Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 13 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 13. Habitat and habits of Laius spp. A. Type locality (Nusa Dua, Bali, Indonesia) of Laius baliensis sp. nov. and L. satoi Yoshitomi, 2008, three Laius species living sympatrically. B. L. baliensis sp. nov., female. C. L. satoi, male. D. L. asahinai Nakane, 1955 (at Miyake-jima). Photographs by HY.

Fig. 11 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 11. Larva of Laius rodriguesensis sp. nov. A. Maxillae and labium in ventral view. B. Labrum in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views. C. Mandible in dorsal (left) and ventral (right) views.

Fig. 12 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 12. Laius andamanensis sp. nov., ♂, paratype. A. Inner part of fore leg, showing enlarged femur and tibia. B. Antennomere III. C. Aedeagal apex. D. Spinous area (SEM photographs).

Fig. 8 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 8. Male antennomere III of Laius spp. A. Laius baliensis sp. nov. (paratype). B. L. andamanensis sp. nov. (paratype). C. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. (paratype). D. L. maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). E. L. marchei Pic, 1922. F. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. G. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). H. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. I. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype).

Fig. 5 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 5. Dorsal habitus of Laius spp. of ♂ (holotypes A, C, E) and ♀♀ (paratypes B, D, F). A–B. Laius baliensis sp. nov. C–D. L. andamanensis sp. nov. E–F. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 4 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 4. Endophallic sclerites of Laius spp. A. Laius etsukoae Satô, Yoshitomi & Ohbayashi, 2006 (paratype). B. L. flavicornis (Fabricius, 1801). C. L. keiichii Satô, Yoshitomi & Ohbayashi, 2006 (paratype). D. L. lutaoensis Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010 (paratype). E. L. madli Yoshitomi, 2010 (paratype). F. L. miyamotoi Nakane, 1955. G. L. satoi Yoshitomi, 2008. H. L. taiwanus Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010 (paratype). I. L. pankowi Wittmer, 1999.

Fig. 6 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 6. Dorsal habitus of Laius spp. (left: ♂; right: ♀). A. Laius maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). B. L. marchei Pic, 1922. C. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. D. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). E. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. F. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). Scale bars = 1.0 mm.

Fig. 2 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 2. Aedeagus of Laius lutaoensis Yoshitomi & Lee, 2010, showing the terminology and abbreviations for measurement of endophallic structures. A. Aedeagus with extracted endophallus. B. Aedeagus with holding endophallus (from Yoshitomi & Lee 2010). C. Gonoporal piece. D. Ligula.

Fig. 7 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 7. Left antennae of Laius spp. (above: male; below: female). A. Laius baliensis sp. nov. (paratype). B. L. andamanensis sp. nov. (paratype). C. L. rodriguesensis sp. nov. (paratype). D. L. maai Wittmer, 1973 (paratype). E. L. marchei Pic, 1922. F. L. politus Fairmaire, 1880. G. L. sabangensis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype). H. L. sericatus Champion, 1924. I. L. submariniformis Wittmer, 1985 (paratype).

Fig. 1 in Comparative morphology of the endophallic structures of the genus Laius (Coleoptera, Melyridae), with the descriptions of three new species

Fig. 1. Copulation of Laius baliensis sp. nov. A. Endophallus fully engaged with female structures in dorsal view. B. Endophallus fully engaged with female structures in dorsal view, close up. Abbreviations: M = male, F = female.

Fig. 6. G1 in Description of three new species of Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838 from the Lake Victoria region in southern Uganda, East Africa (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae)

Fig. 6. G1, ventral view (A–C) and dorsal view (D–F). A, D. Potamonautes entebbe sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 35 mm, from Entebbe, southern Uganda (NHMUK 1955.11.8.26). – B, E. P. busungwe sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 21.5 mm, from Busungwe Island, Lake Victoria (NHMUK 2017.37). – C, F. P. kantsyore sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 16.8 mm, from Kantsyore Island in the Kagera River, southern Uganda (NHMUK 2017.29). Scale bars: A, D = 2.3 mm; B, E = 3.1 mm; C, F = 3.3 mm.

Fig. 4 in Description of three new species of Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838 from the Lake Victoria region in southern Uganda, East Africa (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae)

Fig. 4. Frontal view of carapace. A. Potamonautes entebbe sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 35 mm, from Entebbe, Lake Victoria, southern Uganda (NHMUK 1955.11.8.26). – B. P. busungwe sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 21.5 mm, from Busungwe Island, Lake Victoria,, southern Uganda (NHMUK 2017.37). – C. P. kantsyore sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 16.8 mm, from Kantsyore Island in the Kagera River, southern Uganda (NHMUK 2017.29). Scale bars: A = 2.34 mm; B = 3.1 mm; C = 3.3 mm. Photographs A–B by Phillip Crabb, NHMUK.

Fig. 3 in Description of three new species of Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838 from the Lake Victoria region in southern Uganda, East Africa (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae)

Fig. 3. Potamonautes kantsyore sp. nov. from Kantsyore Island in the Kagera River, southern Uganda. A–B. Holotype, adult ♂, CW 16.8 mm, (NHMUK 2017.29). A. Whole animal, dorsal view. B. Whole animal, ventral view. C. Paratype, adult ♀, CW 16.1 mm, (NHMUK 2017.33), whole animal, ventral view. Scale bars: A–B = 6.1 mm; C = 6.4 mm.

Fig. 1 in Description of three new species of Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838 from the Lake Victoria region in southern Uganda, East Africa (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae)

Fig. 1. Potamonautes entebbe sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 35 mm, from Entebbe, southern Uganda (NHMUK 1955.11.8.26). A. Whole animal, dorsal view. B. Whole animal, ventral view. Scale bars: 6.3 mm. Photographs by Phillip Crabb, NHMUK.

Fig. 2 in Description of three new species of Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838 from the Lake Victoria region in southern Uganda, East Africa (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae)

Fig. 2. Potamonautes busungwe sp. nov, holotype, adult ♂, CW 15.9 mm, from Busungwe Island, Lake Victoria, southern Uganda (NHMUK 2017.37). A. Whole animal, dorsal view. B. Whole animal, ventral view. Scale bars: 6.3 mm. Photographs by Phillip Crabb, NHMUK.

Fig. 7 in Description of three new species of Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838 from the Lake Victoria region in southern Uganda, East Africa (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae)

Fig. 7. Distribution map showing the known localities of Potamonautes entebbe sp. nov. (black triangle), P. busungwe sp. nov. (black circle) and P. kantsyore sp. nov. (black star) in Uganda, East Africa. For exact localities, see text.

Fig. 5 in Description of three new species of Potamonautes MacLeay, 1838 from the Lake Victoria region in southern Uganda, East Africa (Brachyura: Potamoidea: Potamonautidae)

Fig. 5. Frontal view of left and right chelipeds. A–B. Potamonautes entebbe sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 35 mm, from Entebbe in southern Uganda (NHMUK 1955.11.8.26). – C–D. Potamonautes busungwe sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 21.5 mm, from Entebbe in southern Uganda (NHMUK 2017.37). – E–F. Potamonautes kantsyore sp. nov., holotype, adult ♂, CW 16.8 mm, from Kantsyore Island in the Kagera River in southern Uganda (NHMUK 2017.29). Scale bar: A–B = 2.3 mm; C–D = 3.1 mm; E–F = 3.3 mm. Photographs A–D by Phillip Crabb, NHMUK.

Fig. 10 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 10. Diplopeltoides grandis sp. nov. A. Female anterior end, surface view. B. Female tail. C. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. D. Vulval region. Scale bar = 20 µm.

Fig. 11 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 11. Light microscopy images of anterior ends. A. Diplopeltoides bulbosus (Vitiello, 1972) comb. nov., female, amphid. — B–C. Diplopeltoides grandis sp. nov., holotype, female. B. Amphid. C. Cuticularised plate. Scale bars: A–C = 20 µm.

Fig. 7 in Three new and five known species of Diplopeltoides Gerlach, 1962 (Nematoda, Diplopeltoididae) from Sweden, and a revision of the genus

Fig. 7. Diplopeltoides nudus (Gerlach, 1956). A. Female pharyngeal region, optical median section. B. Vulval region. C. Female tail. D. Male tail. E. Female anterior end, surface view. F. Male anterior end, surface view. Scale bar = 20 µm.