gynoecium of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A–R light microscopy; TS in horizontal orientation). A Secantial section. B, C TS %note cellular organisation). D Secantial section. E, F TS %note cellular organisation). G Secantial section of young gynoecium showing cellular organisation. H–J TS %note lacking cellular organisation, localisation in K–M). K–M LS at different levels from outside to inside of the same specimen %note strongly stained peripheral tissue; asterisks indicate tissue illustrated in H–J). N TS %note dehiscence lines of the prospective endocarp). O, P TS showing transmission tissue and dorsal bundles at top of style. Q vascularisation at base of gynoecium %note strongly stained peripheral tissue). R Vascularisation at base of flower %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; db, dorsal bundle; dl, dehiscent line; ep, epidermis; lb, lateral bundle; tt, transmission tissue; ut, peripheral tissue; vb, ventral bundle; vs, ventral slit)

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2022View details →

◂Fig. 3 Gynoecium of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A, B stack shot images; C–K light microscopy; G polarised light; TS in horizontal orientation). A, B Anthetic female flower, calyx and corolla partly removed. B LS of gynoecium. C LS of functionally female flower %note strongly stained peripheral tissue of corolla, anther and gynoecium). D LS of gynoecium. E, F TS of functionally female flower %note strongly stained, peripheral tissue). G TS of functionally female flower %note crystal deposition). H LS of ovule %note stalked embryo sac). J TS of functionally male flower with non-functional ovules. K LS of functionally male flower %style lacking, original position indicated by an asterisk) %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; a,anther; bs, basal septum; c, calyx; car, carpel; co, corolla; db, dorsal bundles; es, embryo sac; fs, false septum; lb, lateral bundles; o, ovule; stg, stigma; sty, style; t, trichomes; tt, transmission tissue; ut, peripheral, strongly stained tissue; vb, ventral bundles; vs, ventral slit) in Observations on flower and fruit anatomy in dioecious species of Cordia (Cordiaceae, Boraginales) with evolutionary interpretations

◂Fig. 3 Gynoecium of C. crenata %yellow frames), C. cf. grandicalyx %blue frames) and C. sinensis %pink frames; A, B stack shot images; C–K light microscopy; G polarised light; TS in horizontal orientation). A, B Anthetic female flower, calyx and corolla partly removed. B LS of gynoecium. C LS of functionally female flower %note strongly stained peripheral tissue of corolla, anther and gynoecium). D LS of gynoecium. E, F TS of functionally female flower %note strongly stained, peripheral tissue). G TS of functionally female flower %note crystal deposition). H LS of ovule %note stalked embryo sac). J TS of functionally male flower with non-functional ovules. K LS of functionally male flower %style lacking, original position indicated by an asterisk) %LS, longisection; TS, transverse section; a,anther; bs, basal septum; c, calyx; car, carpel; co, corolla; db, dorsal bundles; es, embryo sac; fs, false septum; lb, lateral bundles; o, ovule; stg, stigma; sty, style; t, trichomes; tt, transmission tissue; ut, peripheral, strongly stained tissue; vb, ventral bundles; vs, ventral slit)

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in A new live trap for the acoustically orienting parasitoid fly Emblemasoma erro (Diptera: Sarcophagidae)

Fig. 2. Details of trap construction showing a) the trap box and b) the speaker box. To reveal internal components, the front-facing, side plywood panels of the trap and speaker boxes are not illustrated. Also, for clarity, only 3 of the 5 wire screen cones of the trap box are illustrated.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →

Fig. 1 in A new live trap for the acoustically orienting parasitoid fly Emblemasoma erro (Diptera: Sarcophagidae)

Fig. 1. The complete live trap deployed in the field. Captured flies are visible in the holding jar assembly at the top of the trap box.

Fig. 3 in A report of 18 unrecorded prokaryotic species isolated from the feces of an Oriental stork (Ciconia boyciana), and from the intestinal tracts of a cobitid fish (Kichulchoia multifasciata) and a Korean splendid dace (Coreoleuciscus splendidus)

Fig. 3. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, showing the relationship between the seven strains belonging to the phylum Firmicutes isolated in this study and the notable type species from each genus. The tree was reconstructed using neighbor joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms. Filled diamonds indicate corresponding branches present in the phylogenetic tree generated using the three different tree construction methods. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values of more than 70% are shown, based on 1000 replicates (NJ/MP/ML). Limnochorda pilosa HC45T (AP014924) was used as the outgroup. The bar indicates 0.02 accumulated substitutions per nucleotide.

Fig. 4 in A report of 18 unrecorded prokaryotic species isolated from the feces of an Oriental stork (Ciconia boyciana), and from the intestinal tracts of a cobitid fish (Kichulchoia multifasciata) and a Korean splendid dace (Coreoleuciscus splendidus)

Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, showing the relationship between the two strains belonging to the phylum Proteobacteria isolated in this study and the notable type species from each family. The tree was reconstructed using neighbor joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms. Filled diamonds indicate corresponding branches present in the phylogenetic tree generated using the three different tree construction methods. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values of more than 70% are shown, based on 1000 replicates (NJ/MP/ML). Bacteroides fragilis NCTC 9343T (NR_074784.2) was used as the outgroup. The bar indicates 0.05 accumulated substitutions per nucleotide.

Fig. 2 in A report of 18 unrecorded prokaryotic species isolated from the feces of an Oriental stork (Ciconia boyciana), and from the intestinal tracts of a cobitid fish (Kichulchoia multifasciata) and a Korean splendid dace (Coreoleuciscus splendidus)

Fig. 2. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, showing the relationship between the eight strains belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria isolated in this study and the notable type species from each genus. The tree was reconstructed using neighbor joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms. Filled diamonds indicate corresponding branches present in the phylogenetic tree generated using the three different tree construction methods. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values of more than 70% are shown, based on 1000 replicates (NJ/MP/ML). Akkermansia muciniphila ATCC BAA-835T (NR_074436.1) was used as the outgroup. The bar indicates 0.02 accumulated substitutions per nucleotide.

Fig. 1 in A report of 18 unrecorded prokaryotic species isolated from the feces of an Oriental stork (Ciconia boyciana), and from the intestinal tracts of a cobitid fish (Kichulchoia multifasciata) and a Korean splendid dace (Coreoleuciscus splendidus)

Fig. 1. Transmission electron micrographs of the strains isolated in this study. The arrows indicate flagella. Strains: 1, H11M7; 2, H11M9; 3, H23M10; 4, H21T1; 5, H13T1; 6, H43T7; 7, H21T20; 8, H23M25; 9, H23M9; 10, S13R1; 11, H13R26; 12, H11M5; 13, H11M15; 14, H11R12; 15, H21T7; 16, H11R21; 17, M13M1; 18, H23T21.

Fig. 5 in A report of 18 unrecorded prokaryotic species isolated from the feces of an Oriental stork (Ciconia boyciana), and from the intestinal tracts of a cobitid fish (Kichulchoia multifasciata) and a Korean splendid dace (Coreoleuciscus splendidus)

Fig. 5. Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons, showing the relationship between strain H23T21 and the notable type species from the family Sphingobacteriaceae. The tree was reconstructed using neighbor joining (NJ), maximum likelihood (ML), and maximum parsimony (MP) algorithms. Filled diamonds indicate corresponding branches present in the phylogenetic tree generated using the three different tree construction methods. Numbers at the nodes represent bootstrap values of more than 70% are shown, based on 1000 replicates (NJ/MP/ML). Filobacterium rodentium SMR-CT (LC055729) was used as the outgroup. The bar indicates 0.05 accumulated substitutions per nucleotide.

Figs 70-76 in Orsunius gen.nov. from the Oriental region (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Medonina)

Figs 70-76: Orsunius discipennis (FAUVEL), lectotype: (70) habitus; (71) forebody; (72) male sternite VII; (73) male sternite VIII; (74-75) aedeagus in lateral and in ventral view; (76) apex of ventral process of aedeagus in lateral view. Scale bars: 70-71: 1.0 mm; 72-75: 0.2 mm; 76: 0.1 mm.

Figs 57-69 in Orsunius gen.nov. from the Oriental region (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Medonina)

Figs 57-69: Orsunius prolongatus nov.sp.: (57) forebody; (58) median dorsal portion of head; (59) labrum (paratype); (60-61) left and right mandible; (62) maxillary palpus; (63) labium; (64) ligula; (65) median dorsal portion of pronotum; (66) male sternite VIII; (67) aedeagus in lateral view; (68) apical portion of aedeagus in ventral view; (69) apex of ventral process in lateral view. Scale bars: 57: 0.5 mm; 58, 65-68: 0.2 mm; 59-64: 0.1 mm; 69: 0.05 mm.

Figs 12-19 in Orsunius gen.nov. from the Oriental region (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Medonina)

Figs 12-19: Orsunius wunderlei nov.sp. (12-14) and O. yunnanus nov.sp. (15-19): (12) left mandible; (13) right mandible; (14, 17) male sternite VIII; (15) habitus; (16) forebody; (18) aedeagus in lateral view; (19) apical portion of ventral process in lateral view. Scale bars: 15: 1.0 mm; 16: 0.5 mm; 12-14, 17-19: 0.2 mm.

Figs 20-26 in Orsunius gen.nov. from the Oriental region (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae: Medonina)

Figs 20-26: Orsunius excisus nov.sp.: (20) forebody; (21) posterior median portion of head in dorsal view; (22) median dorsal portion of pronotum; (23) median portions of abdominal tergites VI and VII; (24) male sternite VIII; (25-26) aedeagus in lateral and in ventral view. Scale bars: 20: 0.5 mm; 24-26: 0.2 mm; 21-23: 0.1 mm.

Fig. 6 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 6. Phortica (Phortica) yena sp. nov., ♂. A. Epandrium and cercus; B. Surstylus; C. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 5. Phortica (Phortica) wongding sp. nov., ♂. A. Epandrium and cercus; B. Surstylus; C. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 1. Bayesian tree based on the combined data of COI gene. Numbers around the node indicate the Bayesian posterior probability; results lower than 0.5 are not shown.

Fig. 4 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 4. Phortica (Phortica) mengda sp. nov., ♂. A. Epandrium and cercus. B. Surstylus. C. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 3 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 3. Phortica (Phortica) kava sp. nov., ♂. A. Arista. B. Epandrium and cercus. C. Surstylus. D. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 2 in Phortica eparmata species complex (Diptera, Drosophilidae) from the Oriental Region, with DNA barcoding information of Chinese species

Fig. 2. Phortica (Phortica) jadete sp. nov., ♂. A. Arista. B. Epandrium and cercus (lateral view). C. Surstylus (frontal view). D. Hypandrium, paramere, aedeagus and aedeagal apodeme (lateral views). E. Paramere (frontal view). F. Tip of aedeagal median rod (ventral view). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.