Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 1 in Trechus species from Mt. Choke of northern Ethiopia related to T. niloticus (Quéinnec & Ollivier) with notable male genital morphology (Carabidae: Trechini)

FIGURE 1. Trechus (Abyssinotus) apertus Schmidt, sp. n., holotype (Fig. 1A) and details of paratypes (Fig. 1B–H). A, habitus; the white circles point to the insertions of the supraorbital setae, pronotal lateral setae, parascutellar seta, elytral discal setae, and setae of the umbilicate series. B, right mandible, ventral aspect. C, left mandible, ventral aspect. D, labrum, dorsal aspect. E, left maxilla. F, left labial palpus and ligula, dorsal aspect; the arrows point to the three setae inserting on the penultimate palpomere. G, aedeagus, left lateral view. H, aedeagus, dorsal view.

FIGURE 3 in Trechus species from Mt. Choke of northern Ethiopia related to T. niloticus (Quéinnec & Ollivier) with notable male genital morphology (Carabidae: Trechini)

FIGURE 3. Left protarsomeres (A–C), aedeagus in left lateral view (D–G) and dorsal view (H–K) of Trechus (Abyssinotus) species. A, D, I, T. reebae (Quéinnec & Ollivier, 2021), specimen from western crater valley. B, E, J, T. kniphofia Schmidt, sp. n., paratype. C, F, H, T. yitbareki Schmidt, sp. n., paratype. G, K, T. igori Schmidt, sp. n., paratype.

FIGURE 5 in Trechus species from Mt. Choke of northern Ethiopia related to T. niloticus (Quéinnec & Ollivier) with notable male genital morphology (Carabidae: Trechini)

FIGURE 5. Trechus (Abyssinotus) subtree of the molecular phylogeny of Trechini beetles by Faille et al. (2023), modified (see that paper for details). Black circles and stars at branch nodes refer to posterior probabilities ≥0.98 and bootstrap values>75, respectively.

FIGURE 4 in Trechus species from Mt. Choke of northern Ethiopia related to T. niloticus (Quéinnec & Ollivier) with notable male genital morphology (Carabidae: Trechini)

FIGURE 4. Topographic map of Mt. Choke (highest point marked by a white triangle), showing sampling localities of six Trechus (Abyssinotus) species of the niloticus group (white circles; the numbers refer to the different species). 1, T. apertus Schmidt, sp. n. 2, T. reebae (Quéinnec & Ollivier). 3, T. yitbareki Schmidt, sp. n. 4, T. kniphofia Schmidt, sp. n. 5, T. igori Schmidt, sp. n. 6, T. niloticus (Quéinnec & Ollivier). Sampling data of T. reebae and T. niloticus published by Quéinnec et al. (2021) are considered. Base map was downloaded from Topographic-map.com.

opennotspecifiedMar 2013View details →

PLATE 2. Figures 5–43. Genital segment. 5 in Morphology and terminology of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) male genitalia

PLATE 2. Figures 5–43. Genital segment. 5. Arachnodes splendidus (Fairmaire, 1889). 6. Onitis sp. 1. 7. Gyronotus fimetarius Kolbe, 1894. 8. Coptorhina excavata Frolov, Akhmetova, & Scholtz, 2008. 9. Canthon cyanellus LeConte, 1859. 10. Amphistomus inermis Matthews, 1974. 11. Canthon quinquemaculatus Laporte, 1840. 12. Anachalcos procerus Gerstaecker, 1874. 13. Hansreia affinis (Fabricius, 1801). 14. Canthon septemmaculatus (Latreille, 1812). 15. Canthon triangularis (Drury, 1773). 16. Canthon melancholicus Harold, 1868. 17. Ateuchus sp. 18. Uroxys coarctatus Harold, 1867. 19. Dichotomius bos (Blanchard, 1845). 20. Coptodactyla glabricollis (Hope, 1842). 21. Digitonthophagus gazella (Fabricius, 1787). 22. Onthophagus mirabilis Bates, 1886. 23. Proagoderus brucei Reiche, 1847. 24. Scarabaeus (Pachysoma) sp. 25. Sceliages adamastor (LePeletier & Serville, 1828). 26. Eudinopus dytiscoides (Schreibers, 1802). 27. Ontherus sanctaemartae Génier, 1996. 28. Onitis sp. 2. 29. Malagoniella astyanax punctatostriata (Blanchard, 1845). 30. Anomiopus sp. 31. Copris dracunculus Ferreira, 1959. 32. Copris incertus Say, 1835. 33. Copris mesacanthus Harold, 1878. 34. Canthon sp. 35. Canthon lamproderes Redtenbacher, 1867. 36. Canthon aequinoctialis Harold, 1868. 37. Canthon unicolor Blanchard, 1846. 38. Canthon fortemarginatus Balthasar, 1939. 39. Canthon humectus (Say, 1832). 40. Canthon virens Mannerheim, 1829. 41. Canthon indigaceus LeConte, 1866. 42. Canthon chalcites (Haldeman, 1843). 43. Deltochilum (Deltohyboma) sp.

opennotspecifiedMar 2013View details →

PLATE 1. Figures 1–4. 1. Aedeagus. 2. Genital segment. 3 in Morphology and terminology of dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) male genitalia

PLATE 1. Figures 1–4. 1. Aedeagus. 2. Genital segment. 3. Internal sac of the aedeagus. 4. Basal sclerite.

opennotspecifiedOct 2009View details →

FIGURE 5. Genital plates. a in Comparative morphological and biometrical studies on Trhypochthonius species of the tectorum species group (Acari: Oribatida: Trhypochthoniidae)

FIGURE 5. Genital plates. a—Trhypochthonius tectorum; b—T. americanus; c—T. silvestris; d—T. silvestris europaeus subsp. nov.; e—T. japonicus forma occidentalis. Scale bar 100 µm.

FIGURE 5 in Molecular systematics and genital morphology of the Neotropical cockroaches from the genus Xestoblatta (Blattellidae)

FIGURE 5. The genus Xestoblatta (sesu stricto). A–H, Xestoblatta zeteki Gurney (male) (BLA 007). A, Habitus (dorsal); B, Abdominal segments VI and VII (dorsal); C, Lefth paraproct (ventral); D, Supra-anal plate (dorsal); E, Subgenital plate (ventral). F–J, Genital sclerites, (F) L2 (dorsal), (G) L3 (ventral), (H) R with membranes (dorsal), dashed lines indicate cuts on the membranes, (I) R without membranes and (J) Xestoblatta cantralli Fisk & Gurney, R2i (dorsal). The arrows in 5H-I indicates the regions and subregions of the sclerite R. Scale bar 1mm.

FIGURE 2 in Molecular systematics and genital morphology of the Neotropical cockroaches from the genus Xestoblatta (Blattellidae)

FIGURE 2. Maximum likelihood tree (-lnL = -75980.991) based on 5236 sites showing the Blattellidae relationships. Nodal support based on ultrafast bootstrap of 3000 pseudoreplicates and posterior probabilities from Bayesian inference are given adjacent to respective nodes. The dash (-) indicates that the node was not retrieved in the Bayesian inference. The complete trees are in Figures S1 and S2.

FIGURE 4 in Molecular systematics and genital morphology of the Neotropical cockroaches from the genus Xestoblatta (Blattellidae)

FIGURE 4. Sinatablatta magdalenensis gen. et sp.n. (male). A, Habitus (dorsal) of holotype (CEUA 88086). Red arrows indicate the tergal modification on the abdominal segments I, II and III. The following drawings are based on the paratype CEUA 88087, B, Abdominal segment VII (dorsal); C, Left paraproct (ventral); D, Supra-anal plate (dorsal); E, Subgenital plate (ventral), Left style = L, Right style = R. F-H, Genital sclerites, (F) L2 (dorsal), the dashed lines represent membranes, (G) L3 (ventral), and (H) R (dorsal). Scale bar 1 mm.

FIGURE 1 in Molecular systematics and genital morphology of the Neotropical cockroaches from the genus Xestoblatta (Blattellidae)

FIGURE 1. Geographic sampling for genetic and morphology data. (A) Genetic sampling for Xestoblatta (sensu lato). (B) (C) (D) correspond to morphology data obtained from either specimen examination or literature records. Colors correspond to clades shown in Fig. 2.

FIGURE S3 in Molecular systematics and genital morphology of the Neotropical cockroaches from the genus Xestoblatta (Blattellidae)

FIGURE S3. Maximum likelihood trees based on 5236 sites showing the Blattodea relationships. Nodal support based on ultrafast bootstrap of 3000 pseudoreplicates. Above, tree retrieved when the genus Attaphila is excluded (-lnL = - 71442.275). Under, tree retrieved when the genera Anaplectoidea and Sigmella are excluded (-lnL = -71436.503).

FIGURE S2 in Molecular systematics and genital morphology of the Neotropical cockroaches from the genus Xestoblatta (Blattellidae)

FIGURE S2. Bayesian majority-rule consensus tree based on 5236 sites showing the Blattodea relationships. Posterior probabilities are given adjacent to respective nodes. Color shades highlight family-level classification.

FIGURE S1 in Molecular systematics and genital morphology of the Neotropical cockroaches from the genus Xestoblatta (Blattellidae)

FIGURE S1. Maximum likelihood tree (-lnL = -75980.991) based on 5236 sites showing the Blattodea relationships. Nodal support based on ultrafast bootstrap of 3000 pseudoreplicates. Color shades highlight family-level classification.

Figure 7 in Genital coupling, morphology and evolution of male holding structures in Cicadinae (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

Figure 7. Ancestral state reconstruction of anchor (left tree) and grip (right tree) traits mapped on the tree pruned from Marshall et al. (2018); filled circles at the tips represent the terminal states. Pie charts depict both the probabilities under maximum likelihood and the stochastic character mapping methods of each node (see probability values in Supporting Information, Table S1). Numbers above nodes indicate the nodes referred to in Results and the Discussion. Values inside the squares are the estimated state transitions, and values between the arrows are the estimated transition rates. Pictures to the left show the diversity of lateral thecal processes and vesical processes (scale bars: 0.5 mm; P. hilpa and M. angularis, 0.25 mm); pictures to the right show the diversity of cornuti and spines of the vesica.

Figure 4. A in Genital coupling, morphology and evolution of male holding structures in Cicadinae (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

Figure 4. A, Dorisiana sp., male and female during copulation. B, female of Guyalna bonaerensis with pygofer attached to terminalia. Abbreviations: ab9, abdominal segment 9; gx VIII, gonocoxites VIII; pyg, pygofer; st VII, sternite VII. Scale bar: 2 mm (B). Photo A kindly provided by D. Maccagnan.

Figure 1 in Genital coupling, morphology and evolution of male holding structures in Cicadinae (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree of Cicadidae sensu Marshall et al. (2018) and habitus of representative species of Cicadinae sampled in this study. Scale bars: 100 mm.

Figure 3 in Genital coupling, morphology and evolution of male holding structures in Cicadinae (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

Figure 3. Ornamentations of vesica and theca of cicadas. A–D, aedeagus of Gaeana maculata. A, left lateral view, with dashed blue line delimiting spines of the vesica, red line delimiting cornuti, and purple line delimiting microsculptures of the vesica. B, magnification of spines of vesica under SEM. C, magnification of cornuti under SEM. D, magnification of microsculptures of vesica under SEM. E, F, aedeagus of Diceroprocta vitripennis. E, left lateral view, with dashed purple line delimiting microsculptures of the theca. F, magnification of microsculptures of the theca under SEM. Abbreviations: cor, cornuti; mt, microsculptures of theca; SEM, scanning electron microscopy; sv, spines of vesica; vp, vesical process. Scale bars: 1 mm (A); 0.25 mm (E).

Figure 6 in Genital coupling, morphology and evolution of male holding structures in Cicadinae (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

Figure 6. Coupling theca and vesica with the seminal ampoule of Guyalna bonaerensis. A, longitudinal section through the seminal ampoule, showing the microsculpturized portion of the vesica in contact with the posterior region of the inner wall of the seminal ampoule, green box delimiting spines of the vesica, and purple box delimiting microsculptures of the seminal ampoule. B, magnification of spines of the vesica under scanning electron microscopy. C, magnification of microsculptures of the seminal ampoule under scanning electron microscopy. Abbreviations: aed, aedeagus; sa, seminal ampoule; ve, vesica; vp, vesical process. Scale bar: 0.5 mm (A).

Figure 5 in Genital coupling, morphology and evolution of male holding structures in Cicadinae (Hemiptera: Cicadidae)

Figure 5. Coupling male and female genitalia of Guyalna bonaerensis, with male genitalia shown in green and female terminalia in purple. A, left lateral view, with black box magnifying the interaction of the uncus with sternite VII and gonocoxites VIII). B, C, seminal ampoule, showing the aedeagus crossing the genital duct. B, right lateral view. C, left lateral view, showing the lateral branches of the uncus fitting the gonocoxites VIII (sternite VII was removed). Abbreviations: ab9, abdominal segment 9; aed, aedeagus; co, common oviduct; dvp, dorsovaginal pouch; gx VIII, gonocoxites VIII; lbu, lateral branches of uncus; os, ovipositor sheath; pyg, pygofer; sa, seminal ampoule; st VII, sternite VII; udc, uncal dorsal crest; un, uncus; ve, vesica. Scale bars: 2 mm (A); 1 mm (B–C).