Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,606

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

1,606 results for “Prairie”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
edi48/100

ASD04 Stream discharge measured at the flumes on watershed N20B at Konza Prairie

Stream discharge is measured on a catchment (N20B), with 20-year fire return interval and grazed by bison since 1992. Measurements are taken at 5 minute intervals at a triangular throated flume. The prairie streams are 3rd-order and are intermittent. Daily and stormflow discharge records are available.

openCC0Oct 2025View details →
edi48/100

CSM06 Seasonal summary of numbers of small mammals on miscellaneous traplines in prairie habitats that were trapped from 1 to 11 years at Konza Prairie

Data set contains seasonal summaries (spring, summer and autumn) of the number of individuals of each species of small mammal captured (relative abundance) on each prairie trapline. Each record contains year, season, trapline and number of individuals captured of each species. These live trap records are based on daily captures during 4-day trapping periods in spring (early March to early April), summer (late June to late July) and autumn (early October to mid-November) for each permanent trapline (two traplines per treatment). These treatments include annual burns, 2-year burns, 4-year burns and 10-year burns; none were grazed by bison. This data set includes 14 traplines sampled in autumn and spring and 30 traplines in summer.

openCC0Jan 2023View details →
edi48/100

CSM05 Seasonal summary of numbers of small mammals on the six LTER traplines in prairie habitats on which fire regime has been reversed at Konza Prairie

Data set contains seasonal summaries (spring and autumn) of the number of individuals of each species of small mammal captured (relative abundance) on each grassland trapline. Each record contains year, season, trapline and number of individuals captured of each species. These live trap records are based on daily captures during a single 4-day trapping period in spring (mid-March to early April) and autumn (late October to early December) for each of six permanent traplines established on two fire treatments (three traplines per treatment). These two fire treatments include one treatment that was changed from a 20-year burn to an annual burn and one that was changed from an annual burn to 20 years between fires. Bison do not graze these two habitat types.

openCC0Jan 2023View details →
edi48/100

CSM03 Seasonal summary of numbers of small mammals on the two LTER traplines in planted grassland (Brome fields) habitats at Konza Prairie

Data set contains seasonal summaries (spring, summer and autumn) of the number of individuals of each species of small mammal captured (relative abundance) on each woodland trapline. Each record contains year, season, trapline and number of individuals captured of each species. These live trap records are based on daily captures during a single 4-day trapping period in spring (early March to early April), summer (early July to late July) and autumn (mid-October to early December) for each of four permanent traplines established in two habitats (two traplines in gallery forest and two on limestone ledges). Bison did not graze any of the treatment units during the period of study.

openCC0Oct 2025View details →
edi48/100

CFP01 Fish population on selected watersheds at Konza Prairie

Fishes were collected by habitat (pool or riffle) at 6 sites in the Kings Creek watershed with a single-pass electrofishing survey with one person operating the electrofisher and two people dipnetting. Collections were made seasonally.

openCC0May 2023View details →
edi48/100

ASD05 Stream discharge measured at the flumes on watershed N01B at Konza Prairie

Stream discharge is measured on a catchment (N01B), with 1-year fire return interval and grazed by bison since 1992. Measurements are taken at 5 minute intervals at a triangular throated flume. The prairie streams are 3rd-order and are intermittent. Daily and stormflow discharge records are available.

openCC0Oct 2025View details →
edi48/100

VIR01 Effects of invertebate and vertebrate herbivory on tallgrass prairie plant community composition and biomass, Konza Prairie LTER

The effects of herbivores and their interactions with nutrient availability on primary production and plant community composition in grassland systems is expected to vary with herbivore type. Although nutrient additions are known to affect plant species diversity and primary productivity, the role of herbivores in mediating the strength of these effects also remains unclear. Herbivores may alter plant responses to nutrient additions in several ways. First, herbivores can alter the plant community response to nutrient additions by either selectively feeding on particular groups of species (e.g. grasses versus forbs) or by generally opening up space, allowing for species turnover and immigration. Second, feeding by herbivores may reduce the production response to nutrient additions if the plants cannot compensate for tissue lost to herbivory. As the functional effects of vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores on plant community composition and production may vary, the interactive effects of vertebrate versus invertebrate herbivores with nutrient additions may also vary. Here we are experimentally assessing the independent and interactive effects of removing vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores on aboveground biomass and plant community composition in native tallgrass prairie. Further, we are examining whether the removal of vertebrate and invertebrate herbivores interacts with nutrient availability. By doing this, we address three related questions: 1) what is the relative strength of the effects of invertebrate versus vertebrate herbivory in a grassland system; 2) how does herbivory (invertebrate and/or vertebrate) affect the relative abundances of grasses and forbs, the two dominant plant functional types within the ecosystem; and 3) what are the consequences of these changes in composition for aboveground net primary productivity, an important ecosystem function?

openCC0Jun 2023View details →
edi48/100

PAB05 Aboveground net primary productivity of tallgrass prairie based on accumulated plant biomass on the LTER fire reversal experiment watersheds

Data set contains estimates of end-of-season standing crop biomass (grams per square meter) of live graminoids, forbs, woody plants, and previous year's dead vegetation for 2 soil types (shallow and deep) on the four Fire Reversal Experiment watersheds. This experiment is based on reversing fire treatments on four watersheds, two of which had a history of annual spring burning and two of which had a history of long-term fire suppression. The dataset includes both pre- and post-fire treatments.

openCC0Jan 2023View details →
edi48/100

CSM08 Small mammal host-parasite sampling data for 16 linear trapping transects located in 8 LTER burn treatment watersheds at Konza Prairie

Data set contains summaries (summer) of the number of individuals of each species of small mammal captured (relative abundance) on each transect. Each record contains date, treatment, transect, trap station, species, specimen number, recapture status, specimen disposition, external body measurements (where applicable), reproductive information, and miscellaneous associated comments. These sampling records are based on nightly captures during one 4-night trapping period in summer (June through August) for each of 16 permanent transects established on eight fire treatments (two transects per treatment). These treatments include two seasonal burn watersheds (SpB, SuB), two reversal burn watersheds (R1A, R20A), one annual burn watershed (1D), two 4-year burn watersheds (4B, 4F, and one 20-year burn watershed (20B). None of these treatments implement bison grazing.

openCC0May 2023View details →
edi48/100

Gunnison's Prairie Dog Restoration Experiment (GPDREx): Vegetation Cover Data from the Sevilleta National Wildlife Refuge, New Mexico (2011-2016)

Prairie dogs (Cynomys spp.) are burrowing rodents considered to be ecosystem engineers and keystone species of the central grasslands of North America. Yet, prairie dog populations have declined by an estimated 98% throughout their historic range. This dramatic decline has resulted in the widespread loss of their important ecological role throughout this grassland system. The 92,060 ha Sevilleta NWR in central New Mexico includes more than 54,000 ha of native grassland. Gunnison's prairie dogs (C. gunnisoni) were reported to occupy ~15,000 ha of what is now the SNWR during the 1960's, prior to their systematic eradication. In 2010, we collaborated with local agencies and conservation organizations to restore the functional role of prairie dogs to the grassland system. Gunnison's prairie dogs were reintroduced to a site that was occupied by prairie dogs 40 years ago. This work is part of a larger, long-term study where we are studying the ecological effects of prairie dogs as they re-colonize the grassland ecosystem.

openCC0Aug 2021View details →
zenodo44/100

The geographic scale of population level variation in growth and nodulation differs for two species of the prairie clover

<p>Zenodo deposit for Pozzi et al (2024) AJB</p> <p>The geographic scale of population level variation in growth and nodulation differs for two species of the prairie clover</p> <p><strong>&nbsp;_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________</strong></p> <p><strong>The geographic scale of population level variation in growth and nodulation differs for two species of the prairie clover</strong></p> <p>Adrien C.M. Pozzi<sup>1,2</sup>, Ruth G. Shaw<sup>1</sup>, Georgiana May<sup>1,3</sup></p> <p><sup>1</sup> Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota Twin-Cities, St Paul, MN 55108. <sup>2</sup> Current affiliation: Universite Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Laboratoire d'Ecologie Microbienne, UMR CNRS 5557, UMR INRAE 1418, VetAgro Sup, 69622 Villeurbanne, France. ORCID: 0000-0001-6765-4293. <sup>3</sup> Correspondence: Georgiana May (gmay@umn.edu)</p> <p><em><strong>Keywords:</strong></em></p> <p>conservation; <em>Dalea</em> spp.; habitat fragmentation; mutualism; nitrogen-fixing symbiosis; population level variation; native prairie legume; restoration; rhizobia</p> <p><em><strong>Description:</strong></em></p> <p>This Zenodo deposit is part of the MN LCCMR Healthy Prairies project granted to R. Shaw and G. May, UMN Twin-Cities. It contains the following files:</p> <p><span><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>&ldquo;Metadata &amp; data&rdquo; spreadsheet. <em>Contains metadata and data about the Twin Valley experiment (including the position of plants, an intermediary census, growth and nodulation traits for harvested plants, data on bacterial isolates from root nodules, and source modifiers for GenBank accessions OQ732394-OQ732572).</em></p> <p><span><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>&ldquo;Blast alignments output.txt&rdquo; text file. <em>Contains ouput of Blastn alignements for the 16S rRNA genes of bacterial isolates against the rRNA_typestrains/16S_ribosomal_RNA 16S ribosomal RNA (Bacteria and Archaea type strains) database, to determine the genus as recommended by GenBank during sequence submission.</em></p> <p><span><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>&ldquo;General script.R&rdquo;. <em>R script of the general statistical analyses produced for publication.</em></p> <p><span><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>&ldquo;General environment.RData&rdquo;.<em> The companion RData (environment) of the above R script.</em></p> <p><span><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>&ldquo;Trait model script.R&rdquo;. <em>R script of the plant trait models produced for publication</em></p> <p><span><span>&middot;<span>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; </span></span></span>&ldquo;Trait model environment.RData&rdquo;. <em>The companion RData (environment) of the above R script.</em></p> <p><strong><em>Acknowledgments:</em></strong></p> <p>The authors thank members of the May Lab (Mai Beauclaire, Em Daily, Mara Demers, Kane Keller, Cedric Ndinga-Muniania, Liam Vertal, Monica Watson) for their help in field and lab work. We thank members of the Healthy Prairies project (Shelby Flint, Anna Peschel, Bill Peterson) who provided much of the infrastructure that made this project possible, as well as help in setting up field experiments. We also thank volunteer undergrads from University of Minnesota Morris (Amelia Nelson, Emily Job, Lily Fulton) for assistance in measuring harvested plants and counting nodules. Funding for this project was provided by the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (LCCMR) Project 00086965, Healthy Prairies.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2024View details →
edi44/100

Dataset for Disturbance: a double-edged sword for restoration in a changing climate: Western Oregon and Washington upland prairies 2019-2020

Data associated with the paper submitted to Restoration Ecology in November 2021: Disturbance: a double-edged sword for restoration in a changing climate Alejandro Brambila1, Paul B. Reed1, Scott D. Bridgham1, Bitty A. Roy1, Bart R. Johnson2, Laurel Pfeifer-Meister1 and Lauren M. Hallett1 1. Institute of Ecology and Evolution, University of Oregon 2. Department of Landscape Architecture, University of Oregon In this project, we used this data to test how fire disturbance, designed to enhance restoration seeding success, combines with climate and initial vegetation conditions to shift perennial versus annual grass dominance and overall community diversity in Pacific Northwest grasslands. We seeded both native and introduced perennial grasses and native forbs in paired, replicated burned-unburned plots in three sites along a latitudinal climate gradient from southern Oregon to Washington. Past restoration and climate manipulations at each site had increased the variation of starting conditions between plots. This data is to be used with the script, full_disturbance_script.R, which can be accessed at https://github.com/HallettLab/hops. Includes the tables: plotkey.csv spkey.csv mixkey.csv vegplot.csv vegplot2020.csv

openCC0Nov 2021View details →
edi44/100

N cycling summary 2020-2022 of annually burned bison, cattle and ungrazed experimental watersheds on upland tallgrass prairie soils at the Konza Prairie Biological Station

Nitrogen (N) is a necessary element of soil fertility and a limiting nutrient in tallgrass prairie but grazers like bison and cattle can also recycle N. Bison and cattle impact the nitrogen (N) cycle by digesting forage that is consumed, and recycled back to the soil in a more available forms stimulating soil microbial N cycling activities. Yet we do not know how both grazers comparatively affect N cycling in tallgrass prairie. Thus, we investigated if bison cattle had similar impacts on N cycling in annually burned tallgrass prairie relative to ungrazed conditions over a 3-year period (2020-2022) at the Konza Prairie Biological Station. We took soil samples to investigate soil data: pH, soil water content, mineralized N, nitrification potential, denitrification potential and extracellular enzyme assays on upland soils of the Florence-Benfield complex soil map during the summer growing season from 2020 to 2022 on bison, cattle and ungrazed experimental watersheds at the Konza Prairie Biological Station. Soil sampling was undertaken once late in each summer growing season from 2020-2022. These years spanned a range of above-average rainfall (2020) to well below average (2021) and slightly below average (2022). We sampled along four 10-m transects, parallel to long-term plant sampling transects in each experimental watershed, in two bison grazed (N1A and N1B), two cattle grazed (C1A and C1B), and two ungrazed (1D and SpB) watersheds, all of which are burned annually.

openCC0Feb 2024View details →
edi44/100

Integrated experimental and techno-economic modeling of renewable natural gas production from prairie biomass

This study coupled experimental and techno-economic modeling to evaluate the economic prospects of utilizing prairie biomass as a feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Anaerobic digestion experiments were performed using 15 lab-scale bioreactors under semi-continuous operation, designed based off a box-Behnken design with three factors. Response variables included biogas and biomethane yields, in addition to numerous digestate physico-chemical characteristics. Statistical models were developed from the experimental data to predict these responses and were subsequently incorporated into a techno-economic model developed in Python using BioSTEAM. In addition to optimizing key anaerobic digestion parameters, four scenarios were evaluated investigating liquid digestate recirculation, as well as methane recovery from the liquid digestate in a two-stage anaerobic digestion process.

openCC (other)May 2025View details →
edi44/100

Prairie manure application impacts on floral abundance, plant growth, plant community structure, insect and spider community abundance and activity density in experimental plots in Ames, Iowa (2021-2022).

This dataset contains results from a two-year field experiment at Iowa State University’s Horticulture Research Station to evaluate the effects of dairy manure application on native prairie plant and insect communities. We established replicated 4 m² plots across two field types, an established tallgrass prairie and a tilled crop field, and applied four manure treatments (weekly, biweekly, once per season, and control) using liquid slurry from a local dairy farm. Plant responses were monitored through weekly measurements of mortality, ground cover, floral abundance, plant height, and visual obstruction. Insect communities were sampled biweekly using vacuum suction for foliage and flower visitors and pitfall traps for ground-dwelling arthropods. Collected insects were identified to order, with Hymenoptera and Carabidae further resolved to family or genus.

openCC (other)Jun 2025View details →
edi44/100

Hydroxycinnamic acid extraction from prairie biomass for enhancing performance in anaerobic digestion, Iowa, 2021-2022.

This dataset contains a series of batch and continuous anaerobic digestion (AD) experiments that document the effects of hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA) extraction as a pretreatment strategy for prairie biomass to enhance methane production and digestion performance. It includes data on chemical composition of raw inputs (prairie biomass, manure, inoculum), including elemental and solids content; methane and biogas yields under various conditions: untreated vs. HCA-treated biomass, co-digestion with manure at different ratios, and operational enhancements such as biochar supplementation and liquid digestate recirculation; digestate characteristics, including pH, ammonia concentration, and total phenolic content, under different treatment and operational scenarios; optimization data for HCA extraction, detailing the influence of temperature and time on HCA yield and lignin removal; and HCA composition data, including cumulative and species-specific yields (ferulic and p-coumaric acids), and acetyl bromide soluble lignin content.

openCC (other)Sep 2025View details →
edi44/100

CGR02 Sweep sampling of Grasshoppers on Konza Prairie LTER watersheds (Reformatted to the ecocomDP Design Pattern)

This data package is formatted as an ecocomDP (Ecological Community Data Pattern). For more information on ecocomDP see https://github.com/EDIorg/ecocomDP. This Level 1 data package was derived from the Level 0 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/knb-lter-knz/29/18. The abstract below was extracted from the Level 0 data package and is included for context: Sweep samples were taken for grasshoppers (Acrididae) at two sites for each of 14 Konza Prairie LTER watersheds. Samples are taken in late July to early August. At each site on each occasion, 10 sets of 20 sweeps (200 sweeps total) are taken. Stored data include for each site on each occasion: total number of each species (all instars combined) collected and total number for each instar for each species (200 sweeps combined).

openCC0Aug 2021View details →
edi44/100

CSM01 Seasonal Summary of Numbers of Small Mammals on 14 LTER Traplines in Prairie Habitats at Konza Prairie (Reformatted to the ecocomDP Design Pattern)

This data package is formatted as an ecocomDP (Ecological Community Data Pattern). For more information on ecocomDP see https://github.com/EDIorg/ecocomDP. This Level 1 data package was derived from the Level 0 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/knb-lter-knz/88/8. The abstract below was extracted from the Level 0 data package and is included for context: Data set contains seasonal summaries (spring and autumn) of the number of individuals of each species of small mammal captured (relative abundance) on each grassland trapline. Each record contains year, season, trapline and number of individuals captured of each species. These live trap records are based on daily captures during two 4-day trapping periods in spring (late February to early April) and autumn (early October to mid-November) for each of 14 permanent traplines established on seven fire-grazing treatments (two traplines per treatment). These seven fire-grazing treatments include three sites that are grazed by bison (1 unburned, 1 annual burn and 1 4-year burn) and four sites that are not grazed by bison (1 unburned, 1 annual burn and 2 4-year burn).

openCC0Aug 2021View details →
edi44/100

[DEPRECATED] CFC01 Kings Creek long-term fish and crayfish community sampling at Konza Prairie (Reformatted to ecocomDP Design Pattern)

This data package has been deprecated due to several issues in the L0 source dataset that prohibits the creation of an L1 ecocomDP dataset. This data package is formatted according to the "ecocomDP", a data package design pattern for ecological community surveys, and data from studies of composition and biodiversity. For more information on the ecocomDP project see https://github.com/EDIorg/ecocomDP/tree/master, or contact EDI https://environmentaldatainitiative.org. This Level 1 data package was derived from the Level 0 data package found here: https://portal.edirepository.org/nis/mapbrowse?scope=knb-lter-knz&identifier=130&revision=4 The abstract below was extracted from the Level 0 data package and is included for context:

openCC0Jul 2021View details →
edi44/100

CBP01 Variable distance line-transect sampling of bird population numbers in different habitats on Konza Prairie (Reformatted to a Darwin Core Archive)

This data package is formatted as a Darwin Core Archive (DwC-A, event core). For more information on Darwin Core see https://www.tdwg.org/standards/dwc/. This Level 2 data package was derived from the Level 1 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/edi/339/2, which was derived from the Level 0 data package found here: https://pasta.lternet.edu/package/metadata/eml/knb-lter-knz/26/11. The abstract below was extracted from the Level 0 data package and is included for context: Records of bird species based on line transect sampling, giving perpendicular distance of sighting from the transect line on 16 separate transects. Bird surveys were conducted 2-4 times per year in January, April, June, and October for a 29-year period from 1981 to 2009. Transects were designed to determine bird communities and population numbers associated with tallgrass prairie habitats with different experimental treatments (fire frequency, grazed by bison vs. ungrazed), riparian habitats on forest edge, and gallery forests dominated by oak woodland.

openCC0Jul 2021View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record