Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
412
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
412 results for “Verification”
Specification and Verification for Unrestricted Algebraic Effects and Handling
<p>This is the supporting data from a paper submission to ICFP24, including the source code and the benchmarks. </p> <p>The benchmark examples can be found in folder "src/demo/".</p>
SV-Benchmarks: Benchmark Set for Software Verification (SV-COMP 2024)
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Formal verification of software architectures with SysADL Studio
<p>This short video demonstrates how to formally verify a software architecture description expressed in the <a href="https://sysadl.imd.ufrn.br">SysADL architectural language</a> using its supporting tool, SysADL Studio.</p>
Data from: The Jive Verification System and its Transformative Impact on Weather Forecasting Operations
<p><span><span>This repository </span><span>contains</span><span> the data used for the analysis </span><span>in</span><span> the paper “</span></span><span><span>The Jive Verification System and its Transformative Impact on Weather Forecasting Operations” Loveday et al. 2024 </span><span>to be </span><span>submitted</span><span> to the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (BAMS). </span></span><span> </span></p>
simulated data for ASSE verification: noise-free and noisy data
<p>Simulation data of an ultralight aircraft.</p> <p>Data *.mat collects in MAT files all flight data and ASSE coefficients for three manoeuvres:</p> <ol> <li>stall: from 10 s to 40 s</li> <li>AoS sweep: from 80 s to 110 s</li> <li>3211 elevator: from 5 s to 40 s</li> </ol> <p>Data *_noise.mat are the same with uncertainty levels described in https://www.mdpi.com/1436482</p>
Adjustable Block Analysis: Actor-based Creation of Block Summaries for Scaling Formal Verification
<p>Software quality assurance becomes more and more popular in modern software development. Fixing bugs early, reduces the cost and increases the quality of the product. Since a great portion of time is needed for debugging, assisting techniques are integrated. Many techniques use formal verification as a basis. Although formal verification is applied with great success to many software development pipelines, the scalability is still a big challenge. In this work, we introduce the concept of the distributed CPAs (configurable program analyses). The core idea is to partition the control flow automaton (CFA) of a given input program in coherent blocks with one entry and one exit node. Workers analyze every block parallely and broadcast new information to every other worker. If a block contains an error location, the block is analyzed backwards from the error location. Whenever the analysis reaches the top of the block, we ask whether other blocks can prove the error location (un)reachable. For this, we can reuse the results of previous verification runs on other blocks. Our approach is easily extensible to support any existing configurable program analysis and additionally allows an easy integration of other concepts, e.g., fault localization. This work shows and explains the implementation of a framework for distributed CPAs in CPAchecker. Furthermore, we perform a thorough evaluation of the approach, showing that our implementation is sound and matches the results of the existing predicate analysis. However, the great amount of transferred data between workers slows down the verification process causing many out-of-memory errors and timeouts. Nonetheless, the evaluation reveals the current bottle-necks and points us to potentially useful and effective improvements.</p> <p>Thesis: https://www.sosy-lab.org/research/msc/2022.Kettl.Adjustable_Block_Analysis.pdf</p>
Distribution Known only from Peninsular Malaysia, including Selangor (Ulu Gombak) and Pahang (Sungai Tekam Forest Reserve, Gunung Benom, and Krau Wildlife Reserve) provinces. Also listed from Fraser's Hill Forest Reserve, Pahang; but this record needs verification. in Vespertilionidae
Distribution Known only from Peninsular Malaysia, including Selangor (Ulu Gombak) and Pahang (Sungai Tekam Forest Reserve, Gunung Benom, and Krau Wildlife Reserve) provinces. Also listed from Fraser's Hill Forest Reserve, Pahang; but this record needs verification.
Distribution. Palestine, S Israel, SWJordan, NE Egypt (Sinai), NE & SC Sudan, W Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and SW Oman; it may occur in SE Egypt, and there is a purported record from C Kenya, but these need verification. in Vespertilionidae
Distribution. Palestine, S Israel, SWJordan, NE Egypt (Sinai), NE & SC Sudan, W Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and SW Oman; it may occur in SE Egypt, and there is a purported record from C Kenya, but these need verification.
Distribution. India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Vietham, Cambodia, Borneo, Java, Lesser Sunda Is (Bali and Lombok), and Philippines; presence in Bangladesh is very likely but needs confirmation. Previous records on Malay Peninsula and Sumatra need further verification as to whether the populations may have disappeared or may have been misidentified. in Molossidae
Distribution. India, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, China, Thailand, Laos, Vietham, Cambodia, Borneo, Java, Lesser Sunda Is (Bali and Lombok), and Philippines; presence in Bangladesh is very likely but needs confirmation. Previous records on Malay Peninsula and Sumatra need further verification as to whether the populations may have disappeared or may have been misidentified.
Distribution. Widely distributed in S Africa (S DR Congo, Angola, Zambia, Malawi, S Tanzania, Mozambique, NE Namibia, N & SE Botswana, Zimbabwe, N South Africa, and Swaziland; isolated records from Ethiopia and Kenya require verification. in Nesomyidae
Distribution. Widely distributed in S Africa (S DR Congo, Angola, Zambia, Malawi, S Tanzania, Mozambique, NE Namibia, N & SE Botswana, Zimbabwe, N South Africa, and Swaziland; isolated records from Ethiopia and Kenya require verification.
Distribution. East African coast from the Rufiji River in SE Tanzania to the Limpopo River in SE Mozambique, also inland in montane areas (e.g. Thyolo Mts of W Malawi) and extending W into Chimanimani, Zimbabwe; a record from Mt Namuli in Mozambique requires verification. in Galagidae
Distribution. East African coast from the Rufiji River in SE Tanzania to the Limpopo River in SE Mozambique, also inland in montane areas (e.g. Thyolo Mts of W Malawi) and extending W into Chimanimani, Zimbabwe; a record from Mt Namuli in Mozambique requires verification.
Distribution. Based on molecular vouchers it occurs in E Zambia, Malawi, and Tanzania; records from N Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and N South Africa lack genetic verification, but are included here. in Muridae
Distribution. Based on molecular vouchers it occurs in E Zambia, Malawi, and Tanzania; records from N Mozambique, Zimbabwe, and N South Africa lack genetic verification, but are included here.
Benchmark for work "Temporal Verification of Mixed Sync-Async Execution Models"
<p>This benchmark is for validation and evaluation purpose for <br> the work "Temporal Verification of Mixed Sync-Async Execution <br> Models". It is constructed by manually annotating ASyncEffs<br> specifications, including both succeeded and failed cases. </p> <p>This benchmark consists two folders:<br> 1. validation_tests: <br> The validation tests are synthetic examples to test <br> the main contributions, including the preemption interleaving computation and <br> the inclusion checking for the parallel composition and the waiting operator. </p> <p>2. evaluation_tests:<br> We select 16 programs, varying from 15 lines to 300 lines, and annotate <br> ASyncEffs specifications<br> with a 1:1 ratio for succeeded/failed cases. </p>
Experiments for 'Sampling-Based Verification of CTMCs with Uncertain Rates'
<p>This artifact accompanies the CAV 2022 paper with the same title. The artifact contains a docker file, which can be unzipped and then loaded with:</p> <pre><code>docker load -i slurf_cav22_docker.tar</code></pre> <p>Please refer to the README for more information.</p>
Automated Verification for Real-Time Systems via Implicit Clocks and an Extended Antimirov Algorithm
<p>This is the artifact for paper</p> <p>"Automated Verification for Real-Time Systems via Implicit Clocks and an Extended Antimirov Algorithm"</p> <p>The latest code can be found in https://github.com/songyahui/Timed_Verification</p> <p>Our benchmark contains three folders:</p> <p>- Validation: We manually annotate TimEffs specifications for a set of synthetic examples (for about 54 programs), to test the main contributions, including: computing effects from symbolic timed programs written in C^t ; and the inclusion checking for TimEffs with the parallel composition, block waiting operator and shared global variables.</p> <p>- Experiment1: For 16 C^t programs, and the annotated temporal specifications are in a 1:1 ratio for succeeded/failed cases. We record the evaluation results in Table 3 in the paper.</p> <p>- Experiment12: comparison with the PAT [16] model checker using real-life Fischer’s mutual exclusion algorithm.</p>
A digital twin model of urban utility tunnels and its application:One-dimensional comparison verification
<div> <div> <div> <div> <div> </div> 重点词汇</div> <div> <div>93<em>/</em>5000</div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div> </div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div>通用场景</div> <div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> <div> <div> <p><span>论文《城市综合管廊数字孪生模型及其应用》中一维综合管廊中天然气浓度分布快速预测模型结果对比</span></p> </div> </div> </div>
The data for the work "Verification of the modified Bixon-Jortner-Plotnikov model by calculating rates of non-adiabatic transitions in aromatic compounds"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Verification Algorithms for Automated Separation Logic Verifiers (Artifact)
<p>This is the artifact for the CAV 2024 paper "Verification Algorithms for Automated Separation Logic Verifiers". For more information, see the description of the artifact in "artifact_overview.pdf". The data in the artifact (minus the implementations of the benchmarked algorithms) can also be found on GitHub: https://github.com/marcoeilers/CAV24-data.</p>
Raw data for the article "Speed up BDD for Safety Verification in Agile Development: A Partially Replicated Controlled Experiment"
<p>This is the raw data for the paper "Speed up BDD for safety verification in Agile development: A partially replicated controlled experiment". </p>
Meshes, volume fractions, and normal vectors for paraboloid fit verification
<p>These datasets are used to verify the results of the paper "A Paraboloid Fitting Technique for Calculating Curvature from Piecewise-Linear Interface Reconstructions on 3D Unstructured Meshes" by Z. Jibben, N. N. Carlson, and M. M. Francois.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.