Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
339
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
339 results for “robotic surgery”
Cost-effectivness of Robot-assisted Surgery Compared to Open Surgery for Partial Nephrectomy in Context of Renal Tumor
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05089006. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 1.
Training Skills in Minimally Invasive, Robotic and Open Surgery: Brain Activation as an Opportunity for Learning
<p>The advantages of the robotic approach in surgery are undisputed. However, during surgical training, how this technique influences the learning curve has not been described. We provide a tentative model for analyzing the learning curves associated with observation and active participation in learning different surgical techniques, using functional imaging. Forty medical students were enrolled and assigned to 4 groups who underwent training in robotic (ROB), laparoscopic (LAP), or open (OPEN) surgery, and a control group that performed motor training without surgical instruments. Surgical/motor training included six 1-h sessions completed over 6 days of the same week. All subjects underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scanning sessions, before and after surgical training during. Twenty-three participants completed the study. The 3 surgical groups exhibited different learning curves during training. The main effects of the day of training (<em>p</em> < 0.01) and the group (<em>p</em> < 0.01) as well as a significant interaction of day of training group (<em>p</em> < 0.01) were observed. The performance increased in the first 4 days, reaching a peak at day 4, when all groups were considered together. The OPEN group showed the best performance compared to all other groups (<em>p</em> < 0.04). The OPEN group showed a rapid improvement in performance, which peaked at day 4 and decreased on the last day. Similarly, the LAP group showed a steady increase in the number of exercises they completed, which continued for the entire training period and reached a peak on the last day. However, the participants training in ROB surgery, after a performance initially indistinguishable from that of the LAP group, had a dip in their performance, quickly followed by an improvement and reaching a plateau on day 4. fMRI analysis documented the different involvement of the cortical and subcortical areas based on the type of training. Surgical training modified the activation of some brain regions during both observation and the execution of tasks. Differences in the learning curves of the 3 surgical groups were noted. Functional brain activity represents an interesting starting point to guide training programs.</p>
Functional Status and Quality of Life in Older Patients Undergoing Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05848609. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Robotic Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Robotic Transabdominal Specimen Extraction Surgery for Early-Stage Rectal Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06405308. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Robotic Emergency General Surgery Program
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07202442. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Early Mobilisation in the Surgical Robot Assisted Spinal Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04133103. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Value of CE-LUS During Robot-assisted Surgery for Primary Colorectal Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02457390. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
IS-001 Injection in Patients Undergoing Robotic-Assisted Gynecological Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05954767. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Robotic Transanal Specimen Extraction Surgery Versus Robotic Transabdominal Incision Specimen Extraction Surgery for Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05468944. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Optimal Positive End-Expiratory Pressure in Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06026670. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Influence of Nociception Level Monitor (NOL) Guided Analgesic Delivery on Robot-assisted Colorectal Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05662371. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Recovery After Robotic Urogynecological Surgery: The Patient's Perspective
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00757432. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Effect of Inspiratory Muscle Training and Respiratory Physiotherapy on Pulmonary Functions, Respiratory Muscle Strength and Functional Capacity in Patients With Robotic Heart Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03636633. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Prospective Evaluation of Cornerstone Robotics Sentire Surgical System in Major Gastrointestinal and Urologic Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06926374. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Transoral Robotic Surgery in Treating Patients With Benign or Malignant Tumors of the Head and Neck
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01473784. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Robot-assisted Spinal Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05388383. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Implementation of a Multimodal Prehabilitation Program in Robotic Oncological Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05671094. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02121249. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Comparison of Robot Assisted Thoracic Surgery With Video Assisted Thoracic Surgery in Case of Lung Cancer
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03152071. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Robotic Versus Video-assisted Lobectomy/Segmentectomy for Lung Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05270616. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.