Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
154
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
154 results for “Water table”
TABLE 2 in Australia's deep-water octocoral fauna: historical account and checklist, distributions and regional affinities of recent collections
<p><b>TABLE 2.</b> Seven bathomes—ecologically meaningful depth zones <i>sensu</i> Last <i>et al.</i> (2005) sampled during the biodiversity surveys 1997–2008. The numbers and depth range of sampling stations where octocoral were collected are s hown separately.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Bathome</th><th>Bathome depth range (m)1)</th><th>Number of sampling stations</th><th></th><th>Min. sampling depth (m)</th><th>Max. sampling depth (m)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th></th><td></td><td>TOTAL</td><td>SP-Sample2)</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th>Outer shelf</th><td>50–150</td><td>63</td><td>58</td><td>77</td><td>133</td></tr><tr><th>Shelf-break</th><td>150–250</td><td>17</td><td>16</td><td>150</td><td>249</td></tr><tr><th>Upper slope (shallow)</th><td>250–500</td><td>51</td><td>45</td><td>252</td><td>498</td></tr><tr><th>Upper slope (deep)</th><td>500–800</td><td>31</td><td>26</td><td>527</td><td>800</td></tr><tr><th>Mid-slope (shallow)</th><td>800–1100</td><td>61</td><td>56</td><td>825</td><td>1092</td></tr><tr><th>Mid-slope (deep)</th><td>1100–1500</td><td>69</td><td>56</td><td>1104</td><td>1500</td></tr><tr><th>Lower slope</th><td>>1500</td><td>44</td><td>34</td><td>1502</td><td>3950</td></tr></tbody></table><p>1) inclusive of upper limit</p><p>2) SP-Sample identifies the number of sampling stations from which octocorals were identified to species-level</p>
Supplementary Table S1and S2 (raw data) of "Effect of salinity and water dilution on environmental DNA degradation in freshwater environments"
<p>All data, including the raw values for the qPCR experiments</p>
Data: The effects of glucose addition and water table manipulation on peat quality of drained peatland forests with different management practices
<p>The file contain data on peat chemical quality and peat decomposition. We studied how glucose addition, water table and forest harvesting affect the chemical composition of peat and decomposition rate (carbon dioxide fluxes) and soil water quality. Experiments and results are presented in:</p> <p>Aaltonen H., Zhu X., Khatun R., Laurén A., Palviainen M., Könönen M., Peltomaa E., Berninger F., Köster K., Ojala A., Pumpanen J. 2022. The effects of glucose addition and water table manipulation on peat quality of drained peatland forests with different management practices. Soil Science Society of America Journal 86:1625–1638. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20419">https://doi.org/10.1002/saj2.20419</a></p> <p> </p>
Data: Impact of forest harvesting intensity and water table on biodegradability of dissolved organic carbon in boreal peat in an incubation experiment.
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Supplementary tables for Water Geochemistry and Stable Isotope Changes Record Groundwater Mixing After a Regional Earthquake in Northeast India
<p>This is the supplementary material for <strong>Water Geochemistry and Stable Isotope Changes Record Groundwater Mixing After a Regional Earthquake in Northeast India</strong></p>
Supplementary material, Table S5 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.
<p><span>Supplementary material, Table S5 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.</span></p> <p><span>Table S5. Comparison between studies on the presence of microplastics in coastal and oceanic waters.<br>Captions: Mps - microplastics; Mp/L - microplastics per liter; Mp/m2 - microplastics per square meter; Mp/m³ - microplastics per cubic meter; n.d. - Not determined; μm - microns; mm - millimeters.<br></span></p>
Supplementary material, Table S4 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.
<p>Supplementary material, Table S4 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.</p> <p>Table S4. Most common types of microplastics.<br>Source: adapted from Gago et al. (2019).</p>
Supplementary material, Table S1 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.
<p><span>Supplementary material, Table S1 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.</span></p> <p><span>Table S1. Sampled and unsampled seasons over the summer and winter of 2020-2021.<br>Caption: SB, Santos Basin.<br></span></p>
Supplementary material, Table S2 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.
<p><span>Supplementary material, Table S2 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.</span></p> <p><span>Table S2. Size ranges of marine anthropogenic litter.<br>Source: adapted from Gago et al. (2019).<br></span></p>
Supplementary material, Table S3 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.
<p><span>Supplementary material, Table S3 from Hudson Carvalho Ferreira and Gisele Lôbo-Hajdu (accepted) Preliminary assessment of microplastic pollution in surface waters of the Santos Basin: abundance and diversity in the most important oil and gas exploration hub in Brazil. Ocean and Coastal Research.</span></p> <p><span>Table S3. Most common colors of microplastics.<br>Source: adapted from Gago et al. (2019).<br></span></p> <p> </p>
TABLE 2 in Description of new species of deep water Sthenolepis Willey, 1905 and Neoleanira Pettibone, 1970 (Annelida, Sigalionidae) from off Northern California, with the redescription of Sthenolepis spargens Fauchald, 1972
<p><b>TABLE 2.</b> Comparative table of the valid species of <i>Neoleanira</i> Pettibone, 1970b (Read & Fauchald 2024), including the geographical and bathymetrical distribution. The number of times in sizes relationships between wide and length is given by ‘×’.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th><i>N. areolata</i> (McIntosh, 1885)</th><th><i>N. magellanica</i> (McIntosh, 1885)</th><th><i>N. racemosa</i> (Fauchald, 1972)</th><th><i>N. tetragona</i> (Örsted, 1845)</th><th><i>N. solitaria</i> <b>n. sp.</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Type locality</th><td>South of Yedo, Japan San Nicolas Basin, California (synonym <i>Leanira calcis</i>)</td><td>Off little Wellington Island, Chile</td><td>Guaymas Basin, Gulf of California, Mexico</td><td>Christianiafjord, Norway</td><td>W of Farallon Islands, California, USA</td></tr><tr><th>Depth (m)</th><td>280–1,370</td><td>485–675</td><td>1,774–2,900</td><td>40–2,200</td><td>2,560</td></tr><tr><th>Median antenna style size compared to its ceratophore</th><td>5–7× as long</td><td>8× as long</td><td>–</td><td>6× as long</td><td>8× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Lateral antennae style size compared to prostomium</th><td>2× as long</td><td>3× as long</td><td>Shorter</td><td>1.5× as long</td><td>2× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Auricle size compared to median ceratophore</th><td>¼× as long</td><td>½× as long</td><td>½× as long</td><td>1/3× as long</td><td>1/3× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Palps size (reach segment)</th><td>Segment 19</td><td>Segment 30</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 20</td><td>Segment 20</td></tr><tr><th>Tentacular cirri size compared to parapodia</th><td>4× as long</td><td>5× as long</td><td>Similar length</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>3× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Size of dorsal cirrus from segment 3 compared to the parapodia</th><td>Slightly longer</td><td>As long as parapodium</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>Similar</td><td>Slightly longer</td></tr><tr><th>Simple chaetae in posterior neuropodia</th><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td></tr><tr><th>Neurochaetae canaliculate</th><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td></tr><tr><th>Neurochaetal handles (distal section)</th><td>Subdistal spines</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Distal spines</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Subdistal and distal spines</td></tr><tr><th>First branchiae</th><td>Segment 6</td><td>Segment 7</td><td>Segment 2</td><td>Segment 6</td><td>Segment 2</td></tr><tr><th>First ctenidial pads</th><td>Segment 6</td><td>Segment 7</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 6</td><td>Segment 1</td></tr><tr><th>Branchiae with a spurlike process</th><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td></tr><tr><th>Ventral ctenidia</th><td>Boot-shaped</td><td>Clavate</td><td>–</td><td>Clavate</td><td>Boot-shaped</td></tr><tr><th>Elytral surface/Margin</th><td>Smooth/Fimbriae</td><td>Granular/Smooth</td><td>–</td><td>Smooth/Fimbriae</td><td>Smooth/Fimbriae</td></tr><tr><th>Reference</th><td>McIntosh 1885; Hartman 1960; Pettibone 1970b; Imajima 2003</td><td>McIntosh 1885; Pettibone 1970b</td><td>Fauchald 1972; Pettibone 1989</td><td>Örsted 1845; Pettibone 1970b</td><td>This study</td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in Description of new species of deep water Sthenolepis Willey, 1905 and Neoleanira Pettibone, 1970 (Annelida, Sigalionidae) from off Northern California, with the redescription of Sthenolepis spargens Fauchald, 1972
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Comparative table of the valid species of <i>Sthenolepis</i> Willey, 1905 (Read & Fauchald 2024), including the geographical and bathymetrical distribution. The number of times in sizes relationships between wide and length is given by ‘×’.</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th><i>S. fimbriarum</i> (Hartman, 1939)</th><th><i>S. grubei</i> (Treadwell, 1901)</th><th><i>S. Japonica</i> (McIntosh, 1885)</th><th><i>S. Javanica</i> (Horst, 1917)</th><th><i>S. kuekenthali</i> Augener, 1922</th><th><i>S. melanocephala</i> (Horst, 1917)</th><th><i>S. oculata</i> (Hartman, 1942)</th><th><i>S. spargens</i> Fauchald, 1972</th><th><i>Leanira izuensis</i> Takahashi, 1938</th><th><i>Leanira vulturis</i> Horst, 1917</th><th><i>S. ruffi</i> <b>n. sp.</b></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Type locality</th><td>Escondido Bay, off Carmen Island, Baja California, Mexico</td><td>Puerto Rico</td><td>Kobe, Japan</td><td>N coast of Java</td><td>Kingston, Jamaica</td><td>Molo Strait, Indonesia</td><td>Off Cayo Fragoso, Cuba</td><td>Mazatlán, Mexico</td><td>Izu Peninsula, Japan</td><td>Makassar, Indonesia</td><td>W of Farallon Islands, California, USA</td></tr><tr><th>Depth (m)</th><td>Shore–18.2</td><td>1</td><td>91.4</td><td>330</td><td>–</td><td>69–91</td><td>438</td><td>1,750–3,400</td><td>30–130</td><td>30.6–56</td><td>2,350–3,253</td></tr><tr><th>Median antenna style size compared to prostomium</th><td>Slightly longer</td><td>Shorter</td><td>2× as long</td><td>4× as long</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly longer, biarticulate</td><td>Half as long, biarticulate</td><td>4× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Auricle size compared to median ceratophore</th><td>Similar length</td><td>Slightly larger</td><td>½ as long</td><td>Similar length</td><td>–</td><td>Similar length</td><td>½ as long</td><td>½ as long</td><td>Similar length</td><td>½ as long</td><td>½ as long</td></tr><tr><th>Eyes</th><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td><td>Absent</td></tr><tr><th>Palps size (reach segment)</th><td>–</td><td>Segment 9</td><td>Approx. Segment 16</td><td>Segment 10</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 12</td><td>Segment 13</td><td>Segment 20</td><td>Segment 14</td><td>Approx. Segment 18</td><td>Segment 12</td></tr><tr><th>Tentacular cirri size compared to parapodia</th><td>Similar</td><td>–</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>2× as long</td><td>–</td><td>3× as long</td><td>–</td><td>12× as long</td><td>Slightly longer</td><td>6× as long</td><td>5× as long</td></tr><tr><th>Neurochaetae canaliculate</th><td>Absent</td><td>Absent</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present</td><td>Present, may be absent in lowest neurochaetae</td></tr><tr><th>Neurochaetal handles (distal section)</th><td>Slightly spinose</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Subdistal tooth</td><td>–</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Enlarged subdistal tooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Small subdistal tooth</td></tr><tr><th>First branchiae</th><td>Segment 7</td><td>–</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 5</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 5</td><td>–</td><td>Segment 2</td><td>Segment 13</td><td>Segment 13</td><td>Segment 2</td></tr><tr><th>Elytral surface/</th><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Granular/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Granular/Smooth</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>–</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td><td>Smooth/</td></tr><tr><th>Margin</th><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Fimbriae</td><td>Anterior ones with fimbriae, posterior ones smooth</td><td></td><td>Smooth</td><td></td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td><td>Smooth</td></tr><tr><th>Reference</th><td>Hartman 1939</td><td>Treadwell 1901</td><td>McIntosh, 1885; Uschakov & Wu 1959; Imajima 1997</td><td>Horst 1917</td><td>Augener 1922</td><td>Horst 1917</td><td>Hartman 1942</td><td>Fauchald 1972; this study</td><td>Takahashi 1938</td><td>Horst 1917</td><td>This study</td></tr></tbody></table><p><i>Sthenolepis gracilior</i> Augener, 1927 was deliberately kept out of this table due to the lack of morphological details in the original description, which may agree or disagree with <i>Sthenolepis</i> but to other morphologically close genera such as <i>Horstileanira</i> or <i>Labiosthenolepis</i>. Currently, <i>Leanira izuensis</i> and <i>L. vulturis</i> are junior synonyms of <i>Ehlersileanira incisa</i> (Grube, 1877); however, here they are considered in the table due to the past combination under the genus-group name <i>Sthenolepis</i> and the current unclear specific status (Hartman 1965; Cruz-Gomez 2022b).</p>
Data from: On the role of water table depth and urbanization on groundwater drought susceptibility
<p>Propagation of meteorological drought to groundwater drought is mediated by a range of natural and human-induced drivers. Using long-term (1978–2020)<em> in-situ</em> groundwater level depth (GWD) time series from 2,928 pairs of monitoring wells, this study assesses the role of two such drivers, viz., GWD and urbanization, on groundwater drought characteristics. Results show that locations with deeper GWD often experience less frequent but more intense groundwater droughts with longer average duration. In contrast, urbanization is generally associated with a reduction in groundwater drought duration and an increase in its frequency. Relative to the influence of GWD, urbanization's imprint on groundwater drought characteristics is muted. These findings can aid in improved assessment of groundwater drought risks, and for devising more effective drought adaptation measures.</p>
Dataset for "Water Table and Permeability Estimation from Multi-Channel Seismoelectric Spectral Ratios"
<p>This dataset is for using multi-channel seismoelectric spectral ratios to estimate the water table depth and permeability of stratified materials. Readers may use the dataset by utilizing the main program entitled "Inv_BL_SESR.m" to excute the inversion procedure and reproduce the figures in the associated paper. For further guidance on accessing the necessary codes and data, please refer to the README file.</p> <p> </p>
Data from: On the role of water table depth and urbanization on groundwater drought susceptibility
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Palms and trees resist extreme drought in Amazon forests with shallow water tables
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
2012 growing season water table depth in common gardens:Specialization, maintenance of diversity and ecosystem consequences of growth defense trade-offs in a model system, the hyper-diverse willow communities of Cedar Creek
Cedar Creek includes a diversity of habitats, which support an astonishing number of species (15) from a single evolutionary lineage: the willow family (Salicaceae). The physiological tolerances and abiotic mechanisms that maintain natural diversity in this hyper-diverse system are beginning to be understood; the role of biotic interactions, however, remains a major gap in understanding. We hypothesize that insect herbivory plays a critical role in niche partitioning, providing an important explanation for high willow diversity. Using a replicated series of common gardens and insect herbivore manipulations in resource rich and resource poor habitats, we are testing for evolved trade-offs between defense investment and growth rate. We expect specialized plant syndromes to emerge along the continuum from ???herbivore escape??? via fast growth in high resource environments to ???anti-herbivore protection??? via heavy investment in defense in low resource environments. Evolved growth/defense strategies that promote diversity are also likely to have ecosystem consequences due to foliar chemical influences on decomposition and the composition and diversity of the insect communities they support. The proposed research takes advantage of natural diversity, providing an important model system at Cedar Creek.
TABLE 1 in Australia's deep-water octocoral fauna: historical account and checklist, distributions and regional affinities of recent collections
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Summary of the number of sampling stations and depth ranges of octocoral collections during 6 biodiversity surveys in four regions in offshore Australian waters; number of sampling stations are broken down by sampling gear type (see text for references of gear types and survey codes). The numbers and depth range of sampling stations where octocoral were collected are shown separately.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Survey region</th><th>North Tasman</th><th>South-eastern Australia</th><th></th><th></th><th></th><th>South-western Australia</th><th>North-western Australia</th><th>Overall</th><th></th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Survey year</th><td>2003</td><td></td><td>1997</td><td></td><td>2007</td><td></td><td>2008</td><td></td><td>2005</td><td></td><td>2007</td><td></td><td>1997–2008</td></tr><tr><th>Survey Code</th><td>Tan0308</td><td></td><td>SS01/97</td><td></td><td>SS02/07</td><td></td><td>TT01/08</td><td></td><td>SS10/05</td><td></td><td>SS05/07</td><td></td><td>Grand Total</td></tr><tr><th>Depth range (m)</th><td>77–1927</td><td></td><td>670–1694</td><td>105–1255</td><td>729–3950</td><td>86–1092</td><td></td><td>78–1022</td><td></td><td>77–3950</td></tr><tr><th>Number of sampling stations</th><td>Total</td><td>SP-Sample1)</td><td>Total</td><td>SP-Sample1)</td><td>TOTAL</td><td>SP-Sample1)</td><td>TOTAL</td><td>SP-Sample1)</td><td>TOTAL</td><td>SP-Sample1)</td><td>TOTAL</td><td>SP-Sample1)</td><td>TOTAL</td><td>SP-Sample1)</td></tr><tr><th></th><td>57</td><td>47</td><td>28</td><td>27</td><td>46</td><td>45</td><td>77</td><td>57</td><td>74</td><td>64</td><td>54</td><td>51</td><td>336</td><td>291</td></tr><tr><th>Beam trawl</th><td>13</td><td>10</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>37</td><td>30</td><td>33</td><td>30</td><td>83</td><td>72</td></tr><tr><th>CSIRO Sherman sled</th><td>16</td><td>13</td><td>27</td><td>26</td><td>46</td><td>45</td><td></td><td></td><td>37</td><td>32</td><td>12</td><td>12</td><td>138</td><td>128</td></tr><tr><th>NIWA sled</th><td>2</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>2</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th>Rock dredge</th><td>1</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th>Commercial fish trawl</th><td>15</td><td>13</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>9</td><td>9</td><td>24</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><th>Ratcatcher trawl</th><td>10</td><td>9</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>10</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><th>Dropline</th><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td>1</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th>ROV <i>Jason</i></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>76</td><td>56</td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>76</td><td>56</td></tr></tbody></table><p>1) SP-Sample identifies the number of sampling stations from which octocorals were identified to species-level</p>
TABLE 3 in Australia's deep-water octocoral fauna: historical account and checklist, distributions and regional affinities of recent collections
<p><b>TABLE 3.</b> Octocoral genera sampled in>5% of the 320 sampling stations, showing the number of sampling stations at which they were collected in total and by survey region and the depth range of the collections.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Genus</th><th>Number of sampling stations</th><th>min. depth (m)</th><th>max. depth (m)</th><th>N Tasman</th><th>SE Australia</th><th>SW Australia</th><th>NW Australia</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><i>Acanthogorgia</i></th><td>35</td><td>81</td><td>1150</td><td>7</td><td>13</td><td>6</td><td>9</td></tr><tr><th><i>Anthomastus</i></th><td>41</td><td>230</td><td>1694</td><td>2</td><td>33</td><td>4</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th><i>Anthothela</i></th><td>26</td><td>181</td><td>1525</td><td></td><td>19</td><td>6</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Chironephthya</i></th><td>24</td><td>78</td><td>751</td><td>4</td><td></td><td>4</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><th><i>Chrysogorgia</i></th><td>66</td><td>124</td><td>2395</td><td>6</td><td>47</td><td>5</td><td>8</td></tr><tr><th><i>Corallium</i></th><td>19</td><td>311</td><td>2173</td><td>1</td><td>16</td><td>2</td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Dendronephthya</i></th><td>43</td><td>77</td><td>1081</td><td>3</td><td></td><td>11</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><th><i>Keratoisis</i></th><td>32</td><td>257</td><td>2898</td><td>8</td><td>24</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Lepidisis</i></th><td>38</td><td>330</td><td>3950</td><td>15</td><td>21</td><td>1</td><td>1</td></tr><tr><th><i>Narella</i></th><td>37</td><td>440</td><td>2559</td><td>3</td><td>30</td><td>2</td><td>2</td></tr><tr><th><i>Pennatula</i></th><td>20</td><td>95</td><td>1273</td><td>12</td><td>1</td><td></td><td>7</td></tr><tr><th><i>Pleurogorgia</i></th><td>20</td><td>915</td><td>1525</td><td></td><td>20</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Primnoisis</i></th><td>29</td><td>670</td><td>1511</td><td>1</td><td>28</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Thouarella</i></th><td>37</td><td>342</td><td>1375</td><td>5</td><td>32</td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Tokoprymno</i></th><td>23</td><td>729</td><td>1694</td><td></td><td>23</td><td></td><td></td></tr></tbody></table>
TABLE 1 in A new species of the broad-shouldered water strider genus Microvelia Westwood (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Veliidae) from the Ogasawara (Bonin) Islands, Japan
<p><b>TABLE 1.</b> Measurements of <i>Microvelia</i> (<i>Picaultia</i>) <i>yoshitomii</i> Watanabe, <b>sp. nov.</b> Unit: mm, range (mean ± SD).</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Structure</th><th>Apterous male (<i>N</i> = 3)</th><th>Apterous female (<i>N</i> = 3)</th><th>Macropterous male (<i>N</i> = 1)</th><th>Macropterous female (<i>N</i> = 3)</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Body length</th><td>1.49–1.51 (1.50 ± 0.01)</td><td>1.67–1.84 (1.77 ± 0.07)</td><td>1.71</td><td>1.80–1.89 (1.84 ± 0.04)</td></tr><tr><th>Body width</th><td>0.58 (0.58 ± 0.00)</td><td>0.70–0.81 (0.76 ± 0.04)</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.81–0.85 (0.82 ± 0.02)</td></tr><tr><th>Head length</th><td>0.28–0.31 (0.30 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.31–0.35 (0.34 ± 0.02)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Head width</th><td>0.44–0.45 (0.45 ± 0.00)</td><td>0.46–0.51 (0.49 ± 0.02)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Interocular distance</th><td>0.23–0.24 (0.24 ± 0.00)</td><td>0.27–0.29 (0.28 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Antennal segment I</th><td>0.15–0.16 (0.15 ± 0.00)</td><td>0.17–0.19 (0.18 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Antennal segment II</th><td>0.14–0.15 (0.14 ± 0.00)</td><td>0.15–0.16 (0.16 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Antennal segment III</th><td>0.18–0.20 (0.19 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.19–0.23 (0.21 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Antennal segment IV</th><td>0.28–0.30 (0.29 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.31–0.33 (0.32 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Pronotum length</th><td>0.34–0.36 (0.35 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.35–0.42 (0.39 ± 0.03)</td><td>0.57</td><td>0.60–0.65 (0.62 ± 0.02)</td></tr><tr><th>Pronotum width</th><td>0.54–0.56 (0.55 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.64–0.71 (0.68 ± 0.03)</td><td>0.74</td><td>0.81–0.85 (0.82 ± 0.02)</td></tr><tr><th>Fore femur</th><td>0.39–0.45 (0.42 ± 0.02)</td><td>0.42–0.47 (0.45 ± 0.02)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Fore tibia</th><td>0.33–0.37 (0.35 ± 0.02)</td><td>0.32–0.36 (0.34 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Fore tarsus</th><td>0.21–0.23 (0.22 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.21–0.23 (0.22 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Middle femur</th><td>0.44–0.54 (0.48 ± 0.05)</td><td>0.48–0.53 (0.51 ± 0.02)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Middle tibia</th><td>0.40–0.45 (0.42 ± 0.02)</td><td>0.41–0.45 (0.43 ± 0.02)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Middle tarsomere I</th><td>0.10–0.12 (0.11 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.12–0.13 (0.13 ± 0.00)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Middle tarsomere II</th><td>0.15–0.16 (0.16 ± 0.00)</td><td>0.16 (0.16 ± 0.00)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Hind femur</th><td>0.51–0.56 (0.54 ± 0.02)</td><td>0.56–0.63 (0.60 ± 0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Hind tibia</th><td>0.51–0.57 (0.54 ± 0.02)</td><td>0.61–0.67 (0.65 ± 0.03)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Hind tarsomere I</th><td>0.13–0.14 (0.14 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.14–0.15 (0.15 ± 0.01)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr><tr><th>Hind tarsomere II</th><td>0.14–0.16 (0.15 ± 0.01)</td><td>0.16–0.17 (0.17 ± 0.00)</td><td>-</td><td>-</td></tr></tbody></table>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.