Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,549
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
1,549 results for “invertebrate”
Figure 3 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
Figure 3 - Distribution of stygofauna sampling effort by lithology in Queensland, Australia; In Figure 3 the total number of samples is indicated by numerical figures located above the columns and the percentage of samples is indicated by numerical figures along the x-axis.
Figure 2 from: Glanville K, Schulz C, Tomlinson M, Butler D (2016) Biodiversity and biogeography of groundwater invertebrates in Queensland, Australia. Subterranean Biology 17: 55-76. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.17.7542
Figure 2 - Outline map of Queensland, Australia highlighting the location of stygofauna sampling sites and other localities; In Figure 2 an outline map shows the location of all 582 stygofauna sampling sites and other key localities mentioned in the text (e.g. Bowen Basin, Murray–Darling Basin, Proserpine–Sarina Lowlands IBRA region).
Figure 6 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 6 - Spatial variations in relative abundance of main invertebrates groups along the gradient of subterranean environmental conditions. (X-axis: 0 — the cave entrance area, negative values — epigean zone, positive values — cave zone). A Cave Abrskila B Cave Golova Otapa.
Figure 1 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 1 - Map of the study regions of Abkhazia. Caves: 1 New Athos 2 Simona Kananita 3 Nizhnyaya Shakuranskaya 4 Srednyaya Shakuranskaya 5 Tsebel'dinskaya 6 Abrskila 7 Golova Otapa 8 Well Uapatyh 9 Well 85 m.
Figure 3 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 3 - Map of Cave Golova Otapa. Sampling stations marked by red points (accordingly Grigorjan 1973).
Figure 2 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 2 - Map of Cave Abrskila. Sampling stations marked by red points (accordingly Benze et al. 1965).
Figure 5 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 5 - Spatial variations in abundance and species richness of the fauna along the gradient of subterranean environmental conditions. (X-axis: 0 — the cave entrance area, negative values — epigean zone, positive values — cave zone). A Cave Abrskila B Cave Golova Otapa.
Figure 4 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 4 - Map of Cave New Athos. Sampling stations marked by red points (accordingly Abhastur 2009).
Figure 7 from: Chertoprud ES, Palatov DM, Borisov RR, Marinskiy VV, Bizin MS, Dbar RS (2016) Distribution and a comparative analysis of the aquatic invertebrate fauna in caves of the western Caucasus. Subterranean Biology 18: 49-70. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8648
Figure 7 - Two-dimensional ordination with superimposed clusters of the stygobiotic faunas from different caves, based on Kulszinski similarity index. River valleys are shown by different colors. Caves: 1 New Athos 2 Simona Kananita 3 Nizhnyaya Shakuranskaya 4 Srednyaya Shakuranskaya 5 Tsebel'dinskaya 6 Abrskila 7 Golova Otapa 8 Well Uapatyh 9 Well 85 m.
Figure 3 from: Pellegrini TG, Sales LP, Aguiar P, Ferreira RL (2016) Linking spatial scale dependence of land-use descriptors and invertebrate cave community composition. Subterranean Biology 18: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8335
Figure 3 - Detailed figure of Gruta Helictites showing different land uses within the 50, 100 and 250 m buffers.
Figure 2 from: Pellegrini TG, Sales LP, Aguiar P, Ferreira RL (2016) Linking spatial scale dependence of land-use descriptors and invertebrate cave community composition. Subterranean Biology 18: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8335
Figure 2 - Study area location, sampling design used in sampled caves at "Parque Estadual do Sumidouro", and the Buffers of 50m, 100m, and 250m for analyzing the effect of spatial scale on the explanatory power of environmental variables in the cave invertebrate communities.
Figure 1 from: Pellegrini TG, Sales LP, Aguiar P, Ferreira RL (2016) Linking spatial scale dependence of land-use descriptors and invertebrate cave community composition. Subterranean Biology 18: 17-38. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.18.8335
Figure 1 - Spatial characterization of landscape at "Parque Estadual do Sumidouro". Different colors represent distinct vegetation cover or land-use types. The numbers indicate the sampled caves, indicated by name. Legend: 1 Gruta Ninho de Pérolas 2 Gruta Macaco das Cavernas 3 Lapa da Várzea 4 Gruta do Grilão 5 Gruta Helictites 6 Lapa das Pacas 7 Gruta do Sumidouro 8 Gruta Lagoa Seca 9 Gruta do Feneme 10 Gruta do Lixo.
Figures 66-70 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 66-70 Photographs of ♂ terminalia (as in life rotated 180°) and illustrations from Londt (1994, figures 51–53): 66Microphonteswhittingtoni (Holotype, NMSA-DIP-4777), lateral (Morphbank #861908) 67 same, ventral (#861910) 68Microphonteskryphios sp. n. (Holotype, NMSA-DIP-74620), lateral 69 same, dorsal 70 same, ventral. Arrows point to tip of postero-median projection of hypandrium. Magnification: 120× (66–67), Scale bars: 1 mm (68–70).
Figures 62-65 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 62-65 Photographs of ♂ terminalia (as in life rotated 90°): 62Microphontesgaiophanes sp. n. (Paratype, USNMENT01384082), lateral (top = ventral, Morphbank #861913) 63 same, ventral (#861915, image rotated 180°) 64Microphontessafra (USNMENT00832231), lateral (top = dorsal, #861889) 65 same, ventral (#861891). Magnification: 120×.
Figures 50-55 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 50-55 Microphonteswhittingtoni: 50 ♂ Holotype (NMSA-DIP-4777), dorsal (Morphbank #861895) 51 same, lateral (#861897) 52 same, head anterior (#861899) 53 ♀ Paratype (NMSA-DIP-74619), head anterior (#861902) 54 same, dorsal (#861904) 55 same, lateral (#861906). Scale bars: 5 mm (50–51, 54–55), 1 mm (52–53).
Figures 44-49 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 44-49 Microphontessafra: 44 ♂ Holotype (NMSA-DIP-4769), dorsal (Morphbank #861874) 45 same, lateral (#861876) 46 same, head anterior (#861878) 47 ♀ Paratype (NMSA-DIP-74618), head anterior (#861881) 48 same, dorsal (#861883) 49 same, lateral (#861885). Scale bars: 5 mm (44–45, 48–49), 1 mm (46–47).
Figures 38-43 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 38-43 Microphontesmegoura: 38 ♂ Holotype (SAM-DIP-A015480), dorsal (Morphbank #861855) 39 same, lateral (#861857) 40 same, head anterior (#861859) 41 ♀ Paratype (SAM-DIP-A015487), head anterior (#861862) 42 same, dorsal (#861864) 43 same, lateral (#861866). Scale bars: 5 mm (38–39, 42–43), 1 mm (40–41).
Figures 9-10 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 9-10 Photographs of M.gaiophanes sp. n. in nature on sand dune as in Figs 1–2: 9 ♂ resting on sand (note that pro-, mes- and metathoracic legs are held sideways and up so that tarsi do not touch sand, Morphbank #861774) 10 ♀ resting on dry vegetation just above ground (#861777). Photographs by T. Dikow.
Figures 32-37 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 32-37 Microphonteskryphios sp. n.: 32 ♂ Holotype (NMSA-DIP-74620), dorsal (Morphbank #861837) 33 same, lateral (#861839) 34 same, head anterior (#861841) 35 ♀ Paratype (NMSA-DIP-4775), head anterior (#861844) 36 same, dorsal (#861846) 37 same, lateral (#861848). Scale bars: 5 mm (32–33, 36–37), 1 mm (34–35).
Figures 56-61 from: Markee A, Dikow T (2018) Taxonomic revision of the assassin-fly genus Microphontes Londt, 1994 (Insecta, Diptera, Asilidae). African Invertebrates 59(2): 195-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/afrinvertebr.59.30684
Figures 56-61 Photographs of ♂ terminalia (as in life rotated 180°): 56Microphontesericfisheri sp. n. (Holotype, USNMENT01115122), lateral (image flipped horizontally showing right side, Morphbank #861789) 57 same, ventral (#861791) 58Microphontesjasonlondti sp. n. (Holotype, NMSA-DIP-4768), lateral (#861822) 59 same, ventral (#861824) 60Microphontesmegoura (Holotype, NMSA-DIP-4768), lateral (#861868) 61 same, ventral (#861870). Magnification: 120×.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.