Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 20. Daviesia costata. A. Flowering branchlet. B. Long phyllode. C. Inflorescence. D. Flower with bracts. E in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 20. Daviesia costata. A. Flowering branchlet. B. Long phyllode. C. Inflorescence. D. Flower with bracts. E. Calyx opened out, upper lobes at left. F. Standard. G. Wings. H. Keel. I. Same, opened out. J. Pod. A from Morrison s.n. (PERTH 2778742); B from Dodd 6; C from Crisp 5366; D–I from Taylor 2135; J from Koch s.n. (type: NSW 34718). Drawn by B-J. Osborne and D. Fortescue. Adapted from Crisp (1991a) with permission from CSIRO Publishing.

FIGURE 42. Daviesia alata. A. Leafless flowering stem. B. Phyllode from a juvenile plant. C. Inflorescence. D. pod. A, C from Crisp 6774 in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 42. Daviesia alata. A. Leafless flowering stem. B. Phyllode from a juvenile plant. C. Inflorescence. D. pod. A, C from Crisp 6774; B from Crisp 2497; D from Woolls s.n. (MEL 77407). Drawn by B-J. Osborne.

FIGURE 33. Daviesia mollis. A in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 33. Daviesia mollis. A. Branchlet late in flowering. B. Infructescence. A, B from Crisp 4953. Drawn by B-J. Osborne.

FIGURE 32. Daviesia lancifolia. A. Prostrate flowering branchlet. B, C. Phyllodes showing variation. D. Inflorescence. E. Pod. A from Crisp 5165 in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 32. Daviesia lancifolia. A. Prostrate flowering branchlet. B, C. Phyllodes showing variation. D. Inflorescence. E. Pod. A from Crisp 5165; B from Crisp 1003; C from Crisp 5107; D from Crisp 4989; E from Crisp 4987. Drawn by B-J. Osborne.

FIGURE 6. Daviesia acicularis. A. Fruiting branchlet. B. Developmentally intermediate phyllode. C. Flower. D. Pod. A from Crisp 6790 in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 6. Daviesia acicularis. A. Fruiting branchlet. B. Developmentally intermediate phyllode. C. Flower. D. Pod. A from Crisp 6790; B from Anon. (NSW 35616); C from Burgess s.n. (CBG 7468); D from Carolin 3880 (SYD). Drawn by B-J. Osborne.

FIGURE 34. Daviesia spiralis. A. Flowering branchlet. B. Inflorescence. C. Standard, adaxial view. D in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 34. Daviesia spiralis. A. Flowering branchlet. B. Inflorescence. C. Standard, adaxial view. D. Same, showing calli in transection (indicated by arrows in C), adaxial face upward. E. Wing. F. Keel. G. Pod. H, I. Seed in lateral and hilar view respectively. A from Kenneally 2303; B–I from Crisp 5491 (holotype). Drawn by B-J. Osborne and M.D. Crisp.

FIGURE 2. Daviesia anceps. A. Flowering stem. B. Lateral branchlet with flower. C in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 2. Daviesia anceps. A. Flowering stem. B. Lateral branchlet with flower. C. Detail of inflorescences, with persistent pedicels of disarticulated flowers labelled 'p'. D. Pod. E. Detail of warty branchlet ridges. A from Crisp 5033; B from Crisp 4937; C, E from Maxwell s.n. (MEL 72504); D from Crisp 4952. Drawn by A.L. Prowse and M.D. Crisp.

FIGURE 44. Daviesia flava. A. Flowering branchlet. B. Inflorescence with calyces representing flowers. C. Pod. A–C in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 44. Daviesia flava. A. Flowering branchlet. B. Inflorescence with calyces representing flowers. C. Pod. A–C from Wrigley & Telford NQ1490. Drawn by B-J. Osborne.

FIGURE 1A in A monograph of Daviesia (Mirbelieae, Faboideae, Fabaceae)

FIGURE 1A. Phylogeny (part) of Daviesia estimated using maximum likelihood (PHYML) from concatenated sequences of ITS (nrDNA), and ndhF and trnL–trnF (cpDNA). The tree was rooted using the monotypic sister groups Viminaria and Erichsenia (not shown). The informal clade names are used for reference in the taxonomic treatment. Numbers on branches show non-bootstrap support. The tips are labelled with the taxon name and sample accession number.

FIGURE 21 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 21. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Chamaetrichon strains grown on MIEB12 medium. A, B. SAG 1.87, general and close view of filaments, with a common mucilage, C. UTEX 1918, filaments with rudimentary branching, surrounded by common mucilage stained with indian ink, D. SAG 23.88, branched filaments, E. ULVO-15, short branched filaments surrounded by mucilage at the edge of the colony, F. SAG 2396, short filaments and packets, surrounded by common matrix.

FIGURE 14 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 14. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Sarcinofilum strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A,B. SAG 4.90, C. SAG 24.93, D. SAG 29.94, E. 26.94, F. SAG 26.88.

FIGURE 11 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 11. Morphology of A–C. Halofilum helgolandicum SAG 2.95 and D–G. H. ramosum SAG 2050 grown on 1/2SWES medium.

FIGURE 8 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 8. Morphology of Paulbroadya petersii SAG 2240 grown on SWES medium. A, B. general view of plants, C–G. morphology of filaments in two-weeks of growth.

FIGURE 4 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 4. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Pseudendoclonium strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A. ULVO-21, B. ULVO-29, C. ULVO-26, D. SAG 2237, E. SAG 467-2, F. CCAP 415/1.

FIGURE 19 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 19. Morphology of Rhexinema edaphica ULVO-10 grown on MiEB12 medium. A–E. cells packets and rudimentary branching, F,G. single cells and packets surrounded by common mucilage contrasted by indian ink.

FIGURE 13 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 13. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Ctenocladus strains grown on 3NBBM medium. A,B. ULVO-16, C. ULVO-18, D,E. ULVO-24, F. SAG 467-1.

FIGURE 1 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 1. Molecular phylogeny of the Ulvophyceae based on SSU rDNA sequence comparisons. The phylogenetic tree shown was inferred using the maximum likelihood method based on a data set of 1770 aligned positions of 106 taxa using PAUP 4.0b10. For the analysis, the GTR+I+G (base frequencies: A 0.23760, C 0.22733, G 0.28379, T 0.25128; rate matrix A-C 1.0063, A-G 2.3095, A-T 1.3005, C-G 0.7427, C-T 4.0954, G-T 1.0000) with the proportion of invariable sites (I = 0.5552) and gamma shape parameter (G = 0.4527) was chosen, which was calculated as the best model by Modeltest 3.7. The branches in bold are highly supported in all analyses (Bayesian values> 0.95 calculated with PHASE and MrBayes; bootstrap values> 70% calculated with PAUP using maximum likelihood, neighbor-joining, maximum parsimony and RAxML using maximum likelihood). The sister group of the Oltmannsiellopsis-clade was chosen as outgroup. The clade designations was given after the represented genera. The strains originally assigned as Dilabifilum and Pseudendoclonium basiliense are marked with * and # behind the accession number, respectively. The generic names after taxonomic revision are given in white boxes.

FIGURE 16 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 16. Overview about the morphology of the investigated Rhexinema strains grown on MiEB12 medium. A. R. paucicellularis SAG 463-1, B. SAG 29.93, C. SAG 8.90, D. SAG 466-2; E. R. planctonica UTEX 1570, F,G. R. sancta-tomea ACOI 592.

FIGURE 15 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 15. Morphology of Planophila bipyrenoidosa A–I. ULVO-1 and J–Q. ULVO-55 grown on 3NBBM medium. A–C. settled zoospores and sporangium, D–I. cell packets, J. settled zoospores, K–Q. variety of vegetative cells.

FIGURE 12 in Toward a monograph of non-marine Ulvophyceae using an integrative approach (Molecular phylogeny and systematics of terrestrial Ulvophyceae II.)

FIGURE 12. Morphology of Ctenocladus circinnatus CCMP 2158 grown on 1/2SWES medium, two-weeks old cultures.