Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
9,882
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
9,882 results for “Scale”
Fig. 1 in Life-history of the South American darter, Characidium pterostictum (Crenuchidae): evidence for small scale spatial variation in a piedmont stream
Fig. 1. Size frequency distribution (total length, Lt) for Characidium pterostictum in two sampling sites at Lajeado river, southern Brazil (PA, n = 62; PB, n = 188).
Fig. 1 in Identification of the stages of ovarian maturation of the Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi Marini, 1933 (Teleostei: Merlucciidae): advantages and disadvantages of the use of the macroscopic and microscopic scales
Fig. 1. Merluccius hubbsi: area of collection of samples obtained during surveys and the operations of the commercial fishing fleet of Santos and Guarujá in the period from 1996 to 2002.
Fig. 10 in Identification of the stages of ovarian maturation of the Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi Marini, 1933 (Teleostei: Merlucciidae): advantages and disadvantages of the use of the macroscopic and microscopic scales
Fig. 10. Merluccius hubbsi: relative frequency of females by stage of gonadal maturation identified microscopically by class of total lenght (n = 326).
Fig. 2 in Identification of the stages of ovarian maturation of the Argentine hake Merluccius hubbsi Marini, 1933 (Teleostei: Merlucciidae): advantages and disadvantages of the use of the macroscopic and microscopic scales
Fig. 2. Merluccius hubbsi: relative frequency of females by stage of gonadal maturation identified macroscopically by class of total lenght (n = 326).
Figure 6 in Variation in elasmoid fish scale patterns is informative with regard to taxon and swimming mode
Figure 6. Scaled body section of slices (in grey) in the different longitudinal (A, C, and P) and transversal zones (1, 2, and 3). Angles increase from the central areas to the extremes. The lower insets show the transformations between the overall scale consensus shape (reference) and the shapes represented by the extremes of principal component 1 (PC1) (targets; leftmost = -ve PC1 scores; rightmost = +ve PC1 scores; see Fig. 4), which broadly reflect anterior–posterior variation in scale shape.
Figure 4 in Variation in elasmoid fish scale patterns is informative with regard to taxon and swimming mode
Figure 4. First two principal components (PCs) of shape labelled by species. Thin plate spline transformation grids for the extreme points of each PC are shown; these are superimposed on the shapes predicted when the average landmark configuration of all specimens is deformed into that of a hypothetical specimen positioned at the extreme of the PC of interest.
Figure 3 in Variation in elasmoid fish scale patterns is informative with regard to taxon and swimming mode
Figure 3. First two principal components of scale shape. A, labelled by longitudinal zones. B, labelled by transverse zones.
Figure 24. Scale morphology. A, Agalope trimacula. B, Elcysma westwoodi. C, D, Aglaope infausta. E, Formozygaena shibatai. F, Campylotes maculosus. G, Histia flabellicornis ultima. H, Pidorus atratus. I, Cyclosia midama. J, Clelea formosana. K, Heteropan lycaenoides. L in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 24. Scale morphology. A, Agalope trimacula. B, Elcysma westwoodi. C, D, Aglaope infausta. E, Formozygaena shibatai. F, Campylotes maculosus. G, Histia flabellicornis ultima. H, Pidorus atratus. I, Cyclosia midama. J, Clelea formosana. K, Heteropan lycaenoides. L, Trypanophora semihyalina.
Figure 23. Scale morphology. A, B, Adscita statices. C, Inouela formosensis. D, Phauda mimica. E, Callizygaena auratus. F, Callizygaena splendens. G, H, Chalcosiopsis variata. I, Lactura dives. J, K, Himantopteris fuscinervis. L in The phylogenetic relationships of Chalcosiinae (Lepidoptera, Zygaenoidea, Zygaenidae)
Figure 23. Scale morphology. A, B, Adscita statices. C, Inouela formosensis. D, Phauda mimica. E, Callizygaena auratus. F, Callizygaena splendens. G, H, Chalcosiopsis variata. I, Lactura dives. J, K, Himantopteris fuscinervis. L, Anomoetes levis.
Figure 3. Ovoid gastral scales. A in The evolution of the scalation pattern in temnospondyl amphibians
Figure 3. Ovoid gastral scales. A, Branchierpeton amblystomus. Gastral scales articulating in the ventral midline, redrawn after Werneburg (1991). B, Sclerocephalus haeuseri, MB.Am.1302. Gastral scale. C, Trimerorhachis insignis, MCZ 1080. Posterior part of interclavicle with gastral scales in ventral view.
Figure 6. Dorsal scales. A, B in The evolution of the scalation pattern in temnospondyl amphibians
Figure 6. Dorsal scales. A, B, Archegosaurus decheni, MB.Am.273. A, scales of the flanks in the region of the ilium. B, scales of the tail, showing concentric rings and radial striae. C, Sclerocephalus haeuseri, MB.Am.1314. Scales of the tail. D, schematic reconstruction of the arrangement of dorsal scales in Sclerocephalus haeuseri (left), schematic reconstruction of the arrangement of dorsal scales in the sacral region of Archegosaurus decheni (right). E, Eryops megacephalus, MCZ 1539 (cast). Scales of the tail. F, H, Greererpeton burkemorani. F, CMNH 11233. Dorsal scales in external (above) and internal (below) view. G, CMNH 11219. Dorsal scales showing an imbricating pattern.
Figure 5. Rhombic gastral scales. A, B in The evolution of the scalation pattern in temnospondyl amphibians
Figure 5. Rhombic gastral scales. A, B, Platyoposaurus stuckenbergi, PIN 164/1–9. A, isolated gastral scale, probably from the anterior part of the trunk, in anteroventral (left) and anterodorsal view (right). B, isolated gastral scale, probably from the posterior part of the trunk, in anteroventral (left) and anterodorsal view (right). C, D, Sclerocephalus haeuseri, SMNS 90507. C, gastral scales articulating in the ventral midline, ventral view. D, articulating gastral scales in ventral view.
Figure 4. Spindle-shaped gastral scales. A, B in The evolution of the scalation pattern in temnospondyl amphibians
Figure 4. Spindle-shaped gastral scales. A, B, Archegosaurus decheni, MB.Am.289. A, gastral scales in ventral view. B, gastral scales in dorsal view. C, Dendrerpeton sp., MCZ 8779. Two gastral scales in dorsal view plus isolated dorsal scale. D, Eryops megacephalus, MCZ 1738. Gastral scales in dorsal view. E, Plagiosuchus pustuliferus, SMNS 84794. Gastral scales with small, globular osteoderms in dorsal view.
Figure 22. A–E, Chrysometa maitae. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view cleared. C, dorsal view cleared. D, central view. E, caudal view. F–I, Chrysometa levii. F, male habitus. G, male pedipalp ectal view. H, dorsal view. I, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 22. A–E, Chrysometa maitae. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view cleared. C, dorsal view cleared. D, central view. E, caudal view. F–I, Chrysometa levii. F, male habitus. G, male pedipalp ectal view. H, dorsal view. I, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm; except A 1 mm.
Figure 16. Allende puyehuensis. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, first leg mesal view. D–H, epigynum. D, caudal view. E, ventral view. F, lateral view. G, caudal view cleared. H, dorsal view cleared. I, male habitus. J, male frontal view. K–N, male pedipalp. K, dorsal view. L, ectal view. M, conductor detail. N, ventral view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 16. Allende puyehuensis. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, first leg mesal view. D–H, epigynum. D, caudal view. E, ventral view. F, lateral view. G, caudal view cleared. H, dorsal view cleared. I, male habitus. J, male frontal view. K–N, male pedipalp. K, dorsal view. L, ectal view. M, conductor detail. N, ventral view. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 18. Allende longipes. A, C–E, female habitus. B, female frontal view. F, first leg mesal view. G–K, epigynum. G, ventral view. H, vaudal view. I, lateral view. J, caudal view cleared. K, dorsal view cleared. L, male habitus. M, male frontal view. N–Q, male pedipalp. N, dorsal view. O, ventral view. P, ectal view. Q, conductor detail. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 18. Allende longipes. A, C–E, female habitus. B, female frontal view. F, first leg mesal view. G–K, epigynum. G, ventral view. H, vaudal view. I, lateral view. J, caudal view cleared. K, dorsal view cleared. L, male habitus. M, male frontal view. N–Q, male pedipalp. N, dorsal view. O, ventral view. P, ectal view. Q, conductor detail. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 13. Metabus debilis. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 13. Metabus debilis. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 14. Metabus ebanoverde. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 14. Metabus ebanoverde. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 21. Chrysometa acinosa. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–H, male pedipalp. F, ventral view. G, mesal view. H, ectal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 21. Chrysometa acinosa. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–H, male pedipalp. F, ventral view. G, mesal view. H, ectal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm; except A 1 mm.
Figure 12. Metabus ocellatus. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, epigynum ventral view. D, caudal view. E, central view cleared. F, dorsal view cleared. G, male habitus. H, male frontal view. I–L, male pedipalp. I, ectal view. J, ventral view. K, mesal view. L, cleared L. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 12. Metabus ocellatus. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, epigynum ventral view. D, caudal view. E, central view cleared. F, dorsal view cleared. G, male habitus. H, male frontal view. I–L, male pedipalp. I, ectal view. J, ventral view. K, mesal view. L, cleared L. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.