Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,010
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,010 results for “government”
Publications from government weather and climate authorities on the X platform and replies from citizens in five Brazilian cities during a year between 2021 and 2022
<p>This dataset contains messages published and replies received by government weather and climate authorities on the X (former Twitter) social media platforms. The data comprises government weather and climate authorities for the Brazilian cities of São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Belo Horizonte, Porto Alegre, and Belém. Government weather and climate authorities are city hall departments or sectors responsible for informing and keeping the population updated about weather events.</p><p>Publications made by the authority and replies published by citizens to these publications are observed. This data supports the study on the interaction dynamics between the climate authority and citizens over time.</p><p><strong>Data Structure</strong></p><p>Two files are available <strong>publications.csv</strong> and <strong>replies.csv</strong>.</p><p>Each line in the publications' file (<strong>publications.csv</strong>) refers to an authority publication/tweet. For each publication, it is stored the public authority's unique Twitter identifier (<i>AUTHORITY_ID</i>), the tweet unique identifier (<i>TWEET_ID</i>), the Unix timestamp that indicates when it was published (<i>TIMESTAMP</i>), and the text of the publication (<i>TEXT</i>). </p><p>Each line in the replies file (<strong>replies.csv</strong>) is a reply from a citizen to an authority. For each reply, it is stored the authority's unique Twitter identifier (<i>AUTHORITY_ID</i>), the unique identifier of the authority's tweet being replied to (<i>TWEET_ID</i>), the replier masked unique Twitter identifier (<i>AUTHOR_ID</i>), and the reply Unix timestamp (<i>TIMESTAMP</i>) that indicates when it was published.</p><p>All data were collected through the X's application programming interface (API) provided to scientific researchers. Publications and replies were posted by users (authorities and citizens) with public visibility.</p><p><strong>Data Content</strong></p><p>The dataset covers 1-year observation period, starting on July 17, 2021, and ending on June 16, 2022. It contains a total of 10,229 publications and 5,471 replies. The observed authorities are as follows:</p><p> </p><p><strong>City Authority name X handle </strong><i><strong>AUTHORITY_ID</strong></i></p><p>São Paulo Centro de Gerenciamento de Emergências Climáticas da Prefeitura de SP <i>@cge_sp </i>268407434</p><p>Rio de Janeiro Sistema de Alerta localizado no Centro de Operações do Rio (COR) @<i>alertario </i>87487749</p><p>Belo Horizonte Defesa Civil de Belo Horizonte @<i>defesacivilbh </i>837731966</p><p>Porto Alegre Defesa Civil Porto Alegre @<i>defesacivilpoa </i>1037420896473022466</p><p>Belém Defesa Civil de Belém @<i>defesacivilbel </i>1346501728632500225</p><p> </p><p>As weather and climate authorities are government bodies, the whole content of their publications is of public interest according to Brazilian law. Thus, the text messages in their publications on social media are in the public domain and are stored in this dataset. As the data structure describes, text messages of citizens' replies are not stored. According to the terms of use of the X platform, citizen text messages cannot be publicly stored outside the X platform. Such text messages are public on that platform, and, for reproductivity, they can be recollected using the platform web page or API informing the <i>TWEET_ID</i> stored in this dataset.</p>
WP4 Deliverable 4.1 Literature Review- Legitimate Crisis Governance in the Context of Human, Rights, Minority Rights and the Principle of Non-Discrimination
<p>The Covid-19 pandemic and crisis management dominate media and scholarly literature since 2020. The literature review shows that human rights, their limitation(s) and suspension as well as impact(s) of crisis management on democracy, legitimacy, diverse (social) minorities, marginalized groups and border communities are often mentioned, but seldom focussed on. LEGITIMULT project on legitimate democratic crisis governance in multilevel systems combines multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary approaches, qualitative and quantitative research methods in studying those complex and dynamic phenomena. As a deliverable of this project, the paper focuses on the impact(s) of crisis management, policies and measures (particularly restrictive and repressive ones), on human rights, minority rights and protection of minorities as well as on the principle of non-discrimination. Qualitative approaches and methods prove the most suitable for studying the perceptions of persons belonging to diverse minorities on democracy and legitimacy of crisis management and governance in respective environments.</p>
Governing Migration and Social Cohesion through Integration Requirements
<p>This socio-legal project questions how and with what effects the notion of “integration” has become, in migration law, administrative and court practice, a decisive criterion based on which states select which migrants shall be granted or denied access to specific rights (e.g., right of abode, political rights, right to family reunification). This affects the way social cohesion is strived for and reveals how both in law and practice social cohesion is conceived of and who is considered to belong or not. Based on the analysis of legal texts, ethnographic data and documents our research contributes to understanding how state officials deal with different categories of mobile or sedentary foreign nationals (in terms of gender, class, ethnicity, religion, age, etc.) when deciding about the allocation or denial of rights based on the criterion of “being integrated”. The underlying rationales of policies and practices are to be interpreted within broader processes of social transformation, e.g., the rise of the human rights regime, of neoliberalism, and of a “culture of control”. Switzerland is at the center of the study. The study implies an inter-cantonal and an international comparison with two contrasting European welfare states: Germany and Sweden.</p>
Analysing the Characteristics of Open Government Data Portals in Croatia
<p>Open government data (OGD) paradigm gained momentum in the recent years resulting in numerous OGD initiatives. These initiatives assured reliable and faster development of open data ecosystem on different administration levels. Diversity of government organizations dealing with different kinds of data, however, resulted in a variety of OGD initiatives. As a direct result, OGD portals developed through these initiatives show different functionalities, characteristics, and quality of provided data and services. This paper therefore aims to provide a better insight into the similarities and differences of data portals by analyzing their characteristics from thematical, semantical, functional, and technological perspective. The methodology used relies on the framework previously developed and implemented in Greece in 2015, consisting of multiple indicators assessing different characteristics of portals, in each of four perspectives. Results of the assessment show Croatian portals have well developed functionalities but also have limitations preventing data reuse. These limitations are mostly related to data discovery and absence of metadata and licenses by the publishing institutions.</p>
Associated data underlying the article "OPEN GOVERNMENT DATA (OGD) IN EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS CURRICULUM CURRENT STATE AND PROSPECTS"
<p>Associated data underlying the article</p> <p>Rizun, Nina; Ciesielska, Magdalena; Alexopoulos, Charalampos; Saxena,Stuti; Papageorgiou, Georgios International Conference on Open Data (ICOD 2022): Book of abstracts, Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia, pp. 26-29 (978-953-270-167-8).</p> <pre><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8069910">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8069910</a></pre> <p>It is everybody’s knowledge now that Open Government Data (OGD) pertains to the availability of datasets pertaining to government operations and functioning via license-free formats (Afful-Dadzie and Afful-Dadzie, 2017) and these datasets are linked with different themes contingent upon the area of administration like energy, education, climate, tourism, environment, infrastructure, etc. (Ubaldi, 2013). Governments have been benchmarking their OGD initiatives across standard indices like ODIN, OKFN, Open Data Barometer, etc. (Lnenicka et al., 2022; Lnenicka and Nikiforova, 2021) and ample research exists on assessing the quality of OGD portals from the demand (i.e. the governments’ efforts at maintaining the quality of datasets) and supply (i.e. the perceptions of users regarding the quality of datasets) side (Crusoe et al., 2019; de Souza et al., 2022; Islam et al., 2021; Kaasenbrood et al., 2015; Khurshid et al., 2022; Lnenicka et al., 2022; Purwanto et al., 2020; Saxena and Janssen, 2017; Shehata and Elgllab, 2021; Talukder et al., 2019; Weerakkody et al., 2017; Wirtz et al., 2016; Wirtz et al., 2018; Wirtz et al., 2019; Zuiderwijk et al., 2015). Given the magnitude of academic interest on OGD- especially in the last 10 years- it remains to be assessed as to how far has the domain progressed in the academic environs and surprisingly, no research has been conducted to elucidate the infusion of this very significant domain- that is relatable to the extent to which the governments are forwarding their claims regarding the furtherance of transparent and corruption-free administration apart from bolstering citizen participation, collaboration and trust (Gil-Garcia et al., 2020; Hellberg and Hedstrom, 2015) besides serving as a means for value creation and innovation by a range of stakeholders (Jetzek et al., 2012; Jetzek et al., 2014) - in the diverse platforms that are meant for furthering academic dialogue and discussion.</p>
Data to Deliverable 3.4 - Co-creation process for innovative planning and governance able to facilitate the transition to a water circular economy
<p>Transcription of co-creation workshops; Worksheets filled by groups of the co-creation workshops; and final worksheets filled of the co-creation workshops.<br> </p>
Lateral interactions govern self-assembly of the bacterial biofilm matrix protein BslA (experimental and simulation data)
<p>The soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis is a model organism to investigate the formation of biofilms, the predominant form of microbial life. The secreted protein BslA self-assembles at the surface of the biofilm to give the B. subtilis biofilm its characteristic hydrophobicity. To understand the mechanism of BslA self-assembly at interfaces, here we built a molecular model based on the previous BslA crystal structure and the newly determined crystal structure of the BslA paralogue YweA. Our analysis revealed two conserved protein-protein interaction interfaces supporting BslA self-assembly into an infinite 2d lattice that fits previously determined transmission microscopy images. Molecular dynamics simulations and in vitro protein assays further support our model of BslA elastic film formation, while mutagenesis experiments highlight the importance of the identified interactions for biofilm structure. Based on this knowledge, YweA was engineered to form more stable elastic films and rescue biofilm structure in bslA deficient strains. These findings shed new light on protein film assembly and will inform the development of BslA technologies which range from surface coatings to emulsions in fast-moving consumer goods.</p>
A scoping review of multi-level governance of forests in the Philippines
<p>This review scopes the landscape of multi-level forest governance in the Philippines, providing a clearer picture of potential gaps and opportunities for further development in the field. </p>
Librarians and information specialists as methodological peer-reviewers: a case-study of the International Journal of Health Governance. Datasets
<p>Objectives of this study were to analyze the impact of including librarians and information specialist as methodological peer-reviewers, because they can enhance methodologies in evidence synthesis. We sought to determine if and how librarians’ comments differed from subject peer-reviewers’; whether there were differences in the implementation of their recommendations; how this impacted editorial decision-making, and the perceived utility of librarian peer review by librarians and authors. We used a mixed method approach, conducting a qualitative analysis of reviewer reports, author replies and editors’ decisions of submissions to the International Journal of Health Governance. Our content analysis categorized 16 thematic areas so methodological and subject peer-reviewers’ comments, decisions and rejection rates could be compared. Categories were based on the standard areas covered in peer-review (e.g., title, originality, etc.) as well as additional in-depth categories relating to the methodology (e.g., search strategy, reporting guidelines, etc.). We developed and used criteria to judge reviewers’ perspectives and code their comments. Methodological peer-reviewers assessed 13 evidence synthesis manuscripts submitted between September 2020 and March 2023. 55 reviewer reports were collected: 25 from methodological peer-reviewers, 30 from subject peer-reviewers.</p>
Greenhouse gas reduction opportunities for local governments: a quantification and prioritization framework
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data for: A policy mix approach to biodiversity governance in Colombia
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
QTL mapping: insights into genomic regions governing component traits of yield under combined heat and drought stress in wheat
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Health records from hospitalized adults with malaria during 2019 at Bo Government Hospital, Sierra Leone
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Geographic variations in eco-evolutionary factors governing urban birds: the case of university campuses in China
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Improving governance outcomes for water quality: insights from participatory social network analysis for chalk stream catchments in England
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Cross-kingdom interactions and functional patterns of active microbiota matter in governing deadwood decay
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Use of web-based species occurrence information systems by academics and government professionals
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: The role of outflow-layer inertial stability in governing the radial location of secondary eyewall formation in tropical cyclones
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Strength-mass scaling law governs mass distribution inside honey bee swarms
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Genetic insights into the age-specific biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.