Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 8 in Reinstatement and redescription of Lebbeus armatus (Owen, 1839), long synonymized with L. groenlandicus (Fabricius, 1775), and description of one new species from the southwestern Sea of Okhotsk, Hokkaido, Japan (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Thoridae)

FIGURE 8. Lebbeus groenlandicus (Fabricius, 1775), male (cl 10.5 mm), W of Greenland, HUMZ-C 1396. A, anterior part of carapace and cephalic appendages, lateral view (setae partially omitted); B, left first to fifth pleura of pleon, lateral view. Scale bars: 5 mm for A; 2 mm for B.

FIGURE 11. Lebbeus magnificus n in Reinstatement and redescription of Lebbeus armatus (Owen, 1839), long synonymized with L. groenlandicus (Fabricius, 1775), and description of one new species from the southwestern Sea of Okhotsk, Hokkaido, Japan (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Thoridae)

FIGURE 11. Lebbeus magnificus n. sp., holotype, ovigerous female (cl 24.0 mm), Kitami Yamato Bank, southwestern Sea of Okhotsk, CBM-ZC 12597. Thoracic appendages, lateral view. A, right third maxilliped; B, right first pereopod; C, left second pereopod; D, right third pereopod; E, right fourth pereopod; F, right fifth pereopod. Scale bar: 5 mm.

FIGURE 1 in Reinstatement and redescription of Lebbeus armatus (Owen, 1839), long synonymized with L. groenlandicus (Fabricius, 1775), and description of one new species from the southwestern Sea of Okhotsk, Hokkaido, Japan (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Thoridae)

FIGURE 1. Lebbeus armatus (Owen, 1839), female (cl 36.7 mm), Sea of Japan off Hokkaido, CBM-ZC 7914. A, entire animal in lateral view; B, dorsum of carapace in lateral view, showing surface setation.

FIGURE 4 in Reinstatement and redescription of Lebbeus armatus (Owen, 1839), long synonymized with L. groenlandicus (Fabricius, 1775), and description of one new species from the southwestern Sea of Okhotsk, Hokkaido, Japan (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Thoridae)

FIGURE 4. Lebbeus armatus (Owen, 1839), female (cl 19.2 mm), North Yamato Bank, Sea of Japan, CBM-ZC 4990, left thoracic appendages in lateral view. A, left third maxilliped; B, first pereopod; C, second pereopod; D, third pereopod; E, fourth pereopod; F, fifth pereopod. Scale bar: 5 mm.

Figure 7 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 7. Fossil cyclostome bryozoans with stratocormidial colonies, scanning electron micrographs. (A, B) Cellulipora ornata d'Orbigny, 1849, Cenomanian, Cap de le Hève, Seine Maritime, France; neotype, MNHN R61665; (A) zooids growing radially outwards from the centre of a subcolony; (B) autozooids with porous plates, mostly broken, proximal of the large apertures. (C) Multifascigera campicheana d'Orbigny, 1853, Cretaceous, Neocomian, Ste Croix, Switzerland; paralectotype, MNHN R61559. (D) Semimulticavea landrioti (Michelin, 1841), Cretaceous. Albian, Grandpré, Ardennes, France; MNHN.F.A24660 (ex d'Orbigny Colln 6029). Scale bars: (A) = 2 mm; (B) = 100 µm; (C, D) = 1 mm.

Figure 8 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 8. Drawings of Cretaceous stratocormidial cyclostomes taken from d'Orbigny (1851–1854). (A) Reptomulticava pyriformis d'Orbigny, 1854 (pl. 792, figs 4 and 5) showing egg-shaped colony and details of concentric subcolonies (cf. Figure 6(K) herein). (B) Semimulticavea landrioti (Michelin, 1841) (d'Orbigny 1841, pl. 648, figs 5 and 7), which differs from the colony given the same name and shown here in Figure 7(D).

Figure 5 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 5. Kamchatkapora ozhgibesovi gen. et sp. n., scanning electron micrographs of gonozooids in bleached fragments of paratype NHMUK 2017.17.11.4. (A) Oblique view of gonozooid with broken roof. (B) Collapsed ooeciopore. (C) Sutured calcification and pseudopores in gonozooid roof. (D) Islands of autozooids penetrating gonozooid roof. Scale bars: (A, D) = 500 µm; (B) = 100 µm; (C) = 50 µm.

Figure 1 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 1. Maps showing the location of the Sea of Okhotsk and the position of Station 190 west of the Kamchatka Peninsula where Kamchatkapora ozhgibesovi gen. et sp. n. was collected. Drawn by Aleksey Rybin.

Figure 4 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 4. Kamchatkapora ozhgibesovi gen. et sp. n., scanning electron micrographs. Bleached fragments of holotype NHMUK 2017.7.11.2 (A–D, F), and paratype NHMUK 2017.17.11.4 (E) specimens. (A) Raised clusters of autozooids. (B) Radially arranged clusters of autozooids. (C) Low spines at the corners of an autozooidal aperture. (D) Surface of an interior wall showing distally imbricated crystallites and a couple of interzooidal pores. (E) Tall mural spines. (F) Mural spines with spiked heads. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B = 500 µm; C = 50 µm; D, F = 20 µm; E = 100 µm.

Figure 3 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 3. Kamchatkapora ozhgibesovi gen. et sp. n., detail of surface of holotype of NHMUK 2017.7.11.2, showing the monticulate subcolonies in various stages of coalescence. Scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 2 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 2. Kamchatkapora ozhgibesovi gen. et sp. n., broken edges showing layering and surface views showing subcolonies of colony fragments. (A,B) – paratype, NHMUK 2017.7.11.4. (C,D) – holotype, NHMUK 2017.7.11.2. (E,F) paratype, NHMUK 2017.7.11.3. Scale bars: 1 cm.

Figure 6 in A new bryozoan genus from the Sea of Okhotsk and the taxonomy and geological history of 'stratocormidial' cyclostome bryozoans

Figure 6. Fossil cyclostome bryozoans with stratocormidial colonies. (A) Blumenbachium globosum Koenig, 1825, sectioned lectotype colony; NHMUK PI D52755, Pliocene, Coralline Crag Formation, Suffolk, UK. (B) Blumenbachium globosum, colony exterior surface showing ridges bounding subcolonies; NHMUK PI D51069, Pliocene, Coralline Crag Formation, Suffolk, UK. (C) Cellulipora ornata d'Orbigny, 1849, polygonal subcolonies on colony surface; NHMUK PI 25327, Cretaceous, Cenomanian, Le Havre, Seine Maritime, France. (D) Centronea americana Canu and Bassler, 1920, surface of colony; NHMUK PI BZ8914, Eocene, Castle Hayne Limestone Formation, Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County, North Carolina, USA. (E) Centronea americana, Canu and Bassler, 1920, underside of colony showing expanding, exterior-walled subcolonies; NHMUK PI BZ8915, Eocene, Castle Hayne Limestone Formation, Rocky Point Quarry, Pender County, North Carolina, USA. (F) Multifascigera campicheana d'Orbigny, 1853, carrot-shaped colony which evidently grew around a cylindrical substrate; paralectotype, MNHN R615598, Cretaceous, Valanginian, Ste Croix, Switzerland. (G) Semimulticavea marginata (1926), almost spherical colony; NHMUK PI D55117, Cretaceous, Aptian, Faringdon Sponge Gravel, Bowlers Pit, Faringdon, Oxfordshire, UK. (H) Semimulticavea marginata (Canu and Bassler, 1926), broken colony showing layered internal structure; NHMUK PI D55371, Cretaceous, Aptian, Faringdon Sponge Gravel, Little Coxwell Pit, Faringdon, Oxfordshire, UK. (I, J) Multifascigera debenensis Balson and Taylor, 1982; holotype, NHMUK PI D52760, Pliocene, Coralline Crag Formation, Ramsholt Cliff, Suffolk, UK; (I) surface detail of a large colony showing fascicles of autozooids; (J) broken edge of the same colony revealing layered internal structure and columnar fascicles. (K) Reptomulticava pyriformis d'Orbigny, 1854, colony surface showing layers of concentric growth from two subcolonies; syntype, MNHN F.R61575, Cretaceous, Aptian, Ste Croix, Switzerland. Scale bars: (A–J) = 1 cm; (K) = 1 mm.

opennotspecifiedJan 2009View details →

Subspecies and Distribution. U. a. arctos Linnaeus, 1758 — Europe and W Russia. U. a. alascensis Merriam, 1896 — most of Alaska (excluding Alaska Peninsula, SE panhandle & Kodiak Island group). U. a. beringianus Middendorff, 1853 — NE Russia (Kamchatka Peninsula & N Kuril Islands northward through the Koryak Autonomous District, and along W coast of the Sea of Okhotsk). U. a. collaris Cuvier, 1824 — Russia (Siberia, from E of the Yenisey River to the Bering Sea, but excluding Kamchatka and more southern parts of the Russian Far East), N Mongolia. U. a. dalli Merriam, 1896 — SE Alaska (N of Alexander Archipelago). U. a. gyas Merriam, 1902 — Alaska peninsula. U. a. horribilis Ord, 1815 —W Canada (Yukon, North-West Territories, British Columbia & Alberta), inland W USA (extirpated from S Wyoming to Mexico). U. a. isabellinus Horsfield, 1826 — N India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, N to Kazakhstan and Mongolia (Gobi Desert). U. a. lasiotus Gray, 1867 — Russia (Southern Kuril Islands, Sakhalin, Ussuri/Amur river region of the Russian Far East), NE China, North Korea, and Japan (Hokkaido). U. a. middendorffi Merriam, 1896 — Alaska (Kodiak Island & nearby islands). U. a. pruinosus Blyth, 1853 — Tibetan Plateau, China, N Nepal. U. a. sitkensis Merriam, 1896 — SE Alaska (Alexander Archipelago & adjacent coastal area). U. a. stikeenensis Merriam, 1914 — W Canada (W British Columbia), and formerly W USA (W Washington and Oregon). U. a. syriacus Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1828 — Middle East, from Turkey to Iran (extirpated in Syria), Caucasus mountains of Russia, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan. in Ursidae

Subspecies and Distribution. U. a. arctos Linnaeus, 1758 — Europe and W Russia. U. a. alascensis Merriam, 1896 — most of Alaska (excluding Alaska Peninsula, SE panhandle & Kodiak Island group). U. a. beringianus Middendorff, 1853 — NE Russia (Kamchatka Peninsula & N Kuril Islands northward through the Koryak Autonomous District, and along W coast of the Sea of Okhotsk). U. a. collaris Cuvier, 1824 — Russia (Siberia, from E of the Yenisey River to the Bering Sea, but excluding Kamchatka and more southern parts of the Russian Far East), N Mongolia. U. a. dalli Merriam, 1896 — SE Alaska (N of Alexander Archipelago). U. a. gyas Merriam, 1902 — Alaska peninsula. U. a. horribilis Ord, 1815 —W Canada (Yukon, North-West Territories, British Columbia & Alberta), inland W USA (extirpated from S Wyoming to Mexico). U. a. isabellinus Horsfield, 1826 — N India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, N to Kazakhstan and Mongolia (Gobi Desert). U. a. lasiotus Gray, 1867 — Russia (Southern Kuril Islands, Sakhalin, Ussuri/Amur river region of the Russian Far East), NE China, North Korea, and Japan (Hokkaido). U. a. middendorffi Merriam, 1896 — Alaska (Kodiak Island & nearby islands). U. a. pruinosus Blyth, 1853 — Tibetan Plateau, China, N Nepal. U. a. sitkensis Merriam, 1896 — SE Alaska (Alexander Archipelago & adjacent coastal area). U. a. stikeenensis Merriam, 1914 — W Canada (W British Columbia), and formerly W USA (W Washington and Oregon). U. a. syriacus Hemprich & Ehrenberg, 1828 — Middle East, from Turkey to Iran (extirpated in Syria), Caucasus mountains of Russia, Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan.

Figure 5 in Harpacticoida (Copepoda) from the pelagic zone of the Sea of Okhotsk: diversity, spatiotemporal distribution, and role in benthopelagic coupling

Figure 5. Composition (% from abundance) of harpacticoids life forms in pelagic zone in different months (A), on different depths and shores of Prostor Bay (B).

Figure 2 in Harpacticoida (Copepoda) from the pelagic zone of the Sea of Okhotsk: diversity, spatiotemporal distribution, and role in benthopelagic coupling

Figure 2. Average intermonthly dynamics of weather conditions in the Prostor Bay 2013–2015 (sea surface temperature (SST) and storminess).

Figure 1. A in Harpacticoida (Copepoda) from the pelagic zone of the Sea of Okhotsk: diversity, spatiotemporal distribution, and role in benthopelagic coupling

Figure 1. A. Map of Russian Far East with position of the Iturup Island; B. Map of Iturup Island with location of the Prostor Bay; C. four sampling transects in south-west part of the Prostor Bay. Black points – zooplankton sampling stations; white points – station of catching salmon fry.

Figure 4 in Harpacticoida (Copepoda) from the pelagic zone of the Sea of Okhotsk: diversity, spatiotemporal distribution, and role in benthopelagic coupling

Figure 4. Variations of harpacticoids species richness (A) and diversity (B) in pelagic zone at different depths and near different shores of Prostor Bay.

Figure 7 in Harpacticoida (Copepoda) from the pelagic zone of the Sea of Okhotsk: diversity, spatiotemporal distribution, and role in benthopelagic coupling

Figure 7. Composition (% of abundance) of diatoms from different life forms in harpacticoids diet in pelagic zone.

Figure 6 in Harpacticoida (Copepoda) from the pelagic zone of the Sea of Okhotsk: diversity, spatiotemporal distribution, and role in benthopelagic coupling

Figure 6. Harpacticoids dominance structure (% of abundance) in pelagic zone near southern (A) and western (B) shores of Prostor Bay.

Figure 3 in Harpacticoida (Copepoda) from the pelagic zone of the Sea of Okhotsk: diversity, spatiotemporal distribution, and role in benthopelagic coupling

Figure 3. The abundance of adults harpacticoids and copepodites in pelagic zone in different months (A) and on different depths (B).