Find research datasets worth reusing

Figures 69–78 in On some Silverfish Taxa from the Mildura Region (Inland South-eastern Australia) (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Ctenolepismatinae)

Figures 69–78. Acrotelsella auricoronata sp. nov. holotype ♀ (69) long pectinate macrochaeta of side of head; (70) finely pectinate macrochaeta of anal region; (71) pectinate macrochaeta of cerci; (72) darker dorsal scale; (73) head (cross-hatched area obscured by eye pigment); (74) antenna, scape, pedicel and basal intervals of flagellum; (75) mandible; (76) maxilla and part of palp; (77) maxillary palp, arrow showing location of basiconic sensillum; (78) labium (left side of submentum damaged, right palp missing). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 23–27 in On some Silverfish Taxa from the Mildura Region (Inland South-eastern Australia) (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Ctenolepismatinae)

Figures 23–27. Acrotelsella mallee sp. nov. holotype ♀ (23) mesothoracic sternum; (24) metathoracic sternum and PIII; (25) PII; (26) urotergite III; (27) urotergite IX, right infralateral seta. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 88–96 in On some Silverfish Taxa from the Mildura Region (Inland South-eastern Australia) (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Ctenolepismatinae)

Figures 88–96. Acrotelsella auricoronata sp. nov. holotype ♀ (88) urotergite V; (89) urotergite VII, left lateral comb; (90) idem, left sublateral comb; (91) idem, left submedial comb; (92) urotergite X; (93) urosternite V; (94) urosternite VII, left sublateral comb; (95) coxites VIII and IX with ovipositor; (96) apex of gonapophyses. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 145–151 in On some Silverfish Taxa from the Mildura Region (Inland South-eastern Australia) (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Ctenolepismatinae)

Figures 145–151. Acrotelsella tanni sp. nov. holotype ♀ (145) metathoracic sternum and PIII; (146) combs of metasternum; (147) urotergite VII; (148) idem, right combs; (149) urotergite X; (150) urosternite VII; (151) left comb of urosternite IV. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 137–144 in On some Silverfish Taxa from the Mildura Region (Inland South-eastern Australia) (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Ctenolepismatinae)

Figures 137–144. Acrotelsella tanni sp. nov. holotype ♀ unless otherwise indicated by specimen number (137) pronotum; (138) idem, right anterior trichobothrial area; (139) mesonotum; (140) metanotum; (141) idem, right posterior comb (K.377788); (142) presternum, prothoracic sternum; (143) mesothoracic sternum; (144) combs of mesosternum. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 152–156 in On some Silverfish Taxa from the Mildura Region (Inland South-eastern Australia) (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Ctenolepismatinae)

Figures 152–156. Acrotelsella tanni sp. nov. holotype ♀ unless otherwise indicated by specimen number (152) left coxites VIII and IX with ovipositor; (153) apex of gonapophyses; (154) base of cerci and medial filament; (155) cercus, most distal surviving divisions; (156) urosternite VIII, coxites IX and penis of male (K.377777). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figures 61–66 in On some Silverfish Taxa from the Mildura Region (Inland South-eastern Australia) (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Ctenolepismatinae)

Figures 61–66. Acrotelsella albicaudata sp. nov. holotype ♂ unless otherwise indicated with specimen number (61) coxites VIII and IX and ovipositor of female; (62) idem, apex of gonapophyses; (63) base of cerci and medial filament; (64) cercus, most distal surviving divisions; (65) medial filament, most distal surviving division; (66) urosternite VIII and coxites IX with penis and stylus IX (NMV T-22587). Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Fig. 4 in Utilising a novel surveillance system to investigate species of Forcipomyia (Lasiohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as the suspected vectors of Leishmania macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in the Darwin region of Australia

Fig. 4. Assessment of L. macropodum DNA using FTAṜ card technology. FTAṜ cards were exposed to field-collected F. (Lasiohelea). Cards with and without insects adhered were processed and parasite load was determined with qPCR. 4.83% (7/145) FTAṜ cards were positive for L. macropodum DNA. Black columns show parasite load detected on each positive FTAṜ card (numbered FTA.1 – FTA.7). Dashed columns show the number of insects adhered to each card. When dashed columns are absent, this signifies the absence of insects on the positive cards.

Fig. 1 in Utilising a novel surveillance system to investigate species of Forcipomyia (Lasiohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as the suspected vectors of Leishmania macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in the Darwin region of Australia

Fig. 1. Wax-paper cups were used to contain and maintain field-collected biting midges. (A) Honey-coated FTAṜ cards were left at room temperature for 48 h allowing even absorption of honey into the cards. (B) A 2.5 cm slit was carved into the bottom of disposable cup and sealed with adhesive tape. (C) Insects were aspirated directly into the bottom of the containers through a small perforation created before field collection. Once biting midges were collected from the macropods, the small perforation was sealed with a rubber plug. Gauze was used as a lid to seal the top of the containers and fastened securely with a rubber band. The honey-coated FTAṜ card was inserted through the bottom slit after insect collection and once again sealed with adhesive tape.

Fig. 3 in Comparison of the modified agglutination test and real-time PCR for detection of Toxoplasma gondii exposure in feral cats from Phillip Island, Australia, and risk factors associated with infection

Fig. 3. Predicted lines of fit for the multivariable logistic regression model plotted as probability of Toxoplasma gondii qPCR positivity in feral cats on Phillip Island (Victoria) versus body weight for each season. Dashed lines show 95% confidence intervals.

Fig. 5 in Characterisation of the tongue worm, Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae), in Australia

Fig. 5. Light microscopy of adult specimens collected in this study: A, anterior and B, posterior hooks of a female (132-1); C, anterior and D, posterior hooks of male specimens (131-7 and 132-3, respectively); buccal cadre of E, a female (132-1) and F, a male (132-3); G and H, copulatory spicule of males (131-7 and 131-5, respectively). Scale bars = 50µm.

Fig. 4 in Characterisation of the tongue worm, Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae), in Australia

Fig. 4. Scanning electron microscopy of the nymph: A) ventral view of the full body; B) ventral view of the anterior part of the nymph showing two pairs of hooks with dorsal accessory pieces, mouth, sensory papillae (white arrows) and sensillae (within yellow square); C) magnified view of the sensillae; D) magnified view of hooks and dorsal accessory pieces from one side of the body; E) magnified view of the annulus, showing sensory pores (green square) and row of well-developed annular spines; F) magnified view of the annular spines; G) posterior end of the nymph.

Fig. 6 in Characterisation of the tongue worm, Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae), in Australia

Fig. 6. Phylogenetic trees based on the Cox1 (a) and 18sRNA (b) sequences for Linguatula spp., with Armillifer agkistrodontis as an outgroup for Cox1 and 18sRNA sequences. Bayesian posterior probabilities values over 85% are indicated above the branches.

Fig. 3 in Characterisation of the tongue worm, Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae), in Australia

Fig. 3. Scanning electron microscopy of the male specimen: A) ventral side of the cranial region of the parasite, showing the mouth, two pairs of hooks and the two pairs of papillae (arrows), with the genital pore interrupting the annular rows midline; B) magnified view of the mouth; C) magnified view of the sensory sensillae; D) showing arrangement and structure of the annulus' sensory pores (arrows) and spines (within the square); E to G) variation in the posterior end of the male specimens.

Fig. 1 in Comparison of the modified agglutination test and real-time PCR for detection of Toxoplasma gondii exposure in feral cats from Phillip Island, Australia, and risk factors associated with infection

Fig. 1. Location and Toxoplasma gondii infection status, as detected by real-time PCR (qPCR), of feral cats trapped on Phillip Island (Victoria) from July 2016 to December 2017. Map shows the distribution of different location types (Park, Agricultural, Residential) used in multivariable regression analysis. A circular spread of points around a location marked with 'x' indicates multiple animals were sampled at the same site (i.e. same GPS coordinates). Red = T. gondii qPCR positive, white = T. gondii qPCR negative. Map created using Quantum GIS, version 3.8. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

Fig. 2 in Utilising a novel surveillance system to investigate species of Forcipomyia (Lasiohelea) (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) as the suspected vectors of Leishmania macropodum (Kinetoplastida: Trypanosomatidae) in the Darwin region of Australia

Fig. 2. Leishmania macropodum DNA detection by qPCR. Individual or pools of F. (Lasiohelea) species were assessed for the presence of L. macropodum DNA. Only positive samples are shown, with each pair of columns representing results from one sample. Black columns depict the parasitic load detected and the dashed columns show the number of insects processed in that sample. Asterisks represent groups that contained ≥ 5 × 106 F. (Lasiohelea) parasites.

Fig. 1 in Characterisation of the tongue worm, Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae), in Australia

Fig. 1. Template for measurement conventions of the adult hook and fulcrum. AB – hook gape; AC – blade length; AD – hook length; BC – base length; CD – plateau length; BD – hook width; FL – fulcrum length.

Fig. 2 in Characterisation of the tongue worm, Linguatula serrata (Pentastomida: Linguatulidae), in Australia

Fig. 2. Scanning electron microscopy of female specimens: A) ventral side of the cranial region of the parasite, showing the mouth, two pairs of hooks and the single row of sensory pores on each annulus; B) magnified view of the mouth; C) magnified view of a hook; D) magnified view of the sensory sensillae; E & F) showing arrangement and structure of the annulus' sensory pores (see arrows); G) mouth in another specimen; H & I) ventral side of the cranial region of two other female specimens showing variations in the morphology of the head. Arrows are pointing at papillae; J) posterior end of the female showing terminal cleft (see the arrow).

Fig. 7 in Mammal parasites in arid Australia

Fig. 7. Distributions of selected endemic species of hydromyine rodents in Australia for which published helminthological studies are available. A, Distributions of the grassland melomys, Melomys burtoni, the fawn-footed melomys, M. cervinipes and the white-tailed rat, Uromys caudimaculatus; B, Distributions of the delicate mouse, Pseudomys delicatulus and the sandy inland mouse, P. hermansburgensis; C, Distributions of the eastern chestnut mouse, P. gracilicaudatus and the desert mouse, P. desertor.

Fig. 5 in Mammal parasites in arid Australia

Fig. 5. Geographical distributions of the closely related strongylid nematode species Rugopharynx australis and R. macropodis. Records based on Beveridge and Chilton (1999) and voucher specimens deposited in the South Australian Museum, Adelaide. Rugopharynx australis (represented by closed circles) occurs in the stomachs of Macropus fuliginosus, M. giganteus, Osphranter rufus and O. robustus; R. macropodis (represented by open squares) occurs in the stomachs of M. fuliginosus and M. giganteus.