Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
28,427
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
28,427 results for “group”
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group TF1.7 Boreal and temperate fens
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>TF1.7 Boreal and temperate fens</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group T2.3 Oceanic cool temperate rainforests
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>T2.3 Oceanic cool temperate rainforests</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group T2.2 Deciduous temperate forests
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>T2.2 Deciduous temperate forests</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group T3.1 Seasonally dry tropical shrublands
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>T3.1 Seasonally dry tropical shrublands</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group T3.2 Seasonally dry temperate heath and shrublands
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>T3.2 Seasonally dry temperate heath and shrublands</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group T7.2 Sown pastures and fields
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>T7.2 Sown pastures and fields</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group T2.4 Warm temperate laurophyll forests
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>T2.4 Warm temperate laurophyll forests</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group S2.1 Anthropogenic subterranean voids
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>S2.1 Anthropogenic subterranean voids</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Weekly CoMix contact matrices for UKHSA COVID-19 dashboard and ONS COVID-19 infection survey age-groups
<p>Weekly contact matrices calculated from data collected as part of the UK arm of the CoMix survey. All contact matrices were calculated over two survey rounds (SR) of data to account for alternating panels (the indicated SR and the previous SR). Full details of composition can be found in Munday et. al. [1]. Contact matrices are provided for age-groups consistent with publicly available case data from the UKHSA COVID-19 dashboard <strong> (0-9, 10-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70+) </strong>and publicly available aggregates of infection and antibody prevalence from the ONS COVID-19 infection survey <strong>(2-10, 11-15, 16-24, 25-34, 35-49, 49-69 and 70+)</strong>. The data is provided in qs files as 1000 bootstrapped samples of each contact matrix for weekly 'survey rounds' between 19 and 94 (see directory "survey_round_dates.csv"). The files that begin with UKHSA contain the contact matrices for the age stratification of the UKHSA COVID-19 dashboard case data. The files that begin with ONS contain the contact matrices for the age stratification of the ONS COVID-19 infection survey. </p> <p>Ethics: The study and method of informed consent were approved by the ethics committee of the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (LSHTM; reference number 21795).</p> <p>1. Munday, J.D., Jarvis, C.I., Gimma, A. <em>et al.</em> Estimating the impact of reopening schools on the reproduction number of SARS-CoV-2 in England, using weekly contact survey data. <em>BMC Med</em> <strong>19</strong>, 233 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-021-02107-0</p>
FAIR-CHO Citation Model Zotero Group Library Bibliography. Supplementary material
<p>This is a selected bibliography created during the project <em>A FAIR-enabling citation model for Cultural Heritage Objects</em>.</p> <p>This bibliography has been set up via a Zotero Library Group, by organizing it into subject folders representative of the project content. An initial list of descriptors was also defined to 'semantically' label the bibliographic references as they were collected.</p> <p>The dataset represents the Zotero Library on 1st August 2023.</p> <p>The dataset is published in .csv and .ris formats.</p> <p>See also on Zotero Groups: <a href="https://www.zotero.org/groups/4883319/cho_citation_model/library">https://www.zotero.org/groups/4883319/cho_citation_model/library</a>.</p>
DICOM converted whole slide hematoxylin and eosin images of rhabdomyosarcoma from Children's Oncology Group trials
<p>Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is an aggressive soft-tissue sarcoma, which primarily occurs in children and young adults. This dataset contains manifests referring to the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained images in Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) format available from National Cancer Institute Imaging Data Commons (IDC) [1] (also see IDC Portal at <a href="https://imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov">https://imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov</a>) as of data release v16. The original images in vendor-specific format were collected on IRB-approved clinical trials or tissue banking studies from Children’s Oncology Group (COG) patients enrolled on ARST0331, ARST0431, D9602, D9803, and D9902 trials, as described in [2]. Those images, augmented with the metadata describing their content, were provided to the IDC team for the purposes of archival, and were converted into DICOM Whole Slide Microscopy (SM) representation [3], [4] using custom open source scripts and tools available and described here [5]. The resulting converted images were released in IDC in the RMS-Mutation-Prediction collection with the data release v16.</p> <p>To conveniently explore the data available for this dataset, please use this dashboard: <a href="https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/7f267400-8774-42e1-b5d1-ca11863c52a9">https://lookerstudio.google.com/reporting/7f267400-8774-42e1-b5d1-ca11863c52a9</a>.</p> <p>Notebooks demonstrating how to use this data are available here: <a href="https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/IDC-Tutorials/tree/master/notebooks/collections_demos/rms_mutation_prediction">https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/IDC-Tutorials/tree/master/notebooks/collections_demos/rms_mutation_prediction</a>.</p> <p>Clinical data accompanying the images is available via SQL interface in IDC BigQuery tables, see details on accessing IDC clinical data in the respective tutorial (<a href="https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/IDC-Tutorials/blob/master/notebooks/clinical_data_intro.ipynb">https://github.com/ImagingDataCommons/IDC-Tutorials/blob/master/notebooks/clinical_data_intro.ipynb</a>).</p> <p>The images referred to by the accompanying manifests can be explored and visualized using IDC Portal here: <a href="https://portal.imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov/explore/">https://portal.imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov/explore/</a>. Direct link to open the collection is <a href="https://portal.imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov/explore/filters/?collection_id=rms_mutation_prediction">https://portal.imaging.datacommons.cancer.gov/explore/filters/?collection_id=rms_mutation_prediction</a>.</p> <p>The GCP and AWS manifests provided with this dataset record can be used to download the corresponding files from the IDC Google Cloud Storage (GCS) or Amazon S3 (AWS) buckets free of charge following the instructions available in IDC documentation here: <a href="https://learn.canceridc.dev/data/downloading-data">https://learn.canceridc.dev/data/downloading-data</a>. Specifically, you will need to install the s5cmd command line tool on your computer (see instructions at <a href="https://github.com/peak/s5cmd#installation">https://github.com/peak/s5cmd#installation</a>), and follow the manifest-specific download instructions accompanying the file list below.</p> <p>If you use the files referenced in the attached manifests, we ask you to please cite this dataset, as well as the publication describing the original dataset [2] and the publication acknowledging IDC [1].</p> <p>Specific files included in the record are:</p> <ol> <li> <p><strong><code>rms_mutation_prediction_gcs.s5cmd</code></strong>: GCS-based manifest (to download the files described in the manifest, execute this command: <code>s5cmd --no-sign-request --endpoint-url https://storage.googleapis.com run rms_mutation_prediction_gcs.s5cmd</code>)</p> </li> <li> <p><strong><code>rms_mutation_prediction_aws.s5cmd</code></strong>: AWS-based manifest (to download the files described in the manifest, execute this command: <code>s5cmd --no-sign-request --endpoint-url https://s3.amazonaws.com run rms_mutation_prediction_aws.s5cmd</code>)</p> </li> <li> <p><strong><code>rms_mutation_prediction_dcf.csv</code></strong>: Gen3-based manifest (see details in <a href="https://learn.canceridc.dev/data/organization-of-data/guids-and-uuids">https://learn.canceridc.dev/data/organization-of-data/guids-and-uuids</a>).</p> </li> </ol> <p><strong>References</strong></p> <p>[1] A. Fedorov et al., "NCI Imaging Data Commons," Cancer Res., vol. 81, no. 16, pp. 4188–4193, Aug. 2021, doi: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0950">10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-21-0950</a>. </p> <p>[2] D. Milewski et al., "Predicting molecular subtype and survival of rhabdomyosarcoma patients using deep learning of H&E images: A report from the Children's Oncology Group," Clin. Cancer Res., vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 364–378, Jan. 2023, doi: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1663">10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-22-1663</a>.</p> <p>[3] National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA), "DICOM PS3.3 - Information Object Definitions: A.32.8 VL Whole Slide Microscopy Image IOD." Accessed: Aug. 11, 2023. [Online]. Available: <a href="https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part03.html#sect_A.32.8">https://dicom.nema.org/medical/dicom/current/output/html/part03.html#sect_A.32.8</a></p> <p>[4] M. D. Herrmann et al., "Implementing the DICOM standard for digital pathology," J. Pathol. Inform., vol. 9, no. 1, p. 37, Jan. 2018, doi: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpi.jpi_42_18">10.4103/jpi.jpi_42_18</a>. </p> <p>[5] D. Clunie, A. Fedorov, and M. D. Herrmann, ImagingDataCommons/idc-wsi-conversion: Initial release. Zenodo, 2023. doi: <a href="https://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8240154">10.5281/zenodo.8240154</a>. </p>
Indicative distribution map for Ecosystem Functional Group T1.4 Tropical heath forests
<p>This archive contains indicative distribution maps and profiles for <strong>T1.4 Tropical heath forests</strong>, a ecosystem functional group (EFG, level 3) of the <a href="https://global-ecosystems.org/">IUCN Global Ecosystem Typology</a> (v2.0). Please refer to Keith <em>et al.</em> (2020) for details.</p> <p>The descriptive profiles provide brief summaries of key ecological traits and processes, maps are indicative of global distribution patterns, and are not intended to represent fine-scale patterns. The maps show areas of the world containing major (value of 1, coloured red) or minor occurrences (value of 2, coloured yellow) of each ecosystem functional group. Minor occurrences are areas where an ecosystem functional group is scattered in patches within matrices of other ecosystem functional groups or where they occur in substantial areas, but only within a segment of a larger region. Given bounds of resolution and accuracy of source data, the maps should be used to query which EFG are likely to occur within areas, rather than which occur at particular point locations. Detailed methods and references for the maps are included in the profile (xml format).</p>
Data in support of Primack et al. 2022 Frontiers in Ecology & Environment: Historically excluded groups in ecology are undervalued and poorly treated
Hostile workplaces undermine efforts to make the ecological sciences more inclusive and welcoming. A survey sent to the Ecological Society of America membership and ECOLOG-L listserv subscribers provides a snapshot of a range of workplace experiences in ecology. The results of this survey are published as Primack et al. 2022. Historically excluded groups in ecology are undervalued and poorly treated. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. This dataset includes the survey results and code for data analysis.
Leaf area index (LAI) by plant functional group in moist acidic tussock tundra, at the 2007 Anaktuvuk River fire scar measured in 2017
This file contains leaf area index (LAI) based on biomass measurements from an aboveground pluck in the southern portion of the Anaktuvuk River fire scar, and a nearby unburned site in late July 2017. Vegetation was sampled randomly at 10-m intervals along two 100 meter transects at both the burned and unburned sites. Vegetation was sampled within a 10X40 cm quadrat to the mineral layer, and plant material was sorted into new and old aboveground leaf and woody biomass by species. All samples were dried and weighed, and subsampled leaf material was scanned to determine specific leaf area (centimeterSquaredPerGram biomass) per species, which was then used to transform leaf biomass (gramPerMeterSquared) into the leaf area index for each site.
Biomass totals and root biomass (partitioned by percent of total leaf area) for species, tissue type, and functional group for the Arctic LTER experimental 1981 mesic acidic tussock tundra (MAT81) for the 2000 and 2015 harvests, Toolik Field Station, Alaska.
Whole plant biomass totals and root biomass (partitioned by percent of total leaf area) for species, tissue type, and functional group for the Arctic LTER experimental 1981 mesic acidic tussock tundra (MAT81) for the 2000 and 2015 harvests. Because most of the root biomass could not be identified to species in either 2000 or 2015, the calculation of root biomass and element content for roots not identified to species was estimated by the proportion of those species’ contributions to total leaf area. Specific Leaf Area (SLA = leaf area per gram leaf, centimeter squared per gram) values were available from several previous harvests of this experiment; in the present study, we used measurements from the 1995 harvest (Shaver et al. 2001).
PIE LTER, stable isotope chemistry (carbon, nitrogen and sulfur) for food web analysis of functional groups in the Plum Island Sound Estuary, Massachusetts.
Stable isotopes of primary producers will be compared to stable isotopes of functional groups of organisms at primarily three sites within the estuary that have different dominant sources of organic matter. The three sites are: Lower (IBYC, SO-3, mouth of Plum Island Sound, 2-3 km upstream of the mouth of the estuary), Middle (OTL, PR-10.1, upper Sound, lower Parker, 8-11 km upstream of the mouth of the estuary) and Upper (P2, PR-21.9, upper Parker, above Middle Rd Bridge (22 km upstream of the mouth of the estuary). The Lower site is dominated by marine phytoplankton, the Middle site is dominated by a mixture of salt marsh and phytoplankton and the Upper site is dominated by oligohaline phytoplankton and fresh marsh. Ten functional groups will be sampled at each site (Surface sediment, benthic diatoms, Nereis, mummichog, ribbed mussels, POM, blue mussels, pelagic copepods (Acartia), silversides and soft shell clams (Mya). Marsh, benthic algae and phytoplankton inputs or benthic vs. pelagic pathways will be evident in the isotopic signals of these functional groups. Samples will be collected between the middle and end of August to reflect a growing season using recently produced OM. Samples of 15 – 20 individuals will be pooled for analysis. Some silverside samplings will have 3 different pooled samples for determination of variance. Often times the same species are not collected at each site due to habitat differences (salinity/discharge) so additional species are collected to try to accomplish task of getting functional groups collected.
SBC LTER: Cross-shelf Study 2008-2009: Profiles of CTD, biogeochemistry, primary production, abundance of phytoplankton groups, and abundance and production of bacteria
These data were used by the following papers: Goodman, J., M. A. Brzezinski, E. R. Halewood and C. A. Carlson. 2012. Sources of phytoplankton to the inner continental shelf in the Santa Barbara Channel inferred from cross-shelf gradients in biological, physical and chemical parameters. Continental Shelf Research, 48: 27-39. (DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2012.08.011) Halewood, E. R., C. A. Carlson, M. A. Brzezinski, D. C. Reed and J. Goodman. 2012. Annual cycle of organic matter partitioning and its availability to bacteria across the Santa Barbara Channel continental shelf. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 67:189-209. (DOI:10.3354/ame01586) These data were collected on monthly day cruises from January 2008 to April 2009 on the RV Kelp Fish at five stations across the shelf starting at Mohawk Reef in the nearshore area of the Santa Barbara Channel, California, USA. Data were collected with a SBE19-Plus and rosette sampler. Measurements include standard CTD parameters in 1 m bins (e.g. salinity, temperature, density). At selected depths (1, 5, 10, 20 m), rosette bottle samples were collected for nutrients, pigments, particulate and dissolved organic carbon and nitrogen, and bacterial abundance, community structure and productivity. Phytoplankton abundances (to genus) were obtained from the 5 m sample only.
ECOBREED WP2 T2.1 Winter common wheat (Triticum aestivum) - Late maturity group
<p>Description of the winter common wheat (Triticum aestivum) late maturity group nursery. Tested within T2.1 in Germany (by Secobra), Czech Republic (by Selgen) and Slovakia (by NPPC) in 2019/2020.</p>
MiRoR11 - P2 - Annotated dataset for spin-related types of statements (statements of similarity and within-group comparisons)
<p>180 abstracts / 2401 sentences annotated for 2 types of spin-related statements: statements of similarity and within-group comparisons.</p>
Phenology data set of plants and birds and other taxonomic groups, as well as agrarian activities and abiotic phenomena from Latvia, 1970-2018
<p>A data set of phenological observations of plants, birds, as well as agrarian activities and abiotic phenomena from Latvia, 1970-2018 is presented. The data include limited number of observations of insects, amphibians, mammals, mushrooms, mollusks and fishes as well. The data was collected by voluntary observers (citizen scientists) and published as paper based yearly bulletins. It includes almost 48 000 individual observations of 159 different phenological phases from 103 locations in Latvia. Each entry is comprised of following fields:</p> <ol> <li>Station: name of the observation station</li> <li>Year: year of observation</li> <li>Season: season of observation as indicated in the primary publication</li> <li>Species: English name of the species observed or description of phenomena observed in case of abiotic occurrences</li> <li>Species Latin: Latine name of the species observed</li> <li>Taxonomic_group: taxonomic group of the species observed or grouping of non-biological phases (“Abiotic” for meteorological phenomena and “Agrarian” for agrarian activities)</li> <li>Phenophase: description of phenological phase observed</li> <li>BBCH: attributed BBCH code for phenological phase observed, where applicable</li> <li>Date: date of the first observation of the phase</li> <li>DoY: day of the year of the first observation of the phase</li> <li>Implausible: flag indicating of the reported date of phenological phase is highly implausible (TRUE) or realistic (FALSE)</li> <li>Wrong_order: flag indicating if the order of the reported phases at a given station and year is not realistic (TRUE) or realistic (FALSE)</li> </ol>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.