Find research datasets worth reusing

Figures 58–59 in Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) fauna in Nevşehir and Niğde provinces with a new record from Turkey

Figures 58–59. Wing patterns of fruit flies. 58- Urophora trinervii a) Adult (male), b) Head, c) Thorax, d) Wing; 59- Urop. turkeyensis.

Figures 25–36 in Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) fauna in Nevşehir and Niğde provinces with a new record from Turkey

Figures 25–36. Wing patterns of fruit flies: 25- Tep. hyoscyami, 26- Tep. merzi, 27- Tep. nigricauda, 28- Tep. postica, 29-Tep. praecox, 30- Tep. recurrens, 31- Tep. sauterina, 32- Tephritomyia lauta, 33- Terellia colon, 34- Ter. gynaecochroma, 35- Ter. ivannikovi, 36- Ter. luteola.

Figures 49–57 in Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) fauna in Nevşehir and Niğde provinces with a new record from Turkey

Figures 49–57. Wing patterns of fruit flies: 49-Urophora jaceana, 50-Urop. mauritanica, 51-Urop. phalolepidis, 52-Urop. quadrifasciata, 53-Urop. solstitialis, 54-Urop. stylata, 55-Urop. tenuior, 56- Urop. tenuis, 57-Urop. terebrans.

Figures 13–24 in Fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) fauna in Nevşehir and Niğde provinces with a new record from Turkey

Figures 13–24. Wing patterns of fruit flies: 13- Orellia falcata, 14- Orellia stictica, 15- Oxyna flavipennis, 16- Rhagoletis berberidis, 17- Sphenella marginata, 18- Tephritis acanthiophilopsis, 19- Tep. cometa, 20- Tep. dioscurea, 21- Tep. divisa, 22- Tep. fallax, 23- Tep. formosa, 24- Tep. hurvitzi.

Figure 4 in Microsatellite based genetic diversity of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata, Diptera: Tephritidae) populations from Southwest Turkey

Figure 4. ΔK distribution along with different values of clusters (K) for 7 populations depending on Evanno's method (Evanno et al. 2005) using Structure Harvester application.

Figure 2 in Microsatellite based genetic diversity of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata, Diptera: Tephritidae) populations from Southwest Turkey

Figure 2. Unrooted Neighboor-Joinning (NJ) tree of 7 C. capitata populations using 8 polymorphic microsatellite markers.

Fig. 9 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 9. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter gourd plot treated with Thai bait.

Fig. 8 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 8. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter gourd plot treated with Pinnacle bait.

Fig. 5 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 5. Species and number of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in angled luffa plots treated with Pinnacle bait.

Fig. 4 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 4. Percentage of infested fruits of bitter gourd in plots treated with Pinnacle, Thai baits and untreated. (Only Bactrocera cucurbitae and B. tau were found.)

Fig. 1 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 1. Funnel trap for dead fruit flies collecting in plots treated with baits (1=waxed cardboard funnel; 2=plastic basket; 3=plastic glass, 4=formalin (5%), 5=string and 6=post).

Fig. 6 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 6. Species and number of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in bitter guard plots treated with Pinnacle and the Thai baits (Both sexes were collected).

Fig. 7 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 7. Number and sex ratio of fruit fly collected from funnel traps in angled luffa plot treated with Pinnacle bait.

Fig. 2 in Efficacy Of Protein Bait Sprays In Controlling Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) Infesting Angled Luffa And Bitter Gourd In Thailand

Fig. 2. Number of fruit flies collected from fallen flowers of angled luffa in plots treated with Pinnacle bait and untreated. (Only Bactrocera diversa was found.)

Fig. 1 in Captures of oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution or 2- or 3-component synthetic food cones in Hawaii

Fig. 1. Captures of wild Bactrocera dorsalis in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution, 2-component cones, or 3-component cones. Symbols represent means (± 1 SE); N = 12 traps per treatment per weathering interval.

Fig. 3 in Captures of oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution or 2- or 3-component synthetic food cones in Hawaii

Fig. 3. Captures of release Bactrocera dorsalis (top) and Zeugodacus cucurbitae (bottom) in traps baited with torula yeast borax solution (TYB), 2-component cones (2C), or 3-component cones (3C). Bar heights represent means (± 1 SE); N = 48 traps per treatment (8 traps per replicate × 6 replicates).

Fig. 5 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 5. Fruit fly species response to methyl eugenol single trap, raspberry extract single trap, methyl eugenol + raspberry extract mixture traps, methyl eugenol and raspberry extract traps placed side-by-side.

Fig. 3 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 3. Dendrogram of host plant families based on presence or absence of fruit fly species pests using Ward's distance matrix.

Fig. 2 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 2. Distribution of Bactrocera zonata, Bactrocera dorsalis, and Bactrocera cucurbitae in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa as projected on elevation (a, b, c), land cover (d, e, f), and climatic zones (g, h, i) maps.

Fig. 4 in Bionomics of Bactrocera fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan; exploring performance of various trap types and their characteristics

Fig. 4. Annual population dynamics of (a) number of fruit flies, (b) flies per trap per d, (c) number of species, (d) number of Bactrocera dorsalis, (e) number of Bactrocera zonata, (f) number of Bactrocera cucurbitae flies in relation to climatic factors in Peshawar District.