Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
4,276
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
4,276 results for “Estimation”
Estimating the carbon footprint of citizen science biodiversity monitoring
<p>Datasets used in the production of the paper Gillings, S. & Harris, S.J. 2022. Estimating the carbon footprint of citizen science biodiversity monitoring. People & Nature.</p> <p>The dataset comprises a) the estimated round-trip distances from approximate locations of observers to survey locations for the UK Breeding Bird Survey and b) questionnaire responses concerning mode of travel used to access survey locations. Data have been anonymised and locations have been coarsened to preserve anonymity.</p> <p>We would also greatly appreciate if you could fill out <a href="https://forms.gle/DCc58VXpdmqnTmTk8" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this very short form</a> to tell us how you intend to use these data. Thanks in advance!</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
Estimating historical air-sea CO2 fluxes: Incorporating physical knowledge within a data-only approach
<p>Reconstructed surface ocean pCO2 and air-sea CO2 fluxes for 1990-2019 using the pCO2-Residual Approach (JAMES 2021MS002960, in review)</p> <p>Surface ocean pCO2 (spo2) and resulting estimates of the air-sea CO2 flux (fCO2) are included in the netcdf file at monthly temporal resolution and for 1x1 grid cell spatial resolution. SeaFlux (https://zenodo.org/record/5482547#.YlT72y-B0_U) variables are used to calculate the fluxes from surface ocean pCO2.</p>
Data for Li et al., Coupling remote sensing and particle tracking to estimate trajectories in large water bodies, International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2022
<p>This data set contains four parts:</p> <p>1) compressed folder with input parameters and results for the hydrodynamic model</p> <p>2) compressed folder with input parameters and results for the particle tracking</p> <p>3) compressed folder with satellite data </p> <p>4) code used in the article for hydrodynamic model, particle tracking and image processing</p> <p>Each folder contains a readme file,</p>
Data Sets for SNR Estimation in Flexible Optical Networks: Lightpath, Link, and Span Levels
<p>These data sets have been generated based on the analytic models [1,2] to estimate signal to the noise ratio (SNR) for spans, links, and lightpaths of a Flexible Optical Network (FON) over standard single-mode fiber (SSMF). For PM-BPSK and PM-QPSK modulation format levels, equation 41-43 [1], and for PM-8-64QAM modulation format levels, equation 7.32 [2], are applied.</p> <p>[1] P. Poggiolini, G. Bosco, A. Carena, V. Curri, Y. Jiang and F. Forghieri, "The GN-Model of Fiber Non-Linear Propagation and its Applications," in <em>Journal of Lightwave Technology</em>, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 694-721, Feb.15, 2014, DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2013.2295208.</p> <p>[2] P. Poggiolini, Y. Jiang, A. Carena and F. Forghieri, "Analytical modeling of the impact of fiber non-linear propagation on coherent systems and networks" in Enabling Technologies for High Spectral-Efficiency Coherent Optical Communication Networks, New York, NY, USA:Wiley, pp. 247-310, 2016.</p>
GWTC-2.1: Deep Extended Catalog of Compact Binary Coalescences Observed by LIGO and Virgo During the First Half of the Third Observing Run - Parameter Estimation Data Release
<p>This material is part of several data products associated with GWTC-2.1, an update to the second Gravitational-Wave Transient Catalog from the <a href="https://www.ligo.org/">LIGO</a> Scientific Collaboration, the <a href="https://www.virgo-gw.eu/">Virgo</a> Collaboration, and the <a href="https://gwcenter.icrr.u-tokyo.ac.jp/en/">KAGRA</a> Collaboration. For more information, see the paper (<a href="https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2100063/public">https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2100063/public</a>), the related material linked from this page, and the GWTC-2.1 data release documentation (<a href="https://www.gw-openscience.org/GWTC-2.1/">https://www.gw-openscience.org/GWTC-2.1/</a>).</p> <p><strong>Parameter estimation data release</strong></p> <p>This data release contains posterior samples (*.h5) for gravitational-wave candidates through the first part of the third observing run (O3a). We provide results for the 44 candidates that have a probability of astrophysical origin of over 0.5 from O3 as well as the 10 previously-reported binary-black-hole candidates from GWTC-1 (this excludes GW170817). There are two .h5 files per event</p> <ul> <li> <p>Cosmologically reweighted (*cosmo.h5)</p> </li> <li> <p>Not cosmologically reweighted (*nocosmo.h5)</p> </li> </ul> <p>The cosmologically reweighted posteriors are reweighted to have a luminosity-distance prior that has a uniform merger rate in the source's comoving frame. Each .h5 file contains samples for multiple runs with keys C01:RUN_NAME, where RUN_NAME is the waveform used for the run (and additional prior-choice information if necessary) or Mixed, indicating an equal mixture of samples from runs with similar physics if they exist. In cases where only one waveform was used, the Mixed dataset is simply a resampling of those results . GW190425 does not have Mixed samples. See the <a href="https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P2100063/public">paper</a> appendices for further information. In addition to containing the posterior samples, the .h5 files also contain metadata about the analyses including the configuration files (which specify details such as the detector data analyzed), noise power spectral densities (potentially for a superset of the detectors used in the analysis) and calibration uncertainty envelopes.</p> <p>The python notebook explains how to use the posterior samples. This data release also contains .FITS skymap files, which can be read with <a href="https://lscsoft.docs.ligo.org/ligo.skymap/#">ligo.skymap</a>, and skymap statistics in *.txt files.</p> <p>The inference of the source parameters were performed with <a href="https://lscsoft.docs.ligo.org/bilby/">Bilby</a>, <a href="https://lscsoft.docs.ligo.org/parallel_bilby/">Parallel Bilby</a> and <a href="https://git.ligo.org/richard-oshaughnessy/research-projects-RIT/tree/temp-RIT-Tides">RIFT</a>. The results are formatted using <a href="https://lscsoft.docs.ligo.org/pesummary/">PESummary</a>.</p> <p><a href="https://zenodo.org/record/5546663#.YnAAcvPMKqC">A similar release has been made to accompany GWTC-3</a> for results from the second part of the third observing run.</p> <p><strong>How to download all files from this page</strong></p> <p>If you would like to download all files on this page, we recommend <a href="https://gitlab.com/dvolgyes/zenodo_get">zenodo_get</a>:</p> <pre><code class="language-bash">pip install zenodo_get zenodo-get RECORD_ID_OR_DOI </code></pre> <p>where the record ID for the most recent version of this page is 5117702 and IDs for other versions can be found in the Versions section at the side of this page.</p> <p>For more general background on gravitational-wave parameter estimation, try the materials from a <a href="https://www.gw-openscience.org/workshops/">GW Open Data Workshop</a> or the <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6382/ab685e">guide to LIGO–Virgo data analysis</a>.</p>
Supporting data for "Estimating animal density for a community of species using information obtained only from camera-traps"
<p>Data underlying a paper published in Methods in Ecology and Evolution (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13930">https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13930</a>).</p> <p>These data are suitable for estimating animal density using the Random Encounter Model and include: i) detection counts for 35 species across 510 camera-trap locations; ii) movement speeds (estimated by tracking animal movements in camera-trap image sequences), iii) activity times (filtered so that records of the same species at the same location are > 60 minutes apart), and iv) measurements of the angular and radial distance from camera-traps for animals that were detected.</p>
Estimating the Global Distribution of Field Size using Crowdsourcing
<p>There is increasing evidence that smallholder farms contribute substantially to food production globally yet spatially explicit data on agricultural field sizes are currently lacking. Automated field size delineation using remote sensing or the estimation of average farm size at subnational level using census data are two approaches that have been used but both have limitations, e.g. limited geographical coverage by remote sensing or coarse spatial resolution when using census data. This paper demonstrates another approach to quantifying and mapping field size globally using crowdsourcing. A campaign was run in June 2017 where participants were asked to visually interpret very high resolution satellite imagery from Google Maps and Bing using the Geo-Wiki application. During the campaign, participants collected field size data for 130K unique locations around the globe. Using this sample, we have produced an improved global field size map (over the previous version) and estimated the percentage of different field sizes, ranging from very small to very large, in agricultural areas at global, continental and national levels. The results show that smallholder farms occupy no more than 40% of agricultural areas, which means that, potentially, there are much more smallholder farms in comparison with the current global estimate of 12%. The global field size map and the crowdsourced data set are openly available and can be used for integrated assessment modelling, comparative studies of agricultural dynamics across different contexts and contribute to SDG 2, among many others.</p> <p> </p> <p>The dataset (global field sizes.zip) contains:<br> - map of dominant field sizes (dominant_field_size_categories.tif) and description of legend items (legend_items.txt)<br> - table with all submissions by the participant (those who completed more than 10 classifications) and table description<br> - table with quality score of all the participants and table description<br> - table with estimated dominant field sizes at each location and table description</p>
Remote sensing of river discharge (RSQ) estimates derived from multi-temporal Landsat width observations and BAM/geoBAM discharge inversion algorithms
<p><strong>This repository provides three data files in CSV format:</strong><br> 1. Gauge name, lat/lon information<br> 2. Gauge name, date, and multi-temporal river width extracted from Landsat<br> 3. Gauge name, date, and BAM/geoBAM estimates of river discharge with monthly Q priors</p> <p>Note: the multi-temporal river width data were extracted from Landsat imageries using RivWidthCloud, where the river centerline/orthogonal line definition and the cross-section sampling strategies were made prior to, and different from Feng et al. (2022). So the width values may be different from Feng et al. (2022) at some locations due to these differences. The discharge estimates were derived from BAM/geoBAM algorithms with width-only observations. More details of the technical workflow and the inner workings of BAM/geoBAM were provided in the literature below and papers therein.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Reference:</strong></p> <p>Lin, P., D. Feng, C.J. Gleason, M. Pan, C.B. Brinkerhoff, X. Yang, H.E. Beck, R. Frasson (2023). Inversion of river discharge from remotely sensed river widths: a critical assessment at three-thousand global river gauges. <em>RSE</em>.</p> <p> </p> <p>Updated: 2022/6/17, 2023/1/19</p> <p> </p>
Minimal dataset for "Insights to HIV-1 coreceptor usage by estimating HLA adaptation with Bayesian generalized linear mixed models"
<p>This repository contains a minimal data set to reproduce all results that don't compromise the privacy concerns for the manuscript "Insights to HIV-1 coreceptor usage by estimating HLA adaptation with Bayesian generalized linear mixed models".<br> <br> The repository contains the following data:</p> <ul> <li>adaptscore_acute.csv <ul> <li>A csv file that contains the estimated adaptation scores for the acute data set with HLA I model.</li> </ul> </li> <li>adaptscore_leftout.csv <ul> <li>A csv file that contains the estimated adaptation scores for the leftout data set with the joint HLA I and HLA II model</li> </ul> </li> <li>adaptscore_training.csv <ul> <li>A csv file that contains the estimated adaptation scores for the traininig data set with the joint HLA I and HLA II model</li> </ul> </li> <li>adaptscore_training_hla1_without_clin.csv <ul> <li>A csv file that contains the estimated adaptation scores for the training data set with the HLA I model (via cross-validation)</li> </ul> </li> <li>adaptscore_training_seed2.csv <ul> <li>A csv file that contains the estimated adaptation scores for the training data set with the joint HLA I and HLA II model via cross-validation with another seed</li> </ul> </li> </ul>
Estimated height of the OpenStreetMap buildings of 24 French communes using the GeoClimate Software (version 0.0.1)
<p>This repository contains:</p> <ul> <li>a folder called "_toReproduceResults" containing data, script and methodology to reproduce most of the work described in the research manuscript,</li> <li>the main output of the research work: 24 folders (each of them corresponding to a French city), containing building geometry footprints and their corresponding building height as well as averaged building height value aggregated at rectangular grid cell (100 m by 100 m). The footprint geometries comes from the OpenStreetMap project and the building height has been estimated using a RandomForest algorithm using as independent variables indicators describing the building size and shape and the building environment. The data has been produced using the GeoClimate Software (version 0.0.1).</li> </ul> <p>A more detailed description of the content can be used in the file "Metadata.csv".</p>
Estimating global ammonia (NH3) emissions based on IASI observations from 2008 to 2018
<p>The dataset ia produced based on the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) observations in Luo et al.,(2022), by updating the prior ammonia (NH3) emission fluxes with the ratio between biases in simulated NH3 concentrations and effective NH3 lifetimes against the loss of the NHx family (NHx ≡ NH3 + NH4+). We then include sulfur dioxide (SO2) column to correct the NH3 emission trends over India and China, where SO2 emissions have changed rapidly in recent years. Finally, we quantify the uncertainty of NH3 emission by a series of perturbation and sensitivity experiments. The GEOS-Chem simulation driven by top-down estimates has lower bias with the IASI observations than prior emissions, demonstrating the consistency of our estimates with observations.</p>
Processing and Data for "Estimating ocean net primary productivity from daily cycles of carbon biomass measured by profiling floats"
<p><strong>Description: </strong></p> <p>These files contain processed BGC-Argo float data, figure data, the radiocarbon productivity subset, bootstrapping results, and the associated Python/Matlab code to calculate net primary productivity from daily cycles of optical backscatter and dissolved oxygen.</p> <p>The raw float data used in this study are available from the Argo Global Data Assembly Centers in Brest, France (ftp://ftp.ifremer.fr/ifremer/argo/dac/coriolis) and Monterey, California (ftp://usgodae.org/pub/outgoing/argo/dac/coriolis). The raw MODIS satellite-based productivity data is available from the Oregon State University Ocean Productivity site (<a href="http://orca.science.oregonstate.edu/npp_products.php">http://orca.science.oregonstate.edu/npp_products.php</a>). The raw MODIS satellite-based euphotic depth estimates are available from the NASA L3 browser (<a href="https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/l3/">https://oceancolor.gsfc.nasa.gov/l3/</a>). The original ship-based estimates of net primary productivity are available from the Pangaea (<a href="https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932417">https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.932417</a>) and the British Oceanography Data Centre (<a href="https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/814803">https://www.bco-dmo.org/dataset/814803</a>).</p> <p><strong>Please cite as: </strong></p> <p>Stoer, A., and Fennel, K. 2022. Processing and Data for Estimating ocean net primary productivity from daily cycles of carbon biomass measured by profiling floats. Zenodo. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6977161.</p> <p><strong>Python/MATLAB Software Description: </strong></p> <p>dielFit_GOPeqCR.m: This code is from Johnson and Bif (2021). We have added outputs for standard errors for linear and PvE models and sunrise/sunset times. To run this code with the associated Python software a MATLAB engine needs to be installed. Please see: <a href="https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab-engine-for-python.html">https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab-engine-for-python.html</a></p> <p>argo_so_processing_20220815.py: This code is the first of two pieces of software for estimating net primary productivity from floats in the Southern Ocean. The program below obtains the data from the BGC Argo database (Argo, 2021) and processes it. Simple data quality control, interpolation, biogeochemical calculations, and data binning occur. The processed float data is located in the folder 'Processed Argo Transects'.</p> <p>argo_daily_npp_20220815.py: This code using processed Argo float data that contains oxygen and particle backscatter measurements to infer net primary production. The code combines the float that meet the criteria of sampling at all local hours of the day throughout its lifetime. Then, it constructs diel cycles from this data by finding the median value of each hour and uses the code from Johnson and Bif (2021), which is a modified version from Barone et al. (2019). The algorithm used to convert particle backscatter to particulate organic carbon is from Graff et al. (2015). We assume that dissolved primary productivity accounts for 30% of total primary productivity (Moran et al., 2022).</p> <p>argo_daily_npp_bootstrap_20220815.py: This code using processed Argo float data that contains co-located oxygen and particle backscatter measurements to infer net primary production. This code is very similar to argo_daily_npp_20220815.py but randomly samples a subset of the co-located profiles at different sample sizes before calculating net primary productivity. Productivity is calculated at each sample size 1000 times. The results of this analysis is located in the folder 'Bootstrapped Results'. </p> <p>More details can be found in the code itself. </p> <p><strong>Data Descriptions: </strong></p> Data from 'Processed Argo Transects' Folder | Description for each variable <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>Average depth of depth bin</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>mid_depth</td> <td>Center of depth bin</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>pressure</td> <td>Average pressure in depth bin</td> <td>dbar</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_index</td> <td>Profile number or index</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_longitude</td> <td>Average longitude of profile</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_latitude</td> <td>Average latitude of profile</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_time</td> <td>Average UTC time of profile</td> <td>yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_local_time</td> <td>Average local time of profile</td> <td>yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_local_hour</td> <td>The hour of the local timestamp</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>salinity</td> <td>Seawater salinity</td> <td>PSU</td> </tr> <tr> <td>temperature </td> <td>Seawater temperature</td> <td>degC</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen</td> <td>Dissolved oxygen concentration</td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_saturation</td> <td>Saturated dissolved oxygen concentration calculated from the Garcia and Gordon (1992) equation.</td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_anom</td> <td>The difference between observed dissolved oxygen concentration and saturated oxygen </td> <td>umol kg-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>bbp470</td> <td>Optical backscatter coefficient at 470 nm. Particulate organic carbon is calculated in argo_daily_npp_20220815.py</td> <td>m-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>wmo</td> <td>WMO number of float</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_index</td> <td>Profile index or profile number taken by float</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_latitude</td> <td>Average profile latitude</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>profile_longitude</td> <td>Average profile longitude</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>fod</td> <td>Fraction of day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy</td> <td>Sinusoidal curve fit to oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc</td> <td>Sinusoidal curve fit to particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_med</td> <td>Hourly median oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_sem</td> <td>Hourly standard error of oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc_med</td> <td>Hourly median particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>poc_sem</td> <td>Hourly standard error of particulate organic carbon</td> <td>mol m-3</td> </tr> <tr> <td>region</td> <td>Name of data subset (e.g., 30-40 deg N, co-located)</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>region</td> <td>Name of data subset (e.g., 30-40 deg N) </td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>Depth of profile</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>zeu</td> <td>1% euphotic depth from Lee et al. (2013) algorithm from NASA (2022) L3 satellite products. </td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_profiles_bpp</td> <td>Number of backscatter profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_profiles_oxy</td> <td>Number of oxygen profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_floats_bbp</td> <td>Number of floats with backscatter measurements</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>n_floats_oxy</td> <td>Number of floats with oxygen measurements</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do</td> <td>Gross oxygen productivity estimated from dissolved oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross oxygen productivity estimated from dissolved oxygen</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_p</td> <td>p-value of curve fit to hourly oxygen data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>r-squared value of curve to hourly oxygen data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_sr</td> <td>The calculated sunrise time as a fraction of the day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxy_ss</td> <td>The calculated sunset time as a fraction of the day</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp</td> <td>Gross carbon productivity estimated from optical backscatter</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross carbon productivity estimated from optical backscatter</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_p</td> <td>p-value of curve fit to hourly particulate organic carbon data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>r-squared value of curve to hourly particulate organic carbon data</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_bbp</td> <td>Gross oxygen productivity calculated from gross carbon productivity (gpp_bbp)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of gross oxygen productivity calculated from gross carbon productivity (gpp_bbp_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_bbp</td> <td>Net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_bbp)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_bbp_serr</td> <td>Standard error of net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_bbp_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_do</td> <td>Net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_do)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_do_serr</td> <td>Standard error of net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity (gop_do_serr)</td> <td>mol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table> Data for Fig. S1 | Description for number_of_bbp_profiles_in_each_year.csv and number_of_oxy_profiles_in_each_year.csv <table><tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>year</td> <td>Year</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>bbp470</td> <td>Number of backscatter profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>oxygen_anom</td> <td>Number of oxygen profiles</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>mid_depth</td> <td>Depth of NPP profile</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>mean</td> <td>Mean volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>median</td> <td>Median volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>min</td> <td>Minimum volumetric 14C-NPP at depth</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>maximum</td> <td>Maximum volumetric 14C-NPP</td> <td>mmol m-3 yr-1</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th><strong>Variable</strong></th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>subset</td> <td>Number of profiles randomly sampled from the co-located dataset</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>int_npp_do</td> <td>Euphotic-depth-integrated net primary productivity calculated from oxygen-based gross oxygen productivity</td> <td>mol m-2 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>int_npp_bbp</td> <td>Euphotic-depth-integrated net primary productivity calculated from backscatter-based gross oxygen productivity</td> <td>mol m-2 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>gop_do_r2</td> <td>R-squared of the sinusoidal curve to the diel cycle of oxygen anomaly</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>gpp_bbp_r2</td> <td>R-squared of sinusoidal curve to the diel cycle of particulate organic carbon</td> <td> </td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>ROSE</td> <td>Topographic (negative values are below sea level)</td> <td>m</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ETOPO05_Y</td> <td>Latitude</td> <td>degN</td> </tr> <tr> <td>ETOPO05_X</td> <td>Longitude</td> <td>degE</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <table> <tbody><tr> <th>Variable</th> <th>Description</th> <th>Units</th> </tr> </tbody><tbody> <tr> <td>database</td> <td>Database the data was extracted from</td> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td>Month</td> <td>Month of NPP measurement</td> <td>month of year</td> </tr> <tr> <td>npp_14c</td> <td>Net primary productivity estimated from the radiocarbon method</td> <td>mmol m-3 y-1</td> </tr> <tr> <td>depth</td> <td>depth of 14C-NPP measurement</td> <td>m</td> </tr> </tbody> </table> <table> </table>
Training Deep Learning Models to Estimate Permeability using Geophysical Datasets
<p>This folder contains the dataset for training deep learning models to estimate permeability using hydro-geophysics simulations</p>
Nutritional table to estimate the availability of nutrients in households from the Mexican National Survey of Household Income and Expenditures (ENIGH) 2008-2020
<p>The database contains the amount of six nutrients (calories, proteins, vitamin A and C, iron, and zinc) per 100 grams/mililiters for each of the food categories used in the Mexican National Survey of Household Income and Expenditures 2008-2020.</p>
A Systematic Review on Techniques and Approaches to Estimate Mobile Software Energy Consumption (SUSCOM Dataset)
<p>Dataset and replication data for the systematic review entitled "A Systematic Review on Techniques and Approaches \\to Estimate Mobile Software Energy Consumption".</p>
End-condition for solution small angle X-ray scattering measurements by kernel density estimation
<p>The set of python scripts and some datasets for estimating the minimum X-ray exposure time for X-ray solution scattering experiments using statistical and mathematical approaches.</p> <p>We apply a statistical inequality to estimate the kernel density estimation (KDE) method’s error to determine the minimum X-ray exposure time.</p> <p>Please refer to the following article, </p> <p>End-condition for solution small angle X-ray scattering measurements by kernel density estimation<br> Science and Technology of Advanced Materials: Methods, Volume 2 Issue 1, pages 426-434 (2022)<br> DOI: 10.1080/27660400.2022.2140021<br> <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/27660400.2022.2140021">https://doi.org/10.1080/27660400.2022.2140021</a></p>
The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER with NICER Background Estimates
<p>Posterior sample files associated with the publication "The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER with NICER background estimates" by Salmi et al. (2022; <a href="https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac983d">ApJ 941 150</a>; <a href="https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.12840">arXiv:2209.12840 [astro-ph.HE]</a>).</p> <p>Also included are: the data products; the numeric model files including the telescope calibration products; model modules in the Python language using the X-PSI framework; and Jupyter analysis notebooks.</p> <p>Please refer to the README for detailed information.</p> <p> </p> <p> </p>
MC-hands-1M: A glove-wearing hand dataset for pose estimation
<p>We introduce MC-hands-1M, a synthetic glove-wearing hand dataset for pose estimation. In the zip folder, there exist two subfolders: one containing roughly 750K images (Big set) and another with 250K images (Small set) along with the 2D camera plane and 3D world ground truth data of the corresponding poses. Each set is organized in folders named as Rendered View X, representing a specific camera in the 3D space with a fixed rotation and location. In each of those folders, there exist a json file containing corresponding data for the camera (location, rotation, intrinsics' matrix and images' relative paths) along with the aforementioned ground truth per image (pose). For each of those views, there exist other subfolders named as Scene 's Collection 's Objects' States' Combination Y. Each of those folders contains images of the different poses from the set camera view, given a different combination of background, lighting, glove- and cloth-like materials, and hand's a priori scaling state.</p><p>!!!!! IMPORTANT NOTE !!!!!</p><p>After some testing, an error in the ground truth of the small set of images was found. Please use only the big set found in the zip. For further instructions and questions, please contact us at prod@iti.gr.</p>
Estimating surface water availability in high mountain rock slopes using a numerical energy balance model
<p>Model output, forcing data and physical parameters used to estimate water and energy balance. The model was calibrated with field measurements from a study site in the Mont-Blanc massif, at 3842 m a.s.l, at a slope of 55 deegrees and aspect azimut of 150 degrees (south-east). The different ModelOutput files are from simulations at different elevastions (from 4800 m to 2700 m at steps of 300 m). We used the CryoGrid community model (version 1.0) toolbox (Westermann et al., 2022) to simulate the 1D ground thermal regime and ice/water balance, and estimate the availability of surface water and its potential for infiltration in rock fractures. The S2M-SAFRAN dataset combines output from a numerical weather prediction model and <em>in situ</em> observations, and was originally developed for operational needs to estimate avalanche hazard in mountainous areas (Durand et al., 1993). The S2M-SAFRAN dataset that we used is available for various mountain areas, at elevation steps of 300 m, and with an hourly resolution between the years 1958 to 2021 (Vernay et al., 2022). It includes most parameters that are required for modeling with CryoGrid: Relative humidity, air T, incoming long wavelength radiation, incoming short wavelength solar radiation, and wind speed. To complete the forcing data we used top of the atmosphere incident solar radiation from ERA5 global reanalysis dataset (Hersbach et al., 2020).</p>
Ancillary data for article "The general formulation for runoff components estimation and attribution at mean annual time scale"
<p>The mean annual (1960-1990) precipitation and estimated model parameters wetting potential (Wp), vaporization potential (Vp) and upper limit of <span>the portion remaining after precipitation (</span>Up) of 312 catchments over China.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.