Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
412
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
412 results for “SCOPE”
Data for study "'Conditional Acceptance' (additional experiments required): A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review"
<p>Dataset for study "‘Conditional Acceptance’ (additional experiments required): A scoping review of recent evidence on key aspects of Open Peer Review", 2022 preprint by Tony Ross-Hellauer and Serge Horbach.</p> <p>Dataset includes excel file with 10 sheets showing systematic literature search (per PRISMA-SCR protocol) of academic databases (Web of Science, Scopus), snowballing and web-search to identify 52 studies on key aspects of Open Peer Review published from Jan 2017 until May 2022.</p> <p><strong>Study Abstract: </strong>Diverse efforts are underway to reform the journal peer review system. Combined with growing interest in Open Science practices, Open Peer Review (OPR) has become of central concern to the scholarly community. However, what Open Peer Review is understood to encompass and how effective some of its elements are in meeting the expectations of the peer review system, are uncertain. This scoping review updates previous efforts to summarise research on OPR to date. Following the PRISMA methodological framework, it addresses the question: “What evidence has been reported in the scientific literature from 2017 to date regarding uptake, attitudes, and efficacy of two key aspects of Open Peer Review (Open Identities and Open Reports)?” The review identifies, analyses and synthesises 52 studies matching inclusion criteria, finding that OPR is growing, but still far from common practice. Our findings indicate positive attitudes towards Open Reports and more sceptical approaches to Open Identities. Changes in reviewer behaviour seem limited. and no evidence for lower acceptance rates of review invitations or slower turnaround times is reported. Concerns about power dynamics and potential backfiring on critical reviews are in need of further experimentation. We conclude that elements of OPR seem to be gaining acceptance, but more experimentation is needed. Evidence still mainly consists of either survey data or case studies of individual or few journals, not allowing for generalisability across fields and journals, and revealing no studies which compare the quality of review under Open Identities or Open Reports versus other modes of peer review.</p>
Experimental materials for "Reanalysis of Empirical Data on Java Local Variables with Narrow and Broad Scope"
<p>Data, scripts, and graphs for the paper "Reanalysis of Empirical Data on Java Local Variables with Narrow and Broad Scope", published in ICPC 2023.</p><p>See README file for details on directories and usage.</p>
Supporting data for: Immersive information seeking - a scoping review of information seeking in virtual reality environments
<p>Dataset that contains of all reviewed research items obtained for the Scoping Literature Review <em>Immersive information seeking - a scoping review of information seeking in virtual reality environments</em>.</p>
Dataset of scoping reviews on climate-disease publications for Lyme disease and cryptosporidiosis
<p>The climate-disease relationship is complex, where multiple driver-pressure factors and interactions combine with climate change in determining the occurrence geographies and timings of various infectious diseases. However, studies often focus on just some selected factor(s) and interaction(s). Such focus choices may limit and bias our understanding and predictive capability of disease sensitivity to climate and other driver-pressure changes. To assess these research choices and identify possible remaining key gaps and biases, a scoping review is applied to climate-disease related publications for Lyme disease and cryptosporidiosis. </p> <p>This dataset includes three excel files for Lyme disease (“literature_search_LD_raw.xls”), cryptosporidiosis (“literature_search_CY_raw.xls”), and categories of driver-pressure factors ("Table_1.xlsx") respectively, covering all the relevant information for further analysis. The first two excel files contain three sheets named “Search”, “Filter”, and “Quantitative”. Contents of each sheet is explained as follows.</p> <p>1. “Search”</p> <p>Sheet “Search” listed all the publications found from the literature searches, including the information of publication year, title, DOI, and Authors. The searches were performed in Web of Science™ (WoS) and considered publications from 1 January 2000 to 10 February 2022. Search terms were (('borreliosis' OR 'Lyme disease') AND ('climate' OR 'climate change' OR 'climate variability')) for Lyme disease, ((‘cryptosporidiosis’ OR ‘cryptosporidium’ OR ‘crypto.’) AND (‘climate’ OR ‘climate change’ OR ‘climate variability’)) for cryptosporidiosis. The search yielded 555 publication results for Lyme disease and 185 for cryptosporidiosis.</p> <p>2. “Filter”</p> <p>Sheet “Filter” listed the inclusions and exclusions for searched publications, and categories each included publication belonging to. Excluded articles (marked as blank in column “Included”) are ones that: (i) do not consider both climate and disease; (ii) are for Lyme disease, but not about the <em>Ixodes</em> transmission of the <em>Borrelia </em>pathogen; (iii) are not written in English; and (iv) are not full-text open access. Included articles (marked as “x” in column “Included”) are further classified into following categories based on their focus: for Lyme disease, categories of publications include reviews (mentioning), reviews (specifically discussing), public awareness, mitigation, survey (implications), investigations, projections, and others; for cryptosporidiosis, categories include reviews (mentioning), reviews (specifically discussing), survey (implications), investigations, projections, and others. Articles belonging to any categories are marked as “x”.</p> <p>3. “Quantitative”</p> <p>Sheet “Quantitative” lists further information extracted from quantitative studies which are articles under category of investigations and projections in sheet “filter”. Further extracted information is from the methods section of each study or from the full text if necessary. The information includes transmission components, study region (if applicable), category of investigations or projections, included driver-pressure factors, and methods. Transmission components are reproduction host, transmission host, vector, and human for Lyme disease; animal reservoir, environmental reservoir, and human for cryptosporidiosis. Study region considers specific countries as the smallest scale for spatial resolution, so that smaller than whole-country study sites were counted as studies of the associated countries. Included driver-pressure factors are categorized as shown in Table 1 in the file of "Table_1.xlsx", including main categories and their covered variables. Methods include laboratory/field experimentation/observation, statistical analysis, mechanistic modelling, and synthesis/meta-analysis.</p> Enable Ginger<em>Cannot connect to Ginger</em> Check your internet connection<br> or reload the browserDisable in this text fieldRephraseRephrase current sentenceEdit in Ginger×
Data for study "Digital tools for innovative higher education teaching - a Scoping Review of Empirical Studies".
<p>The goal of this research is to point out, by a scoping review of the papers published between 2020 and 2023, the digital tools used in the teaching process at the higher education level. The dataset was collected using Web of Science and Scopus databases.</p> <p>The dataset contains the following elements:</p> <ol> <li>paper details (Authors, Publication Year, Article Title, DOI),</li> <li>OECD classification,</li> <li>teaching tool assigned to paper.</li> </ol>
Supplemental; Materials - Current state of genomics in nursing: A scoping review of healthcare provider oriented (clinical and educational) outcomes (2012-2022)
<p>Supplemental Table S1 "Scoping Review Data Extraction Table"</p>
A scoping review of multi-level governance of forests in the Philippines
<p>This review scopes the landscape of multi-level forest governance in the Philippines, providing a clearer picture of potential gaps and opportunities for further development in the field. </p>
Evaluation of the Impact of a Forward Viewing Scope at Time of ERCP
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05627882. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Feasibility of the Infra-Red Illumination for Facilitation of Video Scope-tracheal Intubation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04991545. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 9.
Hip Scope Fascia-iliaca (FI) Block Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02365961. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
What harms and what hinders de-implementation of low-value care in emergency medicine practice ? A scoping review
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Changes of Chinese forest-grassland ecotone in geographical scope and landscape structure from 1990 to 2020
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
A scoping review of evidence for the effects of seven global deer species on woody vegetation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Description of biologging instrument impacts from scoping literature review
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Drug and Therapeutics Committee (DTC) evolvement and expanded scope in Ethiopia
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Randomised trials in maternal and perinatal health in low- and middle-income countries from 2010 to 2019: A systematic scoping review
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Excel data coding file for child welfare reform scoping review
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: A scoping review of mosquito vector range shifts: widespread expansions and evidence gaps in climate attribution
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Environmental and calcification data for widespread scope for coral adaptation under combined ocean warming and acidification
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data for: Characterizing multi-criteria decision analysis, risk stratification, and hotspot analysis methods to optimise disease policymaking and evidence translation for medicines in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.