Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
13,017
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
13,017 results for “Positionning”
Рис. 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, общий виΔ. 1–2 – самки: 1 – гоΛотип, 2 – паратип; 3–4 – самцы: 3 – из окрестностей оз. МаркакоΛь (Казахстан), 4 – из Рахмановского Λесничества (Казахстан). Figs 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, general view. 1–2 – females: 1 – holotype, 2 – paratype; 3–4 – males: 3 – from the Markakol Lake vicinities (Kazakhstan), 3 – from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry (Kazakhstan). in To the systematic position of Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides (Straneo, 1937) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the Altai Mountains
Рис. 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, общий виΔ. 1–2 – самки: 1 – гоΛотип, 2 – паратип; 3–4 – самцы: 3 – из окрестностей оз. МаркакоΛь (Казахстан), 4 – из Рахмановского Λесничества (Казахстан). Figs 1–4. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, general view. 1–2 – females: 1 – holotype, 2 – paratype; 3–4 – males: 3 – from the Markakol Lake vicinities (Kazakhstan), 3 – from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry (Kazakhstan).
Рис. 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, этикетки и генитаΛии самца. 5 – этикетки гоΛотипа; 6 – этикетки паратипа; 7 – энΔофаΛΛус, виΔ сΛева (экземпΛяр из Рахмановского Λесничества, Казахстан); 8–9 – меΔиаΛьная ΔоΛя эΔеагуса (экземпΛяр с Курчумского хребта, Казахстан): 8 – виΔ сΛева, 9 – виΔ сверху; 10 – правая парамера, виΔ сбоку (этот же экземпΛяр). Figs 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, labels and male genitalia. 5 – labels of the holotype; 6 – labels of the paratype; 7 – endophallus, left view (specimen from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry, Kazakhstan); 8–9 – median lobe of aedeagus (specimen from the Kurchum Mountain Range, Kazakhstan): 8 – left view, 9 – dorsal view; 10 – right paramere, lateral view (the same specimen). in To the systematic position of Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides (Straneo, 1937) (Coleoptera: Carabidae) from the Altai Mountains
Рис. 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, этикетки и генитаΛии самца. 5 – этикетки гоΛотипа; 6 – этикетки паратипа; 7 – энΔофаΛΛус, виΔ сΛева (экземпΛяр из Рахмановского Λесничества, Казахстан); 8–9 – меΔиаΛьная ΔоΛя эΔеагуса (экземпΛяр с Курчумского хребта, Казахстан): 8 – виΔ сΛева, 9 – виΔ сверху; 10 – правая парамера, виΔ сбоку (этот же экземпΛяр). Figs 5–10. Pterostichus (Petrophilus) magoides, labels and male genitalia. 5 – labels of the holotype; 6 – labels of the paratype; 7 – endophallus, left view (specimen from the Rakhmanovskoe Forestry, Kazakhstan); 8–9 – median lobe of aedeagus (specimen from the Kurchum Mountain Range, Kazakhstan): 8 – left view, 9 – dorsal view; 10 – right paramere, lateral view (the same specimen).
Data for: Specialist carabids in mixed montane forests are positively associated with biodiversity-oriented forestry and abundance of roe deer
<p>The ongoing transition within forest management towards more biodiversity-oriented practices, such as close-to-nature forestry and retention forestry, may benefit forest fauna such as forest-specialized ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). However, it remains unclear how forest carabids are jointly affected by these practices in Central European montane forests, which host particularly sensitive, range-restricted carabid species, and where biodiversity-oriented forestry is widely applied. Moreover, roe deer (<em>Capreolus capreolus</em>), the most common large herbivore in these forests, is intensively managed to reduce browsing pressure, but it is yet unknown how this may affect carabids, alongside the effect of silviculture. On 66 1-ha plots in the Black Forest region of Germany, we sampled carabids with pitfall traps, measured roe deer abundances using camera trapping, and measured several structural variables directly related to close-to-nature and retention practices, as well as variables describing microclimate and landscape-level forest cover. We found that the carabid assemblage was dominated by forest specialists, with little influence from fragmentation of the surrounding forest. Higher broadleaf share (and canopy cover for montane specialists) was correlated with higher carabid activity-density. Increasing stand maturity (and lying deadwood volume for montane specialists), was correlated with higher species richness. Plots with higher roe deer abundances showed higher carabid richness and activity-density. Assemblage composition changed along the altitudinal gradient, and both richness and activity-density increased with elevation. Thus, carabid communities, including montane specialists and several species of conservation interest, stand to benefit from close-to-nature and retention practices, if applied throughout the altitude range of montane forests. Forest carabids may additionally profit from maintaining higher roe deer abundances, but further research is needed to understand this causal link, as well as to weigh the costs and benefits of deer culling for forest biodiversity.</p>
Fig. 14 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 14. The bovid artiodactyl cf. Sinotragus from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). A. Left mandibular ramus (MYŞE PV2553) in labial (A 1) and lingual (A 2) views. B. Right mandibular body MYŞE PV-2567) in occlusal view. C. Left upper P2–P3 (MYŞE PV-1409) in occlusal view.
Fig. 10 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 10. The bovid artiodactyl Skoufotragus cf. Sk. schlosseri (Andree, 1926) from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). A. Palate (MYŞE PV-1309) in occlusal view. B. Left upper tooth row P2–M3 (MYŞE PV-1312) in buccal view. C. Right upper tooth row M1–M3 (MYŞE PV-1622) in occlusal view. D. Right mandibular ramus with p2–m3 (MYŞE PV-1510) in labial view. E. Left mandibular ramus with p2–m3 (MYŞE PV-1544) in occlusal view. F. Right mandibular ramus with p2–m3 (MYŞE PV-1510) in occlusal view.
Fig. 8 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 8. The bovid artiodactyl Skoufotragus cf. Sk. schlosseri (Andree, 1926) from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). Partial skull (MYŞE PV-547) in anterior (A), posterior (B), lateral (C), and ventral (D) views.
Fig. 13 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 13. The bovid artiodactyl Urmiatherium rugosifrons (Sickenberg, 1932) from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). A. Juvenile frontlet (MYŞE PV-2504) in anterior view. B. Frontlet (MYŞE PV-2503) in anterior view. C. Opisthocranium (MYŞE PV-1182) in ventral view. D. Axis + 3rd cervical vertebra (MYŞE PV-2599) in dorsal view.
Fig. 4 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 4. The bovid artiodactyl Palaeoryx pallasi (Wagner, 1848) from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). A. Left mandible (MYŞE PV1599) in occlusal view. B. Right mandible (MYŞE PV-2574) in lingual view. C. Right upper tooth row (MYŞE PV-2573) in occlusal view.
Fig. 9 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 9. The bovid artiodactyl Skoufotragus cf. Sk. schlosseri (Andree, 1926) from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). A. Frontlet (MYŞE PV-1571) in anterior view. B. Female frontlet (MYŞE PV-1576) in anterior (B1) and lateral (B2) views.
Fig. 6 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 6. The bovid artiodactyl Sporadotragus parvidens (Gaudry, 1861) from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). A. Frontlet (MYŞE PV2502) in anterior view. B. Right P2–M3 (MYŞE PV-1522) in occlusal view. C. Right mandibular ramus with p3–m3 (MYŞE PV-1311) in lingual view. D. Left mandibular ramus with p2–m3 (MYŞE PV-1406) in labial view.
Fig. 1 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 1. The fossil mammal site of Şerefköy-2 (Turkey). A. Geographical location. B. Local lithostratigraphy (modified from Kaya et al. 2012). C. Typical fossil accumulation at Şerefköy-2. D. View of the fossiliferous site.
Fig. 5 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 5. Scatter plot comparing the upper and lower premolar (P, p) / molar M, m) ratio against the complete tooth row length of Palaeoryx from several localities.
Fig. 2 in Late Miocene bovids from Şerefköy-2 (SW Turkey) and their position within the sub-Paratethyan biogeographic province
Fig. 2. The bovid artiodactyl Gazella cf. G. capricornis (Wagner, 1848) from Şerefköy-2 (Turkey), Late Turolian (Late Miocene). A. Left horn core (MYŞE PV-1578) in lateral view. B. Left horn core (MYŞE PV-560) in lateral view. C. Frontlet (MYŞE PV-2501) in frontal (C 1) and lateral (C 2) views. D. Left mandibular body (MYŞE PV-2557) in occlusal (D 1) and lingual (D 2) views. E. Right mandibular body (MYŞE PV-2564) in occlusal view. F. Right P2-M3 of the palate (MYŞE PV-2572) in occlusal view.
FIGURE 6 in Reassessment and systematic position of the sinistral snails of genus Hemiplecta from Thailand (Eupulmonata: Ariophantidae), with description of two new species
FIGURE 6 SEM images of radula. A-C. Hemiplecta retrorsa, CUMZ 5094 from Ranong Province, (A) central and inner lateral teeth, (B) outer lateral teeth, and (C) outer marginal teeth. D, E. Hemiplecta thailandica n. sp., holotype CUMZ 5095/1 from the type locality, (D) central and lateral teeth, and (E) lateral teeth and marginal teeth. F. Hemiplecta ligorica n. sp., paratype CUMZ 5087 from the type locality. Central tooth indicated by 'C'. Numbers indicate the tooth order from lateral to marginal end.
FIGURE 5 Genital characters. A, B. Hemiplecta retrorsa, CUMZ 5094 from Ranong Province. C, D. Hemiplecta thailandica n in Reassessment and systematic position of the sinistral snails of genus Hemiplecta from Thailand (Eupulmonata: Ariophantidae), with description of two new species
FIGURE 5 Genital characters. A, B. Hemiplecta retrorsa, CUMZ 5094 from Ranong Province. C, D. Hemiplecta thailandica n. sp., holotype CUMZ 5095/1 from the type locality. E, F. Hemiplecta ligorica n. sp., paratype CUMZ 5087 from the type locality. A, E, C. Male and female genital organs. B, D, F. internal wall sculpture of penis, vagina and dart apparatus chamber. Abbreviations: at, atrium; da, dart apparatus; dp, dart papilla; e, epiphallus; ec, epiphallic caecum; fl, flagellum; fo, free oviduct; go, gametolytic organ; p, penis; ps, penial sculpture; pr, penial retractor muscle; v, vagina; vd, vas deferens; vs, vaginal sculpture.
FIGURE 3 Shell characters. A, B in Reassessment and systematic position of the sinistral snails of genus Hemiplecta from Thailand (Eupulmonata: Ariophantidae), with description of two new species
FIGURE 3 Shell characters. A, B. Hemiplecta retrorsa, (A) syntype MCZ 169330 and (B) specimen CUMZ 5099 from Ranong Province. C, D. Hemiplecta salangana, (C) syntype ZMB/Moll 32578 and (D) specimen CUMZ 4967 from Phuket Province. E. Hemiplecta lahatensis, syntype MNHN-IM-2000–22834.
FIGURE 2 in Reassessment and systematic position of the sinistral snails of genus Hemiplecta from Thailand (Eupulmonata: Ariophantidae), with description of two new species
FIGURE 2 Bayesian inference tree based on 1576 bp concatenated alignment dataset of COI + 16S + 28S genes. Numbers on nodes indicate bootstrap values from maximum likelihood (ML) and bpp from Bayesian inference analysis (BI), and are shown as BI/ML. Images of living specimens are not to scale.
FIGURE 4 Shell characters. A. Hemiplecta lahatensis, specimen CUMZ 5259 in Reassessment and systematic position of the sinistral snails of genus Hemiplecta from Thailand (Eupulmonata: Ariophantidae), with description of two new species
FIGURE 4 Shell characters. A. Hemiplecta lahatensis, specimen CUMZ 5259/2. B, C, Hemiplecta thailandica n. sp., (B) holotype CUMZ 5095/1 and (C) specimen CUMZ 5098 from Chanthaburi Province. D, E. Hemiplecta ligorica n. sp., (D) holotype CUMZ 5093/1 and (E) paratype CUMZ 5087 from the type locality.
Images of dust and datasets obtained from them, cloister of Santa María del Paular, in positions 1, 3 and 6 (2021-2022)
<p>This dataset is related to the research article entitled "Assessment of dust deposition through image analysis in complex and remote exhibition sites – study in the cloister of the Santa María de El Paular Monastery in the Sierra de Guadarrama in Spain "</p> <p>These are photographs of slides located in 3 different points of the cloister, on which the dust was allowed to settle for 4 different periods of time.</p> <p>Folders *_x10 contain original microscope photos</p> <p>Folders *_x10_Split contain the result of dividing the original images (from Folders *_x10) into nine rectangles of equal size</p> <p>Folders *_x10_BW contain the result of of treating images (from Folders *_x10_Split) with an automatic threshold (triangle - ImageJ)</p> <p>Folders *_x10_DT contains csv files with dust particles detected in each image (from folders *_x10_BW)</p> <p>Also included are macros (for splitting and thresholding)</p>
Good vibrations: Remote-tactile foraging success of wading birds is positively affected by the water content of substrates they forage in
<p>Some taxa of wading birds can locate buried prey by detecting vibratory cues in their foraging substrates while probe-foraging, using a sensory modality called "remote-touch". As more saturated substrates transmit vibrations better, we predict that these birds can detect prey in wetter substrates more easily. We used sensory assays to test whether substrate water content affects the remote-touch foraging success rate of Hadeda Ibises, <em>Bostrychia hagedash</em>. The birds were more successful at locating prey using vibratory cues than when relying on random direct contact with the beak alone. Their remote-touch foraging success rate was positively affected by increasing water contents of the soil, but water content had no effect on their direct contact foraging success (indicating this is not an artefact of ease of probing). This may partially explain the link between the range expansion of this species in southern Africa and increased soil irrigation, as it is easier for the birds to detect prey in wetter substrates. Thus, it is likely that the distribution of other remote-touch foraging birds is affected by substrate water content, and as many of these species are endangered and rely on sensitive wetland habitats, it is vital to understand their sensory requirements for foraging.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.