Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
2,327
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
2,327 results for “Placement”
Figure 1-5 from: Gabriel R, Longhorn SJ (2015) Revised generic placement of Brachypelma embrithes (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1936) and Brachypelma angustum Valerio, 1980, with definition of the taxonomic features for identification of female Sericopelma Ausserer, 1875 (Araneae, Theraphosidae). ZooKeys 526: 75-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.526.6315
Figure 1-5 - 1 Spermathecae from holotype of Sericopelma embrithes in dorsal view 2 Live specimen in situ of Sericopelma cf. embrithes at type locality on Barro Colorado Island, probable adult Female [Photo: Insa Wagner, STRI] 3 Spermatheca drawing of female Nicaraguan Sericopelma sp. in dorsal from Schiapelli and Gerschman (1967), their figure 20 4 Spermatheca of mature female Sericopelma sp. Boquete (8.78°N, 82.43°W), Districto Boquete, Chiriquí Province, Panama, dorsal view lacking any distinct median notch 5 Same spermatheca (as 4) in lateral view with diagnostic 'P-shape' (of seen in reverse).
Figure 12 from: Gabriel R, Longhorn SJ (2015) Revised generic placement of Brachypelma embrithes (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1936) and Brachypelma angustum Valerio, 1980, with definition of the taxonomic features for identification of female Sericopelma Ausserer, 1875 (Araneae, Theraphosidae). ZooKeys 526: 75-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.526.6315
Figure 12 - Geographic distribution of the genus Sericopelma from published records (including this study), where complete black-centred shapes are for specimens examined during this study, whilst gray shapes [outlined in black] are further specimens listed by Valerio (1980), accordingly data for Sericopelma immensum has black shapes (for the holotype, allotype and further female from Pozo Azul de Pirrís examined here), and gray shapes for further sites of Valerio. Sericopelma rubronitens and Sericopelma panamense are of unspecific location, but canal-zone seems likely.
Figure 6-11 from: Gabriel R, Longhorn SJ (2015) Revised generic placement of Brachypelma embrithes (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1936) and Brachypelma angustum Valerio, 1980, with definition of the taxonomic features for identification of female Sericopelma Ausserer, 1875 (Araneae, Theraphosidae). ZooKeys 526: 75-104. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.526.6315
Figure 6-11 - Holotype of Sericopelma angustum. 6 Habitus and labels 7 Valerio (1980) figure 19, drawing spermathecae 8 Spermathecae, dorsal view 9 Spermathecaee, lateral view showing (reversed) 'P-shape' diagnostic of Sericopelma 10 Dense pad of plumose hairs on femur IV not present in Brachypelma, upper with alcohol wet, bottom left inset same dried, bottom right inset closeup of plumose hairs 11 tarsus leg IV showing unusual spines along central axis, bottom left inset closer image.
Figures 8-13 from: Maddison WP, Maddison DR, Zhang J, Szűts T (2016) Phylogenetic placement of the unusual jumping spider Depreissia Lessert, and a new synapomorphy uniting Hisponinae and Salticinae (Araneae, Salticidae). ZooKeys 549: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.549.6171
Figures 8-13 - Male palps to show absence (8–10) or presence (11–13) of the cymbial apical groove (a depression in the cymbium that cradles the tip of the embolus, marked with an arrow) 8 Lyssomanes taczanowskii Galiano, 1980 9 Cocalodes papuanus Simon, 1900 10 Depreissia myrmex Lessert, 1942 11 Tomocyrba ubicki Szűts & Scharff, 2009 12 Hispo sulcata Wanless, 1981 13 Phidippus audax (Hentz, 1845). Triangle marks base of median apophysis (ma).
Figures 2-7 from: Maddison WP, Maddison DR, Zhang J, Szűts T (2016) Phylogenetic placement of the unusual jumping spider Depreissia Lessert, and a new synapomorphy uniting Hisponinae and Salticinae (Araneae, Salticidae). ZooKeys 549: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.549.6171
Figures 2-7 - Male palp of Depreissia myrmex 2 Cleared palp, ventral view. 3 Retrolateral view 4 Dorsal view 5 Ventral view, highlighting the path of spermaphore (yellow) and embolus (black) 6 Left palp, prolateral view 7 Right palp, prolateral view. Abbreviations: e' = origin of embolus; e'' = end of embolus; ma = median apophysis; s = spermophore; t = tegulum. Triangle marks base of median apophysis.
Figure 1 from: Maddison WP, Maddison DR, Zhang J, Szűts T (2016) Phylogenetic placement of the unusual jumping spider Depreissia Lessert, and a new synapomorphy uniting Hisponinae and Salticinae (Araneae, Salticidae). ZooKeys 549: 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.549.6171
Figure 1 - Maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree from 28S sequences, constrained as described in text. Branches labelled by bootstrap percentages from 500 replicates, with selected branches also showing (after "/") bootstrap percentages for analysis with Eupoa and Agorius removed. Branch length of Agorius abridged to 50% of its actual length. Voucher specimen codes appended in brackets. Cocalodine, spartaeine and lapsiine lineages are colored as in Maddison et al. (2014). Stars mark clades constrained except for the freedom of Depreissia and Agorius.
Figure 1 from: Gadelha SS, Nunes JF, Zaldívar-Riverón A, Oliveira ML (2016) Venifurca, a new genus of neotropical Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and its phylogenetic placement. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 91-100. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9634
Figure 1 - Bayesian phylogram derived from a 28S + COI matrix. The phylogram shows the phylogenetic affinity of the genus Venifurca gen. n. within the Doryctinae. Posterior probabilities ≥ 0.95 are indicate near branches.
Figure 2 from: Gadelha SS, Nunes JF, Zaldívar-Riverón A, Oliveira ML (2016) Venifurca, a new genus of neotropical Doryctinae (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), and its phylogenetic placement. Journal of Hymenoptera Research 51: 91-100. https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.51.9634
Figure 2 - Venifurca leiosoma sp. n. (Holotype). Lateral habitus (A), lateral head and mesosoma (B), dorsal head and mesonotum (C), hind wing (D), hind wing with emphasis on the bifurcate m-cu (E), dorsal propodeum and metasoma (F).
Figure 1 from: Wood KR, Appelhans MS, Wagner WL (2016) Melicope oppenheimeri, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species from West Maui, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its ecology, conservation, and phylogenetic placement. PhytoKeys 69: 51-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.69.8844
Figure 1 - Melicope oppenheimeri K.R. Wood, Appelhans & W.L. Wagner. A Flowering branch, Oppenheimer & Hansen H20505 (PTBG) B Inflorescence C Undehisced fruit, showing beaked carpels D Fruit, partly open E Fruit, fully opened F Fruit endocarp showing venation and hairs B–F from Oppenheimer & Miller H90609 (PTBG) (Illustration by Alice Tangerini).
Figure 4 from: Wood KR, Appelhans MS, Wagner WL (2016) Melicope oppenheimeri, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species from West Maui, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its ecology, conservation, and phylogenetic placement. PhytoKeys 69: 51-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.69.8844
Figure 4 - Habit of Melicope oppenheimeri (Oppenheimer & Miller H90609). Photo by H. Oppenheimer, 12 Sep 2006.
Figure 5 from: Wood KR, Appelhans MS, Wagner WL (2016) Melicope oppenheimeri, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species from West Maui, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its ecology, conservation, and phylogenetic placement. PhytoKeys 69: 51-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.69.8844
Figure 5 - Melicope oppenheimeri A Flowers B Fruit, showing beaked carpels (Oppenheimer & Miller H90609). Photos by H. Oppenheimer, 12 Sep 2006.
Figure 3 from: Wood KR, Appelhans MS, Wagner WL (2016) Melicope oppenheimeri, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species from West Maui, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its ecology, conservation, and phylogenetic placement. PhytoKeys 69: 51-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.69.8844
Figure 3 - Map of upper Waihe'e Valley, West Maui, with red dot indicating the location of Melicope oppenheimeri on the cliff-base plateau region.
Figures 25-30 from: Paucar-Cabrera A, Moore MR (2018) New tribal placement and review of Parapucaya Prell and Pucaya Ohaus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae). ZooKeys 805: 127-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.28524
Figures 25-30 Form of clypeus and pronotum. 25Parapucaya sp. (clypeus thickened with sharp crest on margins) 26Cyclocephalamelanocephala (Fabricius) (clypeus not thickened, margins weakly raised, rounded). 27Stenocrates sp. (clypeus trapezoidal, pronotum not produced anteriorly at middle) 28Dyscinetus sp. (clypeus subtrapezoidal, pronotum with anterior margin produced at middle). Form of clypeus in posterodorsal view Mentum 29Ancognatha sp. (with furrow) 30Cyclocephala sp. (without furrow, weakly emarginate). (figures 28–30 from Ratcliffe 2003, by permission).
Figures 8-15 from: Paucar-Cabrera A, Moore MR (2018) New tribal placement and review of Parapucaya Prell and Pucaya Ohaus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae). ZooKeys 805: 127-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.28524
Figures 8-15 Form of clypeal apex. 8Peltonotussilvanus Jameson and Wada (subquadrate, note chitinized labrum) 9Ruteloryctesmorio (Fabricius) (emarginate, note round mandibles) 10Surutuseabrai d'Andretta and Martínez (narrowly parabolic) 11S.hesperius Ratcliffe (broadly parabolic) 12 Protibia of Harposceles sp. 13Acrobolbia sp. (pentagonal) 14Arriguttia sp. 15Augoderia sp. (thickened apex) (Figures 9–15 modified from Jameson et al. 2002, by permission).
Figure 7 from: Paucar-Cabrera A, Moore MR (2018) New tribal placement and review of Parapucaya Prell and Pucaya Ohaus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae). ZooKeys 805: 127-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.28524
Figure 7 Bootstrap consensus tree from W-IQ-TREE analysis. Node support values from left to right are ML bootstrap, Bayesian posterior probability, and parsimony bootstrap. Support values labeled with a "*" have 100% bootstrap support or 1.0 posterior probability. Support values labeled with a "-" have bootstrap supports lower than 50% or posterior probability lower than 0.95. Nodes labeled "--" indicates that node was not recovered by an analysis.
Figures 16-24 from: Paucar-Cabrera A, Moore MR (2018) New tribal placement and review of Parapucaya Prell and Pucaya Ohaus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae). ZooKeys 805: 127-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.28524
Figures 16-24 Form of clypeal apex. 16Aspidolea sp. (subquadrate, dirvergent from base to apex) 17Erioscelis sp. (subquadrate truncate) 18Erioscelis sp. (subquadrate emarginate) 19Ancognatha sp. (narrowly parabolic) 20Ancognatha sp. (parabolic) 21Cyclocephala sp. (rounded) 22Cyclocephala sp. (truncate) 23Cyclocephala sp. (emarginate) 24Cyclocephala sp. (sharply acuminate) (Figures modified from Jameson et al. 2002 and Ratcliffe 2003, by permission).
Figures 5-6 from: Paucar-Cabrera A, Moore MR (2018) New tribal placement and review of Parapucaya Prell and Pucaya Ohaus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae). ZooKeys 805: 127-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.28524
Figures 5-6 Maxillary galea showing four teeth. 5Cyclocephalafreyi Endrődi 6Pucayapulchra Arrow. Photograph credits to Gavin J. Martin.
Figures 3-4 from: Paucar-Cabrera A, Moore MR (2018) New tribal placement and review of Parapucaya Prell and Pucaya Ohaus (Coleoptera, Scarabaeidae, Dynastinae). ZooKeys 805: 127-158. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.805.28524
Figures 3-4 Hindwing vein RA3, distal to apical hinge. 3Parapucaya sp. 4Pucaya sp. Photo credits to Gavin J. Martin.
Code and data for manuscript: Does ankle push-off correct for errors in anterior-posterior foot placement relative to center-of-mass states?
<p>Data and code documentation for paper: “Does ankle push-off correct for errors in anterior-posterior foot placement relative to center-of-mass states?” All code in the current study can be accessed via the link (https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1AnL9ajMk_Q3Gwzv_OrOp7A8DNwS8lniC?usp=sharing). The code was written by Jian Jin, Sjoerd Bruijn and Moira van Leeuwen. The data was from (van Leeuwen et al., 2020)and can be accessed through the link (https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4229851).</p>
Supplementary material 2 from: García N, Cuevas C, Sepúlveda JE, Cádiz-Véliz A, Román MJ (2022) Two new species of Miersia and their phylogenetic placements alongside the recently described M. putaendensis (Gilliesieae, Allioideae, Amaryllidaceae). PhytoKeys 211: 107-124. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.211.87842
Figure S2
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.