Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

145

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

145 results for “CT Angiography;”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
ClinicalTrials.gov20/100

Patient Tailored Contrast Volume for Preoperative CT Angiography of the Aorta

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05716568. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov20/100

Cardiac CT Angiography in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06176872. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
zenodo12/100

Dataset related to the article: "CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Suspected In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression"

<p>This record contains raw data related to the article &quot;CT Perfusion Versus Coronary CT</p> <p>Angiography in Patients With Suspected</p> <p>In-Stent Restenosis or CAD Progression&quot;</p> <p>OBJECTIVES The goal of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography</p> <p>angiography (CTA) alone, adenosine-stress myocardial perfusion assessed by computed tomography (CTP) alone, and</p> <p>coronary CTA &thorn; CTP by using a 16-cm Z-axis coverage scanner versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and fractional</p> <p>flow reserve (FFR) as the clinical standard.</p> <p>BACKGROUND Diagnostic performance of coronary CTA for in-stent restenosis detection is still challenging. Recently,</p> <p>CTP showed additional diagnostic power over coronary CTA in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. However,</p> <p>few data are available on CTP performance in patients with previous stent implantation.</p> <p>METHODS Consecutive stable patients with previous coronary stenting referred for ICA were enrolled. All patients</p> <p>underwent stress myocardial CTP and rest CTP &thorn; coronary CTA. Invasive FFR was performed during ICA when clinically</p> <p>indicated. The diagnostic rate and diagnostic accuracy of coronary CTA, CTP, and coronary CTA &thorn; CTP were evaluated in</p> <p>stent-, territory-, and patient-based analyses.</p> <p>RESULTS In the 150 enrolled patients (132 men; mean age 65.1 9.1 years), the CTP diagnostic rate was significantly</p> <p>higher than that of coronary CTA in all analyses (territory based [96.7% vs. 91.1%; p &lt; 0.0001] and patient based [96%</p> <p>vs. 68%; p &lt; 0.0001]). When ICA was used as gold standard, CTP diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher than that</p> <p>of coronary CTA in all analyses (territory based [92.1% vs. 85.5%, p &lt; 0.03] and patient based [86.7% vs. 76.7%,</p> <p>p &lt; 0.03]). The concordant coronary CTA &thorn; CTP assessment exhibited the highest diagnostic accuracy values versus ICA</p> <p>(95.8%in the territory-based analysis). The diagnostic accuracy of CTP was significantly higher than that of coronary CTA</p> <p>(75% vs. 30.5%; p &lt; 0.001). The radiation exposure of coronary CTA &thorn; CTP was 4.15 1.5 mSv.</p> <p>CONCLUSIONS In patients with coronary stents, CTP significantly improved the diagnostic rate and accuracy of coronary</p> <p>CTA alone compared with both ICA and invasive FFR as gold standard.</p>

restrictedFeb 2020View details →
zenodo12/100

DATASET RELATED TO THE ARTICLE "Interpretability of coronary CT angiography performed with a novel whole-heart coverage high-definition CT scanner in 300 consecutive patients with coronary artery bypass grafts"

<p>This record contains raw data related to the article: Interpretability of coronary CT angiography performed with a novel wholeheart</p> <p>coverage high-definition CT scanner in 300 consecutive patients with</p> <p>coronary artery bypass grafts&#39;</p> <p>Aims: Coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is an accurate non-invasive tool for the evaluation of coronary artery</p> <p>bypass graft (CABG). However, inability to sustain a long breath-hold, high heart rate (HR) and atrial fibrillation</p> <p>may affect image quality. Moreover, radiation exposure is still a matter of some concern. A scanner combining</p> <p>0.23-mm spatial resolution, new iterative reconstruction and fast gantry rotation time has been recently introduced</p> <p>in the clinical field. The aims of our study were to evaluate interpretability, radiation exposure and</p> <p>diagnostic accuracy of CCTA performed with the latest generation of cardiac-CT scanners compared to invasive</p> <p>coronary angiography (ICA) in the assessment of bypass grafts, and non-grafted and post-anastomotic native</p> <p>coronary arteries.</p> <p>Methods and results: We prospectively enrolled 300 patients undergoing clinically indicated CCTA with a 16-cm</p> <p>z-axis coverage, 256-detector rows, and 0.28-sec gantry rotation time scanner. Coronary artery and graft interpretability,</p> <p>image quality and effective dose (ED) were assessed in all patients and diagnostic accuracy was</p> <p>evaluated in a subgroup of 100 patients who underwent ICA.</p> <p>Mean HR during the scan was 69.6 &plusmn; 10.8. Sinus rhythm was present in 118 patients with HR &lt; 75 bpm</p> <p>and in 112 patients with HR&ge;75 bpm, while 70 patients had atrial fibrillation. CABG interpretability was</p> <p>100%. Compared to ICA, CCTA was able to correctly detecting occlusions or significant stenoses of all CABG</p> <p>segments. Overall interpretability of native coronary segments was 95.6%. Sensitivity, specificity, positive</p> <p>predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of coronary arteries were 98.3%, 97.4%, 93.1%, 99.3%</p> <p>and 96.5%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy in a patient based analysis was 95.2%. Mean ED was</p> <p>3.14 &plusmn; 1.7 mSv.</p> <p>Conclusions: The novel whole-heart coverage CT scanner allows to evaluating CABG and native coronary arteries</p> <p>with excellent interpretability and low radiation exposure even in the presence of unfavorable heart rhythm.</p>

restrictedFeb 2020View details →
zenodo12/100

Data set from Varga A, Di Leo G, Banga PV, Csobay-Novák C, Kolossváry M, Maurovich-Horvat P, Hüttl K. Multidetector CT angiography of the Circle of Willis: association of its variants with carotid artery disease and brain ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):46-56. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5577-x. Epub 2018 Jun 19. PMID: 29922933; PMCID: PMC6291432.

<p>Data set from the article Data set from Varga A, Di Leo G, Banga PV, Csobay-Nov&aacute;k C, Kolossv&aacute;ry M, Maurovich-Horvat P, H&uuml;ttl K. Multidetector CT angiography of the Circle of Willis: association of its variants with carotid artery disease and brain ischemia. Eur Radiol. 2019 Jan;29(1):46-56. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5577-x. Epub 2018 Jun 19. PMID: 29922933; PMCID: PMC6291432.</p> <p>This is the abstract</p> <p><strong>Purpose: </strong> (1) to estimate the prevalence of Circle of Willis (CoW) variants in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, (2) to correlate these variants to controls and (3) cerebral ischemia depicted by computed tomography (CT).</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong> After Institutional Review Board approval, data of 544 carotid endarterectomy patients (331 males, mean age 69&plusmn;8 years) and 196 controls (117 males, mean age 66&plusmn;11 years) who underwent brain CT and carotid CT angiography (CTA) were retrospectively analysed. Two observers independently classified each CoW segment as normal, hypoplastic (diameter &lt;0.8 mm) or non-visualized. Four groups of CoW variants based on the number of hypoplastic/non-visualized segments were correlated with clinical data (ANOVA, &chi;<sup>2</sup> and multivariate logistic regression analysis). Intra- and inter-observer agreement was estimated using Cohen &kappa; statistics.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong> High prevalence of CoW variants (97%) and compromised CoW (81%) was observed in the study group and significant difference was found in the distribution of CoW variants compared to controls (p&lt;0.001), internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis being the only independent predictor of CoW morphology (p&lt;0.001). Significant correlation was found between CoW configuration and brain ischemia in the study group (p=0.002). ICA stenosis of &ge;90% was associated to higher rate of ipsilateral A1 hypoplasia/non-visualization (p&lt;0.001). Intra- and inter-observer agreement was from substantial to almost perfect (Cohen &kappa;=0.75-1.0).</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Highly variable CoW morphology was demonstrated in patients undergoing endarterectomy compared to controls. Likely compromised CoW in relation to cerebral ischemia was observed in a large cohort of carotid endarterectomy subjects.</p> <p><strong>Key points: </strong> &bull; CoW variant distribution significantly differed in the study and control groups (p&lt;0.001). &bull; ICA stenosis was the only independent predictor of CoW morphology (p&lt;0.001). &bull; Severely compromised CoW configuration showed significant association with brain ischemia (p=0.002).</p>

restrictedJun 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record