Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
407
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
407 results for “riparian”
Removing invasive giant reed reshapes desert riparian butterfly and bird communities
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Evidence of climate-driven selection on tree traits and trait plasticity across the climatic range of a riparian foundation species
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Riparian forests shape trophic interactions in detrital stream food webs
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Riparian buffers provide refugia during secondary forest succession
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Leaf-associated macroinvertebrate assemblage and leaf litter breakdown in headwater streams depend on local riparian vegetation
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Effects of riparian grazing on distinct phosphorus sources
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Riparian forests and macroinvertebrates support multiple ecosystem processes across temperate and tropical streams
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Data from: Quality versus quantity: Response of riparian bird communities to aquatic insect emergence in agro-ecosystems
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
High frequency soil sensor data for SOM input - Complex drivers of riparian soil oxygen variability revealed using self-organizing maps
The provided datasets contain the original (non-normalized) high-frequency soil and meteorological observations that were fed to the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) in order to identify ranges of values associated with low and high soil O2 conditions. For the Champlain Valley (CV) site we used the natural breaks algorithm to subset the data into high and low O2 datasets. O2 values were consistently low at the Green Mountains (GM) site, so we ran a single SOM for all O2 values at this site. The original values were then range-normalized before they were fed to the SOM.
Effects of Hydrologic Connectivity and Species Differences on Riparian Poplar Growth (Rhône River, France)
Understanding how ecosystems will respond to the projected increase in drought conditions is a key factor in the larger debate on how to combat climate change. This is especially important for ecosystems intrinsically linked to the hydro system, such as riparian zones. We performed a dendrochronological analysis using the basal area increment of Populus alba and Populus nigra along the Rhône River in Brégnier-Cordon (France) to investigate how the two species respond to water stress. Samples were taken from sites of varying connectedness to the water table in order to simulate different drought conditions. Our goal was to understand if one of the species was more drought resistant, and therefore better adapted to survive declining groundwater levels. Results show that there is a significant correlation between annual growth and the species and site connectiveness to the water table. Not only was growth correlated to both variables separately, but there was significant correlation between growth and the interaction between the two. Our results indicate that the ecosystem structure regarding P. alba and P. nigra along this portion of the Rhône will change as drought conditions worsen as the species are affected significantly differently by water stress.
Dissolved oxygen and pH data collected in shallow riparian ponds from June - September 2013 for a study on hypoxia and hyperoxia.
Dissolved Oxygen and pH data collected using YSI sondes in shallow riparian ponds over three 72 hour periods in June, July, and September focused on patches of dominant vegetation within this pond. The differences in data represent the impact of these dominant vegetation patches on the oxygen dynamics and metabolism of the aquatic system. Data was collected either hourly or in five minute increments over the three study periods which were intended to capture spring (June), summer (July), and fall (September) conditions in the pond. The pond did experience successive states of pond vegetation over the seasons so some macrophytes are not represented in all seasons. Data also includes summary information taken from the primary oxygen data showing hours of hypoxia or hyperoxia or basicity in the various vegetation treatments.
Riparian clearing in CPCRW: Macroinvertebrate and CPOM data; 1982 - 1986
The effects of riparian vegetation removal on a headwater stream in subarctic Alaska were examined using upstream-downstream and before and after comparisons. The study stream, Little Poker Creek, is located in permafrost-dominated taiga forest at the Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed. Three adjacent study sections were established: an upstream "control," a section ("cut") destined for vegetation removal, and a downstream "recovery" section. Studies in 1982-84 examined pre-removal differences in the three study sections. Riparian vegetation was removed in the 160 m "cut" section in early spring of 1985, with differences among the three study sections examined in 1985 and 1986. Leaf litter input to the "cut" section averaged 0.58 g AFDM/m2 compared to 37.22 g in the uncut (control and recovery) sections. Temperatures in the "cut" section showed a slight increase compared to the upstream control section. There were significant differences in densities of macroinvertebrates and their functional groups among the three sections (generally higher densities in the control section), and differences among years for some functional groups. However, Analysis of Variance showed no significant section by year interactions, indicating that these differences were not attributable to riparian clearing.
In situ Denitrification Rates in the Riparian Zone of Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed, Alaska, 2002 - 2004
Prior to this investigation, denitrification had not been intensively measured in headwater catchments of interior Alaska. The primary purpose of this database was to estimate the importance of denitrification as a mechanism of nitrogen retention in the riparian zone of watersheds underlain by discontinuous permafrost.
Groundwater chemistry in the riparian zone of Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed, Alaska, 2003
Groundwater was sample from wells in the riparian zone of a high permafrost (C3) and low permafrost watershed (C2) in Caribou-Poker Creeks Research Watershed in interior Alaska. Each sample was measured for a suite of solutes (anions, cations, dissolved organic carbon, total dissolved nitrogen, conductivity, pH). To analyze spatial and temporal patterns of solutes in riparian groundwater and to determine calculate groundwater inputs to stream chemistry.
Riparian study of dissolved organic carbon at the Coweeta Hydrologic Laboratory from 1993 to 2001
None Available. Researcher has not submitted information.
Riparian Buffer Classifications for the Upper Little Tennessee River watershed
This data set includes riparian buffer classifications for streams in the Upper Little Tennessee River Watershed that were developed from the corrected streams data set. Riparian buffer classifications were not developed for streams occurring in Nantahala National Forest. The corrected streams data set includes streams mapped by the NC Stream Mapping Program (NCSMP) that have been corrected based on their presence or absence as observed in 2006 aerial imagery. Streams mapped by the NCSMP were downloaded from http://www.ncstreams.org/DataAccess/tabid/257/Default.aspx and corrected using aerial photography for Swain and Macon Counties dated 2006 that were obtained by EEP. Four classes of riparian buffer widths were created based on the presence or absence of woody vegetation in the riparian area as viewed in the 2006 aerial photos. Right and left banks were analyzed separately and include the following classes: 1 = < 30 feet 2 = 30-100 feet 3= > 100 feet, and 4 = underground This data set is intended to characterize riparian buffer conditions for streams in the Upper Little Tennessee River Watershed. The riparian buffer classification data set is believed to provide a reasonable basis for generalizing about sub-watershed and watershed conditions. Riparian buffer classification is also one of the key data sets used to determine aquatic function and stream rehabilitation project potential. This data set provides an initial estimate of likely riparian buffer conditions, but a field examination of the area in question is recommended if accurate information on the current buffer status of specific reaches or properties is desired.
Dynamics of summer stream temperature in the southern Appalachian Mountains following the removal of riparian rhododendron, 2014 to 2016.
Summer stream temperature was monitored at numerous locations along four streams before, and after, experimentally removing rhododendron from the riparian zones in 2014 to 2016. Two sites, Kit Springs (KS) and Rocky Bald (RB) were left unmanipulated as reference watersheds throughout the course of the study. Holloway (HW) and Split White Oak (SWO) served as the treatment watersheds, upon which rhododendron was removed. All sites are in the Nantahala National Forest, within in the White Oak Creek Watershed, which is apart of the Nantahala River drainage.
Groundwater Well Data from the Middle Rio Grande Valley Riparian Zone, New Mexico (1999-2014)
This study originated with the objective of parameterizing riparian evapotranspiration (ET) in the water budget of the middle Rio Grande of New Mexico. We hypothesized that flooding and invasions of non-native species would impact the ecosystem's use of water. Our objectives were to measure and compare the ET of native (Rio Grande cottonwood, Populus deltoides ssp. wizleni) and non-native (saltcedar, Tamarix chinensis, Russian olive, Eleagnus angustifolia) bosque (woodland) communities and to evaluate how water use is affected by climatic variability resulting in high river flows and flooding as well as drought conditions and deep water tables. This data set contains water table levels monitored at nine sites along the Rio Grande riparian corridor between Albuquerque and Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge. Data date to 1999. Two sites remain active and are well into their second decade of monitoring. One is in a xero-riparian, non-flooding, saltcedar woodland within the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge. The other is in a dense, monotypic saltcedar thicket at the Bosque del Apache NWR that is subject to flood pulses associated with high river flows.
Data for: Thresholds of freshwater biodiversity in response to riparian vegetation loss in the Neotropical region
<p>These files contain all the data and R scripts used for analyses of the manuscript "Thresholds of freshwater biodiversity in response to riparian vegetation loss in the Neotropical region", published in Journal of Applied Ecology.</p> <p>See Metadata (README).xls file for a detailed description of these files.</p> <p>Dala-Corte RB, Melo AS, Siqueira T, et al. Thresholds of freshwater biodiversity in response to<br> riparian vegetation loss in the Neotropical region. J Appl Ecol. 2020;00:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13657</p>
Amphibian survey of riparian buffer zones at SAFE Project, Borneo
<b>Description: </b><p>Results from amphibian surveys carried out along riparian transect sites at SAFE project, Borneo</p><p><b>Project: </b>This dataset was collected as part of the following SAFE research project: <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/projects/project_view/152"><b>MRes Tropical Forest Ecology Field Course</b></a></p><p><b>XML metadata: </b>GEMINI compliant metadata for this dataset is available <a href="https://www.safeproject.net/datasets/xml_metadata?id=3973551">here</a></p><p><b>Files: </b>This consists of 1 file: frogs_data_rob.xlsx</p><p><b>frogs_data_rob.xlsx</b></p><p>This file contains dataset metadata and 3 data tables:</p><ol><li><p><b>Stream Overview</b> (described in worksheet StreamMeasuresParent)</p><p>Description: Survey overview details</p><p>Number of fields: 16</p><p>Number of data rows: 12</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>ec5_uuid</b>: EpiCollect 5 code (Field type: id)</li><li><b>created_at</b>: Date and time of measurement (Field type: date)</li><li><b>created_by</b>: Researcher contact email (Field type: id)</li><li><b>title</b>: Survey location and visit (Field type: id)</li><li><b>2_Stream_ID</b>: Stream idenity code (Field type: location)</li><li><b>RiparianWidth</b>: Riparian buffer width (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>lat_3_GPS_Location</b>: Latitude (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>long_3_GPS_Location</b>: Longitude (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>accuracy_3_GPS_Location</b>: Accuracy of GPS location data (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>4_Visit</b>: Visit number (Field type: id)</li><li><b>5_Photo_of_stream_la</b>: File ID of photo of river (Field type: id)</li><li><b>7_Start_Time</b>: Time sampling started (Field type: time)</li><li><b>8_Date_ddMMYYYY</b>: Calendar date of sampling (Field type: date)</li><li><b>9_Comments_weather_e</b>: Weather conditions (Field type: comments)</li><li><b>11_Surveyors</b>: Identity of surveyors (Field type: id)</li><li><b>12_RAs</b>: Identity of research assistants (Field type: id)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>Stream characteristics</b> (described in worksheet StreamMeasures)</p><p>Description: Stream characteristics (dimensions, canopy cover and substrate)</p><p>Number of fields: 19</p><p>Number of data rows: 105</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>ec5_parent_uuid</b>: EpiCollect 5 code (Field type: id)</li><li><b>created_at</b>: Date and time of measurement (Field type: datetime)</li><li><b>created_by</b>: Researcher contact email (Field type: id)</li><li><b>StreamID</b>: Stream idenity code (Field type: location)</li><li><b>15_Marker_point</b>: Identity of marker point (Field type: id)</li><li><b>SiteCode</b>: Location code of site (Field type: location)</li><li><b>Width</b>: Width of stream bed (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>17_Upstream_Canopy</b>: Percentage of canopy cover upstream from point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>18_Downstream_Canopy</b>: Percentage of canopy cover downstream from point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>19_Left_Canopy</b>: Percentage of canopy cover to left of point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>20_Right_Canopy</b>: Percentage of canopy cover to right of point (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>20_Large_boulder__co</b>: Percentage coverage by large boulders (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>21_Medium_rock__cove</b>: Percentage coverage by medium rocks (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>22_Small_rock__cover</b>: Percentage coverage by small rocks (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>23_Gravel__cover</b>: Percentage coverage by gravel (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>24_Sand__cover</b>: Percentage coverage by sand (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>25_MudGround__cover</b>: Percentage coverage by mud (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>26_Substrate_cover_o</b>: Percentage coverage by other substrate type (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>27_Water_flow_at_poi</b>: Water flow at point (Field type: categorical)</li></ul></li><li><p><b>Frog species </b> (described in worksheet FrogData)</p><p>Description: Recorded frog species and associated body measurements</p><p>Number of fields: 19</p><p>Number of data rows: 785</p><p>Fields: </p><ul><li><b>Stream_ID</b>: Stream identification code (Field type: location)</li><li><b>Date</b>: Date (Field type: date)</li><li><b>23_Closest_Marker</b>: Distance along transect at which frog was recorded (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>SiteCode</b>: Location code of recorded frog (Field type: location)</li><li><b>24_Horizontal_Distan</b>: Approximate distance of recorded frog from stream bed (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>25_Vertical_Distance</b>: Approximate distance of recorded frog above stream bed (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>27_Substrate</b>: Substrate on which frog was recorded (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>28_Substrate_if_othe</b>: Secondary substrate on which frog was recorded (Field type: categorical)</li><li><b>30_Dorsal</b>: EpiCollect 5 code for photograph (dorsal) of recorded frog species (Field type: id)</li><li><b>31_Ventral</b>: EpiCollect 5 code for photograph (ventral) of recorded frog species (Field type: id)</li><li><b>32_Left_side</b>: EpiCollect 5 code for photograph (left-side) of recorded frog species (Field type: id)</li><li><b>33_Right_side</b>: EpiCollect 5 code for photograph (right-side) of recorded frog species (Field type: id)</li><li><b>Species</b>: Species or Genus level identity (Field type: taxa)</li><li><b>36_Mass_of_frog_in_bag</b>: Combined mass of frog and bag (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>38_Mass_of_empty_bag</b>: Mass of bag alone (Field type: numeric)</li><li><b>Mass_of_frog</b>: Mass of frog (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>40_SnoutVent_Length</b>: Snout-vent length of frog (Field type: numeric trait)</li><li><b>Comment</b>: Comments on frog identity (Field type: comments)</li><li><b>Sex</b>: Sex of frog (Field type: categorical trait)</li></ul></li></ol><p><b>Date range: </b>2019-02-04 to 2019-02-13</p><p><b>Latitudinal extent: </b>4.6498 to 4.7273</p><p><b>Longitudinal extent: </b>117.5413 to 117.6414</p><p><b>Taxonomic coverage: </b><br> All taxon names are validated against the GBIF backbone taxonomy. If a dataset uses a synonym, the accepted usage is shown followed by the dataset usage in brackets. Taxa that cannot be validated, including new species and other unknown taxa, morphospecies, functional groups and taxonomic levels not used in the GBIF backbone are shown in square brackets.</p><div> -  Animalia <br> -  -  Chordata <br> -  -  -  Amphibia <br> -  -  -  -  Anura <br> -  -  -  -  -  [Other] <br> -  -  -  -  -  Bufonidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Ansonia</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Ansonia spinulifer</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Phrynoidis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Phrynoidis juxtaspera</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Dicroglossidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes finchi</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes kuhlii</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes leporinus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Limnonectes palavanensis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Ingerana</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Ingerana baluensis</i> (as homotypic_synonym: <i>Occidozyga baluensis</i>)<br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Fejervarya</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Fejervarya limnocharis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Occidozyga</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Occidozyga laevis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Ranidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Chalcorana</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Chalcorana megalonesa</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Chalcorana raniceps</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Meristogenys</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Meristogenys orphnocnemis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hylarana</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Hylarana picturata</i> (as synonym: <i>Pulchrana picturata</i>)<br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Staurois</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Staurois guttatus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Staurois latopalmatus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Megophryidae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leptolalax</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leptolalax fritinniens</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leptolalax gracilis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leptobrachium</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Leptobrachium abbotti</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  Rhacophoridae <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rhacophorus</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Rhacophorus pardalis</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Polypedates</i> <br> -  -  -  -  -  -  -  <i>Polypedates macrotis</i> <br></div><p></p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.