Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,373
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,373 results for “working”
Figure 3 from: Work T, St Onge B, Jacobs J (2011) Response of female beetles to LIDAR derived topographic variables in Eastern boreal mixedwood forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 623-639. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2013
Figure 3 - Probability of collecting female Pterostichus adstrictus with changes in azimuth, slope and elevation when additional variables are held constant at their respective means. Dashed lines represent model parameters derived from full logistic model. Solid lines represent model parameters of reduced logistic model including only azimuth, slope, elevation and intercept. Regression slopes for elevation appear near zero as total range of elevation is relatively small.
Figure 1 from: Barkworth M, Murrell Z (2012) The US Virtual Herbarium: working with individual herbaria to build a national resource. ZooKeys 209: 55-73. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.209.3205
Figure 1 - Regional networks and herbaria in the U.S.A. Network boundaries are guides; herbaria are free to join the network of their choice. Some herbaria contribute records to more than one network. No network has been established as yet for the Great Plains, Great Lakes, and Southern Rocky Mountain Regions. Data obtained June, 2011.
Figure 1 from: Brunke A, Klimaszewski J, Anderson R (2012) Present taxonomic work on Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) in Canada: progress against all odds. ZooKeys 186: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.186.3252
Figure 1 - Level of taxonomic maturity and approximate number of species in Canadian Staphylinidae subfamilies: '0' denotes mostly unrevised subfamilies; '1' denotes maturing subfamilies with some modern revisionary works; '2' denotes nearly mature subfamilies with modern revisions for most or all genera; '3' denotes mature subfamilies post modern revision, with reviews and keys available in some format. *Phloeocharinae is ranked here as nearly mature because current keys do not separate the recently introduced Phloeocharis subtilissima Mannerheim from all native members of the subfamily.
Figure 8 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 8 - a–d Colour images of abundant species: a Quedius labradorensis Smetana b Gabrius brevipennis (Horn) c Pseudopsis subulata Herman d Pterostichus punctatissimus (Randall).
Figure 7 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 7 - a–d Colour images of abundant species: a Atheta capsularis Klimaszewski b Atheta klagesi Bernhauer c Atheta strigosula Casey d Tachinus fumipennis (Say).
Figure 5 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 5 - Boxplots depicting catch rates (beetles/day) for eight abundant species collected from experimental plots where forest was a clearcut and deadwood was left intact (SOH) b clearcut with quantity of deadwood reduced (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 6 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 6 - Multivariate regression tree based on sum-of-squares depicting differences in beetle assemblages among experimental plots where forest was a clearcut with stem-only harvested (SOH) b clearcut with whole-tree harvested (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). The tree was selected based on 935/1000 cross-validations and explains 64% of the variance. Both experimental treatment and deadwood volumes provided equivalent improvement at each split. We have labelled splits using experimental treatments.
Figure 4 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 4 - Boxplots depicting overall catch rates (beetles/day) where forest was a clearcut and deadwood was left intact (SOH) b clearcut with quantity of deadwood reduced (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 3 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 3 - Boxplots showing volume of fine and coarse woody debris in stem-only harvested plots (SOH), whole-tree harvested plots (WTH), and in uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 1 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 1 - Schematic representation of treatments with pitfall trap locations, Forêt Montmorency, Quebec.
Figure 2 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 2 - Photographs of experimental plots taken one year following harvest (2012) A, B photos of uncut forests (Control) C stem-only harvested plot (SOH) (operational level) D whole-tree harvested plot (WTH).
Figures 28-31 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 28-31 - Images of hindgut content of the following rove beetle species: 28–30 Tachinus fumipennis (Say) 31 Tachinus quebecensis Robert.
Figures 12-15 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 12-15 - Images of hindgut content of the following rove beetle species: 12–13 Atheta capsularis Klimaszewski 14–15 Atheta klagesi Bernhauer.
Figures 8-11 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 8-11 - Body images of rove beetles in dorsal view: 8 Tachinus frigidus Erichson 9 Tachinus fumipennis (Say) 10 Tachinus quebecensis Robert 11 Pseudopsis subulata Herman.
Figures 2-7 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 2-7 - Body images of rove beetles in dorsal view: 2 Atheta capsularis Klimaszewski 3 Atheta klagesi Bernhauer 4 Oxypoda grandipennis (Casey) 5 Bryophacis smetanai Campbell 6 Ischnosoma longicorne (Mäklin) [previously cited as synonymous Ischnosoma fimbriatum Campbell] 7 Mycetoporus montanus Luze [previously cited as synonymous Mycetoporus rugosus Hatch].
Figures 20-23 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 20-23 - Images of hindgut content of the following rove beetle species: 20 Ischnosoma longicorne (Mäklin) 21–22 Mycetoporus montanus Luze 23 Tachinus frigidus Erichson.
Figures 32-35 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 32-35 - Images of hindgut content of the following rove beetle species: 32–33 Tachinus quebecensis Robert 34–35 Pseudopsis subulata Herman.
Figures 24-27 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 24-27 - Images of hindgut content of the following rove beetle species: 24–26 Tachinus frigidus Erichson 27 Tachinus fumipennis (Say).
Figures 16-19 from: Klimaszewski J, Morency M, Labrie P, Seguin A, Langor D, Work T, Bourdon C, Thiffault E, Pare D, Newton A (2013) Molecular and microscopic analysis of the gut contents of abundant rove beetle species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae) in the boreal balsam fir forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 353: 1-24. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.353.5991
Figures 16-19 - Images of hindgut content of the following rove beetle species: 16 Oxypoda grandipennis (Casey) 17–18 Bryophacis smetanai Campbell 19 Ischnosoma longicorne (Mäklin).
Figure 3 from: Guralnick RP, Cellinese N, Deck J, Pyle RL, Kunze J, Penev L, Walls R, Hagedorn G, Agosti D, Wieczorek J, Catapano T, Page EDM (2015) Community Next Steps for Making Globally Unique Identifiers Work for Biocollections Data. ZooKeys 494: 133-154. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.494.9352
Figure 3 - Identifier schemes differ in whether redirections and mappings to ensure stability are centrally managed or not. Top: a DOI dereferencing service like CrossRef or Datacite redirects to the actual content provider; the URIs of content data and RDF metadata are publicly visible and can be used as independent (albeit often unstable) identifiers. Bottom: A linked open data pattern, where each content provider assumes the responsibility for maintaining a stable mapping; the content negotiation is internal. Modified after Hagedorn 2013.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.