Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,457
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,457 results for “feedback”
T cell - DAM feedback loop drives CNS inflammation and neurodegenration in SPG15 at an early age via CCR5-CCL5 interaction [CD3+]
GEO Series GSE244474. Mus musculus. 1135 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Inference of emergent spatio-temporal processes from single-cell sequencing reveals feedback between de novo DNA methylation and chromatin condensates [BiSulfite-seq]
GEO Series GSE165954. Mus musculus. 288 samples. Type: Methylation profiling by high throughput sequencing.
LncRNA SCIRT acts in a negative feedback loop to regulate the transcriptional program for cancer self-renewal
GEO Series GSE136195. Homo sapiens. 36 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing; Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
The miR-3648/FRAT1-FRAT2/c-Myc feedback loop modulates the metastasis and invasion of gastric cancer cells
GEO Series GSE204669. Homo sapiens. 6 samples. Type: Expression profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Metabolic reprogramming in astrocytes prevents neuronal death through a UCHL1/PFKFB3/H4K8la positive feedback loop
GEO Series GSE266984. Mus musculus. 2 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing.
A novel CRISPR/Cas9 screening platform identifies an IRF1-SOCS1-mediated negative feedback loop that limits CXCL9 expression and anti-tumor immunity (AT3 ATAC-Seq)
GEO Series GSE237967. Mus musculus. 8 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Students' perceptions on different sources of self-feedback
<p>Feedback is crucial for improving student learning. In this regard, overcoming the transmissive conception of feedback, in favour of its dialogic function, introduces new reflections concerning the internal generative feedback process. In this regard, Nicol (2020; 2021) outlines the concept of self-feedback, i.e. the continuous comparative process that students produce from various external information and sources triggering internal feedback. </p> <p>Our research aims to explore students' perceptions concerning the activation of internal/self-feedback, investigating which sources are most effective from their point of view and researching the relationships between different individual characteristics. The results show that students' individual differences and contextual cultural factors might play a crucial role in creating ideal environments to enable the generation of self-feedback. Finally, students consider the teacher to be most effective in activating self-feedback, and many have never experienced self-feedback or automated feedback situations.</p> <p>This record contains the open dataset adopted in the study, jointly with the R script used with the data.</p>
An Experimental Study of the Effects of Contextual Pressure and Performance Feedback on Coaching Styles and Athlete Experiences in Youth Basketball
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
When More is Not Merrier: The Effect of Feedback Frequency on Goal Performance
<p>The datasets contain the data collected from four experimental studies on the effect of feedback frequency on goal performance.</p>
Le mappe argomentative come comparator di feedback interno: un laboratorio per studenti universitari [Argument maps as comparator for internal feedback: a Lab for undergraduate students ]
<p>Il feedback interno è un costrutto divenuto recentemente rilevante per il suo impatto sulla regolazione metacognitiva e affettivo-relazionale, in relazione a diverse skills e contesti formativi. In particolare, il concetto di comparator, ovvero gli strumenti, gli interventi o le risorse che attivano il feedback interno, necessita di approfondimento tramite ricerca empirica. In questo contributo si parte dall’ipotesi che la componente visiva delle mappe argomentative (MA), già legate allo sviluppo di skills argomentative e di pensiero critico, possa essere una fonte generativa di comparazione concreta, permettendo una comprensione facilitata ed una migliore ricostruzione del senso dell’informazione testuale argomentativa. Infatti, le AM diagrammano le relazioni logiche fra i diversi enunciati, permettendo di seguire e di comprendere meglio la catena di ragionamento. Per verificare la suddetta ipotesi, è stato condotto uno studio sperimentale per indagare in che misura un percorso con le AM favorisse gli studenti nell’incremento di: a) feedback interno (FI) associato quindi a b) il livello di competenza di comprensione del testo (CoT) e a c) lo sviluppo di pensiero critico (CT). </p> <p>Questo record Zenodo presenta i quattro dataset (anonimizzati) raccolti durante la sperimentazione ed adottati per le analisi descrittive ed inferenziali, di cui si presenta una parte nel presente paper. Inoltre, si allega ilo Script R utile alla replica delle analisi. Qualsiasi commento o miglioramento è benvenuto!</p> <p>=========</p> <p>ENGLISH</p> <p>Internal feedback is a construct that become recently relevant for the impact it has on metacognitive and affective-relational regulation, in relation to different skills and learning contexts. In particular, the concept of comparator, i.e. the tools, interventions, or resources that activate internal feedback, requires the support of empirical research. In this contribution, we take as an initial hypothesis that the argument maps’ (AM) visual component, already linked to the development of argumentative and critical thinking skills, could be a generative source of concrete comparison, allowing for a facilitated comprehension and an improvement of the sense-making abilities within argumentative texts. In fact, AMs diagram the logical relationships between different utterances, allowing the learner to keep track and better understand the reasoning chain. To test the above hypothesis, an experimental study was conducted to investigate the extent to which a course with AMs favored students in increasing: a) internal feedback (IF), associated with b) their level of text comprehension (CoT) and hence, c) critical thinking (CT). </p> <p>This Zenodo record presents the four (anonymised) datasets collected during the experimentation and adopted for the descriptive and inferential analyses, part of which are presented in this paper. Also attached is the R Script useful for replicating the analyses. Any comments or improvements are welcome!</p>
PI3K inhibition activates SGK1 via a feedback loop to promote chromatin-based regulation of ER-dependent gene expression
GEO Series GSE119522. Homo sapiens. 14 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Maintenance of gene expression homeostasis by systems-level feedback loops in response to changes in RNA polymerase II dosage [RNAPII_levels_CUT&RUN]
GEO Series GSE307865. Homo sapiens. 42 samples. Type: Genome binding/occupancy profiling by high throughput sequencing.
Data masterproef ervaringen met feedback SNI
<p>In deze masterproef hebben we data verzameld m.b.t. de ervaringen van respondenten met de feedback (zowel individueel als op schoolniveau) die ze kregen na het invullen van het SNI op meetmoment 1. De respondenten die aan deze masterproef participeerden namen dus reeds deel aan het Potential project. Deze dataset bevat:</p> <p>- De audio's van de interviews en focusgroepen.</p> <p>- De transcripties van de interviews en focusgroepen. </p>
Spine and lower limb kinematics across feedback conditions
<p>The dataset contains data on participants' spine and lower limb kinematics during a repetitive lifting task in three different feedback conditions (control, auditory, and tactile).</p>
Audio neuro feedback modulation video
<p>Video</p>
Concept to train a supervised model to provide formative feedback in online courses
<p>Illustration of the concept</p>
Cloud feedback components from CMIP6 AMIP model
<p>Cloud feedback components from CMIP6 AMIP model (2002-2014)</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.