Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,327
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,327 results for “Placement”
Figure 1 from: Petersen RH, Hughes KW (2016) Micromphale sect. Perforantia (Agaricales, Basidiomycetes); Expansion and phylogenetic placement. MycoKeys 18: 1-122. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.18.10007
Figure 1 - Gymnopus bulliformis. A, B Basidiomata C, D Basidiospores. Standard bars: A, B = 20 mm; C, D = 5 µm. A, C WTU-F-9305; B, D WTU-F-51955.
Figure 3 from: Kanda K, Gomez AR, Van Driesche R, Miller KB, Maddison DR (2016) Phylogenetic placement of the Pacific Northwest subterranean endemic diving beetle Stygoporus oregonensis Larson & LaBonte (Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae). ZooKeys 632: 75-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.632.9866
Figure 3 - Maximum likelihood tree from concatenated dataset. Scale bar = 0.2 expected substitutions per position as estimated by RAxML. Stygoporus oregonensis in orange; other stygobitic dytiscids in blue; the epigean genus Sanfilippodytes, hypothesized by Larson and LaBonte (1994) to be the closest relative to Stygoporus oregonensis, in green. Bootstrap support given at nodes for Siettitiina and Stygoporus oregonensis + Ereboporus naturaconservatus.
Figure 2 from: Kanda K, Gomez AR, Van Driesche R, Miller KB, Maddison DR (2016) Phylogenetic placement of the Pacific Northwest subterranean endemic diving beetle Stygoporus oregonensis Larson & LaBonte (Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae). ZooKeys 632: 75-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.632.9866
Figure 2 - The two known collection localities of Stygoporus oregonensis. Oregon/Washington State boundary in black. County boundaries in brown. Blue shaded region outlined with a dotted line corresponds to Willamette Lowland basin-fill aquifers. Type locality indicated by red star with black border. New collection locality indicated by black star.
Figure 4 from: Kanda K, Gomez AR, Van Driesche R, Miller KB, Maddison DR (2016) Phylogenetic placement of the Pacific Northwest subterranean endemic diving beetle Stygoporus oregonensis Larson & LaBonte (Dytiscidae, Hydroporinae). ZooKeys 632: 75-91. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.632.9866
Figure 4 - Majority rule consensus of 1,000 bootstrap replicates performed on concatenated dataset. Bootstrap percentages given for clades recovered with more than 50% support. Branches and taxa colored as in Figure 3.
Fig. 2 in Disruption of the leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in citrus: effect of blend and placement height, longevity of disruption and emission profile of a new dispenser
Fig. 2. Mean ± SEM (n = 14) number of male Phyllocnistis citrella captured in pheromone-baited traps in untreated control plots (filled circles) and in pheromonetreated plots (open circles) of grapefruit at VPI-5 grove, St. Lucie County, Florida, USA (n = 8). Triangles represent mean ± SEM (n = 8) percentage trap catch disruption (right y axis).
Fig. 3 in Disruption of the leafminer Phyllocnistis citrella (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) in citrus: effect of blend and placement height, longevity of disruption and emission profile of a new dispenser
Fig. 3. Mean ± SEM (n = 14) number of male Phyllocnistis citrella captured in pheromone-baited traps in untreated control plots (filled circles, n = 12) and in pheromone-treated plots (open circles) of grapefruit at TRB grove, Charlotte County, Florida, USA (n = 6). Triangles represent mean ± SEM (n = 6) percentage trap catch disruption (right y axis).
FIGURE 112 in Four-horned wasps, description of some remarkable Dirhinus (Hymenoptera, Chalcididae) from Kenya, with a discussion of their taxonomic placement
FIGURE 112. Dirhinus (Dirhinus) quadrhinus, holotype ♀ (F01). Habitus in lateral view.
FIGURE 1 in Four-horned wasps, description of some remarkable Dirhinus (Hymenoptera, Chalcididae) from Kenya, with a discussion of their taxonomic placement
FIGURE 1. Dirhinus (Dirhinus) maasaii, holotype ♀ (F05). Habitus in lateral view.
Figure 4 from: Soreng RJ, Gillespie LJ (2018) Poa secunda J. Presl (Poaceae): a modern summary of infraspecific taxonomy, chromosome numbers, related species and infrageneric placement based on DNA. PhytoKeys 110: 101-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.110.27750
Figure 4 Poasecunda infraspecies illustrations (reproduced from Hitchcock 1935): AP.s.var.ampla panicle and floret BP.s.var.juncifolia panicle and floret CP.s.var.nevadensis panicle and floret DP.s.var.gracillima habit, panicle and floret EP.s.var.scabrella habit, panicles, spikelet and floret F, GP.s.var.secunda habit, panicle and floret variations A, B, C = subsp. juncifoliaD, E, F, G = subsp. secunda. Scale bar: 5 mm for florets, 10 mm for spikelet, 5 cm for habits and panicles (10 cm for E habit and panicles).
Figure 2 from: Soreng RJ, Gillespie LJ (2018) Poa secunda J. Presl (Poaceae): a modern summary of infraspecific taxonomy, chromosome numbers, related species and infrageneric placement based on DNA. PhytoKeys 110: 101-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.110.27750
Figure 2 Distribution of Poasecunda subspecies in North America: subsp. secunda (yellow) ; subsp. juncifolia (blue).
Figure 1 from: Soreng RJ, Gillespie LJ (2018) Poa secunda J. Presl (Poaceae): a modern summary of infraspecific taxonomy, chromosome numbers, related species and infrageneric placement based on DNA. PhytoKeys 110: 101-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.110.27750
Figure 1 Poasecunda habit and panicles: AP.s.subsp.secundavar.secunda (Soreng 9359) BP.s.subsp.juncifoliavar.ampla (Soreng 9358) C Panicles of subsp. secundavar.secunda (left) and juncifolia var. ampla (right) (Photos. RJS, Deschutes River near Madras, Jefferson Co., Oregon).
Figure 3 from: Soreng RJ, Gillespie LJ (2018) Poa secunda J. Presl (Poaceae): a modern summary of infraspecific taxonomy, chromosome numbers, related species and infrageneric placement based on DNA. PhytoKeys 110: 101-121. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.110.27750
Figure 3 Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus trees of Poa based on plastid (trnT-trnL-trnF, rpoB-trnC, MatK) data (left) and nrDNA ITS and ETS data (right). Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above branches, maximum parsimony bootstrap values below branches. Outgroups are not shown. Major clades are indicated by colour and capital letters. Taxa shown in blue belong to P.subg.Secundae; those in grey are other taxa of putative hybrid origin that belong to different major clades in plastid and nrDNA trees.
Figure 3 from: Guzow-Krzemińska B, Jabłońska A, Flakus A, Rodriguez-Flakus P, Kosecka M, Kukwa M (2019) Phylogenetic placement of Lepraria cryptovouauxii sp. nov. (Lecanorales, Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota) with notes on other Lepraria species from South America. MycoKeys 53: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.53.33508
Figure 3 Haplotype network showing relationships between nucITS rDNA sequences from Leprariafinkii. Newly generated nucITS rDNA sequences are given in bold. The names of species are followed with herbarium numbers of specimens or accession numbers precede species names in case of sequences obtained from Genbank. Mutational changes are presented as numbers in brackets near lines between haplotypes.
Figure 2 from: Guzow-Krzemińska B, Jabłońska A, Flakus A, Rodriguez-Flakus P, Kosecka M, Kukwa M (2019) Phylogenetic placement of Lepraria cryptovouauxii sp. nov. (Lecanorales, Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota) with notes on other Lepraria species from South America. MycoKeys 53: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.53.33508
Figure 2 Haplotype network showing relationships between nucITS rDNA sequences from selected Lepraria spp. Newly generated nucITS rDNA sequences from L.cryptovouauxii, L.impossibilis and L.sipmaniana were analyzed. The names of species are followed with herbarium numbers of specimens. Mutational changes are presented as numbers in brackets near lines between haplotypes. Haplotypes corresponding to each of species are highlighted with separate elipses. The newly described L.cryptovouauxii is given in bold.
Figure 1 from: Guzow-Krzemińska B, Jabłońska A, Flakus A, Rodriguez-Flakus P, Kosecka M, Kukwa M (2019) Phylogenetic placement of Lepraria cryptovouauxii sp. nov. (Lecanorales, Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota) with notes on other Lepraria species from South America. MycoKeys 53: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.53.33508
Figure 1 ML tree based on nucITS rDNA dataset for Lepraria spp. with midpoint rooting. Newly sequenced specimens of Lepraria are in bold and their names are followed with collection number of specimens. In case of the sequences obtained from GenBank the taxa names are followed with accession numbers. Bootstrap supports from ML analysis ≥ 70 (first value) and posterior probabilities from BA ≥ 0.95 (second value) are indicated near the branches. The newly described L.cryptovouauxii is highlighted in orange, L.vouauxii is highlighted in blue, and L.neglecta is highlighted in grey.
Figure 4 from: Guzow-Krzemińska B, Jabłońska A, Flakus A, Rodriguez-Flakus P, Kosecka M, Kukwa M (2019) Phylogenetic placement of Lepraria cryptovouauxii sp. nov. (Lecanorales, Lecanoromycetes, Ascomycota) with notes on other Lepraria species from South America. MycoKeys 53: 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.53.33508
Figure 4 Morphology of Leprariacryptovouauxii (A−C) and L.nothofagi (D). A Holotype (M. Kukwa 14848a) B Thallus with obscurely lobate margins (Flakus 14814) C Thallus with large and compacted aggregations of granules (Flakus 17682) D Details of thallus (Flakus 17651 & Rodriguez). Scale bars: 500 µm (A−C), 300 µm (D).
Figure 1 from: Karakehian JM, Quijada L, Friebes G, Tanney JB, Pfister DH (2019) Placement of Triblidiaceae in Rhytismatales and comments on unique ascospore morphologies in Leotiomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota). MycoKeys 54: 99-133. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.54.35697
Figure 1 Morphological features of Triblidiaceae. a–d, h–l, uTriblidiumcaliciiformea dried apothecia on bark b same apothecia hydrated c 15 µm thick longitudinal section d dead asci containing living ascospores h–i ascospores j germinating ascospore k dead ascus containing living ascospores, detailing the apex l ascus detailing the apex (phl) u fine transverse striations of dehisced ascus (phl). e–g, m–tHuangshaniaverrucosae habit of apothecia on bark (dried) f detail of dried apothecia g detail of same apothecia hydrated m 15 µm thick longitudinal section in (Cr) n asci (KOH & Mlz) o detail of ascus apex (Cr) p ascospore q ascospore (cb/l) r detail of plug-like structure in a terminal cell of an ascospore s–t detail of verrucose ascospore surface (t in cb/l). All microphotographs of cells and tissues mounted in water unless otherwise noted: Congo red (Cr), cotton blue in lactophenol (cb/l), Melzer's reagent (Mlz), phloxine (phl), potassium hydroxide (KOH). † = dead, * = living. Scale bars: 1 mm (a–b, e–g); 50 µm (c, m–n); 20 µm (h–k, p–q); 10 µm (l, o); 5 µm (r–u). Specimens photographed: T.caliciiforme: a–b, d, j GJO-0088904; i FH-15071105; c, h, k–l, u CUP-18080101; H.verrucosa: UME-29336a.
Figure 4 from: Karakehian JM, Quijada L, Friebes G, Tanney JB, Pfister DH (2019) Placement of Triblidiaceae in Rhytismatales and comments on unique ascospore morphologies in Leotiomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota). MycoKeys 54: 99-133. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.54.35697
Figure 4 Select examples of ascospore morphologies in Graphidaceae and Leotiomycetesa ascospores of Glyphiscicatricosa in Lugol's solution b muriform ascospore of Mellitiosporiumversicolorc–e muriform ascospores of Claussenomyces spp. within living, immature asci. All microphotographs of cells and tissues mounted in water unless otherwise noted. † = dead, * = living. Scale bars: 10 µm (a); 20 µm (b); 5 µm = (c–e). Specimens photographed: a = J.M.K personal collection; b = U.S.A., Oregon, Horse Rock Ridge, M. A. Sherwood, L. H. Pike & D. Wagner, 21 Mar 1979, FH [s.n.], image courtesy of Farlow Herbarium of Harvard University; c–e = L.Q. personal collections.
Figure 3 from: Karakehian JM, Quijada L, Friebes G, Tanney JB, Pfister DH (2019) Placement of Triblidiaceae in Rhytismatales and comments on unique ascospore morphologies in Leotiomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota). MycoKeys 54: 99-133. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.54.35697
Figure 3 Bayesian majority-rule consensus tree of Leotiomycetes based on the ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 + LSU + mtSSU region. Thickened branches are those that were well supported by ML and BI methods. An asterisk indicates that this branch was supported only by Bayesian inference. Classification, orders and families follows Baral in Jaklitsch et al. (2016) using Trichoglossumhirsutum as the outgroup. Species for which molecular sequences have been generated for this study are given in bold followed by fungarium acronym, a dash, then identifying number.
Figure 2 from: Karakehian JM, Quijada L, Friebes G, Tanney JB, Pfister DH (2019) Placement of Triblidiaceae in Rhytismatales and comments on unique ascospore morphologies in Leotiomycetes (Fungi, Ascomycota). MycoKeys 54: 99-133. https://doi.org/10.3897/mycokeys.54.35697
Figure 2 Morphological features of Pseudographis. a–e, g, l–oPseudographispinicolaa dried apothecia on bark b same apothecia hydrated c–e hydrated apothecia g dead ascus containing living ascospores (cb), l ascospores m ascus containing mature ascospores, detail of apex (in dilute L) n ascospore emerging from ascus apex (Cr) o ascus apex. f, h–k, p–rPseudographiselatinaf hydrated ascomata h 15 µm thick longitudinal section i–j ascospores k ascospores (in dilute L) p detail of ascus apex (L) q turgid ascus r same ascus (in dilute L). All microphotographs of cells and tissues mounted in water unless otherwise noted: cresyl blue (cb), Congo red (Cr), Lugol's solution (L). † = dead, * = living. Scale bars: 1 mm (a–f); 50 µm (h, q–r); 20 µm (i–k); 10 µm (g, n–p); 5 µm (l–m). Specimens photographed: P.pinicola: a–b, g, l–o, FH-18061706; c–e courtesy of Adam Polhorský; P.elatina: GJO-0090016.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.