Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 1 in What do Eumerus Meigen larvae feed on? New immature stages of three species (Diptera: Syrphidae) breeding in different plants

Fig. 1 General shape of Eumerus puparia, dorsal view. a Eumerus alpinus. b Eumerus superbus. Scale lines: a and b = 2 mm

Fig. 3 in What do Eumerus Meigen larvae feed on? New immature stages of three species (Diptera: Syrphidae) breeding in different plants

Fig. 3 Head skeletons of Eumerus, lateral view. a Eumerus alpinus. b Eumerus figurans. c Eumerus superbus. D dorsal cornu, L mandibular lobe, M mandibular hook, P pharyngeal ridges, T accessory tooth, V ventral cornu. Scale lines = 250 μm

Fig. 7 in What do Eumerus Meigen larvae feed on? New immature stages of three species (Diptera: Syrphidae) breeding in different plants

Fig. 7 Total count of described early stages of Eumerus (triangles) and total count of known life cycles of early stages of Eumerus species (squares) by the first time a host-plant interaction was reported. X-axis shows years. Y-axis, number of Eumerus species

Fig. 6 in What do Eumerus Meigen larvae feed on? New immature stages of three species (Diptera: Syrphidae) breeding in different plants

Fig. 6 Posterior respiratory processes (PRP) of Eumerus larvae and puparia in dorsal view (left) and polar view (right). a, b Eumerus alpinus, puparium; SEM. c, d Eumerus figurans, larva; stereo microscope. e, f Eumerus superbus, puparium; SEM. α distance from the transverse ridge to the center of the spiracular plate, β width of the PRP at the transverse ridge level, C* spiracular scar, O spiracular opening, R transverse ridge, S spiracular seta. Scale lines: a and e = 500 μm; b and c = 250 μm; d = 100 μm; f = 200 μm

Fig. 5 in What do Eumerus Meigen larvae feed on? New immature stages of three species (Diptera: Syrphidae) breeding in different plants

Fig. 5 Pupal spiracles (PS) of Eumerus puparia (left) and details of the tubercles bearing spiracular openings (right). a, b Eumerus alpinus. c, d Eumerus superbus. O spiracular opening. Scale lines: a = 100 μm; b and d = 50 μm; c = 250 μm

Fig. 9 in What do Eumerus Meigen larvae feed on? New immature stages of three species (Diptera: Syrphidae) breeding in different plants

Fig. 9 Feeding network between larvae of Eumerus species (left, in gray) and plant tissues they feed on (right, colored) based on the interactions historically reported in bibliography for different genera of plants. Links between sides indicate relationships. Scales on each segment show the number of interactions established with the counter side. Plant tissue color palette as follows: tuber (yellow), swollen root (orange), rhizome (brown), processed material (black), fruits (red), stem (light green), corm (purple), cone (pink), and bulb (blue). Picture made using "circlize" package for R software

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →

FIGURE 1 in Rare interspecific breeding in Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae)

FIGURE 1. Key hybrid stages observed in sexual reproduction between Pseudo-nitzschia pseudodelicatissima and P. arenysensis, SEM (a–b), LM c., and TEM (d–f) micrographs. a. Two auxospores attached to the gametangial frustule. b. One mature auxospore. c. A postinitial cell. d. Central portion of the valve in which the central larger interspace is visible, strain 128–1. e. Detail of the central portion of the valve. f. The three cingular bands delimited by vertical lines: VC valvocopula, II second cingular band, III third cingular band. Scale bars = 10 μm (a–c), 1 μm (d), 0.5 μm (e–f).

opennotspecifiedJun 2015View details →

FIGURE 2 in Rare interspecific breeding in Pseudo-nitzschia (Bacillariophyceae)

FIGURE 2. Ultrastructure of the parental strains. a. Central portion of the valve in which the central larger interspace is visible, strain 18–02 and b: strain B110. Scale bars = 0.5 μm (a), 1 μm (b).

Figure 3 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 3. Eggs of eight kiskadee-like mimetic species from egg collections. Egg collection reference (institution acronym–catalogue number): (a) NBCN–181942; (b) NBCN–181153; (c) COMB-E165; (d) WFVZ–118541-2; (e) USNM–48256; (f) MHNG–735096; (g) NBCN–181945; (h) ZMB–SN; (i) DMNH– 10519; (j) WFVZ–184215; (k) MNHN–489-490; (l) NBCN–180866; (m) WFVZ–118522.

Figure 2 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 2. Egg-laying records of lesser kiskadee (Philohydor lictor) based on citizen science, literature, and museum egg collections in relation to monthly total precipitation.

Figure 1 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 1. Reproductive records (nest construction, eggs, nestlings, and fledglings) of lesser kiskadee (Philohydor lictor) from citizen science, literature, and museum egg collections. Ecoregion abbreviations: Temp = Temperate, Trop = Tropical and Subtropical. Asterisks indicate the country's centroid.

Figure 4 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

Figure 4. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) based on egg length, width, volume, and pointedness of eight kiskadee-like mimetic species.

Table 2 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

<p><b>Table 2.</b> Comparison of traits among eight kiskadee-like mimetic species. Body mass from Dunning (2007) and Tobias <i>et al</i>. (2022), bill length from (Tobias <i>et al</i>. 2022), nest type, clutch size, and range from Billerman <i>et al</i>. (2020).</p><table><tbody><tr><th></th><th>Body mass Bill length (g) (mm)</th><th>Egg length (mm)</th><th>Egg width (mm)</th><th>Egg volume (mm3)</th><th>Egg pointedness</th><th>Clutch size</th><th>Nest type</th><th>Range</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th><b>Smaller body size mimetic species</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Philohydor lictor</i></th><td>25.5</td><td>23.4</td><td>20.89 ± 1.41</td><td>16.06 ± 0.66</td><td>2734.66 ± 334.87</td><td>0.0002 ± 0.0001</td><td>1–4</td><td>Open cup</td><td>E Panama to E Brazil</td></tr><tr><th><i>Myiozetetes cayanensis</i></th><td>25.9</td><td>14.4</td><td>22.17 ± 0.99</td><td>15.99 ± 0.67</td><td>2894.08 ± 317.26</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.0001</td><td>2–3</td><td>Domed</td><td>SW Costa Rica to SE Brazil</td></tr><tr><th><i>Myiozetetes similis</i></th><td>28</td><td>16.64</td><td>22.21 ± 1.09</td><td>16.03 ± 0.64</td><td>2897.21 ± 303.41</td><td>0.0004 ± 0.0002</td><td>2–4</td><td>Domed</td><td>W Mexico to NE Argentina</td></tr><tr><th><i>Phelpsia inornata</i></th><td>29.4</td><td>17.9</td><td>21 ± 0.42</td><td>15.95 ± 0.07</td><td>2690 ± 84.85</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.00008</td><td>2</td><td>Open cup</td><td>N and C Venezuela to NE Colombia</td></tr><tr><th><i>Conopias parvus</i></th><td>21</td><td>20</td><td>21.26 ± 0.35</td><td>15.98 ± 0.38</td><td>2787.19 ± 191.05</td><td>0.0002 ± 0.00003</td><td>2–3</td><td>Tree hole or</td><td>S and E Venezuela to N Bolívia and</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>cavity</td><td>N Brasil</td></tr><tr><th><i>C. trivirgatus</i></th><td>24.36</td><td>16.6</td><td>20.98</td><td>15.76</td><td>2647.62</td><td>0.0003</td><td>NA</td><td>Tree hole or</td><td>Venezuela to N Brazil and SE Brazil to NE</td></tr><tr><th></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td>cavity</td><td>Argentina</td></tr><tr><th><b>Larger body size mimetic species</b></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>P. lictor</i>: misidentified</th><td>_</td><td>_</td><td>29.03 ± 1.92</td><td>19.84 ± 0.35</td><td>5799.84 ± 543.71</td><td>0.0004 ± 0.0001</td><td>2–3</td><td>_</td><td>_</td></tr><tr><th>eggs</th></tr><tr><th><i>Megarynchus</i></th><td>63.4</td><td>32.82</td><td>28.01 ± 1.53</td><td>20.19 ± 0.55</td><td>5863.74 ± 520.85</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.0002</td><td>2–3</td><td>Open cup</td><td>SE Mexico to S Argentina</td></tr><tr><th><i>pitangua</i></th><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><th><i>Pitangus sulphuratus</i></th><td>74</td><td>29</td><td>27.93 ± 1.52</td><td>19.94 ± 0.74</td><td>5657.18 ± 564.55</td><td>0.0003 ± 0.0001</td><td>2–5</td><td>Domed</td><td>S Texas to C Argentina</td></tr></tbody></table>

Table 1 in Breeding biology of mimetic species based on secondary data sources should address misidentifications: the case of the lesser kiskadee Philohydor lictor (Aves: Tyrannidae)

<p><b>Table 1.</b> Misidentifications in breeding records of lesser kiskadee (<i>Philohydor lictor</i>) found in citizen science databases (WikiAves, eBird, iNaturalist), museum egg sets, and literature up to August 2023. NA indicates that no information was available.</p><table><tbody><tr><th>Misidentification type</th><th>Locality</th><th>Year</th><th>Record type</th><th>Code/reference/museum</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Amazonas, Brazil</td><td>2015</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>WA1599942</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Colón, Panama</td><td>2016</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>ML34302821</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Pará, Brazil</td><td>2018</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>WA3137441</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Rondônia, Brazil</td><td>2021</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>WA4371921</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Meta, Colombia</td><td>2022</td><td>Citizen science</td><td>145727415</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Guyana</td><td>1848</td><td>Literature</td><td>Schomburgk (1848)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Brazil</td><td>1997</td><td>Literature</td><td>Euler (1867)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Rio de Janeiro, Brazil</td><td>1900</td><td>Literature</td><td>Euler (1900)</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs</th><td>NA</td><td>NA</td><td>Literature</td><td>Oates and Reid (1903)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Guyana</td><td>1929</td><td>Literature</td><td>Young (1929)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Brazil</td><td>1935</td><td>Literature</td><td>Snethlage (1935)</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>NA</td><td>Literature</td><td>Hellebrekers (1942)</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>NA</td><td>Literature</td><td>Hellebrekers (1945)</td></tr><tr><th>Domed nest</th><td>Guyana</td><td>1936</td><td>Literature</td><td>Davis (1961)</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs</th><td>NA</td><td>1832</td><td>Museum</td><td>MNHN–489/490</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs; outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>1898</td><td>Museum</td><td>ZBM–SN</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Argentina</td><td>1901</td><td>Museum</td><td>NBCN–181945</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Santa Catarina, Brazil</td><td>1908</td><td>Museum</td><td>SNMB–24013</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Santa Catarina, Brazil</td><td><1910</td><td>Museum</td><td>SNMB–24012</td></tr><tr><th>Outside species range</th><td>Santa Catarina, Brazil</td><td><1910</td><td>Museum</td><td>SNMB–24014</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs; domed nest</th><td>Sucre, Venezuela</td><td>1934</td><td>Museum</td><td>DMNH–10519</td></tr><tr><th>Larger eggs</th><td>Brazil</td><td>NA</td><td>Museum</td><td>WFVZ–184215</td></tr></tbody></table>

Figure 2 in Seasonal breeding in three sympatric rodent species in semi-arid Tigray, northern Ethiopia

Figure 2: Predicted mean of (A, B, C) the minimal number of animals alive and (D, E, F) proportion of breeding females in the three seasons, for each grid (red grid 1, blue grid 2). The predicted means (dots) and their standard error bars were derived from the general linear models.

Figure 4 in Seasonal breeding in three sympatric rodent species in semi-arid Tigray, northern Ethiopia

Figure 4: Mastomys awashensis monthly variation in (A) abundance (minimal number of animals alive, calculated per trapping session) in both grids (solid red line is grid 1, dashed blue line is grid 2), (B) proportion of breeding females (number of trapped breeding females divided by the MNA in that trap session) in both grids.

Figure 3 in Seasonal breeding in three sympatric rodent species in semi-arid Tigray, northern Ethiopia

Figure 3: Stenocephalemys albipes monthly variation in (A) abundance (minimal number of animals alive, calculated per trapping session) in both grids (solid red line is grid 1, dashed blue line is grid 2), (B) proportion of breeding females (number of trapped breeding females divided by the MNA in that trap session) in both grids.

Figure 1 in Seasonal breeding in three sympatric rodent species in semi-arid Tigray, northern Ethiopia

Figure 1: A glimpse of the sampling habitat in Adi-azab'o, located in the eastern Tigray, northern Ethiopia (photo on 13th October, 2018).(A) Represented a bushland habitat characterized by the dominant presence of Acacia ethbaica trees, where the sampling grids sited and (B) indicated some crop fields inside the enclosures.

Figure 5 in Seasonal breeding in three sympatric rodent species in semi-arid Tigray, northern Ethiopia

Figure 5: Acomys cahirinus monthly variation in (A) abundance (minimal number of animals alive, calculated per trapping session) in both grids (solid red line is grid 1, dashed blue line is grid 2), (B) proportion of breeding females (number of trapped breeding females divided by the MNA in that trap session) in both grids.

Figure 1 in New distribution and breeding record of Wroughton's free-tailed bat (Otomops wroughtoni) (Chiroptera: Molossidae) from Meghalaya, India

Figure 1: A small colony (80) of Otomops wroughtoni at the newly discovered roost at Mikadogre village in the South Garo Hills District of Meghalaya, India.