Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

285

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

285 results for “Computational analysis”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Trigonotarbus johnsoni Pocock, 1911, revealed by X-ray computed tomography, with a cladistic analysis of the extinct trigonotarbid arachnids

Figure 1. Reconstructions of representatives of nine trigonotarbid families, shown to scale. A, Palaeocharinus rhyniensis (Palaeocharinidae). B, Archaeomartus levis (Archaeomartidae). C, Anthracomartus hindi (Anthracomartidae). D, Anthracosiro woodwardi (Anthracosironidae). E, Trigonotarbus johnsoni (Trigonotarbidae). F, Lissomartus schucherti (Lissomartidae). G, Aphantomartus pustulatus (Aphantomartidae). H, Eophrynus prestvicii (Eophrynidae). I, Kreischeria wiedei (Kreischeriidae). Scale bar = 10 mm.

opennotspecifiedAug 2014View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 5 in Trigonotarbus johnsoni Pocock, 1911, revealed by X-ray computed tomography, with a cladistic analysis of the extinct trigonotarbid arachnids

Figure 5. The results of the cladistic analysis. The four trees show, as labelled, the agreement subtree and strict consensus of both the equally weighted analysis and implied weights analyses with concavity constants (k) of 0.25, 1, 3, and 10.

opennotspecifiedAug 2014View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 4 in Trigonotarbus johnsoni Pocock, 1911, revealed by X-ray computed tomography, with a cladistic analysis of the extinct trigonotarbid arachnids

Figure 4. An idealized reconstruction of Trigonotarbus johnsoni based on the computed tomography scan of NHMUK I. 15860 and additional hand specimens. Scale bar = 2 mm.

opennotspecifiedAug 2014View details →
zenodo32/100

Data for "Computational Desire Line Analysis of Cyclists on the Dybbølsbro Intersection in Copenhagen"

<p>Data for the paper&nbsp;&quot;Computational Desire Line Analysis of Cyclists on the Dybb&oslash;lsbro Intersection in Copenhagen&quot;</p> <p>**Paper (preprint)**: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01301](https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.01301) &nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2022View details →
zenodo32/100

Intermediary and supplemental data for publication "Heterogenous circulating miRNA changes in ME/CFS converge on a unified cluster of target genes and may be a result of modulation by latent herpesviruses: A computational analysis"

<p>Intermediary and supplemental data for publication &quot;Heterogenous circulating miRNA changes in ME/CFS converge on a unified cluster of target genes and may be a result of modulation by latent herpesviruses: A computational analysis&quot;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2023View details →
zenodo32/100

Diversity of Expertise is Key to Scientific Impact: a Large Scale Analysis in the Field of Computer Science

<p><strong>This repository is companion to a research paper with the following abstract:</strong></p> <p>Understanding the relationship between the composition of a research team and the potential impact of their research papers is crucial as it can steer the development of new science policies for improving the research enterprise. Numerous studies assess how the characteristics and diversity of research teams can influence their performance across several dimensions: ethnicity, internationality, size, and others. In this paper, we explore the impact of diversity in terms of the authors&rsquo; expertise and skills. To this purpose, we retrieved 114K papers in the field of Computer Science and analysed how the diversity of research fields within a research team relates to the number of citations their papers received in the upcoming 5 years. The results show that two different metrics reflecting the diversity of expertise are directly associated with the number of citations. This suggests that, at least in Computer Science, diversity of expertise is key to scientific impact.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2023View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Evaluation of Patients With Esophageal and Foregut Disorders With WATS (Wide Area Transepithelial Sample With 3-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Analysis) vs. 4-Quadrant Forceps Biopsy

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03859557. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Volumetric Three-dimensional Analysis of the Pediatric Upper Airway Shape Using Computed Tomography Imaging.

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02771171. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Clinical Evaluation and Cone Beam Computed Tomography Analysis of Different Biomaterials for Apexogenesis of Immature Permanent Molars

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07336498. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Analysis and Comparative Evaluation of Aortic Calcium by Computed Tomography and Histopathology in Patients With Aortic Stenosis

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04344353. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 16.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Indocyanine Green Fluorescent Imaging in Robotic Assisted Rectosigmoidal Resection; a Multicenter Assessment of Interobserver Variation and Comparison With Computer-based Pixel Analysis

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04766060. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

The Morphology of the Peri-Implantitis Defects: A Cone-Beam Computed Analysis

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03777449. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Analysis of Visual and Ocular Outcomes of Computer Vision Syndrome

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06106347. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Computational Mathematical Analysis in Vastus Medialis Between a MTrP and Non Painful Point

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06514638. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.

restrictedIPD-UNDECIDEDFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Retrospective Digital Computer Analysis of Keratoconus Evolution - REDCAKE

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03235856. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Computational Cardiac Imaging Analysis to Guide Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Procedures (AI-VT)

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06964152. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

controlledIPD-YESFeb 2026View details →
ClinicalTrials.gov32/100

Age Estimation From Pulp Cavity Analysis Using Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Images for Forensic Purposes

ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05130164. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.

closedIPD-NOFeb 2026View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Is computer-assisted instruction more effective than other educational methods in achieving ECG competence amongst medical students and residents? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2019View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: The appropriateness of language found in research consent form templates: a computational linguistic analysis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicDec 2017View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: Approximate Bayesian computation analysis of EST-associated microsatellites indicates that the broadleaved evergreen tree Castanopsis sieboldii survived the Last Glacial Maximum in multiple refugia in Japan

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2018View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.