Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,373
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,373 results for “working”
Figure 2 from: Penev L, Hagedorn G, Mietchen D, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Sautter G, Agosti D, Plank A, Balke M, Hendrich L, Erwin T (2011) Interlinking journal and wiki publications through joint citation: Working examples from ZooKeys and Plazi on Species-ID. ZooKeys 90: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.90.1369
Figure 2 - The original description of Sinocallipus catba Stoev & Enghoff, 2011 displaying the generic URL of the wiki page (http://species-id.net/wiki/Sinocallipus_catba) right below the ZooBank LSID (see arrow).
Figure 1 from: Penev L, Hagedorn G, Mietchen D, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Sautter G, Agosti D, Plank A, Balke M, Hendrich L, Erwin T (2011) Interlinking journal and wiki publications through joint citation: Working examples from ZooKeys and Plazi on Species-ID. ZooKeys 90: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.90.1369
Figure 1 - Citation template for the simultaneous journal and wiki publication of Sinocallipus catba Stoev & Enghoff, 2011 (generic link: http://species-id.net/wiki/Sinocallipus_catba, permanent link of the version depicted in the figure: http://species-id.net/w/index.php?title=Sinocallipus_catba&oldid=XXXX). The generic link always points to the most recent version of the page, while a permanent link is specific to one particular revision.
Figure 4 from: Penev L, Hagedorn G, Mietchen D, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Sautter G, Agosti D, Plank A, Balke M, Hendrich L, Erwin T (2011) Interlinking journal and wiki publications through joint citation: Working examples from ZooKeys and Plazi on Species-ID. ZooKeys 90: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.90.1369
Figure 4 - Wiki page of Anochetus boltoni Fisher (http://species-id.net/wiki/Anochetus_boltoni) exported from the Plazi Treatment Repository to Species-ID.
Figure 3 from: Penev L, Hagedorn G, Mietchen D, Georgiev T, Stoev P, Sautter G, Agosti D, Plank A, Balke M, Hendrich L, Erwin T (2011) Interlinking journal and wiki publications through joint citation: Working examples from ZooKeys and Plazi on Species-ID. ZooKeys 90: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.90.1369
Figure 3 - Treatment of Anochetus boltoni Fisher extracted through XML markup from the original paper of Fisher and Smith (2008) and deposited at the Plazi Treatment Repository (www.plazi.org).
Figure 1 from: Blagoderov V, Brake I, Georgiev T, Penev L, Roberts D, Ryrcroft S, Scott B, Agosti D, Catapano T, Smith V (2010) Streamlining taxonomic publication: a working example with Scratchpads and ZooKeys. ZooKeys 50: 17-28. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.539
Figure 1 - Typical taxon page on the Scratchpad showing components (taxon description, images, bibliographic references) used in preparation of a publication.
Figure 3 from: Penev L, Agosti D, Georgiev T, Catapano T, Miller J, Blagoderov V, Roberts D, Smith V, Brake I, Ryrcroft S, Scott B, Johnson N, Sautter G, Chavan V, Robertson T, Remsen D, Stoev P, Parr C, Knapp S, Kress W, Thompson F, Erwin T (2010) Semantic tagging of and semantic enhancements to systematics papers: ZooKeys working examples. ZooKeys 50: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.538
Figure 3 - Flowchart of an integrated, XML-based editorial, publishing and dissemination process applied in ZooKeys through the Pensoft Mark Up Tool (PMT).
Figure 2 from: Penev L, Agosti D, Georgiev T, Catapano T, Miller J, Blagoderov V, Roberts D, Smith V, Brake I, Ryrcroft S, Scott B, Johnson N, Sautter G, Chavan V, Robertson T, Remsen D, Stoev P, Parr C, Knapp S, Kress W, Thompson F, Erwin T (2010) Semantic tagging of and semantic enhancements to systematics papers: ZooKeys working examples. ZooKeys 50: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.538
Figure 2 - Four stages of an XML-based editorial, publication and dissemination workflow applied in ZooKeys (stages 1, 2, 4) and/or Plazi (stages 3, 4). Forms in blue are either implemented or prototyped, forms in red are in a process of development.
Figure 4 from: Blagoderov V, Brake I, Georgiev T, Penev L, Roberts D, Ryrcroft S, Scott B, Agosti D, Catapano T, Smith V (2010) Streamlining taxonomic publication: a working example with Scratchpads and ZooKeys. ZooKeys 50: 17-28. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.539
Figure 4 - Preview of the manuscript. This is not intended to show a final layout but to ensure that all necessary components are included and occur in the correct order.
Figure 4 from: Penev L, Agosti D, Georgiev T, Catapano T, Miller J, Blagoderov V, Roberts D, Smith V, Brake I, Ryrcroft S, Scott B, Johnson N, Sautter G, Chavan V, Robertson T, Remsen D, Stoev P, Parr C, Knapp S, Kress W, Thompson F, Erwin T (2010) Semantic tagging of and semantic enhancements to systematics papers: ZooKeys working examples. ZooKeys 50: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.538
Figure 4 - Pensoft Taxon Profile created dynamically by PMT and available through a link to any taxon name mentioned within a paper. In this case, this is the oak species Quercus suber L., cited in a zoological paper (Stoev et al. 2010). The red arrow indicates the "Create your own taxon profile" option, that may be used by the reader to create profiles of any taxon name or to improve search results for taxonomic names cited in the paper.
Figure 3 from: Blagoderov V, Brake I, Georgiev T, Penev L, Roberts D, Ryrcroft S, Scott B, Agosti D, Catapano T, Smith V (2010) Streamlining taxonomic publication: a working example with Scratchpads and ZooKeys. ZooKeys 50: 17-28. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.539
Figure 3 - Sections of the manuscript. Terms listed under taxon name correspond to the fields of the Species Profile Model (SPM) to be automatically included in the manuscript. Custom sections can be organised hierarchically.
Figure 1 from: Penev L, Agosti D, Georgiev T, Catapano T, Miller J, Blagoderov V, Roberts D, Smith V, Brake I, Ryrcroft S, Scott B, Johnson N, Sautter G, Chavan V, Robertson T, Remsen D, Stoev P, Parr C, Knapp S, Kress W, Thompson F, Erwin T (2010) Semantic tagging of and semantic enhancements to systematics papers: ZooKeys working examples. ZooKeys 50: 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.50.538
Figure 1 - Conventional layout of a standard taxonomic publication in PDF format (A) and the same portion of text in XML-tagged format (B). Explanations: The sign "<" incidates the start tag and the symbol " denotes the start of the treatment and the tag (not visible here) marks up the end of the treatment within the text of the paper. The tags and denote the start and end of a particular section of the treatment, in this case the type material data (labelled as Type material.)
Figure 8 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 8 - Probability of collecting female Platynus decentis with changes in azimuth and slope when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Both dashed and solid lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Regression slopes for elevation appear near zero as total range of elevation is relatively small.
Figure 6 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 6 - Probability of collecting female Pterostichus pensylvanicus with changes in azimuth and slope when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Dashed lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Solid lines represent model parameters of reduced logistic model including only curvature, FAC and intercept.
Figure 2 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 2 - Probability of collecting female Calathus ingratus with changes in azimuth and slope when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Dashed lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Solid lines represent model parameters of reduced logistic model including only azimuth, slope and intercept.
Figure 2 from: Jacobs J, Bergeron C, Work T, Spence J (2011) Low intensity surface fire instigates movement by Calosoma frigidum (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 641-649. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2084
Figure 2 - Box and whisker plot of catch rates in burned patches, by collection date, for the year of the fire (year 1) and the following year (year 2). Box represents the upper and lower quartiles divided by the median and whiskers are the largest and smallest values, excluding outliers represented by circles ○.
Figure 7 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 7 - Probability of collecting female Sphaeroderus nitidicollis with changes in azimuth and slope when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Dashed lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Solid lines represent model parameters of reduced logistic model including only curvature, FAC and intercept.
Figure 1 from: Jacobs J, Bergeron C, Work T, Spence J (2011) Low intensity surface fire instigates movement by Calosoma frigidum (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 641-649. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2084
Figure 1 - Box and whisker plot of catch rates of Calosoma frigidum in burned and unburned patches. Letters denote the results of a Tukey's HSD post-hoc test following a 2 factor repeated measures ANOVA. Box represents the upper and lower quartiles divided by the median and whiskers are the largest and smallest values.
Figure 5 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 5 - Figure 5. Probability of collecting female Synuchus impunctatus with changes in azimuth and slope when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Dashed lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Solid lines represent model parameters of reduced logistic model including only curvature, FAC and intercept.
Figure 4 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 4 - Probability of collecting female Pterostichus coracinus with changes in azimuth, slope and elevation when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Dashed lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Solid lines represent model parameters of reduced logistic model including only azimuth, slope, elevation and intercept. Regression slopes for elevation appear near zero as total range of elevation is relatively small.
Figure 1 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 1 - Probability of collecting female Agonum retractum with changes in azimuth and slope when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Dashed lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Solid lines represent model parameters of reduced logistic model including only azimuth, slope and intercept.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.