Find research datasets worth reusing

Text-fig. 5. Reconstruction of aeduellids from the Bohemian Massif. 1 – Spinarichthys dispersus (FRITSCH, 1895) (after Štamberg 1986). 2 – Neslovicella elongata ŠTAMBERG, 2010 (after Štamberg 2010). 3 – Neslovicella rzehaki ŠTAMBERG, 2007 (after Štamberg 2007). 4 – Bourbonnella hirsuta ŠTAMBERG, 2007 (after Štamberg, 2007). Scale bar represents 20 mm. in Knowledge Of The Carboniferous And Permian Actinopterygian Fishes Of The Bohemian Massif - 100 Years After Antonín Frič

Text-fig. 5. Reconstruction of aeduellids from the Bohemian Massif. 1 – Spinarichthys dispersus (FRITSCH, 1895) (after Štamberg 1986). 2 – Neslovicella elongata ŠTAMBERG, 2010 (after Štamberg 2010). 3 – Neslovicella rzehaki ŠTAMBERG, 2007 (after Štamberg 2007). 4 – Bourbonnella hirsuta ŠTAMBERG, 2007 (after Štamberg, 2007). Scale bar represents 20 mm.

Text-fig. 2. Reconstruction of some Westphalian and Stephanian actinopterygians. Figs 1 – 5 after Štamberg (1991), Fig. 6 after Westoll (1944). Scale bars represent 20 mm. 1 – Acrolepis gigas (FRIČ, 1877), 2 – "Elonichthys" krejcii (FRITSCH, 1895), figured after the original holotype of Acrolepis sphaerosideritarum FRITSCH, 1895, 3 – "Elonichthys" krejcii (FRITSCH, 1895), figured after the original holotype of Acrolepis krejcii FRITSCH, 1895, 4 – Sphaerolepis kounoviensis FRIČ, 1877, 5 – Sceletophorus biserialis FRITSCH, 1894, 6 – Pyritocephalus sculptus (FRIČ, 1875). in Knowledge Of The Carboniferous And Permian Actinopterygian Fishes Of The Bohemian Massif - 100 Years After Antonín Frič

Text-fig. 2. Reconstruction of some Westphalian and Stephanian actinopterygians. Figs 1 – 5 after Štamberg (1991), Fig. 6 after Westoll (1944). Scale bars represent 20 mm. 1 – Acrolepis gigas (FRIČ, 1877), 2 – "Elonichthys" krejcii (FRITSCH, 1895), figured after the original holotype of Acrolepis sphaerosideritarum FRITSCH, 1895, 3 – "Elonichthys" krejcii (FRITSCH, 1895), figured after the original holotype of Acrolepis krejcii FRITSCH, 1895, 4 – Sphaerolepis kounoviensis FRIČ, 1877, 5 – Sceletophorus biserialis FRITSCH, 1894, 6 – Pyritocephalus sculptus (FRIČ, 1875).

Text-fig. 3. Progyrolepis speciosus (FRIČ, 1875). Reconstruction of the dermal skull in lateral view, x 0.7. After Štamberg (1991). Ang – angular; cl – cleithrum; Dent – dentalosplenial; Epi – epipreoperculum; Fr – frontal; Gul – gular lateral; La – lacrimal; Mx – maxilla; Na – nasal; Op – operculum; Pop - preoperculum; Pt – posttemporal; Ptr – postrostral; Rbr – branchiostegal rays; Rpm – rostropremaxillar; Sbo – suborbital; Scl – supracleithrum; Sop – suboperculum. in Knowledge Of The Carboniferous And Permian Actinopterygian Fishes Of The Bohemian Massif - 100 Years After Antonín Frič

Text-fig. 3. Progyrolepis speciosus (FRIČ, 1875). Reconstruction of the dermal skull in lateral view, x 0.7. After Štamberg (1991). Ang – angular; cl – cleithrum; Dent – dentalosplenial; Epi – epipreoperculum; Fr – frontal; Gul – gular lateral; La – lacrimal; Mx – maxilla; Na – nasal; Op – operculum; Pop - preoperculum; Pt – posttemporal; Ptr – postrostral; Rbr – branchiostegal rays; Rpm – rostropremaxillar; Sbo – suborbital; Scl – supracleithrum; Sop – suboperculum.

Text-fig. 1. Letovichthys tuberculatus ŠTAMBERG, 2007. Reconstruction of the dermal skull in lateral view, x 3. After Štamberg (2007). Dent – dentalosplenial; Dhy – dermohyal; dlac – dorso-lateral-anterior sensory canal; Dpt – dermopterotic; Dsph – dermosphenotic; Ext.l – extrascapular lateral; Ext.m – extrascapular medial; Fr – frontal; Gu.l – gular lateral; ifc – infraorbital canal; Io.s – infraorbital superior; mdc – mandibular canal; Na – nasal; Op – operculum; Pa – parietal; Pmx – premaxillar; Pop - preoperculum; Pscs – postspiracular; Pt – posttemporal; Ptr – postrostral; Rbr – branchiostegal rays; Sbo – suborbital; Scl – supracleithrum; Sop – suboperculum; stc – supratemporal commisural sensory canal. in Knowledge Of The Carboniferous And Permian Actinopterygian Fishes Of The Bohemian Massif - 100 Years After Antonín Frič

Text-fig. 1. Letovichthys tuberculatus ŠTAMBERG, 2007. Reconstruction of the dermal skull in lateral view, x 3. After Štamberg (2007). Dent – dentalosplenial; Dhy – dermohyal; dlac – dorso-lateral-anterior sensory canal; Dpt – dermopterotic; Dsph – dermosphenotic; Ext.l – extrascapular lateral; Ext.m – extrascapular medial; Fr – frontal; Gu.l – gular lateral; ifc – infraorbital canal; Io.s – infraorbital superior; mdc – mandibular canal; Na – nasal; Op – operculum; Pa – parietal; Pmx – premaxillar; Pop - preoperculum; Pscs – postspiracular; Pt – posttemporal; Ptr – postrostral; Rbr – branchiostegal rays; Sbo – suborbital; Scl – supracleithrum; Sop – suboperculum; stc – supratemporal commisural sensory canal.

Text-fig. 4. Setlikia bohemica ŠTAMBERG et ZAJÍC, 1994. The postrostral and the skull roof in dorsal view. Holotype YA 1352, x 2.7. After Štamberg and Zajíc 1994. Dpt – dermopterotic; Dsph –dermosphenotic; Fr – frontal; ifc – infraorbital canal; In – infraorbital; Na – nasal; Op – operculum; Pa – parietal; Pp – postparietal; Ptr – postrostral; so – spiracular opening; soc – supraorbital canal. in Knowledge Of The Carboniferous And Permian Actinopterygian Fishes Of The Bohemian Massif - 100 Years After Antonín Frič

Text-fig. 4. Setlikia bohemica ŠTAMBERG et ZAJÍC, 1994. The postrostral and the skull roof in dorsal view. Holotype YA 1352, x 2.7. After Štamberg and Zajíc 1994. Dpt – dermopterotic; Dsph –dermosphenotic; Fr – frontal; ifc – infraorbital canal; In – infraorbital; Na – nasal; Op – operculum; Pa – parietal; Pp – postparietal; Ptr – postrostral; so – spiracular opening; soc – supraorbital canal.

Fig. 8 in Bashkirian rugose corals from the Carboniferous Mattson Formation in the Liard Basin, northwest Canada -stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications

Fig. 8. Transverse (A1–A5, A8) and longitudinal (A6, A7) thin sections of aulophyllid rugose coral Heritschioides simplex sp. nov. (GSC 140526, holotype) from Liard Basin, Northwestern Territories, Canada, Mattson Formation, perhaps lower Bashkirian. Corallites in different growth stages (A1–A3), dissepimentarium and peripheral parts of septa (A4, A5), laterally offsetting corallite (A6), detail of parent/offset common tissue (A7), fragment of colony with twins (arrow) (A8). Black dots correspond to cardinal (lower) and counter (upper) septa.

Fig. 7 in Bashkirian rugose corals from the Carboniferous Mattson Formation in the Liard Basin, northwest Canada -stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications

Fig. 7. Lithostrotionid rugose coral Nemistium liardense sp. nov. from Liard Basin, Northwestern Territories, Canada, Mattson Formation, perhaps lower Bashkirian. A. GSC 140520, holotype, longitudinal section of offsetting corallite (A1), transverse section of colony fragment (A2). B. GSC 140526, transverse section showing broken corallites (white arrows) at periphery of colony of Heritschioides simplex sp. nov.; upper part (black arrows) indicates fragment of colony of Nemistium liardense sp. nov.

Fig. 4 in Bashkirian rugose corals from the Carboniferous Mattson Formation in the Liard Basin, northwest Canada -stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications

Fig. 4. Thin sections of lithostrotionid rugose coral Nemistium liardense sp. nov. from Stikine Terrane, Northwestern Territories, Canada, Mattson Formation, lower Bashkirian (A, B), and Liard Basin, Northwestern Territories, Canada, Mattson Formation, perhaps lower Bashkirian (C–E). A. GSC 140524, transverse (A1) and longitudinal (A2) section. B. GSC 140525, transverse (B1) and longitudinal (B2) section. C. GSC 140522, longitudinal section of two corallites (C1) and transverse section (C2). D. GSC 140523, longitudinal section of offsetting corallite with strong pseudocolumella (D1) and transverse section of part of colony (D2). E. GSC 140520, holotype, oblique section of two young corallites.

Fig. 9 in Bashkirian rugose corals from the Carboniferous Mattson Formation in the Liard Basin, northwest Canada -stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications

Fig. 9. Transverse (A2–A4) and longitudinal (A1, A5) thin sections of aulophyllid rugose coral Heritschioides simplex sp. nov. (GSC 140526, holotype) from Liard Basin, Northwestern Territories, Canada, Mattson Formation, perhaps lower Bashkirian. Trabecular microstructure of septum and sclerenchymal cover unequally distributed (A1–A3), detail demonstrating doubled major septa (A4), microstructure of septum (A5); arrow in A3 points to primary septum lacking sclerenchymal cover. Black dots correspond to cardinal (lower) and counter (upper) septa.

Fig. 5 in Bashkirian rugose corals from the Carboniferous Mattson Formation in the Liard Basin, northwest Canada -stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications

Fig. 5. Transverse thin sections of lithostrotionid rugose coral Nemistium liardense sp. nov. from Liard Basin, Northwestern Territories, Canada, Mattson Formation, perhaps lower Bashkirian. A. GSC 140520, holotype, beginning of offsetting (arrow). B. GSC 140523, early (B1, B2) and advanced (B3) development of offsets. C. GSC 140522, offset with elongated septum at early growth stage (arrow).

Fig. 1 in Bashkirian rugose corals from the Carboniferous Mattson Formation in the Liard Basin, northwest Canada -stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications

Fig. 1. Map showing location of study area and Carboniferous lithofacies assemblages subcropping beneath Permian and Mesozoic deposits in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (modified from Richards et al. 1994). In the Liard Basin, western occurrences of the Rundle and Mattson lithofacies assemblages overlie and pass westward into the Besa River lithofacies assemblage. See Fig. 3 for the formational composition of the Banff, Rundle, and Mattson lithofacies assemblages.

Fig. 2 in Bashkirian rugose corals from the Carboniferous Mattson Formation in the Liard Basin, northwest Canada -stratigraphic and paleobiogeographic implications

Fig. 2. Simplified geological map of study region showing distribution of outcrops of Carboniferous Mattson Formation in southwest corner of the Northwest Territories and southeastern Yukon Territory (modified from Harker 1963 and an unpublished Geological Survey of Canada 1:1 000 000 scale map prepared by Andrew Okulitch in 2005).

Fig. 3 in New archaeorthopteran insects from the Carboniferous of Poland: Insights into tangled taxonomy

Fig. 3. Forewing venation of archaeorthopteran insect Nacekomia rossae Richardson, 1956, holotype (FM PE791), Pensylvannian, Moscovian (Westphalian D), Mazon Creek Lagerstätte, Ilinois, USA.

Fig. 4 in New archaeorthopteran insects from the Carboniferous of Poland: Insights into tangled taxonomy

Fig. 4. Forewing venation of archaeorthopteran insect Parapalaeomastax dariuszi gen. et sp. nov., holotype (MP ISEA ISEA I−F/MP/1540/20/09), Carboniferous, Pensylvannian, Langsettian (Westphalian A), Sosnowiec-Klimontów, Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. Photograph (A1) and explanatory drawing (A2). Abbreviations: A1, first anal vein; CuA, cubital anterior; CuPa/b, anterior/posterior branch of cubital posterior; MA/P, media anterior/ posterior; RA/P, radius anterior/posterior; ScP, subcosta posterior.

Fig. 2 in New archaeorthopteran insects from the Carboniferous of Poland: Insights into tangled taxonomy

Fig. 2. Forewing venation of archaeorthopteran insect Owadpteron dareki sp. nov., holotype (MP ISEA I−F/MP/1488/26a,b/08), Carboniferous, Pensylvannian, Langsettian (Westphalian A), Sosnowiec-Klimontów, Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland. Photograph of imprint (A1) and counterimprint (A2), and explanatory drawing (A3). Abbreviations: (+), convex vein; (-), concave vein; A1, first anal vein; CuA, cubital anterior; CuPa/b, anterior/ posterior branch of cubital posterior; CuPaα/β, cubital anterior/posterior branch of CuPa; M, media; MP, media posterior; RA/P, radius anterior/posterior; ScP, subcosta posterior.

Fig. 1 in New archaeorthopteran insects from the Carboniferous of Poland: Insights into tangled taxonomy

Fig. 1. Forewing venation of archaeorthopteran insect Omaliella polonica sp. nov., holotype (MP ISEA I−F/MP/8/1676/17), Carboniferous, Pensylvannian, Duckmantian (Westphalian B), Leszczyny-Czerwionka nearby the Knurów, Upper Silesia, Poland. Photograph in dry state (A1), under a film of ethanol (A2), and explanatory drawing (A3). Abbreviations: A1, first anal vein; CuA, cubital anterior; CuPa/b, anterior/posterior branch of cubital posterior; M, media; MA/P, media anterior/posterior; RA/P, radius anterior/posterior; ScP, subcosta posterior.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2011View details →

Fig. 2 in Paoliida, a Putative Stem-Group of Winged Insects: Morphology of New Taxa from the Upper Carboniferous of Poland

Fig. 2. Line drawings of paoliid insect Zdenekia silesiensis sp. nov., Załęże beds, Mudstone series (Langsettian, Upper Carboniferous), SosnowiecKlimontów, Upper Silesian Coal Basin, Poland (after Kukalová−Peck 1991). A. Fore wing holotype specimen MP ISEA I−F/MP/1488/2ab/08. B. Fore wing paratype specimen MP ISEA I−F/MP/1540/25/09. C. Hind wing specimen MP ISEA I−F/MP/1488/3/08.Vein symbols are abbreviated as follows: ScP, Subcosta posterior; RA/RP, Radius anterior/posterior; MP, Media posterior; CuA/CuP, Cubitus anterior/posterior; AA/AP, Analis anterior/posterior.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2011View details →

Fig. 1. A in Paoliida, a Putative Stem-Group of Winged Insects: Morphology of New Taxa from the Upper Carboniferous of Poland

Fig. 1. A. Geographical situation and geological map of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin with position of insect localities: Horní Suchá (Czech Republic) and Sosnowiec (Poland) indicated by white asterisks (modified after Jureczka et al. 1995). B. Lithostratigraphic division of Pennsylvanian strata of Czech and Polish parts of the Upper Silesian Coal Basin after Dopita et al. (1997) with corresponding stratigraphical levels of both localities indicated by white asterisks. Abbreviations: Bolsov., Bolsovian; Duckman., Duckmantian.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2013View details →

Fig. 2 in A new cnemidolestodean stem-orthopteran insect from the Late Carboniferous of China

Fig. 2. Late Carboniferous cnemidolestodean insect Xixia huban gen. et sp. nov. from Xiaheyan, China; coloration omitted in all drawings; arrows indicate the anterior veinlet from MP + CuA + CuPa fusing with the posterior branch of MA; all figures at the same scale. A. Specimen CNU-NX1-382, drawing (A 1), asterisk indicates a putative free portion of MP, and photograph (A 2), right forewing, positive imprint. B. Specimen CNU-NX1-383, drawing (B 1) and photograph (B 2), left forewing, positive imprint, flipped horizontally. C. Specimen CNU-NX1-384, drawing (C 1), asterisk indicates a putative portion of MP, and photograph (C 2), left forewing, positive imprint, flipped horizontally. D. Specimen CNU-NX1-387, drawing (D 1) and photograph (D 2), right forewing, negative imprint, light-mirrored, flipped horizontally. E. Specimen CNU-NX1-392, drawing (E 1) and photograph (E 2), left forewing, positive imprint, flipped horizontally.