Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
6,498
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
6,498 results for “Physicality”
RemoTeC full-physics retrieval GOSAT/TANSO-FTS Level 2 bias-corrected XCO2 2009-2023, version 2.4.1 operated at Heidelberg University
<p>The data set contains bias-corrected column averaged dry air mole fractions (XCO2) retrieved with the RemoTeCv2.4.1 full-physics algorithm (Butz et al. 2011, Guerlet et al. 2013) applied on GOSAT TANSO-FTS Level 1B (L1B) data from 2009-04-18 to 2023-08-29. The GOSAT TANSO-FTS L1B data product is produced by JAXA/NOIES/MOE and provided by ESA. The XCO2 data together with related variables are aggregated as daily files, only good quality retrievals are included.</p> <p>If the data is used for publications, please contact andre.butz@uni-heidelberg.de to discuss potential co-authorship and technical details.</p> <p> </p> <p>Summary:</p> <p>Shortname: REMOTEC_L2_CO2_GOSAT</p> <p>Longname: RemoTeC full-physics retrieval GOSAT/TANSO-FTS Level 2 bias-corrected XCO2 version 2.4.1</p> <p>DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.12773070</p> <p>Version: 2.4.1</p> <p>Format: netCDF</p> <p>Spatial Coverage: -180.0,-90.0,180.0,90.0</p> <p>Temporal Coverage: 2009-04-18 to 2023-08-29</p>
Dataset for "Low-cloud feedback in CAM5-CLUBB: physical mechanisms and parameter sensitivity analysis"
<p>This repository contains the data of 512 perturbed-parameter ensemble experiments and CAM5-CLUBB default experiments for the paper "Low-cloud feedback in CAM5-CLUBB: physical mechanisms and parameter sensitivity analysis".</p> <p>In this paper, the quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) sampling approach is applied to explore the high-dimensional space. 512 samples are generated with the 18 perturbed parameters. For each parameter sample, a pair of experiments is performed: the control one is based on the climatological sea surface temperature (SST), and the 4K experiment applies a uniform +4K SST perturbation to the control experiment. The total of 1024 simulations are then performed. In addition, CAM5-CLUBB default experiments that adopt the default values of the 18 selected parameters as in Bogenschutz et al. (2013) are performed to provide detailed model diagnostics for analyzing physical mechanisms of the cloud feedback, and they include both control and +4K simulations. Each simulation is run for 5 years and 4 months, forced by climatological SSTs. Monthly mean results from the last 5 years are analysed in this study.</p> <p>Note: data uploaded here is annual-mean and the dimension name 'time' in the files (CAM5-CLUBB_PPE_512*.nc) is the number of 512 PPE member.</p>
Integrated pedagogical methods effectiveness in Physics' preliminary undergraduate education within the context of large size lectures.
<p>Three files relating the first round of analysis testing active methods for large size lectures. The Presentation including the research design, methods, main results in synthesis is available here: https://www.researchgate.net/project/Getting-started-with-Physics-preliminary-undergraduated-strategies/update/5a44cac6b53d2f0bba475104</p> <p>2- Dataset on Students' Learning Outcomes. Dataset adopted in the first experimental round. The dataset includes data used for the first type of analysis (learning outcomes) carried out for the ICEM2017 Conference presentation "Integrating MOOCs in Physics preliminary undergraduate education: beyond large size lectures". The data includes the results of the initial, baseline Test, the final Test, and two other variables that could be used to analyse covariance: Sex and Type of Group (Large/Small).</p> <p>3- Dataset on Students' Opinion. Dataset adopted in the first experimental round. The dataset includes data used for the second type of analysis (students' opinion) carried out for the ICEM2017 Conference presentation "Integrating MOOCs in Physics preliminary undergraduate education: beyond large size lectures". The data includes the results of a final questionnaire gathering the students opinion on the four types of pedagogical factors affecting their experience within a large size lecture: MOOCs, Active Learning, Self-Assessment tools, Tutors’ guidance.</p> <p>4- Codes and analysis adopted in the first experimental round. The Document includes two analysis carried on for the ICEM2017 Conference presentation "Integrating MOOCs in Physics preliminary undergraduate education: beyond large size lectures". These are: Test (measuring students' knowledge on the subject taught) and Students' Opinion/satisfaction on the several pedagogical methods adopted along the experimental intervention.</p>
"Effects of forestry on summertime low flows and physical fish habitat in snowmelt-dominant headwater catchments of the Pacific Northwest" -- data sets
<p>These files contain the data used in the analysis and production of graphs reported in a manuscript titled "Effects of forestry on summertime low flows and physical fish habitat in snowmelt-dominant headwater catchments of the Pacific Northwest," by Stefan Gronsdahl, R. Dan Moore, Jordan Rosenfeld, Rich McCleary, Rita Winkler. The paper will be published in the journal Hydrological Processes. The file named "readme.txt" explains the contents of the files.</p>
EXPLORATORY SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF "ACCESS" TO PHYSICAL AND DIGITAL RETAIL BANKING CHANNELS IN THE UK
<p>File built in order to explore access to banking channels in the UK (February 2019)</p> <p>The report "Exploratory Spatial Analysis of Access to Physical and Digital Retail Banking Channels in the UK" has been published by Think Forward Initiative in October 2019. You can download the full report from here: <a href="https://www.thinkforwardinitiative.com/research/exploratory-spatial-analysis-of-access-to-physical-and-digital-retail-banking-channels-in-the-uk">https://www.thinkforwardinitiative.com/research/exploratory-spatial-analysis-of-access-to-physical-and-digital-retail-banking-channels-in-the-uk</a></p> <p>Related code: <a href="https://github.com/andrasonea">andrasonea</a>/<strong><a href="https://github.com/andrasonea/TFI_AccessToBanking">TFI_AccessToBanking</a></strong></p> <p> </p>
REHAB24-6: A multi-modal dataset of physical rehabilitation exercises
<p>To enable the evaluation of HPE models and the development of exercise feedback systems, we produced a new rehabilitation dataset (REHAB24-6). The main focus is on a diverse range of exercises, views, body heights, lighting conditions, and exercise mistakes. With the publicly available RGB videos, skeleton sequences, repetition segmentation, and exercise correctness labels, this dataset offers the most comprehensive testbed for exercise-correctness-related tasks.</p> <h2>Contents</h2> <ul> <li>65 recordings (184,825 frames, 30 FPS): <ul> <li>RGB videos from two cameras (<code>videos.zip</code>, horizontal = Camera17, vertical = Camera18);</li> <li>3D and 2D projected positions of 41 motion capture marker (<code><2/3>d_markers.zip</code>, marker labels in <code>marker_names.txt</code>);</li> <li>3D and 2D projected positions of 26 skeleton joints (<code><2/3>d_joints.zip</code>, joint labels in <code>joint_names.txt</code>);</li> </ul> </li> <li>Annotation of 1,072 exercise repetitions (<code>Segmentation.csv</code>, indexed based <strong>only on</strong> 30 FPS data, described in <code>Segmentation.txt</code>): <ul> <li>Temporal segmentation (start/end frame, most between 2–5 seconds);</li> <li>Binary correctness label (around 90 from each category in each exercise, except Ex3 with around 50);</li> <li>Exercise direction (around 90 from each direction in each exercise);</li> <li>Lighting conditions label.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <h2>Recording Conditions</h2> <p>Our laboratory setup included 18 synchronized sensors (2 RGB video cameras, 16 ultra-wide motion capture cameras) spread around an 8.2 × 7 m room. The RGB cameras were located in the corners of the room, one in a horizontal position (hor.), providing a larger field of view (FoV), and one in a vertical (ver.), resulting in a narrower FoV. Both types of cameras were synchronized with a sampling frequency of 30 frames per second (FPS).</p> <p>The subjects wore motion capture body suits with 41 markers attached to them, which were detected by optical cameras. The OptiTrack Motive 2.3.0 software inferred the 3D positions of the markers in virtual centimeters and converted them into a skeleton with 26 joints, forming our human pose 3D ground truth (GT).</p> <p>To acquire a 2D version of the ground truth in pixel coordinates, we applied a projection of the virtual coordinates into the camera using the simplified pinhole model. We estimated the parameters for this projection as follows. First, the virtual position of the cameras was estimated using measuring tape and knowledge of the virtual origin. Then, the orientation of the cameras was optimized by matching the virtual marker positions with their position in the videos.</p> <p>We also simulated changes in lighting conditions: a few videos were shot in the natural evening light, which resulted in worse visibility, while the rest were under artificial lighting.</p> <h2>Exercises</h2> <p>10 subjects participated in our recording and consented to release the data publicly: 6 males and 4 females of different ages (from 25 to 50) and fitness levels. A physiotherapist instructed the subjects on how to perform the exercises so that at least five repetitions were done in what he deemed the correct way and five more incorrectly. The participants had a certain degree of freedom, e.g., in which leg they used in Ex4 and Ex5. Similarly, the physiotherapist suggested different exercise mistakes for each subject.</p> <ul> <li><strong>Ex1 = Arm abduction</strong>: sideway raising of the straightened right arm;</li> <li><strong>Ex2 = Arm VW</strong>: fluent transition of arms between V (arms straight up) and W (elbows down, hands up) shape;</li> <li><strong>Ex3 = Push-ups</strong>: push-ups with hands on a table;</li> <li><strong>Ex4 = Leg abduction</strong>: sideway raising of the straightened leg;</li> <li><strong>Ex5 = Leg lunge</strong>: pushing a knee of the back leg down while keeping a right angle on the front knee;</li> <li><strong>Ex6 = Squats</strong>.</li> </ul> <p>Every exercise was also executed in two directions, resulting in different views of the subject depending on the camera. Facing the horizontal camera resulted in a front view for that camera and a profile from the other. Facing the wall between the cameras shows the subject from half-profile in both cameras. A rare direction, only used for push-ups due to the use of the table, was facing the vertical camera, with the views being reversed compared to the first orientation.</p> <h2>Citation</h2> <p>Cite the related conference paper:</p> <p>Černek, A., Sedmidubsky, J., Budikova P.: REHAB24-6: Physical Therapy Dataset for Analyzing Pose Estimation Methods. 17th International Conference on Similarity Search and Applications (SISAP). Springer, 14 pages, 2024.</p> <h2>License</h2> <p>This dataset is for academic or non-profit organization noncomercial research use only. By using you agree to appropriately reference the paper above in any publication making of its use. For comercial purposes contact us at info@visioncraft.ai</p>
A Modified Doyle-Fuller-Newman Model Enables the Macroscale Physical Simulation of Dual-ion Batteries - Dataset and Software
<p>This dataset contains:</p> <p>- all the raw cycling data of the three-electrode cell used to gather the experimental data for the model validation (VMP data, exported with EC-LAB);<br>- the specific, processed data used in the model validation step (0.2C discharge, 5C discharge, EIS data);<br>- the COMSOL dual-ion battery model (version 6.0). IMPORTANT: activate the "Electric potential at the positive electrode current collector (only for EIS)" boundary condition when simulating impedance spectroscopy, and deactivate it when simulating charge/discharge curves; the charge-discharge profile can be modified by changing the duration of the test, the C-rate, and the conditions set in the "Events" section.</p> <p>Update: Fixed the model to work also in the 6.2 version of COMSOL (Substituted Dleff with Dleffxx in the modified weak expression of the cathode mass conservation equation). Download the new version!</p>
Dataset supporting the paper "Bipolar single-molecule electroluminescence and electrofluorochromism. Physical Review Research 5, 033027 (2023)"
<p>Dataset corresponding to theoretical calculations in the paper "Bipolar single-molecule electroluminescence and electrofluorochromism. Physical Review Research 5, 033027 (2023)" DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.5.033027</p> <p>Please cite as:</p> <p>Tzu-Chao Hung, Roberto Robles, Brian Kiraly, Julian H. Strik, Bram A. Rutten, Alexander A. Khajetoorians, Nicolas Lorente and Daniel Wegner. Dataset supporting the paper "Bipolar single-molecule electroluminescence and electrofluorochromism. Physical Review Research 5, 033027 (2023)" DOI:10.5281/zenodo.13768737</p> <p>List of files:</p> <p>Several folders corresponding to the figures of the paper. They contain:</p> <p>CONTCAR files: relaxed structures in VASP format. They can be visualized with VESTA (https://jp-minerals.org/vesta/en/).</p> <p>.agr: grace files (https://plasma-gate.weizmann.ac.il/Grace/).</p> <p>Image files in png format.</p>
Supplemental to: Physical and mechanical depth relationships of rocks from the Rotokawa Geothermal Reservoir, Taupō Volcanic Zone, New Zealand
<p>This contains supplementary informations for the Manuscript </p> <p>Physical and mechanical depth relationships of rocks from the Rotokawa Geothermal Reservoir, TaupōVolcanic Zone, New Zealand</p> <p>submitted for review at the New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics</p>
Dataset: Physical Vulnerability Database for Critical Infrastructure Hazard Risk Assessments
<p>The Physical Vulnerability Database for Critical Infrastructure Hazard Risk Assements is a database that contains fragility and vulnerability curves that can be used to evaluate the expected or potential damages to infrastructure assets due to flooding, earthquakes, windstorms and landslides. The database consists of three Excel-spreadsheets:</p> <ul> <li><em>Table_D1_Summary_CI_Vulnerability_Data:</em> summary table with information on hazard, exposure, and vulnerability characteristics as well as a number of details regarding reliability and reference purposes.</li> <li><em>Table_D2_Hazard_Fragility_and_Vulnerability Curves:</em> collection of fragility and vulnerability curves</li> <li><em>Table_D3_Costs:</em> cost values that can be used in combination with the curves for the estimation of asset damages</li> </ul> <p>Please consult the following publication for detailed information: Nirandjan, S., Koks, E. E., Ye, M., Pant, R., van Ginkel, K. C. H., Aerts, J. C. J. H., and Ward, P. J.: Review article: Physical Vulnerability Database for Critical Infrastructure Multi-Hazard Risk Assessments – A systematic review and data collection, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2023-208, in review, 2024.</p>
Simulation data for "Characteristics of Wave-Particle Power Transfer as a Function of Electron Pitch Angle in Nonlinear Frequency Chirping" which will be submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
<p>Simulation data for "Characteristics of Wave-Particle Power Transfer as a Function of Electron Pitch Angle in Nonlinear Frequency Chirping" which will be submitted to Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics.</p> <p>Including the simulation input parameter file and the necessary output data to plot each figure in the article. </p>
Neural Network and objective analysis reconstruction of 3D Mediterranean physical fields from surface satellite and in situ observations at 1/24 deg
<p>Daily Mediterranean 3D fields of temperature, salinity and geostrophic current at 1/24° of resolution, up to 150m-depth and from 2016 to mid 2022, obtained through a 3 steps approach: (1) Temperature and salinity 3D fields have been first estimated by a machine learning approach by using mediterranean reanalysis outputs (https://doi.org/10.25423/CMCC/MEDSEA_MULTIYEAR_PHY_006_004_E3R) together with satellite observations, (2) a combination of this first step with in situ observations through an Optimal interpolation to remove part of large scale biases, (3) the computation of geostrophic currents using the thermal wind equation. This work has been funded by the European Space Agency through the 4DMED-SEA project [ESA contract No. 4000141547/23/I-DT].</p>
Morphological and physical chemical characterization of main agricultural plastics articles used for protected cultivation systems during ageing in fields, and collection practices
<p>This dataset includes data generated upon the implementation of the ST 1.2.1 "Analysis of degradation and fragmentation of AP and transfer of MNP to soil". The activities dealt with the study of degradation and fragmentation from weathering and agricultural practices of conventional and biodegradable AP relevant for transfer of MNP to soil (during both use and end of life). In particular, the experimental data refer to characterization of biodegradable mulch films, pristine (coded M-BIO0) or subjected to photo-oxidative weathering (M-BIO192), as well as the same samples buried in soil for varying time periods, up to 353 days. The folders included contain gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and Matrix-assisted Laser Desorption Ionization (MALDI-TOF) data, which account for the change in film molecular weight upon soil burial. Furthermore, Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC) data and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Water Contact Angle (WCA) images of some selected samples are also provided. The folder named MS RAW FILES.zip includes all the mass spectrometry raw data.</p>
Transformers for Modeling Physical Systems
<p>Data set associated with the publication <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.03957">Transformers for Modeling Physical Systems</a>. Transformers are widely used in natural language processing due to their ability to model longer-term dependencies in text. Although these models achieve state-of-the-art performance for many language related tasks, their applicability outside of the natural language processing field has been minimal. In this work, we propose the use of transformer models for the prediction of dynamical systems representative of physical phenomena. </p> <p>This data set includes data in HDF5 files for:</p> <p>Lorenz ODE:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/lorenz_training_rk.tar.gz?versionId=c4bd1230-3b22-4d2e-83f0-357146a90423">lorenz_training_rk.tar.gz</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/lorenz_valid_rk.tar.gz?versionId=3cf95dac-a75d-42d8-85ab-615f7a2ad67f">lorenz_valid_rk.tar.gz</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/lorenz_test_rk.tar.gz?versionId=bbb4bd3d-33c9-4903-98ed-f7a926dc95db">lorenz_test_rk.tar.gz</a></li> </ul> <p>Flow Around a Cylinder:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/cylinder_training.tar.gz?versionId=25bd1f3a-03b7-44d0-aa3f-afaffa6cd706">cylinder_training.tar.gz</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/cylinder_valid.tar.gz?versionId=58a6e98d-be41-4603-91cb-9522d848cf57">cylinder_valid.tar.gz</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/cylinder_test.tar.gz?versionId=a3c03293-0278-40ee-b181-2eb53a8d0b47">cylinder_test.tar.gz</a></li> </ul> <p>Gray-Scott Reaction-Diffusion:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/grayscott_training.tar.gz">grayscott_training.tar.gz</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/grayscott_valid.tar.gz?versionId=3bb8aa25-c9c8-494e-a206-e8d1fdb8a88f">grayscott_valid.tar.gz</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/grayscott_test.tar.gz?versionId=d9cee8a6-b22f-44b9-ae1b-2433caf77e34">grayscott_test.tar.gz</a></li> </ul> <p>Rossler ODE:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/rossler_training.tar.gz?versionId=d44be9cf-8fa7-4eb2-8b6e-8ac129822f51">rossler_training.tar.gz</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/rossler_valid.tar.gz?versionId=93c658e3-235a-4150-b233-ed514d6c7467">rossler_valid.tar.gz</a></li> </ul> <p>As well as several pretrained embedding models for the Google Collab notebooks on <a href="https://github.com/zabaras/transformer-physx/">Github</a>:</p> <ul> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/embedding_lorenz_pretrained.pth?versionId=cd30ff4e-34b3-4070-b346-718fb8526dac">embedding_lorenz_pretrained.pth</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/embedding_cylinder_pretrained.pth?versionId=69552efb-09e4-49d9-a224-ccc7cff91b86">embedding_cylinder_pretrained.pth</a></li> <li><a href="https://zenodo.org/api/files/8580a888-775c-471a-95ef-5e6df6f085a2/embedding_rossler_pretrained.pth?versionId=e7d1f4aa-3f31-45fe-91e4-8411e9cd634f">embedding_rossler_pretrained.pth</a></li> </ul> <p>See the Github repository for code base: <a href="https://github.com/zabaras/transformer-physx/">https://github.com/zabaras/transformer-physx/</a></p>
Gerational issues in linking family farming production, traditional food in diet, physical activity and obesity in Pacific Islands countries and territories: the case of the Melanesian population on Lifou Island
<p>In the Melanesian culture, traditional activities are organized around family farming, although the lifestyle transition taking place over the last several decades has led to imbalances in diet and physical activity, with both leading to obesity. The aim of this interdisciplinary study was to understand the links between family farming (produced, exchanged, sold, and consumed food), diet (focused on produced, hunted, and caught food), physical activity (sedentary, light, and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity) and obesity in Melanesian Lifou Island families (parents and children). Forty families, including 142 adults and children, completed individual food frequency questionnaires, wore tri-axial accelerometers for seven continuous days, and had weight and height measured with a bio-impedance device. Qualitative and quantitative interviews were conducted at the household level concerning family farming practices and sociodemographic variables. Multinomial regression analyses and logistic regression models were used to analyze the data. Results showed that family farming production brings a modest contribution to diet and active lifestyles for the family farmers of Lifou Island. The drivers for obesity in these tribal communities were linked to diet in the adults, whereas parental socioeconomic status and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity were the main factors associated to overweight and obesity in children. These differences in lifestyle behaviors within families suggest a transition in cultural practices at the intergenerational level. Future directions should consider seasonality and a more in-depth analysis of diet including macro- and micro- nutrients to acquire more accurate information on the intergenerational transition in cultural practices and its consequences on health outcomes in the Pacific region.</p>
Soil biological, chemical and physical parameters and herbage yield in a field experiment with organic and inorganic fertilizers on peat grassland in the Netherlands
<p>To evaluate the performance of organic and inorganic fertilizers for regeneration of ecosystem services in peat grasslands with biodiversity goals, we carried out a field experiment in the western peat district in the Netherlands. The fertilizers tested represent the current practice and potential alternatives for regenerative grassland management on drained peat.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Experimental setup</strong></p> <p>The field experiment (2013 – 2015) was conducted on a permanent grassland on peat soil (Terric Histosol; SOM 56 g 100 g<sup>−1</sup> and pH<sub>KCl</sub> of 4.5 in 0-10 cm) at the experimental dairy farm at Zegveld (the Netherlands). In March 2013, a randomized block experiment (six blocks) was laid out with six fertilizer treatments and a control treatment (no fertilizer: “Contr”). The fertilizer used were: conventional dairy cattle slurry manure (“Slurry”), mature compost of kitchen and garden waste (“Comp”), dairy cattle farmyard manure (“FYM”), solid fraction of the cattle slurry manure (“SFrac”, obtained by pressurized filtration), inorganic N fertilizer (“IF”; calcium ammonium nitrate, 27% N) and a combination of inorganic N fertilizer and sawdust (“IF+SD”). Plot size was 4 × 10 m; for the Slurry treatment plots were 5.2 × 10 m. Slurry was applied by slit injection, the other fertilizers were applied by hand. Target application rate was 120 kg total N ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup>, divided in two applications per year (February/March and May). This is relatively low for conventional grasslands but usual for grasslands with biodiversity goals (Kleijn et al., 2004). The amount of C<sub>total</sub> applied in Comp was taken for the rate of sawdust to be applied. All plots were fertilized with 200 kg K<sub>2</sub>O ha<sup>−1</sup> yr<sup>−1</sup> (applications in March and May) (Commissie Bemesting Grasland en Voedergewassen, 2019). Fertilizer application quantities and organic matter and nutrient inputs are provided in Fertilizer_intput.csv (dataset).</p> <p>The grassland had an history of conventional management with mainly cutting, winter grazing with sheep and a normal fertilization regime with both slurry manure and inorganic fertilizer. The normal cutting and grazing regime was continued in the first two years of the experiment; during 2015, the monitoring year, the plots were not grazed and only cut for herbage measurements.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Measurements</strong></p> <p>From April to October 2015, soil and aboveground measurements were carried out. Most soil parameters were measured in October. Earthworms and insect larvae are an important food source for meadow birds during the pre-breeding period in spring (Galbraith, 1989) and were therefore sampled in April. Soil moisture and penetration resistance were measured both in April and October.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Soil biological parameters</em></p> <p>Earthworms and insect larvae were sampled in the top soil layer in two soil cubes (20 × 20 × 20 cm) per plot. Earthworms were hand-sorted, counted, weighed and fixed in alcohol prior to identification. Both adults and juveniles were identified to species (Sims and Gerard, 1985; Stöp-Bowitz, 1969) and classified into functional groups (Bouché, 1977). Crane flies (Tipulidae; leatherjackets) or click beetles (Elateridae; wireworms) larvae were counted.</p> <p>Phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) were measured in October. PLFA were extracted from 4 g of fresh soil (Palojärvi, 2006), and analyzed by gas chromatography (Hewlett-Packard, USA). PLFA i15:0, a15:0, 15:0, i16:0, 16:1ω9, i17:0, a17:0, cy17:0, 18:1ω7 and cy19:0 were chosen to represent bacteria and PLFA 18:2ω6 was used as a marker of saprotrophic fungi (Hedlund, 2002). The neutral lipid fatty acid (NLFA) 16:1ω5 occurs in storage lipids of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and was used as marker of AMF (Vestberg et al., 2012). PLFA i15:0, a15:0, i16:0, i17:0 and a17:0 were used as a measure of Gram-positive bacteria, and cy17:0 and cy19:0 for Gram-negative bacteria. PLFA 10Me16:0, 10Me17:0 and 10Me18:0 represented actinomycetes.</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Soil chemical parameters</em></p> <p>A soil sample from the 0−10 cm layer (c. 50 randomly taken soil cores) per experimental plot was collected in October (auger diameter 2.3 cm; Eijkelkamp grass plot sampler, Giesbeek, the Netherlands), was sieved (1 cm mesh size) and homogenized. One sub-sample was taken for analysis of hot water extractable carbon (HWC) according to Ghani et al. (2003) and one for chemical analysis. Prior to analysis of soil acidity (pH<sub>KCl</sub>), soil organic matter (SOM), total carbon (C<sub>total</sub>), total nitrogen (N<sub>total</sub>), total phosphorus (P<sub>total</sub>) and ammonium-lactate extractable P (P<sub>AL</sub>) by Eurofins Agro (Wageningen, the Netherlands), the sub sample was dried at 40°C. Soil pH<sub>KCl</sub> was measured according to NEN-ISO 10390 2005. SOM was determined by loss-on-ignition (NEN 5754 2005). C<sub>total</sub> was measured by incineration at 1150°C, and determination of the CO<sub>2</sub> produced by an infrared detector (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, Mich., USA). For N<sub>total</sub>, evolved gasses after incineration were reduced to N<sub>2</sub> and measured with a thermal-conductivity detector (LECO Corporation, St. Joseph, Mich., USA). P<sub>total</sub> was analysed with Fleishmann acid (Houba et al., 1997). P<sub>AL</sub> is used to assess the P supply capacity of grassland soils (Reijneveld et al., 2014) and was determined according to Egnér et al. (1960) (NEN 5793).</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Soil physical parameters</em></p> <p>Soil moisture was determined in April and October in a homogenized 0−10 cm soil sample after drying at 105°C for 24 hrs. Moisture content was expressed as percentage of fresh soil weight.</p> <p>Penetration resistance was measured (April and October) with a penetrologger (Eijkelkamp, Giesbeek, the Netherlands; cone of 2.0 cm<sup>2</sup> penetration surface and 60° apex angle. Penetration resistance was expressed as an average of 7 penetrations per plot and per soil layer of 0−10, 10−20, and 20−30 cm.</p> <p>Soil structure and rooting density were assessed in October in the 0−10 cm and 10−25 cm layers. The percentage of crumbs, sub-angular blocky elements and angular blocky elements was estimated by one experienced person as described by Peerlkamp (1959) and Shepherd (2000), Root density was estimated by scoring visible roots (score 1–10; 1 for no roots and 10 for above average).</p> <p>Water infiltration rate was measured in October at three spots per experimental plot in 5 of the 6 blocks (35 plots). A PVC pipe (15 cm high, 15 cm diameter) was pushed into the soil to a depth of 10 cm. 500 ml water was poured into each pipe and the infiltration time was recorded. If the infiltration time exceeded 15 min, the remaining water volume was estimated to calculate the infiltration rate (mm min<sup>−1</sup>).</p> <p> </p> <p><em>Grass yield and botanical composition</em></p> <p>Grass dry matter (DM) and N yield were determined during 2015 with a Haldrup plot harvester (J. Haldrup a/s, Løgstør, Denmark). The four harvest dates were May 15, June 29, August 19 and September 30. Fresh biomass, DM content (70°C for 24 hrs) and total N content (Kjeldahl) were determined for each harvest. Herbage DM yield (Mg DM ha<sup>−1</sup>) and herbage N yield (kg N ha<sup>−1</sup>) were calculated. Apparent N recovery (ANR; kg N.kg N<sup>−1</sup>) was calculated as (N yield<sub>(fertilized)</sub> – N yield<sub>(non-fertilized)</sub>)/(N fertilization rate) (Vellinga and André, 1999).</p> <p>In June 2015, botanical composition was measured by visually estimating the relative soil cover of the sward and the proportion of each species therein (Sikkema, 1997).</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data files</strong></p> <ul> </ul> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>Data_soil_grass.csv</strong></em></p> <p><em>Content:</em></p> <p>Dataset with soil biological (earthworms, microbial PLFA), soil chemical, soil physical parameters, herbage dry matter and N yields, and botanical parameters.</p> <p><em>Column names and units:</em></p> <ul> <li>plot: Experimental plot number (1-42)</li> <li>treatment: Treatment code (see text)</li> <li>block: Block number (1-6)</li> <li>EW_species_number: Earthworm - number of species</li> <li>EW_totalnumber: Earthworm - total number per m2</li> <li>EW_epigeic: Earthworm - number of epigeic adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_endogeic: Earthworm - number of endogeic adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_adults: Earthworm - number of adults per m2</li> <li>EW_juveniles: Earthworm - number of juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_epigeic: Earthworm - number of epigeic adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_endogeic: Earthworm - number of endogeic adults per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_epigeic: Earthworm - number of epigeic juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_endogeic: Earthworm - number of endogeic juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_L_rubellus: Earthworm - number of L. rubellus adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_A_chlorotica: Earthworm - number of A. chlorotica adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_A_caliginosa: Earthworm - number of A. caliginosa adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_O_lacteum: Earthworm - number of O. lacteum adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_A_rosea: Earthworm - number of A. rosea adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_O_cyaenum: Earthworm - number of O. cyaneum adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_L_castaneus: Earthworm - number of L. castaneus adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_D_rubida: Earthworm - number of D. rubida adults and juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_L_rubellus: Earthworm - number of L. rubellus adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_A_chlorotica: Earthworm - number of A. chlorotica adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_A_caliginosa: Earthworm - number of A. caliginosa adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_O_lacteum: Earthworm - number of O. lacteum adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_A_rosea: Earthworm - number of A. rosea adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_O_cyaenum: Earthworm - number of O. cyaneum adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_L_castaneus: Earthworm - number of L. castaneus adults per m2</li> <li>EW_adult_D_rubida: Earthworm - number of D. rubida adults per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_L_rubellus: Earthworm - number of L. rubellus juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_A_chlorotica: Earthworm - number of A. chlorotica juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_juven_A_caliginosa: Earthworm - number of A. caliginosa juveniles per m2</li> <li>EW_non_determined: Earthworm - number of non determined individuals per m2</li> <li>EW_total_biomass: Earthworm - total fresh biomass per m2</li> <li>Leatherjackets: number of leatherjackets per m2</li> <li>Wireworms: number of wireworms per m2</li> <li>TOTmicrPLFA: total microbial PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>bactPLFA: bacterial PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>saprofungPLFA: saprotrophic fungal PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Fung_bactPLAF_ratio: ratio of fungal to bacterial PLFA</li> <li>GramPLUSplfa: gram positive PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>GramMINplfa: gram negative PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>ratioGram_PLUS_MIN: ratio of gram positive to gram negative PLFA</li> <li>AMFsporNLFA: AMF spores NLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>ActinomPLFA: Actinomycetes PLFA in nmol.g-1 dry soil</li> <li>ShannonPLFA: PLFA shannon diversity index</li> <li>SOM: soil organic matter in g.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Ctotal: total C in g.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>HWC: hot water extractable C in μg.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Ntotal: total N in g.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>Ptotal: total P2O5 in mg.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>P_AL: total P-AL in mg.100 g-1 dry soil</li> <li>pH_KCl: pH-KCl</li> <li>CN_ratio: C:N ratio</li> <li>C_SOM: C:SOM ratio</li> <li>Soilmoisture_April: soil moisture content in April in g.100g-1 fresh soil</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_April_cm010: penetration resistance in April in 10-20 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_April_cm1020: penetration resistance in April in 20-30 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_April_cm2030: penetration resistance in April in 0-10 cm in Newton</li> <li>Soilmoisture_October: soil moisture content in October in g.100g-1 fresh soil</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_October_cm010: penetration resistance in October in 10-20 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_October_cm1020: penetration resistance in October in 20-30 cm in Newton</li> <li>Penetrationresistance_October_cm2030: penetration resistance in October in 0-10 cm in Newton</li> <li>crumb_struct_cm010: percentage of crumb elements in 0-10 cm</li> <li>round_struct_cm011: percentage of sub-angular elements in 0-10 cm</li> <li>rootdensity_cm010: score (1-10) of root density in 0-10 cm</li> <li>crumb_struct_cm1025: percentage of crumb elements in 10-25 cm</li> <li>round_struct_cm1025: percentage of sub-angular elements in 10-25 cm</li> <li>sharp_struct_cm1025: percentage of angular elements in 10-25 cm</li> <li>rootdensity_cm1025: score (1-10) of root density in 10-25 cm</li> <li>water_infiltration: water infiltration rate in mm per minute</li> <li>DM_yield_year: total herbage dry matter yield in kg.ha-1 per year</li> <li>DM_yield_H1: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 1 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DM_yield_H2: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 2 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DM_yield_H3: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 3 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DM_yield_H4: herbage dry matter yield of harvest 4 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_year: total herbage N yield in kg.ha-1 per year</li> <li>N_yield_H1: herbage N yield of harvest 1 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_H2: herbage N yield of harvest 2 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_H3: herbage N yield of harvest 3 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>N_yield_H4: herbage N yield of harvest 4 in kg.ha-1</li> <li>DMperc_yield_year: herbage dry matter content (per year; weighed average over the 4 harvests) in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H1: herbage dry matter content of harvest 1 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H2: herbage dry matter content of harvest 2 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H3: herbage dry matter content of harvest 3 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>DMperc_yield_H4: herbage dry matter content of harvest 4 in g.100g-1 fresh weight</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_year: herbage N content (per year; weighed average over the 4 harvests) in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H1: herbage N content of harvest 1 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H2: herbage N content of harvest 2 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H3: herbage N content of harvest 3 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>Ncontent_yield_H4: herbage N content of harvest 4 in g.kg-1 dry matter</li> <li>fresh_yield_H1: herbvage fresh yield of harvest 1 in Mg.ha-1</li> <li>ANR: apparent N recovery in kg N.kg N-1</li> <li>productive_grasses: cover percentage of L. perenne and P trivialis</li> <li>monocotyledons: cover percentage of monocotyledons</li> <li>dicotyledons: cover percentage of dicotyledons</li> <li>plant_species: number of plant species</li> <li>monocot_species: number of monocotyledon species</li> <li>dicot_species: number of dicotyledon species</li> <li>Lolium_perenne: plant cover %</li> <li>Poa_trivialis: plant cover %</li> <li>Phleum_pratense: plant cover %</li> <li>Elytrigia_repens: plant cover %</li> <li>Poa_annua: plant cover %</li> <li>Agrostis_stolonifera: plant cover %</li> <li>Holcus_lanatus: plant cover %</li> <li>Alopecurus_pratensis: plant cover %</li> <li>Alopecurus_geniculatus: plant cover %</li> <li>Trifolium_repens: plant cover %</li> <li>Taraxacum_officinale: plant cover %</li> <li>Ranunculus_arvensis: plant cover %</li> <li>Rumex_obtusifolius: plant cover %</li> <li>Rumex_crispus: plant cover %</li> <li>Ranunculus_acris: plant cover %</li> <li>Stellaria_media: plant cover %</li> <li>Cardamine_pratensis: plant cover %</li> <li>Bellis_perennis: plant cover %</li> <li>Rumex_acetosa: plant cover %</li> <li>Ranunculus_sceleratus: plant cover %</li> <li>Polygonum_aviculare: plant cover %</li> <li>Capsella_bursa-pastoris: plant cover %</li> <li>Glechoma_hederacea: plant cover %</li> <li>Geranium_molle: plant cover %</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><em><strong>Fertilizer_input.csv</strong></em></p> <p><em>Content:</em></p> <p>Application quantities of fertilizers and ash, organic matter, C and mineral inputs, and fertilizer C:N ratio. Total N input is the sum of mineral N (Nmin) and organic N (Norg). Average values per hectare and per year over the years 2013−2015.</p> <p><em>Column names and units:</em></p> <ul> <li>Treatment: Treatment code (see text)</li> <li>Fertilizer_fresh: Applied fertilizer in Mg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year (fresh weight)</li> <li>Fertilizer_DM: Applied fertilizer in Mg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year (dry matter weight); for IF+SD this is the sum of 2.72 Mg sawdust + 0.45 Mg N fertilizer</li> <li>Ash: Mineral fraction in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>OM: Organic matter in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>C: Total C in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>Nmin: Mineral N in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>Norg: Organic N in kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>P2O5: kg.ha<sup>-1</sup> per year</li> <li>C_N_ratio: C:N ratio</li> </ul>
Advanced open source data formats for geometrically and physically coupled systems - examples
<p>Some model files to describe a geometrically and physically coupled PDE and a ODE system, arising from discretization in space. The files correspond to:</p> <ul> <li>a simplified two component problem with coupling and an FMU in <strong>withFMU.json</strong></li> <li>the corresponding ODE in <strong>io_withFMU_FECoupled.json</strong></li> <li>a PDE model of a complete machine in <strong>ictimt_coupledModel.zip</strong>. This model belongs to https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2021_7_2021072</li> <li>the corresponding discrete model in <strong>ictimt_feCoupled.zip </strong>This model belongs to https://doi.org/10.17973/MMSJ.2021_7_2021072</li> </ul> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Geophysical and physical oceanography data and acoustic facies mapping results of the Central Basin in the northwestern Ross Sea margin, Antarctica
<p>Multi-channel seismic (MCS), sub-bottom profiler (SBP), multi-beam echosounder (MBES) and expandable conductivity-temperature-depth (XCTD) data and acoustic facies mapping results of the Central Basin in the northwestern Ross Sea margin, Antarctica. The Coordinate Reference System (CRS) for the MCS, SBP, MBES data and acoustic mapping results is WGS 84 / Antarctic Polar Stereographic (EPSG:3031). ). The geophysical data (MCS, SBP, MBES) and oceanographic measurements (XCTD) collected by the RV <em>Araon</em> are provided by the Korea Polar Data Center (<a href="https://kpdc.kopri.re.kr">https://kpdc.kopri.re.kr</a>).</p>
Design Methodologies and Engineering Applications for Ecosystem Biomimicry: An Interdisciplinary Review Spanning Cyber, Physical, and Cyber-Physical Systems
<p>This is the data for the interdisciplinary review on ecosystem biomimicry for engineering applications. </p>
NOAA PSL thermodynamic profiles retrieved from ASSIST infrared radiances with the optimal estimation physical retrieval TROPoe during SPLASH
<p>This dataset contains daily files with thermodynamic profiles retrieved with the optimal estimation physical retrieval TROPoe (TROPoe, Turner and Löhnert 2014; Turner and Blumberg 2019; Turner and Löhnert 2021). The profiles are retrieved every 10 min from instantaneous radiances observed with an Atmospheric Sounder Spectrometer by Infrared Spectral Technology (ASSIST, Rochette et al. 2009).</p> <p>The ASSIST was deployed at Roaring Judy in the East River Watershed in Colorado (38.7169321 N, 106.853031 W, 2494 m above mean sea level) from 21 October 2021 to 28 January 2022 as part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Study of Precipitation, the Lower Atmosphere, and Surface for Hydrometeorology (SPLASH) campaign. </p> <p>The spectral bands used in the retrieval are in the wavenumber range from 612 - 905.4 cm<sup>-1</sup> and are specified in Turner and Löhnert (2021). Additional input data in TROPoe are cloud base height from a collocated ceilometer, temperature, water vapor mixing ratio, and pressure from colocated near-surface measurements and from hourly analysis profiles from the operational Rapid Refresh (RAP, Benjamin et al. 2021) weather prediction model at the closest grid point. The latter are used only outside the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) above 4 km above ground level (AGL) and provide information in the middle and upper troposphere where little to no information content is available from the infrared radiances.</p> <p>In addition to these temporally resolved input data, TROPoe requires an a priori dataset (prior) which provides mean climatological estimates of thermodynamic profiles and specifies how temperature and humidity covary with height as an input (for details see e.g. Djalalova et al. 2022). The prior is a key component of the retrieval and provides a constraint on the ill-posed inversion problem. For this study, we computed the prior from operational radiosondes launched near Denver, CO, and re-centered the mean profiles of water vapor and temperature to account for the elevation difference between the East River Valley and the launch site near Denver to get a more representative prior.</p> <p>The file format is netcdf and the file naming conventions are</p> <p>NOAA_PSL_ASSIST_RoaringJudy_yyyymmdd.cdf</p> <p>with</p> <p>yyyy: Year</p> <p>mm: Month</p> <p>dd: Day</p> <p> </p> <p>The time stamp of all data is in UTC.</p> <p>Selected basic variables are (many more provided):</p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody> <tr> <td> <p>Name</p> </td> <td> <p>Dimension</p> </td> <td> <p>Unit</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>base_time</p> </td> <td> <p>Single value</p> </td> <td> <p>Seconds (since 00 UTC 1 Jan 1970)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>time_offset</p> </td> <td> <p>Time</p> </td> <td> <p>Second (since base_time)</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>hour</p> </td> <td> <p>Time</p> </td> <td> <p>Hours since 00UTC this day</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>height</p> </td> <td> <p>Height</p> </td> <td> <p>km AGL</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>temperature </strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>C, temperature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p><strong>waterVapor </strong></p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>g/kg, water vapor mixing ratio</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>theta</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>K, potential temperature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>pressure</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>hPa, pressure</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>rh</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>%, relative humidity</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>dewpt</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>C, dew point temperature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>thetae</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>K, equivalent potential temperature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>sigma_temperature</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>C, 1-sigma uncertainty temperature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>sigma_waterVapor</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>g/kg, 1-sigma uncertainty water vapor</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>cdfs_temperature</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>cumulative degrees of freedom for temperature</p> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> <p>cdfs_waterVapor</p> </td> <td> <p>Time, Height</p> </td> <td> <p>cumulative degrees of freedom for water vapor</p> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p>Bold variables are the main retrieved profiles, from which the other variables are derived.</p> <p>Note that the vertical resolution of the retrieved profiles decreases with height, because of the broadening of the weighting function as a function of height. Thus, there are relatively few independent pieces of information in the profiles, this is reflected in the cumulative degree of freedom variables. The majority of the information from the ASSIST is in the lowest 2-3 km, above that most information comes from the RAP model.</p> <p>Because of strong emission in the infrared from clouds, clouds strongly impact the ability to retrieve profiles from the ASSIST and care should be taken when analyzing the retrievals in the presence of clouds. </p> <p><strong>References: </strong></p> <p>Rochette, L., W. L. Smith, M. Howard, and T. Bratcher, 2009: ASSIST, atmospheric sounder spectrometer for infrared spectral technology: Latest development and improvement in the atmospheric sounding technology. Imaging spectrometry XIV, Vol. 7457 of, SPIE, 9–17.</p> <p>Turner, D. D., and U. Löhnert, 2014: Information content and uncertainties in thermodynamic profiles and liquid cloud properties retrieved from the ground-based atmospheric emitted radiance interferometer (AERI). J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 53, 752–771, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0126.1.</p> <p>Turner, D. D., and W. G. Blumberg, 2019: Improvements to the AERIoe thermodynamic profile retrieval algorithm. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 12, 1339–1354, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2018.2874968.</p> <p>Turner, D. D., and U. Löhnert, 2021: Ground-based temperature and humidity profiling: Combining active and passive remote sensors. Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3033–3048, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3033-2021.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.