Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

428

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

428 results for “zooplankton”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo40/100

Рис. 1. Карта-схема распоΛожения станций отбора проб в оз. Арейское в 2019–2020 гг. Fig. 1. Schematic map of the sampling station locations in the Areiskoye Lake in 2019–2020: 1 — N 50°59.8657ʹ, E 111°14.1410ʹ; 2 — N 50°59.8836ʹ, E 111°15.4172ʹ; 3 — N 50°58.7316ʹ, E 111°15.0106ʹ; 4 — N 50°58.7474ʹ, E 111°14.1384ʹ; 5 — N 50°59.0378ʹ, E 111°13.9848ʹ; 6 — N 50°59.3193ʹ, E 111°14.0639ʹ in Zooplankton of the Areiskoye Lake (Ingoda River basin, Trans-Baikal Territory)

Рис. 1. Карта-схема распоΛожения станций отбора проб в оз. Арейское в 2019–2020 гг. Fig. 1. Schematic map of the sampling station locations in the Areiskoye Lake in 2019–2020: 1 — N 50°59.8657ʹ, E 111°14.1410ʹ; 2 — N 50°59.8836ʹ, E 111°15.4172ʹ; 3 — N 50°58.7316ʹ, E 111°15.0106ʹ; 4 — N 50°58.7474ʹ, E 111°14.1384ʹ; 5 — N 50°59.0378ʹ, E 111°13.9848ʹ; 6 — N 50°59.3193ʹ, E 111°14.0639ʹ

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →
zenodo40/100

Fig. 1 in Zooplankton communities of the Varvara water reservoir

Fig. 1. Plankton sampling points in the Varvara reservoir Рис. 1. Точки отбора проб пΛанктона в Варваринском воΔохраниΛище

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →
zenodo40/100

Рис. 2. ЭкоΛого-географическая характеристика зоопΛанктона техногенных воΑоемов Fig. 2. Ecological and geographical characteristics of zooplankton in technogenic reservoirs in Zooplankton species diversity in technogenic reservoirs of the Southeastern Transbaikalia

Рис. 2. ЭкоΛого-географическая характеристика зоопΛанктона техногенных воΑоемов Fig. 2. Ecological and geographical characteristics of zooplankton in technogenic reservoirs

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Рис. 1. Daphnia (D.) curvirostris. Партеногенетическая самка: А — гоΛова с боковой стороны, Б — постабΑомен Fig. 1. Daphnia (D.) curvirostris. Parthenogenetic female: А — head, lateral view, Б — postabdomen, lateral view in Zooplankton species diversity in technogenic reservoirs of the Southeastern Transbaikalia

Рис. 1. Daphnia (D.) curvirostris. Партеногенетическая самка: А — гоΛова с боковой стороны, Б — постабΑомен Fig. 1. Daphnia (D.) curvirostris. Parthenogenetic female: А — head, lateral view, Б — postabdomen, lateral view

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Рис. 3. ÀенΑрограмма биоценотического схоΑства зоопΛанктона техногенных воΑоемов: 4–6 — ШерΛовогорское месторожΑение:4 — ШГ-10 — карьерное озеро, 5 — ШГ-8 — озеро поΑ отваΛами руΑного карьера, 6 — ШГ-9 — поΑпруΑное озеро у пгт. ШерΛовая Гора;7–8 — ОрΛовское месторожΑение: 7 — ОР-1, ОР-3 — хвостохраниΛище, 8 — ОР-7 — озеро ниже хвостохраниΛища; 9 — МаΛокуΛунΑинское месторожΑение: МК-2 — поΑпруΑное озеро р. МаΛая КуΛинΑа; 10 — Спокойнинское месторожΑение: ОР-8 — хвостохраниΛище; 11 — Жипкошинское месторожΑение: ЖП-2 — карьер Fig. 3. Dendrogram of zooplankton biocenotic similarity in technogenic reservoirs: 4–6 — Sherlovogorskoye deposit: 4 — ShG-10 pit lake, 5 — ShG-8, a lake under the dumps of an ore quarry, 6 — ShG-9 dammed lake near the village of Sherlovaya Gora;7 –8 — Orlovskoye deposit: O R-1, OR-3 — tailing dump, OR-7— lake below the tailing dump; 9 — Malokulundinskoye deposit: MK-2 — dammed lake on the Malaya Kulinda River; 10 — Spokoininskoye deposit: OR-8 — tailing dump; 11 — Zhipkoshinskoye deposit; ZhP-2 — pit lake in Zooplankton species diversity in technogenic reservoirs of the Southeastern Transbaikalia

Рис. 3. ÀенΑрограмма биоценотического схоΑства зоопΛанктона техногенных воΑоемов: 4–6 — ШерΛовогорское месторожΑение:4 — ШГ-10 — карьерное озеро, 5 — ШГ-8 — озеро поΑ отваΛами руΑного карьера, 6 — ШГ-9 — поΑпруΑное озеро у пгт. ШерΛовая Гора;7–8 — ОрΛовское месторожΑение: 7 — ОР-1, ОР-3 — хвостохраниΛище, 8 — ОР-7 — озеро ниже хвостохраниΛища; 9 — МаΛокуΛунΑинское месторожΑение: МК-2 — поΑпруΑное озеро р. МаΛая КуΛинΑа; 10 — Спокойнинское месторожΑение: ОР-8 — хвостохраниΛище; 11 — Жипкошинское месторожΑение: ЖП-2 — карьер Fig. 3. Dendrogram of zooplankton biocenotic similarity in technogenic reservoirs: 4–6 — Sherlovogorskoye deposit: 4 — ShG-10 pit lake, 5 — ShG-8, a lake under the dumps of an ore quarry, 6 — ShG-9 dammed lake near the village of Sherlovaya Gora;7 –8 — Orlovskoye deposit: O R-1, OR-3 — tailing dump, OR-7— lake below the tailing dump; 9 — Malokulundinskoye deposit: MK-2 — dammed lake on the Malaya Kulinda River; 10 — Spokoininskoye deposit: OR-8 — tailing dump; 11 — Zhipkoshinskoye deposit; ZhP-2 — pit lake

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2022View details →
zenodo40/100

Gelatinous zooplankton abundances in the Rhode River Estuary, MD, USA, 2004-2005 and 2013-2018

<p>Field sampling of ctenophore (<em>Mnemiopsis&nbsp;</em>and&nbsp;<em>Beroe</em>) and scyphomedusae (<em>Chrysaora</em>) abundances in the Rhode River and adjacent Chesapeake Bay (MD, USA). Samples were taken using 0.5 m and 1.0 m diameter nets in 2004-2005 and 2013-2018.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2019View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Seasonal composition and population density of zooplankton in Lake Karaboğaz from the Kızılırmak Delta (Samsun, Turkey)

Figure 4. Seasonal distribution of the diversity in zooplankton; relationship between diversity, temperature, chlorophyll a, and salinity.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2013View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Diurnal vertical distribution of zooplankton in a newly formed reservoir (Tahtalı Reservoir, Kocaeli): the role of abiotic factors and chlorophyll a

Figure 4. The vertical distribution of A) K. cochlearis, B) P. vulgaris, C) P. sulcata, D) total Rotifera, E) B. longirostris, F) total Cladocera, G) copepod nauplii, and H) total Copepoda, denoted by the time of sampling.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2013View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Diversity of zooplankton in municipal wastewater-contaminated urban pond ecosystems of the lower Gangetic plains

Figure 4. Hierarchical cluster analyses of the study sites depending on the physicochemical conditions (a) and zooplankton community structure (b).

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2016View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3b in Species diversity and community structure of zooplankton in three different types of water body within the Sakarya River Basin, Turkey

Figure 3b. CCA biplot diagram with three lakes (all seasons and stations) and 81 species (Rot: Rotifera, Cla: Cladocera, Cop: Copepoda, species abbreviations are listed in Table 2).

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 1 in Species diversity and community structure of zooplankton in three different types of water body within the Sakarya River Basin, Turkey

Figure 1. Species richness, evenness, and diversity boxplots in each lake. The horizontal thick black band represents the median value, and the boxplot margins indicate first and third quartiles.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Species diversity and community structure of zooplankton in three different types of water body within the Sakarya River Basin, Turkey

Figure 2. nMDS plots between lakes in terms of zooplankton species composition and abundance (a: all zooplankton species, b: rotifers, c: cladocerans.), Triangle: Lake Poyrazlar, Square: Çubuk II Reservoir, Circle: Sorgun Pond.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3a in Species diversity and community structure of zooplankton in three different types of water body within the Sakarya River Basin, Turkey

Figure 3a. CCA biplot diagram with three lakes (all seasons and stations), and eight environmental variables. For sample abbreviations, first letter indicates water body; s: Sorgun, p: Poyrazlar, c: Çubuk II; letters between 2 and 4 indicate the seasons: spr: spring, sum: summer, win: winter; numerical variables indicate sampling stations.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 6 in Unusual winter zooplankton bloom in the open southern Adriatic Sea

Figure 6. Box-and-whisker plot of the abundance of protozoan shown by depth layers (February/March 2015, all investigated stations).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 5 in Unusual winter zooplankton bloom in the open southern Adriatic Sea

Figure 5. Spatial distribution of total microzooplankton and mesozooplankton abundance along the investigated profile in February/March 2015.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 3 in Unusual winter zooplankton bloom in the open southern Adriatic Sea

Figure 3. Vertical profiles of temperature, salinity, and density (sigma-t) over the investigated profile in February/March 2015.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Unusual winter zooplankton bloom in the open southern Adriatic Sea

Figure 4. Vertical profiles of chlorophyll a fluorescence (Chl F) concentration and picophytoplankton,nanophytoplankton, and microphytoplankton abundance along the investigated profile in February/March 2015.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 7 in Unusual winter zooplankton bloom in the open southern Adriatic Sea

Figure 7. Box-and-whisker plot of the total copepod developmental stages abundance shown by depth layers (February/March 2015, all investigated stations).

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 2 in Impacts of environmental factors on zooplankton taxonomic diversity in coastal lagoons in Turkey

Figure 2. Venn diagram showing identified zooplankton taxa distribution and number of taxa (in parentheses) in the lagoons.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2017View details →
zenodo40/100

Figure 4 in Does the location of coastal brackish waters determine diversity and abundance of zooplankton assemblages?

Figure 4. Seasonal (monthly) changes in the total zooplankton abundance (mean, minimum, and maximum densities) (ind. dm–3) in the Vistula Lagoon and Lake Łebsko in 2010–2011.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2017View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record