Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 from: Thompson AC, Bazelet CS, Naskrecki P, Samways MJ (2017) Adapting the Dragonfly Biotic Index to a katydid (Tettigoniidae) rapid assessment technique: case study of a biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14552

Figure 4 - Distribution of Katydid Biotic Index (KBI) among ecosystem threat statuses (mean ± s.e.).

Figure 3 from: Thompson AC, Bazelet CS, Naskrecki P, Samways MJ (2017) Adapting the Dragonfly Biotic Index to a katydid (Tettigoniidae) rapid assessment technique: case study of a biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14552

Figure 3 - Distribution of South African and Cape Floristic Region katydid species among Tettigoniidae subfamilies.

Figure 2 from: Thompson AC, Bazelet CS, Naskrecki P, Samways MJ (2017) Adapting the Dragonfly Biotic Index to a katydid (Tettigoniidae) rapid assessment technique: case study of a biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14552

Figure 2 - Composition of South African (A, C, E) and Cape Floristic Region (B, D, F) katydid assemblages as characterised by their distribution (A, B), mobility (C, D), and trophic level (E, F) relative to their IUCN threat status.

Figure 1 from: Thompson AC, Bazelet CS, Naskrecki P, Samways MJ (2017) Adapting the Dragonfly Biotic Index to a katydid (Tettigoniidae) rapid assessment technique: case study of a biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14552

Figure 1 - Proportion of South African (A, C, E, G) and Cape Floristic Region (B, D, F, H) katydid assemblages as characterised by the KBI assessment criteria (Threat Status, Distribution, Trophic level and Mobility).

Figure 5 from: Thompson AC, Bazelet CS, Naskrecki P, Samways MJ (2017) Adapting the Dragonfly Biotic Index to a katydid (Tettigoniidae) rapid assessment technique: case study of a biodiversity hotspot, the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Journal of Orthoptera Research 26: 63-71. https://doi.org/10.3897/jor.26.14552

Figure 5 - Map of ecosystem threat statuses and the average KBI scores (i.e. KBI/Site) of each ecosystem.

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2018View details →

Figure 1 from: Underwood E, Taylor K, Tucker G (2018) The use of biodiversity data in spatial planning and impact assessment in Europe. Research Ideas and Outcomes 4: e28045. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e28045

Figure 1 Data use within the EIA process Own compilation based on information in (King et al. 2012).

Figure 1 from: Kondratieff BC, DeWalt RE, Verdone CJ (2019) Plecoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 243-254. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23535

Figure 1 The percent of the Canadian Plecoptera fauna represented by each family. The numbers represent rounded percentages and do not total 100.

Figure 1 from: Langor DW (2019) The diversity of terrestrial arthropods in Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 9-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.31947

Figure 1 Terrestrial ecozones of Canada as included in the Canadian Biodiversity Ecosystem Status and Trends 2010 report (Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Governments of Canada 2010). [Reprinted with permission from Environment and Climate Change Canada]

Figure 2 from: Langor DW (2019) The diversity of terrestrial arthropods in Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 9-40. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.31947

Figure 2 Collection points for the 375 species of Cerambycidae (Coleoptera) in Canada based on 81,555 records extracted from 106 Canadian and USA collections (Bousquet et al. 2017).

Figure 3 from: Kondratieff BC, DeWalt RE, Verdone CJ (2019) Plecoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 243-254. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23535

Figure 3 Cluster analysis of Plecoptera assemblages for Canadian provinces. For meaning of province abbreviations, see Figure 2 legend. The assemblages of Newfoundland (NF) and Labrador (LB) were kept separate in this analysis.

Figure 2 from: Kondratieff BC, DeWalt RE, Verdone CJ (2019) Plecoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 243-254. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23535

Figure 2 Plecoptera species richness by Canadian provinces. Abbreviations: AB – Alberta, BC – British Columbia, MB – Manitoba, NB – New Brunswick, NL – Newfoundland and Labrador, NS – Nova Scotia, NT – Northwest Territories, NU – Nunavut, ON – Ontario, PEI – Prince Edward Island, QC – Quebec, SK – Saskatchewan, and YT – Yukon.

opencc-zeroJan 2019View details →

Supplementary material 1 from: Kondratieff BC, DeWalt RE, Verdone CJ (2019) Plecoptera of Canada. In: Langor DW, Sheffield CS (Eds) The Biota of Canada – A Biodiversity Assessment. Part 1: The Terrestrial Arthropods. ZooKeys 819: 243-254. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23535

: Link: https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.819.23535.suppl1

Figure 4 from: Sampaio Í, Carreiro-Silva M, Freiwald A, Menezes G, Grasshoff M (2019) Natural history collections as a basis for sound biodiversity assessments: Plexauridae (Octocorallia, Holaxonia) of the Naturalis CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II expeditions. ZooKeys 870: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.870.35285

Figure 4 Map of Plexauridae collected during Tydeman Cape Verde Islands – CANCAP VI and VII cruises.

Figure 2 from: Sampaio Í, Carreiro-Silva M, Freiwald A, Menezes G, Grasshoff M (2019) Natural history collections as a basis for sound biodiversity assessments: Plexauridae (Octocorallia, Holaxonia) of the Naturalis CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II expeditions. ZooKeys 870: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.870.35285

Figure 2 CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II Plexauridae collection: a label of a catalogued record of Thesea talismani in Mauritania b label of previously unidentified and uncatalogued record from the Azores archipelago c different colonies of a new species from a coral garden filmed in situ in 2016 but stored in NBC since 1988 d cf. Placogorgia sp. I (RMNH. COEL. 42336) found mixed with specimens of the primnoid Callogorgia verticillata (Pallas, 1766) e the putative new record of Paramuricea macrospina in the NE Atlantic Ocean f detail of a new record for the Azores archipelago, Paramuricea biscaya (RMNH. COEL. 423339). Scale bars: 1 cm.

Figure 1 from: Sampaio Í, Carreiro-Silva M, Freiwald A, Menezes G, Grasshoff M (2019) Natural history collections as a basis for sound biodiversity assessments: Plexauridae (Octocorallia, Holaxonia) of the Naturalis CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II expeditions. ZooKeys 870: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.870.35285

Figure 1 The National Museum of Natural History of The Netherlands. Naturalis Biodiversity Center in 2016 (a), Marine Invertebrate Collection (b), part of the CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II consulted collection (c, d).

Figure 5 from: Sampaio Í, Carreiro-Silva M, Freiwald A, Menezes G, Grasshoff M (2019) Natural history collections as a basis for sound biodiversity assessments: Plexauridae (Octocorallia, Holaxonia) of the Naturalis CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II expeditions. ZooKeys 870: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.870.35285

Figure 5 Bathymetric distribution of Plexauridae identified to species at different sampling stations of CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II cruises on the NE Atlantic Ocean. Symbols represent precise records while bars represent distribution ranges. Colours represent distinct regions: Azores (blue), Madeira (yellow), Selvagens (white), Canary Islands (orange), Cape Verde (green) and Mauritania (rose).

Figure 3 from: Sampaio Í, Carreiro-Silva M, Freiwald A, Menezes G, Grasshoff M (2019) Natural history collections as a basis for sound biodiversity assessments: Plexauridae (Octocorallia, Holaxonia) of the Naturalis CANCAP and Tyro Mauritania II expeditions. ZooKeys 870: 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.870.35285

Figure 3 Map of Plexauridae collected during CANCAP and Tyro II Mauritania cruises except uncertain Cape Verdean records (see Figure 4).

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2016View details →

Figure 1 from: Queiroz-Santos L, Dias FMS, Dell'Erba R, Casagrande MM, Mielke OHH (2016) Assessment of the current state of biodiversity data for butterflies and skippers in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil (Lepidoptera, Papilionoidea and Hesperioidea). ZooKeys 595: 147-161. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.595.7856

Figure 1 - Occurrence localities of butterflies and number of species per locality in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil.