Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
158
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
158 results for “invertebrate community”
Figure 4 from: Mammola S, Piano E, Giachino PМ, Isaia M (2017) An ecological survey of the invertebrate community at the epigean/hypogean interface. Subterranean Biology 24: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.24.21585
Figure 4 - Annual trends of temperatures in the Pugnetto hypogean complex. The shade of blues indicate the relative position of the dataloggers at each cave-triplet, from the outermost (lighter blues) to the innermost sections (darker blues). Records from only one MSS-triplet are shown.
Figure 3 from: Mammola S, Piano E, Giachino PМ, Isaia M (2017) An ecological survey of the invertebrate community at the epigean/hypogean interface. Subterranean Biology 24: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.24.21585
Figure 3 - a sampling holes (details) b Blocking screw c installation of an MSS-triplet d SSD of three different length e MSS-triplet buried in the ground f, g renewing the pitfall trap inside the SSD. Photo credits: Elena Piano.
Figure 2 from: Mammola S, Piano E, Giachino PМ, Isaia M (2017) An ecological survey of the invertebrate community at the epigean/hypogean interface. Subterranean Biology 24: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.24.21585
Figure 2 - Map of the study area. The shape and the topographic position of the four caves (Borna Maggiore di Pugnetto, Tana del Lupo, Creusa d'le Tampe, Tana della Volpe) was obtained from the original planimetric drawings of Muratore (1946). The position of the sampling plots in caves ("cave triplets", C1–C8), in the MSS ("MSS triplets", M1–M8) and in the leaf litter ("epigean", L1–L6) are represented by coloured dots. The different sectors of the cave are coloured with different shades of grey representing the subjacency – i.e., vertical distance from the surface – according to Motta and Motta (2015).
Figure 6 from: Mammola S, Piano E, Giachino PМ, Isaia M (2017) An ecological survey of the invertebrate community at the epigean/hypogean interface. Subterranean Biology 24: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.24.21585
Figure 6 - Predicted values (black line) and 95% confidence intervals (grey surface) of the effect of the sampling series (Serie_i) on the abundance of external elements in the MSS (a), on the species richness of external elements in the MSS (b) and on the abundance of external elements in the cave at subjacency of 0–20m (c) derived from GAMM analyses. Only fixed effects are shown.
Figure 1 from: Mammola S, Piano E, Giachino PМ, Isaia M (2017) An ecological survey of the invertebrate community at the epigean/hypogean interface. Subterranean Biology 24: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.24.21585
Figure 1 - a Main entrance of the Borna di Pugnetto (photo credit: Alberto Chiarle and Mauro Paschetta, 2014) b Main entrance of the Creusa d'le Tampe (photo credit: Elena Piano, 2013) c exposed soil/MSS profile in a fresh-cut along a slope in the vicinity of the Borna di Pugnetto (photo credit: Jacopo Orlandini, 2014) d the typical cave geo-morphology within the Borna di Pugnetto (photo credit: Alberto Chiarle and Mauro Paschetta, 2014) e detail of the MSS geo-morphological structure (photo credit: Jacopo Orlandini, 2014).
Figure 5 from: Mammola S, Piano E, Giachino PМ, Isaia M (2017) An ecological survey of the invertebrate community at the epigean/hypogean interface. Subterranean Biology 24: 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.24.21585
Figure 5 - Boxplots showing the results of the regression analysis of the MSS (a–c) and the cave (d–f) data. Outlying values are not shown. Significance codes: < 0.001 ***; < 0.005 **; < 0.05 *.
Figure 4 from: Mammola S, Isaia M (2018) Day–night and seasonal variations of a subterranean invertebrate community in the twilight zone. Subterranean Biology 27: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.28909
Figure 4 Interaction plot showing the effect of the interaction between seasonality and the day–night cycle on the abundance of trogloxenes.
Figure 3 from: Mammola S, Isaia M (2018) Day–night and seasonal variations of a subterranean invertebrate community in the twilight zone. Subterranean Biology 27: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.28909
Figure 3 Boxplots showing the difference between relative humidity values during the day (white boxes) and at night (grey boxes) in the four seasons. Significant differences are highlighted by asterisks (Signif. codes: *** p<0.001, ** p<0.01).
Figure 2 from: Mammola S, Isaia M (2018) Day–night and seasonal variations of a subterranean invertebrate community in the twilight zone. Subterranean Biology 27: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.28909
Figure 2 Temperature variation in the study area. Data refer to record of temperature and relative humidity measured every 12 h (one measurement at midday and one at midnight). Top panel: annual trends of temperatures measured at the entrance (0 m; orange line) and inside the mine (10 and 20 m; purple and blue lines, respectively). Bottom panel: mean of monthly positive and negative temperature deviations at night, with respect to the daily temperature recorded during the same period.
Figure 1 from: Mammola S, Isaia M (2018) Day–night and seasonal variations of a subterranean invertebrate community in the twilight zone. Subterranean Biology 27: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.28909
Figure 1 Map of the study area and groundplan of the Seinera mine, with indication of sampling plots and dataloggers.
Figure 5 from: Mammola S, Isaia M (2018) Day–night and seasonal variations of a subterranean invertebrate community in the twilight zone. Subterranean Biology 27: 31-51. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.27.28909
Figure 5 Predicted values (filled lines) and 95% confidence intervals (dotted lines) of the effect of distance from the main entrance in interaction with the sampling season on the abundance of troglophiles derived from the generalized linear mixed model (GLMM). Day and night trends are shown.
Figure 1 in Comparison of soil invertebrate communities in organic and conventional production systems in Southern Brazil
Figure 1. Location of sampling sites in Quitandinha county, part of the greater Curitiba metropolitan area, State of Paraná, Brazil.
Figure 2 in Abrupt boundaries between mountain meadows and forests separate ground-dwelling invertebrate communities: a case study from South Tyrol, Italy
Figure 2. Unconstrained Detrended Canonical Analyses (DCA) of log-transformed abundances of ground-dwelling macroinvertebrates from montane meadows and mixed forests in South Tyrol, Italy. Data for the highest available taxonomic resolution was used (i.e. Araneae and Formicidae at species level, all other on family level, where possible). Each data point represents a pitfall trap along a linear transect starting from extensively managed hay meadows ('MM' and 'M', squares) across an abrupt ecotone ('E', diamonds) towards mixed forest stands ('F' and 'FF', circles). The size of the data points represents the number of taxa from min. 15 to max. 41.
Figure 1 in Abrupt boundaries between mountain meadows and forests separate ground-dwelling invertebrate communities: a case study from South Tyrol, Italy
Figure 1. Overview map of the study area of Barbian/Barbiano, South Tyrol (Italy), showing the three extensively managed meadows and the linear transects towards the forests. (A) Overview of the three meadows that are embedded in montane mixed forests. (B) Detailed view of a site showing the sampling design ('MM' – meadow, 'E' – ecotone, 'FF' – forest). (C) Photo of the plot EH3 (Photo credit: Michael Steinwandter). (D) Position of the study site of Barbian/Barbiano within the European Alps (red border). Aerial photographs by Google Earth.
Figure 2 in Comparison of soil invertebrate communities in organic and conventional production systems in Southern Brazil
Figure 2. Relative abundance of the most representative soil invertebrate groups (> 2 %) and the 'others' group of soil macrofauna (A) and soil mesofauna (B) in four land-use systems (NF = Native forest, OH = organic horticulture, RT = reduced tillage, and CH = conventional horticulture) in Quitandinha, Brazil.
Fig. 6 in Preliminary observations of macrobenthic invertebrates and megafauna communities in the upper mesophotic coral ecosystems in Apo Reef Natural Park, Philippines
Fig. 6. Mean percentage cover of the benthic categories across depths (A) and reef types (B). Abbreviations of the benthic categories are as follows: C – hard coral, DC – dead coral, OCT – octocoral, INV – small invertebrates, ALG – algae assemblages and ABI – abitoic. Significant differences are denoted by an asterisk (*) sign.
Figure 5 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 5 - Non-metric multidimensional scaling (Jaccard index) using presence and absence of species sampled in 55 limestone caves of the Brazilian Savannah. The figure shows that the cave, despite dry most of the year, is subject to seasonal flooding (Deus Me Livre cave), and then was more similar to caves with streams.
Figure 4 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 4 - Correlation between the richness of troglomorphic species and linear development and water body presence/absence. The barr represents the average and the trace the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences in average richness.
Figure 3 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 3 - Correlation between total richness and width of entrances, linear development and water body presence/absence. The barr represents the average and the trace the standard deviation. Different letters indicate significant differences in average richness.
Figure 1 from: Simões MH, Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave physical attributes influencing the structure of terrestrial invertebrate communities in Neotropics. Subterranean Biology 16: 103-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5470
Figure 1 - Cave distribution at Minas Gerais state, Brazil (black triangle), where terrestrial invertebrates were sampled.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.