Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 5. Acanthicolepis zibrowii n in On the distinction of Harmothoe globifera (G. O. Sars, 1873) and some other easily confused polynoids in the NE Atlantic, with the description of a new species of Acanthicolepis Norman in McIntosh, 1900 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae)

FIGURE 5. Acanthicolepis zibrowii n. sp. (SMF 17300, syntypes). (A) anterior end of large syntype, styles of left lateral and median antenna, and of tentacular cirri and right dorsal cirrus missing; (B) right anterior elytron from unknown segment, free in vial; (C) micro- and macrotubercles from same; (D) right elytragerous parapodium from segment 9 of large syntype, posterior view; (E) distal half of long notochaeta; (F) distal part of middle neurochaeta; (G) tip of same; (H) tip of upper neurochaeta; (I) tip of lower neurochaeta. (Scales: A = 2 mm; B = 1 mm; C = 250 µm; D = 500 µm; E, F = 100 µm; G–I = 50 µm).

FIGURE 3 in On the distinction of Harmothoe globifera (G. O. Sars, 1873) and some other easily confused polynoids in the NE Atlantic, with the description of a new species of Acanthicolepis Norman in McIntosh, 1900 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae)

FIGURE 3. Eunoe oerstedi (SMF 17527, small specimen). (A) anterior end; (B) left elytron from segment 4; (C) micro- and macrotubercles from same; (D) left elytragerous parapodium from segment 13, posterior view; (E) distal half of long notochaeta; (F) distal part of upper neurochaeta; (G) distal part of middle neurochaeta; (H) distal part of lower neurochaeta. (Scales: A = 2 mm; B = 1 mm; C, E–H = 250 µm; D = 500 µm).

FIGURE 2 in On the distinction of Harmothoe globifera (G. O. Sars, 1873) and some other easily confused polynoids in the NE Atlantic, with the description of a new species of Acanthicolepis Norman in McIntosh, 1900 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae)

FIGURE 2. Eunoe nodosa (ZMO C5244). (A) anterior end, styles of median antenna, left tentacular and right dorsal tentacular cirri, and dorsal cirri missing; (B) right anterior elytron from unknown segment, free in vial; (C) micro- and macrotubercles at posterior margin from same; (D) micro-and macrotubercles at outer lateral margin from same; (E) right elytragerous parapodium from segment 21, posterior view; (F) distal half of long notochaeta; (G) tip of same; (H) distal part of middle neurochaeta; (I) tip of same; (J) tip of upper neurochaeta; (K) tip of lower neurochaeta. (Scales: A, B = 2 mm; C, D, F, H = 250 µm; E = 500 µm; G, I–K = 100 µm).

FIGURE 4 in On the distinction of Harmothoe globifera (G. O. Sars, 1873) and some other easily confused polynoids in the NE Atlantic, with the description of a new species of Acanthicolepis Norman in McIntosh, 1900 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae)

FIGURE 4. Leucia nivea (VM 23936). (A) anterior end; styles of lateral antennae and tip of median antenna missing; (B) right elytron from unknown segment, free in vial; (C) micro- and macrotubercles from same; (D) left parapodium from unknown segment, posterior view; (E) distal half of long notochaeta; (F) tip of same; (G) distal part of middle neurochaeta; (H) tip of same; (I) tip of lowermost neurochaeta. (Scales: A, B = 2 mm; C, F, H, I = 100 µm; D = 1 mm; E, G = 250 µm).

FIGURE 1 in On the distinction of Harmothoe globifera (G. O. Sars, 1873) and some other easily confused polynoids in the NE Atlantic, with the description of a new species of Acanthicolepis Norman in McIntosh, 1900 (Polychaeta, Polynoidae)

FIGURE 1. Harmothoe globifera (SMF 18887). (A) anterior end; (B) right anterior elytron from unknown segment, free in vial; (C) micro- and macrotubercles from same; (D) left elytragerous parapodium from segment 5, posterior view; (E) distal half of long notochaeta; (F) distal part of middle, unidentate neurochaeta; (G) tip of same; (H) tip of upper bidentate neurochaeta with fragile secondary tooth; (I) tip of upper bidentate neurochaeta with abraded secondary tooth; (J) tip of lower unidentate neurochaeta. (Scales: A, B = 2 mm; C = 250 µm; D = 500 µm; E, F = 100 µm; G–J = 50 µm).

FIGURE 7 in On some taxonomically confused species of the genus Amphiesma Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 related to Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890) (Squamata, Natricidae)

FIGURE 7. Head portrait of Amphiesma kerinciense David & Das, 2003, ZRC 2.3521, holotype, adult female. Photo Patrick David.

FIGURE 6 in On some taxonomically confused species of the genus Amphiesma Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 related to Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890) (Squamata, Natricidae)

FIGURE 6. Living specimen of Amphiesma inas (Laidlaw, 1901), San Yen, Khao Nan National Park, Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand. Photo Michael Cota.

FIGURE 5 in On some taxonomically confused species of the genus Amphiesma Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 related to Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890) (Squamata, Natricidae)

FIGURE 5. Comparison of the pattern in life of four species of the Amphiesma khasiense group. Top left. Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890), Umphang, Tak Province, Thailand. Photo Sjon Hauser. Top right. Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890), Nokrek Biosphere Reserve, State of Meghalaya, India. Photo Ashok Kumar Mallik. Centre left. Amphiesma boulengeri (Gressitt, 1937), Hainan Island, China. Photo Kevin Messenger. Centre right. Amphiesma boulengeri (Gressitt, 1937), Phnom Aural Province, Cambodia. Photo Lee Grismer. Bottom. Amphiesma boulengeri (Gressitt, 1937), Kon Tum Province, Vietnam. Note the dorsal spots and separate blotches on supralabials, closer to the pattern of Amphiesma khasiense rather than to a typical A. boulengeri. Photo Truong Quang Nguyen.

FIGURE 4 in On some taxonomically confused species of the genus Amphiesma Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 related to Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890) (Squamata, Natricidae)

FIGURE 4. Comparison of the pattern of the upper labials of three species of the Amphiesma khasiense group. A. A. boulengeri, BMNH 1969.1710, Kampot Province, Cambodia. B. A. boulengeri, FMNH 180153, Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand. C. A. modestum, BMNH 1925.9.17.2, Kachin Hills, Myanmar. D. A. khasiense, BMNH 1946.1.12.82, syntype, State of Meghalaya, India. E. A. khasiense, BMNH 1946.1.13.63, holotype of Natrix gilhodesi, Kachin State, Myanmar. F. A. khasiense, BMNH 1925.4.2.13, Kachin State, Myanmar. Photos Gernot Vogel.

FIGURE 3 in On some taxonomically confused species of the genus Amphiesma Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 related to Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890) (Squamata, Natricidae)

FIGURE 3. One of the syntypes of Tropidonotus khasiensis, BMNH 1946.1.12.81, Khasi Hills, India. Photos Gernot Vogel.

FIGURE 1 in On some taxonomically confused species of the genus Amphiesma Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 related to Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890) (Squamata, Natricidae)

FIGURE 1. Object scores of first principal component along the geographic coordinates: circles: A. khasiense, males; triangles pointed upwards: A. khasiense, females; triangles pointed downwards: "A. cf. khasiense" of the Indochinese Peninsula, males; triangles pointed to the right: "A. cf. khasiense" of the Indochinese Peninsula, females; triangles pointed to the left: A. boulengeri, males; pentagons: A. boulengeri, females; squares: A. inas, males; diamonds: A. inas, females.

FIGURE 2 in On some taxonomically confused species of the genus Amphiesma Duméril, Bibron & Duméril, 1854 related to Amphiesma khasiense (Boulenger, 1890) (Squamata, Natricidae)

FIGURE 2. Object scores of first principal component along the geographic coordinates: circles: A. boulengeri, Cambodia, males; triangles pointed upwards: A. boulengeri, Cambodia, females; triangles pointed downwards: A. boulengeri, males; triangles pointed to the right: A. boulengeri, females.

FIGURE 7. Plectorhinchus unicolor. A in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 7. Plectorhinchus unicolor. A. Subadult, KPM-NI 28726, 247 mm SL, Okinawa-jima Isl., Ryukyu Isls., Japan, fresh condition. (Photo: H. Senou); B. Juvenile, CSIRO H.7681-02, 191 mm SL, Banyuwangi, East Java, Indonesia, fresh condition. (Photo: W. White); C. Juvenile, QM I.29477, 142 mm SL, Cowan Cowan, Moreton Bay, Queensland, preserved. (Photo: J.W. Johnson).

FIGURE 6. Plectorhinchus unicolor. A. Holotype, AMS I.13415, 342 in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 6. Plectorhinchus unicolor. A. Holotype, AMS I.13415, 342 mm SL, China Strait, Papua New Guinea, preserved. (Photo: P. Waddington); B. Adult, ca 40 cm TL, Southport Seaway, Queensland, underwater. (Photo: I. Banks).

FIGURE 3 in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 3. Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus sp. nov. A. Subadult, paratype, BPBM 17384, 245 mm SL, Kendrew Island, Western Australia, fresh condition. (Photo: J.E. Randall); B. Subadult, ca 30 cm TL, Cape Leveque, Western Australia, underwater. (Photo: G. Edgar); C. Juvenile, ca 25 cm TL, West Lewis Island, Dampier Archipelago, Western Australia, underwater. (Photo: G. Edgar)

FIGURE 11. Plectorhinchus schotaf, juvenile colouration. A in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 11. Plectorhinchus schotaf, juvenile colouration. A. Juvenile, ca 15 cm TL, Persian Gulf, underwater. (Photo: R. Field); B. Juvenile, BPBM 30410, 45 mm SL, Saudi Arabia, Persian Gulf, fresh condition. (Photo: J.E. Randall)

FIGURE 10 in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 10. Plectorhinchus schotaf, adult and subadult colouration. A. Adult, ca 40 cm TL, Gulf of Oman, underwater. (Photo: R. Field); B. Adult, ca 40 cm TL, Gulf of Oman, underwater. (Photo: R. Field); C. Subadult, BPBM 20766, 243 mm SL, Port Sudan, Red Sea, fresh condition. (Photo: J.E. Randall)

FIGURE 5 in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 5. Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus sp. nov., two individuals with jaws locked, engaging in aggressive behavior, off Weipa, Queensland. (Photo: B. Bright).

FIGURE 2 in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 2. Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus sp. nov., holotype, QM I.39242, 536 mm SL, Boyd Bay, Weipa, Queensland. A. Preserved. (Photo: P. Waddington); B. In life, immediately upon capture. (Photo: B. Bright).

FIGURE 9 in Plectorhinchus caeruleonothus, a new species of sweetlips (Perciformes: Haemulidae) from northern Australia and the resurrection of P. unicolor (Macleay, 1883), species previously confused with P. schotaf (Forsskål, 1775)

FIGURE 9. Plectorhinchus unicolor, colour variation post mortem within an individual, QM I.39292, 352 mm SL, Gloucester Island, Queensland. A. Fresh, upon death. (Photo: J.W. Johnson); B. Fresh, after freezing. (Photo: J.W. Johnson).