Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 3. A in Checklist of decapods (Crustacea) from the coast of São Paulo State (Brazil) supported by integrative molecular and morphological data: II. Infraorder Caridea: family Alpheidae

FIGURE 3. A) Synalpheus apioceros Coutière, 1909 (CCDB 5269). B) Synalpheus brevicarpus (Herrick, 1891) (CCDB 5047; green/blue chela morphotype). C) Synalpheus fritzmuelleri Coutière, 1909, (CCDB 5267). D) Synalpheus minus (Say, 1818) (CCDB 4906). E) Synalpheus tenuispina Coutière, 1909 (CCDB 5268). F) Synalpheus townsendi Coutière, 1909 (CCDB 5696). Specimens from Brazil, São Paulo, Ubatuba. Scale bars (mm): A—4; B—7.5; C, D—6; E, F—3. Photographs by R.C. Buranelli (A–E) and D.L. Felder (F).

FIGURE 2. A in Checklist of decapods (Crustacea) from the coast of São Paulo State (Brazil) supported by integrative molecular and morphological data: II. Infraorder Caridea: family Alpheidae

FIGURE 2. A) Athanas dimorphus Ortmann, 1894 (CCDB 5513). B) Athanas nitescens (Leach, 1813 [in Leach 1813–1814]) (CCDB 5509). C) Leptalpheus axianassae Dworschak & Coelho, 1999 (CCDB 5507). D) Salmoneus carvachoi Anker, 2007 (CCDB 6021). Specimens from Brazil, São Paulo: Cananéia (D), São Sebastião (C), Ubatuba (A, B). Sex: male (B), female (A, C, D). Scale bars (mm): A—2.5; B—4; C—7; D—2. Photographs by R.C. Buranelli.

FIGURE 1. A in Checklist of decapods (Crustacea) from the coast of São Paulo State (Brazil) supported by integrative molecular and morphological data: II. Infraorder Caridea: family Alpheidae

FIGURE 1. A) Alpheus brasileiro Anker, 2012 (CCDB 4904). B) Alpheus buckupi Almeida, Terossi, Araújo-Silva & Mantelatto, 2013 (CCDB 5505). C) Alpheus carlae Anker, 2012 (CCDB 6153). D) Alpheus estuariensis Christoffersen, 1984 (CCDB 5048). E) Alpheus formosus Gibbes, 1850 (CCDB 4905). F) Alpheus intrinsecus Spence Bate, 1888 (CCDB 5057). G) Alpheus malleator Dana, 1852 (CCDB 5046). H) Alpheus cf. packardii Kingsley, 1880 (CCDB 5049). I) Alpheus petronioi Almeida, Terossi & Mantelatto, 2014 (CCDB 4728). J) Alpheus thomasi Hendrix & Gore, 1973 (CCDB 5289). Animals from Brazil, São Paulo: Cananéia (A, D, I), São Sebastião (B, C), Ubatuba (E–H, J). Sex: male (A, G, H, J), female (B–F, I). Scale bars (mm): A—9; B—10; C, I—7; D, E, H—8; F, J—11; G—12.5. Photographs by R.C. Buranelli.

FIGURE 4 in A new subspecies of Zamenis hohenackeri (Strauch, 1873) (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 4. PaRatYpE of Zamenis hohenackeri lyciensis ssp. nov. NMW 15173 fRom AkşEhIR, KoNYa, TURkEY; (a) doRSal aNd (b) VENtRal VIEw.

FIGURE 6 in A new subspecies of Zamenis hohenackeri (Strauch, 1873) (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 6. CompaRISoN of hEad coloUR pattERN dIffERENcES bEtwEEN (a) Zamenis hohenackeri lyciensis ssp. nov. KIRkpINaR KaRaNfIll, MUğla, aNd (b) Z. situla, LakE YlIkI, GREEcE.

FIGURE 3 in A new subspecies of Zamenis hohenackeri (Strauch, 1873) (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 3. HolotYpE of Zamenis hohenackeri lyciensis ssp. nov. MHNG2403.007 fRom KohU Daǧ, Elmalı, ANtalYa, TURkEY; doRSal VIEw.

FIGURE 2 in A new subspecies of Zamenis hohenackeri (Strauch, 1873) (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 2. TImE-calIbRatEd BI phYlogENY baSEd oN thE combINEd co1 + cytb mtDNA data aNalYSIS. ThE dIVERgENcE tImES (IN MYa) wERE EStImatEd USINg calIbRatIoN poINtS (C1-C5) aVaIlablE fRom lItERatURE (tExt foR dEtaIlS). GREY baRS INdIcatE 95 % hIghESt poStERIoR dENSItY (HPD) INtERValS of EStImatEd NodE agES; aN aStERISk at NodES dENotES BaYESIaN poStERIoR (pp) SUppoRt ValUES ±0.9, two aStERISkS INdIcatE pp ±0.9 aNd bootStRap ValUES ±80 %; NodE NUmbERS coRRESpoNd to SUpplEmENtaRY TablE 5 that SpEcIfIES thE INdIVIdUal ValUES aNd 95% cREdIblE INtERValS. TIp labElS coNSISt of thE taxoN NamE, oRIgINal SamplE ID followEd bY thE oRIgIN of SamplE (IN bRackEtS). ColoUR codE IS aS followS: black—Zamenis hohenackeri hohenackeri; blUE—Z. h. tauricus; REd—Z. h. lyciensis ssp. nov..

FIGURE 1 in A new subspecies of Zamenis hohenackeri (Strauch, 1873) (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 1. DIStRIbUtIoN map of Zamenis hohenackeri SUbSpEcIES aNd locatIoNS whERE Z. situla IS foUNd wIth NUmbERS aS USEd IN SUpplEmENtaRY TablE 1. SamplINg localItIES of SpEcImENS USEd foR gENEtIc aNd/oR moRphologIcal aNalYSIS aNd holotYpE localItIES aRE INdIcatEd wIth dIffERENt SYmbolS (SEE lEgENd). MoRE dEtaIlEd mapS foR IRaN, aNd REcoRdS wIthIN thE EaStERN CaUcaSUS (GREatER aNd LESSER), INclUdINg RUSSIa, GEoRgIa, ARmENIa, aNd AzERbaIjaN caN bE foUNd IN BISchoff (1993), SchUlz (1996), aNd ARakEYlaN et al. (2011).

FIGURE 5 in A new subspecies of Zamenis hohenackeri (Strauch, 1873) (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 5. PRINcIpal bodY coloUR pattERN of Zamenis situla aNd Z. hohenackeri taxa: A) Z. situla blotchEd, AgoRa, IzmIR (local- ItY 139, FIg. 1); B) Z. situla StRIpEd, IzmIR (localItY 139, FIg. 1); C) Z. h. lyciensis ssp. nov. KIRkpINaR KaRaNfIll, ARIbElENI YaYlaSI, MUğla (localItY 52, FIg. 1); D) Z. h. tauricus Aladaǧ, MERSIN (localItY 85, FIg. 1); E) Z. h. hohenackeri GüNINdI, KaRS (localItY 18, FIg. 1). SEE moRE ExamplES IN SUpplEmENtaRY FIgS. 1–3.

FIGURE 7 in A new subspecies of Zamenis hohenackeri (Strauch, 1873) (Serpentes: Colubridae) based on morphological and molecular data

FIGURE 7. CompaRISoN of doRSal coloUR pattERN dIffERENcES amoNg thE thREE SUbSpEcIES of Zamenis hohenackeri: (a) Z. h. lyciensis ssp. nov.; (b) Z. h. tauricus; (c) Z. h. hohenackeri.

FIGURE 4 in New insights on the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the Neotropical genus Phoebis (Pieridae: Coliadinae) revealed by molecular and morphological data

FIGURE 4. Representatives of Phoebis, Aphrissa and Rhabdodryas (Males). Left side dorsal view, right side ventral view. A. Phoebis agarithe; B. Phoebis argante; C. Phoebis neocypris; D. Phoebis philea; E. Phoebis sennae; F. Aphrissa statira; G. Rhabdodryas trite; H. Phoebis avellaneda.

FIGURE 1 in New insights on the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the Neotropical genus Phoebis (Pieridae: Coliadinae) revealed by molecular and morphological data

FIGURE 1. Some morphological characters used to analyse the phylogenetic relationships of Phoebis. Numbers show character and state. More information is showed in table 1 and 2.

FIGURE 2 in New insights on the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the Neotropical genus Phoebis (Pieridae: Coliadinae) revealed by molecular and morphological data

FIGURE 2. Phylogenetic tree obtained in Bayesian inference analysis for genus Phoebis, based on the combined data set of 20 morphological characters, one mitochondrial and tree nuclear markers. Values below the branches are posterior probabilities (BI analysis) those above the branches are bootstraps values (ML analysis).

FIGURE 3 in New insights on the taxonomy and phylogenetic relationships of the Neotropical genus Phoebis (Pieridae: Coliadinae) revealed by molecular and morphological data

FIGURE 3. Likelihood ancestral states reconstruction of some characters used for classifications of Phoebis and related genera. Character used in this analysis included dorsal spine of harpe, signum shape and line crossing wings.

FIGURE 4 in Synonymize Arma chinensis as Arma custos based on morphological, molecular and geographical data

FIGURE 4. Male genitalia structure of Arma custos (a–b. Pygophore (a. Dorsal view; b. Ventral view. dpr = dorsoposterior rim; pla =lateroposterior angle; dsim = dorsal sclerites; vpr = ventroposterior rim). c–d. Aedeagus (c. Lateral view; d. Ventral view. vlcl = ventrolateral conjunctival lobe; acl = apical conjunctival lobe; mpp = medial penial plates). e. Paramere (Ventral view, fib = finger-like inner branch))

FIGURE 1 in Synonymize Arma chinensis as Arma custos based on morphological, molecular and geographical data

FIGURE 1. The subtle difference of parameres and dorsal sclerites between long-humeri (Arma custos) (a, c) and short-humeri (Arma chinensis) (b, d) (followed Josifov and Kerzhner, 1978)

FIGURE 3 in Synonymize Arma chinensis as Arma custos based on morphological, molecular and geographical data

FIGURE 3. Intraspecific variability of pronotal humeral angle in Arma custos (a. Yunnan (China), b. Shandong (China), c. Hebei (China), d. Neimenggu (China), e. Xinjiang (China), f. Hungary)

FIGURE 5 in Synonymize Arma chinensis as Arma custos based on morphological, molecular and geographical data

FIGURE 5. Female genitalia structure of Arma custos (lt8: laterotergites VIII; fgc: first gonocoxites; lt9: laterotergites IX; vf9: fused valvifers IX)

opencc-zeroOct 2018View details →

Supplementary material 4 from: Huber BA, Eberle J, Dimitrov D (2018) The phylogeny of pholcid spiders: a critical evaluation of relationships suggested by molecular data (Araneae, Pholcidae). ZooKeys 789: 51-101. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.789.22781

Figure S4. Maximum-likelihood tree (RAxML) of a reduced set of taxa (excluding taxa for which less than four genes were available) : Explanation note: In the text we refer to this tree as '4+ genes tree'. Support values as in Figure S1.