Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 3 in Effects of Indole-3-Butyric Acid (IBA) and rooting media on rooting and survival of air layered wax apple (Syzygium samarangense) CV Jambu Madu

Figure 3. Survival rate of air layers (%) of wax apple as affected by different concentrations of IBA and growing media after detaching from mother plants. M C: Sphagnum moss (wet) + IBA 1000 mg L-1, M C: Vermicompost + IBA 1000 mg L-1, M C: Garden soil + IBA 1 1 2 1 3 1 1000 mg L-1, M C: Sphagnum moss (wet) + IBA 1500 mg L-1, M C: Vermicompost + IBA 1500 mg L-1, M C: Garden soil + IBA 1500 mg L-1, 1 2 2 2 3 2 M C : Sphagnum moss (wet) + IBA 2000 mg L-1, M C : Vermicompost + IBA 2000 mg L-1 and M C : Garden soil + IBA 2000 mg L-1.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Figure 2 in Effects of Indole-3-Butyric Acid (IBA) and rooting media on rooting and survival of air layered wax apple (Syzygium samarangense) CV Jambu Madu

Figure 2. Effects of IBA hormones and different rooting media on the survivability of rate of wax apple air layered. M 1 C 0: Sphagnum moss (wet) + IBA 0 mg L-1, M C: Vermicompost + IBA 0 mg L-1, M C: Garden soil + IBA 0 mg L-1, M C: Sphagnum moss (wet) + IBA 2 0 3 0 1 1 1000 mg L-1, M C: Vermicompost + IBA 1000 mg L-1, M C: Garden soil + IBA 1000 mg L-1, M C: Sphagnum moss (wet) + IBA 1500 mg L-1, 2 1 3 1 1 2 M C: Vermicompost + IBA 1500 mg L-1, M C: Garden soil + IBA 1500 mg L-1, M C: Sphagnum moss (wet) + IBA 2000 mg L-1, M C: 2 2 3 2 1 3 2 3 Vermicompost + IBA 2000 mg L-1 and M C: Garden soil + IBA 2000 mg L-1. Bars represent means (n = 7) ± standard error (S.E.). a, b, and 3 3 c indicate significant differences within each growth period (p <0.05).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →

Association between Dysregulated Expression of Ca2+ and ROS-Related Gene Pairs and Breast Cancer Patient Survival

This file is composed of two documents: <ul> <li>Supplementary File 1 containing three Excel files with cumulative proportion survival from redox-related genes, calcium-related genes, and redox and calcium-related genes.</li> <li>Supplementary Table 3 including an Excel file with a functional enrichment analysis using redox and calcium correlated genes. Cell cycle regulation (sheet 1) and Cell adhesion and projection (sheet 2) were the biological processes more enriched.</li> </ul> Both supplementary tables belongs to the study Association between Dysregulated Expression of Ca2+ and ROS-Related Gene Pairs and Breast Cancer Patient Survival, published in Molecular Diagnosis and therapy

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →

Fig. 1 in High winter survival rate of acorn ants inside artificial nest sites (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

Fig. 1 – Changes in temperature recorded near the nest sites with the Temnothorax crassispinus ant colonies localised at ground level, as well as near the nest sites about 5 cm below ground level and 1.5 m above ground level. The experiment lasted from 4 December 2020 to 24 February 2021, but only the temperatures for February are presented. The higher temperatures recorded at ground level and 5 cm below ground level, compared to the temperatures 1.5 above ground level, were probably affected by heating from the sun; the data loggers situated 1.5 m above ground level were attached to trees on the north side, so they were not affected by the sun.

Figure 5 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 5. Kaplan-Meier survival curves depicting the proportion of bottlenose dolphins in zoological care surviving to each age (calculated in days, then transformed to years) during four time periods.

Figure 2 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 2. ASR (95% confidence intervals) of bottlenose dolphin calves <1 yr old in zoological care across historical time periods.

Figure 4 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 4. The population age structure for bottlenose dolphins in zoological care on the last day of each time period.

Figure 3 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 3. Survivorship to each age as calculated for age-at-death data for modern-day dolphins in zoological care and two wild populations.

Figure 1 in How long do dolphins live? Survival rates and life expectancies for bottlenose dolphins in zoological facilities ťs. wild populations

Figure 1. ASR (95% confidence intervals) of bottlenose dolphins>1 yr old in zoological care across historical time periods.

Figure 7 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 7. Association between the survival probability estimate and mass (kg) at the time of release from rehabilitation from the best supported TMMC model: {Φ(mass)}.

Figure 3 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 3. Map of the tracks taken by seals that traveled the greatest distance from their capture or release location for each of the three groups of seals. SF = San Francisco Bay, TB = Tomales Bay, and TMMC = The Marine Mammal Center. The TMMC seal that traveled the furthest was released from Cypress Point, Monterey.

Figure 6. Association between survival probability estimates with circulating T4 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 6. Association between survival probability estimates with circulating T4 (nmol/L) at the time of capture/release from the best supported model: {Φ(g + T4)}.

Figure 5 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 5. The last day of satellite tag transmission for each seal (circles) modeled by two exponential curves (solid lines) with 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines). Data and estimates are in black for the wild (SF and TB) seals and blue for the rehabilitated (TMMC) seals. The gray line represents tag survival based on a normal distribution. The dashed lines display the effect of tag loss on the two survival curves.

Figure 1 in Harbor seal pup dispersal and individual morphology, hematology, and contaminant factors affecting survival

Figure 1. Relationship between standard length and summed organohalogen contaminants (OH) for the three groups: San Francisco Bay [logOH = (length) × (−0.05) + 13.76, F = 6.117, df = 17, R2 = 0.2646, P = 0.024], Tomales Bay [logOH = (length) × (−0.05) + 24.45, F = 10.3, df = 5, R2 = 0.6733, P = 0.023], and The Marine Mammal Center (not significant).

Fig. 2 in Comparative phenology and cohort survival of beech scale (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in part of its native range (Caucasus Mountains, Georgia) and in an invaded area (Massachusetts, USA)

Fig. 2. Cloth wrapping used to cage beech trunk section in 2012 at Gulelebi Forest in Georgia where one part of the scale cohort survival study was conducted.

Fig. 6 in Comparative phenology and cohort survival of beech scale (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in part of its native range (Caucasus Mountains, Georgia) and in an invaded area (Massachusetts, USA)

Fig. 6. Comparative cumulative day-degrees for Tianeti in the country of Georgia (cum DD GEO) and Windsor, Massachusetts, USA (cum DD MA), each in the years in which phenological observations on beech scale were made at the 2 locations.

Fig. 5 in Comparative phenology and cohort survival of beech scale (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in part of its native range (Caucasus Mountains, Georgia) and in an invaded area (Massachusetts, USA)

Fig. 5. Phenology of life stages of beech scale in Massachusetts (USA) (Notchview Reservation, property of Trustees of Reservations, Windsor, 2013), showing univoltine cycle, with settled crawlers being the overwintering stage.

Fig. 4 in Comparative phenology and cohort survival of beech scale (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in part of its native range (Caucasus Mountains, Georgia) and in an invaded area (Massachusetts, USA)

Fig. 4. Phenology of life stages of beech scale in Georgia (Gulelebi Forest, Tianeti District, 2011), showing bivoltine cycle, with adult females being the overwintering stage.

Fig. 3 in Comparative phenology and cohort survival of beech scale (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in part of its native range (Caucasus Mountains, Georgia) and in an invaded area (Massachusetts, USA)

Fig. 3. (a) Example of trunk cages made from small Petri dishes (with an open bottom) that were used to isolate scale patches in Massachusetts. (b) Patches of beech scale initiated by delimiting groups (<50) of newly settled crawlers with top patch (defined by black circle marked on bark) lef uncaged, whereas lower patch was caged (caged removed here) from Oct 2011 to Oct 2012 (1 scale generation) at which time scales were a mixture of adults and crawlers of the next generation; done on American beech at Notchview Reservation (property of Trustees of Reservations), Windsor, Massachusetts, USA. Note the greater number of large white woolly dots (adults of the test generation) in the bottom circle, suggesting significant mortality due to factors, like generalist predators, that were excluded by the cages.

Fig. 1 in Comparative phenology and cohort survival of beech scale (Hemiptera: Eriococcidae) in part of its native range (Caucasus Mountains, Georgia) and in an invaded area (Massachusetts, USA)

Fig. 1. Sites in Georgia where studies were conducted. Site 1 (Gulelebi Forest) was used in 2011 for the phenology observations, and sites 2 (Gombori) and 3 (Lagodekhi) were used for the cohort survival experiment in 2012.