Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 11 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 11. Lacronia ceci Kury & Orrico, 2006, ♂ (MNRJ 6945ꜝ), penis, distal part. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Ventral view. D. Detail of stylus and ventral process, latero-dorsal view. Scale bars: A–C = 50 μm; D = 20 μm.

Fig. 8 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 8. Lacronia boraceae (B. Soares, 1942) comb. nov., ♂ (MNRJ-HS 122ꜝ), penis, distal part. A. Dorsal view. B. Lateral view. C. Ventral view. D. Detail of stylus and ventral process apex, dorsal view. Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–C = 100 μm; D = 10 μm.

Fig. 6 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 6. Lacronia boraceae (B. Soares, 1942) comb. nov., ♂ (MNRJ-HS 122ꜝ), specimen in alcohol. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Same, ventral view. C. Same, lateral view. D. Armature of mesotergum area III, free tergites I–III and anal operculum, posterior view. E. Right Pa–Ti IV, retro-lateral view. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 7 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 7. Lacronia boraceae (B. Soares, 1942) comb. nov., ♂ (MNRJ-HS 122ꜝ). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Ocularium, frontal view. C. Armature of mesotergum area III, posterior view. D. Right Fe III, prodorsal view. E. Habitus, lateral view. F. Left Fe IV, proventral view. G. Right Fe IV, retro-ventral view. H. Right Pa–Ti IV, proventral view. I. Right Pa–Ti IV, ventral view. Scale bars: A, E = 4 mm; B–C = 1 mm; D, H–I = 2 mm; F–G = 3 mm.

Fig. 5 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 5. Southeasten and Southern regions of Brazil, showing the distribution of the Lacronia spp. The area shaded in green represents the Atlantic province, as proposed by Morrone et al. (2022).

Fig. 3 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 3. Lacronia spp., specimens in vivo. A–D. L. nigra (B. Soares, 1942) comb. nov., ♂, from Brazil, São Paulo, Santo André, Alto da Serra. E–H. L. tenuis (Roewer, 1917) comb. nov., ♂, from Brazil, Rio de Janeiro, Mangaratiba. Source: Adriano Kury.

Fig. 2 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 2. Cladogram depicting phylogenetic relationships of Lacronia Strand, 1942 and the outgroups, with synapomorphies supporting each clade mapped using ACCTRAN optimization. The tree represents the topology with shortest number of steps (k-values = 3.2, 4, 5, 6, 10, 15 and 20) recovered by TNT. Blue squares = nonhomoplastic synapomorphies; white circles = homoplastic synapomorphies. Numbers above symbols are the characters numbers. Numbers under symbols are the states numbers.

Fig. 16 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 16. Lacronia serripes (Mello-Leitão, 1923), ♂ (MZSP 14343), specimen in alcohol. A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Same, lateral view. C. Same, ventral view. Scale bars = 1 mm.

Fig. 17 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 17. Lacronia serripes(Mello-Leitão, 1923), ♂ (MZSP 14342). A. Habitus, dorsal view.B. Ocularium, frontal view. C. Armature of mesotergum area III, posterior view. D. Habitus, lateral view. E. Left Fe– Ti III, proventral view. F. Right Fe–Ti IV, dorsal view. G. Same, prolateral view. H. Same, ventral view. I. Same, retro-lateral view. J. Right Mt–Ta IV, retro-lateral view. Scale bars: A, D–E, J = 2 mm; B–C = 1 mm; F–I = 3 mm.

Fig. 12 in Between areolated and band-shaped spots: a revision of Lacronia Strand, 1942 (Opiliones, Gonyleptidae)

Fig. 12. Lacronia nigra (B. Soares, 1942) comb. nov., ♂ (MNRJ 60385). A. Habitus, dorsal view. B. Ocularium, frontal view. C. Armature of mesotergum area III, posterior view. D. Fe–Ti III, prodorsal view. E. Habitus, lateral view. F. Detail of the Cx IV prodorsal distal apophysis, posterior view. G. Right Fe–Ti IV, dorsal view. H. Same, prolateral view. I. Same, ventral view. J. Same, retro-lateral view. K. Right Mt–Ta IV, retro-lateral view. Scale bars: A, D–E, K = 2 mm; B–C, F = 1 mm; G–J = 3 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2023View details →

Resource availability and capacity to implement multi-stranded cholera interventions in the north-east region of Nigeria

<p>Limited healthcare facility (HCF) resources and capacity to implement multi-stranded cholera interventions ('water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH)’, ‘surveillance’, ‘case management’, and ‘community engagement’) can hinder the actualisation of the global strategic roadmap goals for cholera control, especially in settings made fragile by armed conflicts, such as the north-east region of Nigeria. Therefore, we aimed to assess HCF resource availability and capacity to implement these cholera interventions in Adamawa and Bauchi States in Nigeria, as well as assess their coordination in both states and Abuja, where national coordination of cholera is based.<br> We conducted a cross-sectional survey using a face-to-face structured questionnaire to collect data on multi-stranded cholera interventions and their respective indicators in HCFs. We generated scores to describe the resource availability of each cholera intervention and categorised them as: 0-50 (low), 51-70 (moderate), 71-90 (high), and over 90 (excellent). Further, we defined an HCF with a high capacity to implement a cholera intervention as one with a score equal to or above the average intervention score. </p>

Figs 132–137 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 132–137. Patelloceto secutor sp. n. male (132–135) and female (136–137): (132) schematic representation on cusp arrangement on legs I and II; (133) left palp, prolateral view; (134) left palp, ventral view; (135) left palp, retrolateral view; (136) epigyne, ventral view; (137) vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars (133–137) = 0.1 mm.

Figs 106–110 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 106–110. Afroceto rotunda sp. n. male (106–108) and female (109, 110): (106) schematic representation of cusp arrangement on legs I and II; (107) left palp, ventral view; (108) left palp, retrolateral view; (109) dissected epigyne, ventral view; (110) vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars (107–110) = 0.1 mm.

Figs 96–101 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 96–101. Afroceto plana sp. n. male (96–98) and female (99–101): (96, 99) schematic representation of cusp arrangement legs I and II; (97) left palp, ventral view; (98) left palp, retrolateral view; (100) epigyne, ventral view; (101) vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars (97, 98, 100, 101) = 0.1 mm.

Figs 141–145 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 141–145. Patelloceto media sp. n. male (141–143) and female (144–145): (141) schematic representation on cusp arrangement on legs I and II; (142) left palp, ventral view; (143) left palp, retrolateral view; (144) epigyne, ventral view; (145) vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars (142–145) = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 80 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Fig. 80. Distribution of Afroceto croeseri sp. n., A. flabella sp. n. and A. gracilis sp. n. in South Africa.

Figs 102–104 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 102–104. Afroceto porrecta sp. n. male: (102) schematic representation of cusp arrangement on legs I and II; (103) left palp, ventral view; (104) left palp, retrolateral view. Scale bar (103, 104) = 0.1 mm.

Figs 81–95 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 81–95. Scanning electron micrographs of Afroceto plana sp. n. male (81–93) and female (94, 95): (81) eye arrangement, dorsal view; (82) sternum; (83) individual cusp on tibia I; (84, 91) tibia I, ventral cusps; (85, 92) metatarsus I, ventral cusps and scopulate setae; (86, 93) tarsus I, cusps and scopulate setae; (87) left palp, ventral view; (88) fangs, ventral view; (89) individual cusp on metatarsus I; (90) detail of scopulate seta on metatarsus I; (94) epigyne, ventral view, without plugs; (95) epigyne, ventral view, with plugs.

Figs 118–122 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 118–122. General appearance of Patelloceto gen. n. species: P. secutor sp. n. male (118) and female (119); P. denticulata sp. n. male (120); P. media sp. n. male (121) and female (122).

Figs 72–76 in A revision of the tracheline sac spider genus Cetonana Strand, 1929 in the Afrotropical Region, with descriptions of two new genera (Araneae Corinnidae)

Figs 72–76. Afroceto flabella sp. n. male (72–74) and female (75–76): (72) schematic representation of cusp arrangement on legs I and II; (73) left palp, ventral view; (74) left palp, retrolateral view; (75) epigyne, ventral view; (76) vulva, dorsal view. Scale bars (73–76) = 0.1 mm.