Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
3,630
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
3,630 results for “Forming”
Figure 1 in Speciation of two salinity-associated size forms of Oithona dissimilis (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) in estuaries
Figure 1. Large and small forms of Oithona dissimilis from Okinawa-jima island. Female of the large form from Katabaru Beach: (A) Habitus; (B) mandibular palp. Female of the small form from Hija-gawa River: (C) habitus; (D) mandibular palp. Arrows "a" and "b" indicate two pointed spines on the mandibular basis and five setae on the mandibular endopod, respectively.
Figure 19 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 19. Haplochthonius simplex. (A) Anal region of larva; (B) anogenital region of tritonymph. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 15 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 15. Sphaerochthonius splendidus, tritonymph, dorsal aspect. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 13 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 13. Sphaerochthonius splendidus. (A) Anal region of larva; (B) Anogenital region of protonymph. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 14 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 14. Sphaerochthonius splendidus, anogenital region. (A) Deutonymph; (B) Tritonymph. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 11 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 11. Sphaerochthonius splendidus, adult, anogenital region. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 6 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 6. Cosmochthonius ponticus, anogenital region. (A) Deutonymph; (B) Tritonymph. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 5 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 5. Cosmochthonius ponticus, (A) Anal region of larva; (B) anogenital region of protonymph. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 9. Tibia and tarsus I in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 9. Tibia and tarsus I of tritonymphs. (A) Cosmochthonius ponticus, antiaxial aspect; (B) C. ponticus, region of solenidion w; (C) Sphaerochthonius splendidus, antiaxial aspect; (D) S. splendidus, region of solenidion w; (E) S. splendidus, famulus ∈ covered by cerotegument: (F) Haplochthonius simplex, antiaxial aspect; (G) H. simplex, region of solenidion w. Notes: pairs of setae in parentheses; some setae are not illustrated; explanation of labels in text.
Figure 8 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 8. Lateral aspect of tritonymphs. (A) Cosmochthonius ponticus; (B) Sphaerochthonius splendidus. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 7 in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 7. Cosmochthonius ponticus, tritonymph. (A) Dorsal aspect; (B) Fragment of rostrum. Note: explanation of labels in text.
Figure 3. Tibia and tarsus I in Differentiation of body form of Protoplophoroidea (Acari: Oribatida) in the light of ontogeny of three species
Figure 3. Tibia and tarsus I of adults, antiaxial aspect. (A) Cosmochthonius ponticus; (B) Sphaerochthonius splendidus; (C) Haplochthonius simplex. Notes: pairs of setae in parentheses; some setae are not illustrated; explanation of labels in text.
Sister-Species Diverge in Modality-Specific Courtship Signal Form and Function
<p>Understanding the relative importance of different sources of selection (e.g. the environment, social/sexual selection) on the divergence or convergence of reproductive communication can shed light on the origin, maintenance, or even disappearance of species boundaries. Using a multi-step approach, we tested the hypothesis that two presumed sister-species of wolf spider with overlapping ranges and microhabitat use, yet differing degrees of sexual dimorphism, have diverged in their reliance on modality-specific courtship signaling. We predicted that male <i>Schizocosa crassipalpata</i> (no ornamentation) rely predominantly on diet-dependent vibratory signaling for mating success. In contrast, we predicted that male <i>S. bilineata </i>(black foreleg brushes) rely on diet-dependent visual signaling. We first tested and corroborated the sister-species relationship between <i>S. crassipalpata </i>and <i>S. bilineata </i>using phylogenomic scale data. Next, we tested for species-specific, diet-dependent vibratory and visual signaling by manipulating subadult diet and subsequently quantifying adult morphology and mature male courtship signals. As predicted, vibratory signal form was diet-dependent in <i>S. crassipalpata</i> while visual ornamentation (brush area) was diet-dependent in <i>S. bilineata. </i>We then compared the species-specific reliance on vibratory and visual signaling by recording mating across artificially manipulated signaling environments (presence/absence of each modality in a 2 x 2 full factorial design). In accordance with our diet dependence results for <i>S. crassipalpata, </i>the presence of vibratory signaling was important for mating success<i>. </i>In contrast, the light and vibratory environment interacted to influence mating success in <i>S. bilineata, </i>with vibratory signaling being important only in the absence of light. We found no differences in overall activity patterns. Given that these species overlap in much of their range and microhabitat use, we suggest that competition for signaling space may have led to the divergence and differential use of sensory modalities between these sister-species.</p>
FIGURE 4. Empoasca coofa n in New species and color forms of Empoasca (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae: Empoascini) from South America
FIGURE 4. Empoasca coofa n. sp. a. genital capsule, lateral view (broken line = outline of aedeagus); b. genital capsule, ventral view (broken line = outline of aedeagus); c1. aedeagus, lateral view; c2. aedeagus, variation in apical portion of shaft, lateral view; d. aedeagus, left anal hook and dorsal aedeagal support, posteroventral view; e. connective, ventral view; g. style, ventral view; h. pygofer process, lateral view of apical portion; i. pygofer process, ventral view of apical portion; k. pattern of sclerotization of dorsal surface of genital capsule, dorsal view; m. first sternal complex, anterior view; n. base of abdomen and second sternal apodemes, ventral view; p. second tergal apodemes, anterior view; q. base of abdomen, dorsal view.
FIGURE 2. Empoasca bartletti n in New species and color forms of Empoasca (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae: Empoascini) from South America
FIGURE 2. Empoasca bartletti n. sp. a. genital capsule, lateral view (broken line = outline of aedeagus); b. genital capsule, ventral view (broken line = outline of aedeagus); c1. aedeagus, lateral view; c2. aedeagus, variation in processes, lateral view; d. aedeagus, left anal hook and dorsal aedeagal support, posteroventral view; e. connective, ventral view; g. style, ventral view; h. pygofer process, lateral view of apical portion; i. pygofer process, ventral view; k. pattern of sclerotization of dorsal surface of genital capsule, dorsal view; m. first sternal complex, anterior view; n. base of abdomen and second sternal apodemes, ventral view; q. base of abdomen, dorsal view.
FIGURE 3. Empoasca concava n in New species and color forms of Empoasca (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae: Empoascini) from South America
FIGURE 3. Empoasca concava n. sp. a. genital capsule, lateral view (broken line = outline of aedeagus); b. genital capsule, ventral view; c. aedeagus, lateral view; d. aedeagus, left anal hook & dorsal aedeagal support, posteroventral view; e. connective, ventral view; f. style, lateral view; g. style, ventral view; h. pygofer process, lateral view of apical portion; j. anal hook, lateral view; k. pattern of sclerotization of dorsal surface of genital capsule, dorsal view; m. first sternal complex, anterior view; n. base of abdomen and second sternal apodemes, ventral view; r1. forewing—ommon form; r2. apex of forewing—variant; s. base of abdomen, lateral view.
FIGURE 1 in New species and color forms of Empoasca (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Typhlocybinae: Empoascini) from South America
FIGURE 1. Empoasca spp. dorsal aspect (abdomen removed). a: Empoasca bartletti n. sp. b: Empoasca concava n. sp. c: Empoasca coofa n. sp. d: Empoasca longibrachiata Southern—common color pattern. e: Empoasca longibrachiata Southern—variant color pattern.
FIGURE 35. Leptolalax minimus form 2, THNHM 07417 in Sorting out Lalos: description of new species and additional taxonomic data on megophryid frogs from northern Indochina (genus Leptolalax, Megophryidae, Anura) 3147
FIGURE 35. Leptolalax minimus form 2, THNHM 07417, reference specimen, adult male. (A) Lateral view of head, ventral view of (B) right foot and of (C) right hand. Scale bar = 5 mm (3 + 2 mm).
FIGURE 34. Leptolalax minimus form 2, THNHM 07417 in Sorting out Lalos: description of new species and additional taxonomic data on megophryid frogs from northern Indochina (genus Leptolalax, Megophryidae, Anura) 3147
FIGURE 34. Leptolalax minimus form 2, THNHM 07417, reference specimen, adult male, SVL 25.6 mm. (A) Dorsal and (B) ventral view.
FIGURE 43. Micronecta annae Kirkaldy, dorsal habitus. a–b. Brachypterous form. a. Male. b. Female. c–d. Macropterous form. c. Male. d in <strong>Taxonomic revision and systematics of continental Australian pygmy water boatmen (Hemiptera: Heteroptera: Corixoidea: Micronectidae)</strong>
FIGURE 43. Micronecta annae Kirkaldy, dorsal habitus. a–b. Brachypterous form. a. Male. b. Female. c–d. Macropterous form. c. Male. d. Female. Scale bars = 0.5 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.